AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Where is my (our) Kuro replacement?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Where is my (our) Kuro replacement? - Page 14

post #391 of 501
Is this old news to the Forum?

Panasonic shuts PDP TV factory

Why spend $1000s to buy another PDP now versus waiting for OLED prices to decline to a similar price point?
post #392 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9179mhb View Post

Is this old news to the Forum?

Panasonic shuts PDP TV factory

Why spend $1000s to buy another PDP now versus waiting for OLED prices to decline to a similar price point?

You know us well, it's completely old news and we've summed it up as having nothing to do with the demise of plasma.
post #393 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9179mhb View Post

Is this old news to the Forum?

Panasonic shuts PDP TV factory

Why spend $1000s to buy another PDP now versus waiting for OLED prices to decline to a similar price point?

Because the only available OLED is $12,000 for a 55", and I doubt the ability to produce sets will satisfy mainstream demand anytime soon, meaning the premium will remain high for the foreseeable future. Just consider how many CES shows have had prototype OLED's, and look at where we are at now without any of them except one actually making it to the sales-floor. Personally I think that it is far more likely that 4K gets market penetration before OLED. Known technology with improved resolution in 4k sets makes more sense from a manufacturing point of view. I am not sure what possibility there is at this point to get the manufacturing process improved enough for the denser pixel count of 4k for OLED's. The other thing, and this is just opinion, but the long-term quality of OLED has not been proven yet. There hasn't been a set on the market long enough to see how they look over the long term. I don't claim to be up-to-date on the latest developments, but in the beginning was there not concerns with OLED having a shorter half-life compared to other technologies ? I'm sure others more knowledgeable than myself will cheerfully correct me biggrin.gif
post #394 of 501
I got a reply from the fellow selling the brand new Sig 141 for $6600 on eBay:

"It has been stored in a dark, dry space (warehouse) I had plans of using it in my house but never got around to it. Like the ads states I will enjoy it for myself if I can't sell it but for now it is up for grabs. I work in the industry and have since the late 80s. - 92gvr4"
post #395 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glashub View Post

I got a reply from the fellow selling the brand new Sig 141 for $6600 on eBay:

"It has been stored in a dark, dry space (warehouse) I had plans of using it in my house but never got around to it. Like the ads states I will enjoy it for myself if I can't sell it but for now it is up for grabs. I work in the industry and have since the late 80s. - 92gvr4"

Are you thinking about buying it?
post #396 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by pred1973 View Post

Because the only available OLED is $12,000 for a 55", and I doubt the ability to produce sets will satisfy mainstream demand anytime soon, meaning the premium will remain high for the foreseeable future. Just consider how many CES shows have had prototype OLED's, and look at where we are at now without any of them except one actually making it to the sales-floor. Personally I think that it is far more likely that 4K gets market penetration before OLED. Known technology with improved resolution in 4k sets makes more sense from a manufacturing point of view. I am not sure what possibility there is at this point to get the manufacturing process improved enough for the denser pixel count of 4k for OLED's. The other thing, and this is just opinion, but the long-term quality of OLED has not been proven yet. There hasn't been a set on the market long enough to see how they look over the long term. I don't claim to be up-to-date on the latest developments, but in the beginning was there not concerns with OLED having a shorter half-life compared to other technologies ? I'm sure others more knowledgeable than myself will cheerfully correct me biggrin.gif

What about all the OLED phones? And for that matter, AMOLED, Super AMOLED, Super AMOLED+ and Super AMOLED++ (coming soon). I had a windows 7 phone for years now with an AMOLED screen (best black levels I've ever seen, which is to say it matched the Kuro in a dark room, bettered it in very bright areas). Wouldn't those be considered "tested" by now via phones in a pseudo osmosis kind of way? Or are they completely different technologies?
post #397 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glashub View Post

I got a reply from the fellow selling the brand new Sig 141 for $6600 on eBay:

"It has been stored in a dark, dry space (warehouse) I had plans of using it in my house but never got around to it. Like the ads states I will enjoy it for myself if I can't sell it but for now it is up for grabs. I work in the industry and have since the late 80s. - 92gvr4"


Heh, so I was pretty close. He bought it at a really good discount, stored it with the knowledge that Kuro's would hold their value for a while and is now trying to unload it for a profit before the ZT comes out.
post #398 of 501
If anyone is interested I am about to list my Pioneer Elite 151. Unit was peoperly broken in at time of purchase and was calibrated by D-Nice. Pickup only at 17202.
post #399 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonyboy View Post

Are you thinking about buying it?

I thought about it but then let it go. Too much could go wrong. What if it showed up with a dead pixel? Does it have a warranty? What if it's DOA? It's sold as-is. It is a 9G and it looks like the ZT might match that. The ZT at about $4200 is looking like a deal. Or I'll stay with my VT and save the $4300 difference for a trip to Tahiti. smile.gif
post #400 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleboyjones View Post

Heh, so I was pretty close. He bought it at a really good discount, stored it with the knowledge that Kuro's would hold their value for a while and is now trying to unload it for a profit before the ZT comes out.

Yes, you were.
post #401 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleboyjones View Post

Heh, so I was pretty close. He bought it at a really good discount, stored it with the knowledge that Kuro's would hold their value for a while and is now trying to unload it for a profit before the ZT comes out.

All that is your interpretation of why he did it. You're a funny guy. smile.gif

Anyway. I would by it if it was 2K or less. I also want a 101 and another 151.
post #402 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by shpankey View Post

What about all the OLED phones? And for that matter, AMOLED, Super AMOLED, Super AMOLED+ and Super AMOLED++ (coming soon). I had a windows 7 phone for years now with an AMOLED screen (best black levels I've ever seen, which is to say it matched the Kuro in a dark room, bettered it in very bright areas). Wouldn't those be considered "tested" by now via phones in a pseudo osmosis kind of way? Or are they completely different technologies?

And yes, you have measured them all over the course of their lifespan and can say that there has been absolutely no degradation of color accuracy or any other change over time ? As phones have the exactly the same lifespan as tv's and spend as many hours as an active display. Like I said in my post, I make no claim as to where the technology is now, but if it was so perfect and easy to produce, we wouldn't see prototypes for the last 4 CES's at least with only one tv making it to market. Like I also said, an expert will be along shortly to cheerfully correct me. biggrin.gif

Not being snarky, its meant to be tongue-in-cheek.
Edited by pred1973 - 2/18/13 at 5:06pm
post #403 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by saprano View Post

All that is your interpretation of why he did it. You're a funny guy. smile.gif



Well one doesn't need to be a genius to figure out why someone in the AV industry would sit on a Kuro for years and then just happens to try and sell it an extremely high price right after the ZT gets announced.
post #404 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by shpankey View Post

What about all the OLED phones? And for that matter, AMOLED, Super AMOLED, Super AMOLED+ and Super AMOLED++ (coming soon). I had a windows 7 phone for years now with an AMOLED screen (best black levels I've ever seen, which is to say it matched the Kuro in a dark room, bettered it in very bright areas). Wouldn't those be considered "tested" by now via phones in a pseudo osmosis kind of way? Or are they completely different technologies?
OLED is relatively easy to manufacture in small screen sizes (around 4-5 inches) but so far has proven very difficult to scale up to screen sizes that people would really want for a TV. Making large displays requires different plants, fabrication methods, etc.
post #405 of 501
This thread reminded me how lucky I was to be able to secure a 9G. It's still gorgeous, and I'll keep it until one of us dies.

I can only imagine how delighted FW-900 owners are with themselves!
post #406 of 501
People spending $6k on a kuro are insane! You could get 2 65vt50's and have $1k left, and wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Idiots!
Edited by yamvmax - 2/19/13 at 8:56am
post #407 of 501
post #408 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by yamvmax View Post

People spending $6k on a kuro are insane! You could get 2 65vt50's and have $1k left, and wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Idiots!

Really ?

No offence man, but that is the most delusional Panasonic fanboy delusional comment that i have ever had the misfortune of reading.

And believe me i have read a few !!!.

Didn't you know that (all) Kuro's (were) sold at a large loss.
post #409 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu03 View Post

Really ?

No offence man, but that is the most delusional Panasonic fanboy delusional comment that i have ever had the misfortune of reading.

And believe me i have read a few !!!.

Didn't you know that (all) Kuro's (were) sold at a large loss.

Yes...REALLY! I'm NOT a Panasonic fanboy..I currently own a Samsung....which REPLACED a kuro. Dnice himself stated the vt50 is an acceptable replacement to his kuro if it failed. Sorry, but kuro FANBOYS might be the worst fanboys i have ever seen for a product.
post #410 of 501
Stu03

I think he's referring to this new in the box Sig 141 for sale for $6600, http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pioneer-Elite-Kuro-Signature-Elite-Signature-PRO-141FD-60-1080p-HD-Plasma-/200897493785?pt=Televisions&hash=item2ec66c7b19.

I've owned 2 Kuros. Loved the 9g but needed a bigger TV. Went shopping for a Kuro and soon discovered that most Kuro owners selling their TV's 4 years later are trying to recoup 80%-100% of their initial investment. No way for a business man like me to justify paying $3500 for a used, no longer manufactured TV, no matter how good it is. And truth be told it's just not that much better than the 65VT50 I paid $2300 for.

Wish I would've popped for a 151fd but they weren't being discounted that much when I went to buy in 2008 and there was a pretty big gap in pricing between the 111fd and the 141fd.
Edited by Glashub - 2/19/13 at 9:39am
post #411 of 501
Yeah well it's a top quality display with components of a very high grade/level, not to mention the best built panel in the biz alongside all Pioneers.

And it's reputation speaks for itself.

I have traced a new 500M replacing a 500A that is being sold. Sitting at an average distance of 5 and a half feet, size isn't a concern at the end of a bed. I kid you not, i wouldn't swap it for anything new of (any) size.
post #412 of 501
Thought i would post a couple of images of my 500A just before it's sold on as an example of the panel showing black with normal (overhead lighting.)

And just a couple of others on untweaked Movie mode, Gamma 3 brightness at +4, just standard SD images.


post #413 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu03 View Post

Really ?

No offence man, but that is the most delusional Panasonic fanboy delusional comment that i have ever had the misfortune of reading.

And believe me i have read a few !!!.

Didn't you know that (all) Kuro's (were) sold at a large loss.



Well spending 6 grand on a TV from a guy on eBay without a warranty isn't exactly a smart move considering the options that are out now and that are coming out in a few months. If you're making 6 grand a day it might not be a big deal, but if you're making closer to 6 grand a month then it is a giant deal.
post #414 of 501
Stu03, doth protesth too much. You win. I hope they let you take it with you.
post #415 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleboyjones View Post

Well spending 6 grand on a TV from a guy on eBay without a warranty isn't exactly a smart move considering the options that are out now and that are coming out in a few months. If you're making 6 grand a day it might not be a big deal, but if you're making closer to 6 grand a month then it is a giant deal.

Options?.

The quality and reliability is undeniable. And if the guy could somehow access the servive menu and double check that the two inbuilt hour meters are a match - then he is on to a winner.
post #416 of 501
RE: this new in the box Sig 141 for sale for $6600, http://www.ebay.com/itm/Pioneer-Elite-Kuro-Signature-Elite-Signature-PRO-141FD-60-1080p-HD-Plasma-/200897493785?pt=Televisions&hash=item2ec66c7b19.

Spoke with Pioneer support...no warranty, all parts must be paid for out of pocket, and replacement panel = $3500.00
post #417 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbleboyjones View Post

The two nightmare scenarios would be....

  • -It arrives and its defective in some way
  • -Th ZT comes out and is equal or a little better in certain areas and you just realized you spent an extra 2 grand for a TV with no warranty



It would be annoying to know that you could buy a VT right now with extra 5 inches, save 4 grand and wait and see what 4 grand get you in a few years.


With that said do not watch this unboxing of PRO-141 video if you don't want to buy biggrin.gif https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwt5xEsdXpA

Haha, I loved how you attached that link to the unboxing. Couldn't resists watching. That's quite a beauty, but the bezel is pretty thick against today's plasmas but I would take it if I would could afford it. smile.gif
post #418 of 501
Home Theater Magazine just published an article about the Kuro I believe yesterday.

"The Pioneer Kuro plasma display broke new ground upon its introduction in 2007 and was quickly hailed by critics and buyers as The Greatest Television Ever Made. Incredibly, as many Home Theater readers know, the Kuro line was phased out by 2010—which proves that just because you make the best, doesn’t mean people will buy it. Manufacturers regularly pay lip service to excellence, but Pioneer delivered—and the market didn’t reward them with sustainable sales numbers.
I spoke with Josh Kairoff, then Pioneer USA’s director of display engineering, to learn more about what made the Kuro so special. First things first, “Kuro” means “black” in Japanese, and the display’s inky blacks—the blackest blacks—were unmatched in the industry. The deeper blacks also yielded superior shadow detail and resolution. While most manufacturers were hell-bent on making the brightest possible displays, Pioneer took the opposite path with Kuro. Originally conceived as a broadcast monitor, Kairoff thinks the Kuro’s image quality was on par with Sony’s $25k professional monitors. The Kuro line was initiated by Pioneer USA, not in Japan, and the Kuro engineering team was drawn from Pioneer’s professional division.

What really made the Kuro different was that the optical filter was directly bonded to the plasma elements instead of the display’s glass, which is the way every other plasma display was made. Kairoff describes the design approach as “akin to putting Carl Zeiss lenses on your camera.” That design innovation required additional engineering time to perfect, which made the Kuro more expensive to manufacture than other plasmas. The engineers were unable to devise cost saving measures that wouldn’t compromise performance. Pioneer’s exit from the TV market wasn’t the end of the Kuro. Panasonic purchased most of the associated patents and technology and lured a significant segment of the Kuro engineering staff."

From the description of the Panasonic ZT60, it really sounds awfully close to the construction of the Kuros. To wit: "This plasma offers what Panasonic calls "Beyond the Reference" level of picture quality. It has the Studio Master Panel to produce “Ultimate” black color, contrast and crisp image edges. The new Studio Master Panel has been developed by a craftsmanship application technique when applying the outer front glass directly to the plasma panel, thus eliminating any gaps which cause picture interference"
AD
post #419 of 501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stu03 View Post

Options?.

Yes Panasonic has some excellent performing plasma's on the market and more coming out soon. I think I'd at least wait for the ZT reviews.

Quote:
The quality and reliability is undeniable.


It’s a $6000 TV sitting in storage for 3 years without a warranty that still needs to be shipped to your home.
post #420 of 501
Yep, and I would insure the heck out of it, insure the purchase price PLUS the shipping, that way even if it arrived DOA the insurance would cover the repair. Plus I'd want some kind of proof of life before it actually shipped, I would figure as I bought it, I want to know it worked before being shipped in order to cover my butt if an insurance claim was necessary.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Plasma Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › Where is my (our) Kuro replacement?