AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Paradigm Studio 100 vs Klipsch Referance RF-7/RF-8 or aperion-audio-verus-grand
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Paradigm Studio 100 vs Klipsch Referance RF-7/RF-8 or aperion-audio-verus-grand

post #1 of 30
Thread Starter 
Right now I have the Pioneer SP-FS51 5.0 set that I got for $230, I wanted to get the new 52's but at nearly double the price and apparently not going on sale like the originals, I decided to just put my towers on a stack of magazines to raise them up a bit and wait. Now I have decided to get something a little better, the pioneers are great and very detailed but a little col and dry sounding, I wouldn't say dark because they have highs but they are a little lifeless? I just got a great deal on a pair of Wharfedale Diamond 10.2's and I really like them but the lack bass punch compared to my Pioneers and my 8" studio monitors and apparently the towers have the same issue, id really like to audition the 10.7's but haven't found a place with them.

So I'm looking for something with larger drivers 6.5" at least.

I know that the RF-7's are great and I have been looking for a place to check them out but are the RF-82's any good? At double the price the RF-7's have to be a different beast all together but could I save some money and get the RF-82's and still enjoy them?? 8" drivers are what I'm looking for, I'm sure id love the 10"ers in the RF-7's but they have to be huge.

I was also looking at the Paradigm monitors but the 7's and 9's are only 5 and 1/2" and don't offer a lot of bass and the 11's are pretty expensive for what they are so I figured there Studio 100's would be better but damn these get expensive fast, thats when I realized that there the same price as the RF-7's.
post #2 of 30
JBL studio 590

http://www.jbl.com/estore/jbl/us/products/Studio-590/STUDIO%20590_JBL_US

Will give you everything you want without the harshness of the klipsch speakers.
post #3 of 30
So your budget is $3000? I just get the feeling that $$$ is a bit of an issue after reading the 1st and 2nd lines of your post.
Aside from that, what do you plan on powering them with?
Out of your 3 choices, the Klipsch are the most efficient and would require the least power to drive but I'm sure you know that already.

Any one of those speakers would be a definite upgrade to what you have now.

Good luck in your decision..
post #4 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay1 View Post

JBL studio 590

http://www.jbl.com/estore/jbl/us/products/Studio-590/STUDIO%20590_JBL_US

Will give you everything you want without the harshness of the klipsch speakers.
Will check out
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yosh70 View Post

So your budget is $3000? I just get the feeling that $$$ is a bit of an issue after reading the 1st and 2nd lines of your post.
Aside from that, what do you plan on powering them with?
Out of your 3 choices, the Klipsch are the most efficient and would require the least power to drive but I'm sure you know that already.

Any one of those speakers would be a definite upgrade to what you have now.

Good luck in your decision..
Id say about $2000, it depends, I also want a Integrated amp and CD player/DAC so what ever I end up getting, right now I'm running my 5.0 with a HK 354 with my Wharfs on the Second zone but only because it's there, I'm going to eventually go 7.1.

I just like value and price is a big consideration (like RF-7 vs RF-82?) and to some extent looks, size is not so much, I'd have to re-arrange if RF-7's just appeared in my room but I'm willing to do that. I got my Pioneers for $120 for the pair when they were $120 ($100 street) a piece, now there $125 each street, but I have always liked my KRK rokit 8's for music better and the Pioneers do there job for gaming and movies. I just don't think they will be that much better to justify trading up.

After reading Steriophiles review on the SP-BS41-LR's I became interested in the Wharfedale Diamond 10.1's and 10.2's and I remembered this new local shop I had been to had them and the owners really cool and does good business so I went there... turns out he has to much Wharfedale stuff on hand and had an open box pair of 10.2's that I got for $275 and they just have so much detail and air its ridiculous. I probably would of went with the 10.1's but he slashed the price on them so much I easily afforded the 10.2's. To bad he doesn't have the 10.6 or 10.7's or I might have gone back and gotten them too and not made this thread lol.

I've always liked music but most of my audiophilia was with headphones, now I've just recently got into it with speakers and the Wharfedales are the first ones that I have heard that sound bigger than the speakers with sound coming from outside the physical cabinets and vocals coming from between or above the 2 speakers (my Pioneers pull this off but as stated with music they just didn't do it for me) and there detail level is approaching my Denon D-5000's. My only complaint would be the bass punch (its a bookshelf what do ya expect) and that the treble, while even in level with the mids and detailed, is very airy and soft and like smooth now I don't want harsh or dry but I'm going to say I wouldn't mind a slightly more forward and dare I say a little faster more aggressive treble, I don't notice this over all the range just with the treble.

So I'm looking for something with a good sound stage and voicing like my wharfs with the corrections stated but with even more clarity and detail, sense I know it's out there now and the bug has bit, but with more bass punch, something I can rock out with and rattle some windows and feel the kick in my chest when I'm not critically listening (my monitors do this about 85% of what I want) but sense it will be the exact same sound and not a different crappy but loud speaker like a boom box or something I will always be able to enjoy the sound.
Edited by ScaryFatKidGT - 1/22/13 at 3:02am
post #5 of 30
Thread Starter 
I type all that and don't get anything? lol jk bump

I liked the KEF Q900's with there 4 8" drivers but 2 out of the 4 are passive and there bass isn't all that great or powerful. The R900's are out of my budget.
post #6 of 30
I have 3 Klipsch RF7IIs across the front. I purchased 3 shipped to me for a really great price. My system sounds excellent for Music/HT. It's used all the time as it is a living room and not a dedicated theatre. If you want Klipsch I would recommend starting out with just left/right (2.0) and add center and surrounds gradually. I've upgraded a few times and when you sell you always lose money so why not start out small BUT something you won't need to upgrade. If you want to know where I purchased from for RF7s just PM me.
post #7 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Browninggold View Post

I have 3 Klipsch RF7IIs across the front. I purchased 3 shipped to me for a really great price. My system sounds excellent for Music/HT. It's used all the time as it is a living room and not a dedicated theatre. If you want Klipsch I would recommend starting out with just left/right (2.0) and add center and surrounds gradually. I've upgraded a few times and when you sell you always lose money so why not start out small BUT something you won't need to upgrade. If you want to know where I purchased from for RF7s just PM me.
How in the heck and why do you have a RF-7 as a center? Any way what other speakers have you had and why do you like the RF-7's? and I am planning on blowing every thing I got on my 2.0 and amp first. That is why I sort of decided to go big or go home on this and not get some mid-grade stuff.
post #8 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post

How in the heck and why do you have a RF-7 as a center?
His TV is pretty high up (see his avatar) and maybe he drops an AT screen in front for movies?
post #9 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post

How in the heck and why do you have a RF-7 as a center? Any way what other speakers have you had and why do you like the RF-7's? and I am planning on blowing every thing I got on my 2.0 and amp first. That is why I sort of decided to go big or go home on this and not get some mid-grade stuff.
I've had JBL, Bose (not the cubes) 633s and 6Ts from Aperion. When I had Aperion I had a 7.1 setup all Aperions. Even with 3 Aperion towers I was missing dialogue. With the Klipsch everything is dynamic and crystal clear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psgcdn View Post

His TV is pretty high up (see his avatar) and maybe he drops an AT screen in front for movies?
psgcdn has it correct...ceiling mounted 55" plasma and AT screen drops down for blu-ray movie night and big game nights with family and friends (when Michigan plays ND) and hopefully Michigan wins biggrin.gif this article is what intrigued me about matching my front stage...
http://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=89614
Almost like the whole thread is a direct question to me...smile.gif except I only have auditioned and owned Aperions prior flagship speakers not their most recent
Edited by Browninggold - 1/24/13 at 6:43am
post #10 of 30
Thread Starter 
Are there any other powerful speakers I should look at? The only 8" towers I have looked at the Klipsch's and Q900's
post #11 of 30
Did you ever check out the JBL 590's?
post #12 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay1 View Post

Did you ever check out the JBL 590's?
Yeah big horn loaded tweeter things? I couldn't really find any reviews on them or a place to listen to them in MN. I found some reviews on the 580's but couldn't really understand if they were saying that they are "rock speakers" (JBL) but sounded good with classical or that they were colored "fun sounding rock speakers" but only passable with other stuff.

Do horns have a very narrow dispersion compared to dome tweeters or not really?
Edited by ScaryFatKidGT - 1/26/13 at 11:46pm
post #13 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay1 View Post

Did you ever check out the JBL 590's?

How long have the 590s been out? I've never heard of them until just now. Cannot find out too much online about them as far as reviews or owners impressions of them. In my previous setups I believe my second upgrade (now on my fourth and last) I owned some bookshelfs made by JBL.
post #14 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post

Yeah big horn loaded tweeter things? I couldn't really find any reviews on them or a place to listen to them in MN. I found some reviews on the 580's but couldn't really understand if they were saying that they are "rock speakers" (JBL) but sounded good with classical or that they were colored "fun sounding rock speakers" but only passable with other stuff.

Do horns have a very narrow dispersion compared to dome tweeters or not really?

That 580 review was pretty positive. The 590 has greater sensitivity and bass capability. The horn controls the directivity of the tweeter down to the 1.5khz crossover point, where it can match the directivity of the woofer giving completely seamless off axis performance (constant directivity). Yes the top end of the tweeter response wont be as good off axis, but this also means the room has less of an effect on sound quality, and all you have to do is toe the speaker in to not have rolled off highs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Browninggold View Post

How long have the 590s been out? I've never heard of them until just now. Cannot find out too much online about them as far as reviews or owners impressions of them. In my previous setups I believe my second upgrade (now on my fourth and last) I owned some bookshelfs made by JBL.

I'm pretty sure they've been out for a full year now. JBL has done a very bad job of marketing, that's for sure. This series (Studio 5) is the first time JBL has brought their high end approach down to a mid-fi line of speakers.
post #15 of 30
Thanks. I think JBL needs a marketing agent. First I have heard from them and I like JBL
post #16 of 30
Thread Starter 
What about the Polk RTiA9? 4x7" drivers

I wish I new of a place to listen to all this stuff
post #17 of 30
Thread Starter 
So the Polks are out unless I can listen to them and hear different but apparently they have a upper mid emphasis on vocals and such that makes them sound bright, I don't think id like that idk mid range is ok but not upper mid lower treble.

Are horns basically just for low sensitivity? I read some reviews on klipsch's and the consensus seems to be they they have great bass (what I'm looking for) but no mid-range, 3 or 4 years ago these would probably be the speaker for me but now that I have learned about mid-range detail is I think I want something more refined and balanced. I listen to mainly rock and metal so I'm not all about the mid-range like classical and jazz but that is still where most of all the little hidden details lie.
post #18 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post

Do horns have a very narrow dispersion compared to dome tweeters or not really?

As a general rule, yes.

Horn speakers are more properly called waveguide speakers.

In principle there a lot of design options with waveguides so it is not written in stone that they have narrow dispersion.

Speakers with narrower dispersion tend to be less dependent on room acoustics for good sound.
post #19 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post


Are horns basically just for low sensitivity?

Horns are generally for high sensitivity. The horn increases sensitivity to electrical power by matching the speaker to the room better than is possible with pure cones or domes.

However, it is easy enough to either make horns have lower sensitivity (cheap magnets) or pad them down with resistors in the crossovers.
post #20 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaryFatKidGT View Post


Are horns basically just for low sensitivity?

Horns are generally for high sensitivity. The horn increases sensitivity to electrical power by matching the speaker to the room better than is possible with pure cones or domes.

However, it is easy enough to either make horns have lower sensitivity (cheap magnets) or pad them down with resistors in the crossovers.

Two short sermons:

(1) Judge equipment by how it works, not how it is made. At your pay grade you will just confuse yourself if you try to play equipment designer. ;-)

(2) Loudspeaker demos are generally worthless because the sound of the speaker is so dependent on the room it is in. Now if you get a free 30 day in-home demo...
post #21 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

As a general rule, yes.

Horn speakers are more properly called waveguide speakers.

In principle there a lot of design options with waveguides so it is not written in stone that they have narrow dispersion.

Speakers with narrower dispersion tend to be less dependent on room acoustics for good sound.
This is what I suspected but haven't really heard of anyone else worrying about this when buying a pair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arnyk View Post

Two short sermons:

(1) Judge equipment by how it works, not how it is made. At your pay grade you will just confuse yourself if you try to play equipment designer. ;-)

(2) Loudspeaker demos are generally worthless because the sound of the speaker is so dependent on the room it is in. Now if you get a free 30 day in-home demo...
Thats why I usually bring my speakers and listen to them and get a feel for the room, or at least how the sound changed, not the best but I can't really audition 5 different speakers in my room :/

Basically the reason I asked is for home theater are the people sitting on the sides going to get descent treble and imaging?
post #22 of 30
Since you are happy with your bookshelf speakers except for the bass punch why not get a nice sub and call it good ?
http://www.svsound.com/subwoofers/cylinder/pc12-nsd#.UQsycHy9KSM
post #23 of 30
This is what I was able to find. They are B stock and listed as only having cosmetic differences. If you are interested in RF7's I would consider these.

http://www.acousticsounddesign.com/core/view_BigProduct.cfm?pid=2004&sc=57

I heard the Polk's RTI A9 at a local shop and they were interesting. I found that they wanted a bit more power than I was expecting. Their bass response was definitely present and rather powerful. I did find that the mids were a little muddy. Im not sure if I would pay $900/ea for them however at 400-500 I think they are pretty good.
post #24 of 30
You can do better on B stock RF7IIs. I purchased 3 for under 28 Benjamin's from a Authorized Klipsch dealer that was shipped to me via freight on pallet. Nothing wrong with the speakers
post #25 of 30
my opinion: studio 100's all the way
but what you need to do is listen to them all and decide on your own. everyone hears things differently and prefers different sounds.
post #26 of 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by WagBoss View Post

my opinion: studio 100's all the way
but what you need to do is listen to them all and decide on your own. everyone hears things differently and prefers different sounds.

Go listen! WagBoss isn't "wrong"..he likes the Paradigm 100's. I didn't like them. I listened to the entire line up 100, 60 and 20's as well as the SE Paradigm line... Didn't like them at all.

However, there are 1000's of Paradigm fans out there... Try the aperion free...then go from there smile.gif
post #27 of 30
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chashint View Post

Since you are happy with your bookshelf speakers except for the bass punch why not get a nice sub and call it good ?
http://www.svsound.com/subwoofers/cylinder/pc12-nsd#.UQsycHy9KSM
Well I have thought about it but a couple of reasons, I'm not super happy with them, they have more treble extension than my pioneers and monitors but they are really laid back I would like a little more upper and mid-treble presence, the mid range detail is outstanding but then the bass isn't very impactful and they don't seem to want to play as loud as my Pioneer towers or my monitors. I was also thinking about powering them with an integrated amp and there only 2.0 with no sub out.
post #28 of 30
When I was shopping for my speakers the Paradigm Studio 100's and the Klipsch RF-83's were two of the three finalists, I went with the RF-83's becasuse the local dealer had a buy one get one sale and I am very satisfied.
Since I got the price break I could not have done any better than I did.
If the price break had not happened and I had chosen the Studio 100's I am confident I would be equally satisfied just poorer.
I don't think you can go wrong with the RF-7's or the Studio 100's, while they are different they are both very good.
post #29 of 30
I have Studio 100's up front(L/R), along with a 690, 40's(sides) and 20's(rear). I've also had a chance to audition the Klipsch.
Both are excellent speakers and I don't think you'd be dissapointed in either. Unless... wink.gif

I found the Klipsch to be less dependent on their amp to get the best sound, than the Paradigm do. I've driven my system with NAD(975), Anthem(MCA50) and Wyred4Sound(mono blocks and MC5).
While listening to the Klipsch, they didn't react as much to different amps, I'm guessing due to their high sensitivity maybe? The two different amps were a pair of ginormous Musical Fidelity mono blocks, as well as a Pioneer(don't recall the model, but it was pre D-class). The only difference noticed was in the dynamics, as the MF's had WAY more power available.

My Paradigms have reacted quite differently to the three amps I've run them with. The NAD was clean, but I thought I could do better switching to an Anthem. The Anthem was better dynamically, but seemed a bit more laid back on the highs, and the deeper lows near my crossover point were less... pronounced. It just didn't control the low end as well. Moving to my current setup, with class D amps all the way around, has made a huge improvement, and I don't see myself changing anything for quite a while.

So, what actually IS my recommendation? Try to listen to them both, even if it means a drive to a store that carries them. Take some music you know really well, as well as a movie or two. Get some ear time with them, then decide. I don't think you'd be unhappy with either, but it does come down to personal preference.

BTW- If found the Paradigms like a big amp; don't rely on the rated specs. Case in point... The 100's are rated at 230w, with a suggested amp range of 15-350w. My NAD had 130w and it was good. The Anthem had 225w and it was better. They're currently running on 500w mono blocks. And they're damn good. tongue.gif
post #30 of 30
I have a pair of Studio 100s v2 (actually trying to sell them on ebay right now local pick up Albany NY). My original plan was to craft a 7.1 set-up out of them. They are a very competent speaker, I was not a big fan of their highs though they did however nail the mid an lower range with authority. I recently bought a 7.1 system comprising of RF-7iis and couldn't be happier. Would be a no brainier to me to go with the RF-7s having the opportunity to listen to them side by side with the Studio 100s on my Lexicon CX-7 amp. However, what floats your boat may be different than mine smile.gif

What I can tell you with certainty: As for the RF-82 vs RF-7 debate, go with the RF-7. You will always have that lingering thought in the back of your head if what you are listening to would have been better on the RF-7. Save your time and money and drop the RF-82 out of contention. I have always wanted RF-7s throughout the years and never wanted to bite the bill. So I ended up spending much more cumulatively on lesser systems from Polk, KEF, Definitive Technology and Paradigm all to bring me back to where I started, the RF-7.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Paradigm Studio 100 vs Klipsch Referance RF-7/RF-8 or aperion-audio-verus-grand