AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD - Page 5

post #121 of 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

biggrin.gif I know I am, in all likelyhood, going far past what I will need, but I don't want to look back and wish I did more. I will still build stuff once this is done, but for other purposes most likely. I want to be able to run this system in the HT for a long time without the desire to change.

Yep, you are doing the right thing. How often have ANY of us bought new gear (or in your guys case built new gear) and said, "damn, I wish I would have spent less, built smaller, cut corners, etc... "

It doesn't work that way. We always want more - so if you can afford it go as absolutely crazy as possible. Love this thread.

Chop, where do you live? You know you have to have a GTG when this is all said and done. smile.gif
post #122 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by carp View Post

Yep, you are doing the right thing. How often have ANY of us bought new gear (or in your guys case built new gear) and said, "damn, I wish I would have spent less, built smaller, cut corners, etc... "

It doesn't work that way. We always want more - so if you can afford it go as absolutely crazy as possible. Love this thread.

Chop, where do you live? You know you have to have a GTG when this is all said and done. smile.gif

Exactly! I am fortunate to have the opportunity to do this now. I would hate to pass it up and not have that opportunity again down the road.

I am in CT. I was just actually talking about that. Once Matt and I get the project finished up, and I can get them set up in the room, I plan to try to hire Mark Seaton to come out and optimize it to my space. We talked about the potential of a GTG the following day once he has finished. I think it would be lots of fun to host some GTGs. We like to entertain and have people around constantly, so the misses is cool right along too!

All that said, I think Andrew's April GTG will be about as good as it gets.
post #123 of 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

You would have been correct....a few days ago biggrin.gif I'm not saying 8 more are showing up this week, but I'm not saying they're not:D

To answer LTD, I now have 16 of the Dayton RSS460 18s. I have 10kw for them now, but will probably double it with two more CV5Ks.

Nooooo... I hate being wrong... tongue.gif

16!

(Competitiveness engage...) *Must take advantage of Chops S.E.O.S.R. mega build and have my hexadeca subs up and running first...*
biggrin.gif

Really sucks I can't accomodate these mega mains in my current 1,500ft^3 space... These will definitely be a top contender for my next planned space. Really looking forward to Scott's build details as well. I know a few others have seen this, but I thought I'd post it up given all of this mega talk!


I literallly will not have any more room to stuff subs in my current space, but with 16 I'll be half way to my pipe dream... These S.E.O.S.R.'s would be a nice stand-in vs the Jubilees in the pic.
post #124 of 576
So who is going to be the first with 17 subs? biggrin.gifbiggrin.gif
post #125 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTD02 View Post

i was kind of think'n the same thing as mr. c. maybe offset baffles could help a little.

the other thing is that tuning frequency. a lot of guys with super systems like the effect of running the mains in more of a full range mode. the high tuning might limit that somewhat. i understand a high tuning for p.a., but not so much for this application. i'm sure you'll get it sorted out...

16 18's... :-)

on the surface, that sounds insane, but even with amps, that whole rig is less than the cost of some single audiophile subwoofers. don't look back...

What type of offset would you think?? Matt and I have talked a bit more, and I am going to do exactly what Tux advised...build multiple piece units so that we can try the different configurations out.

Tuning lower actaully works out too. I can tune at like 35hz and still not give much up in the range a bit higher. I only started high because I just don't know when I would use them lower and in an attemp to maxmize output near the cross point ot the subs.

Absolutely correct on the subs. With all 16 adn 4 CV5ks, I am into it for $6500 total. Another few hundred in wood, mindsp, etc, but nothing substantial. In the end, I would have been able to get two and a half captivators, 3 subms, or two JLs, or similar. Not that my builds are as nice, but they certainly won't lack output or extension.
post #126 of 576
I think the ideal tuning for those drivers with ~5cuft each is right around 35hz, though anywhere from 30-40hz should be good. My thoughts are you want the tuning to be below the crossover to the subs in order to minimize the group delay/phase shift that can sometimes cause trouble with integration. I also think a rolloff with a wide, slowly sloping knee sounds better then one which is sharp/quick even if that one is flatter above.
post #127 of 576
I sure hope one of you builds this mega system. I really do.

I know I'm one to talk but I do have photographic evidence that it not just a "dream" project. wink.giftongue.gifbiggrin.gifcool.gif
post #128 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtg90 View Post

I think the ideal tuning for those drivers with ~5cuft each is right around 35hz, though anywhere from 30-40hz should be good. My thoughts are you want the tuning to be below the crossover to the subs in order to minimize the group delay/phase shift that can sometimes cause trouble with integration. I also think a rolloff with a wide, slowly sloping knee sounds better then one which is sharp/quick even if that one is flatter above.

Agreed. What do you like best for port option to achevie it?? I am gonna start building these cabs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

I sure hope one of you builds this mega system. I really do.

I know I'm one to talk but I do have photographic evidence that it not just a "dream" project. wink.giftongue.gifbiggrin.gifcool.gif

Oh I'm building it tongue.gif

I ordered my SEOS24s last week and put th order in for my 4595 BMS drivers and 16 TD15M today biggrin.gif I was just hashing out the detials here to make sure we have the best shot at success. I can't wait til its all here and I can post pics. Hopefully I will have a prototype at Andrews GTG in April.
post #129 of 576
Are you shooting for the 10cuft volume per dual 15? If that is the case I like the single 10" diameter x 10" long sonotube port out the back or you could do an 8"x8"x8" square port.

What ports options there are up front depend upon what size you are going to make the baffle.
post #130 of 576
There is one other wilder option that depends on if you could fit this in your space. It is basically a take on the Pi cornerhorns. You fire one TD15M forward and the other rearward. The rear firing woofer would be the .5 woofer with a rolloff around 250hz using passive components. The port would also fire into the corner. The front fire would run all the way up to the SEOS24 crossover. This could be done with an MTM config. Of course it would require good 90deg corners.

I really have no idea if this would work but I think it might have potential. There could be issues with cancellations between the front and rear woofers. The benefits could be big...but it might not work. It could be tested with rough test boxes.

As far as tuning, I think MTG's suggestion of 35hz-40hz tune is solid. It should be a little overdamped which is good. I would highpass a few hz below that so excursion is limited.
post #131 of 576
A rear firing woofer would make a false wall that much deeper.
post #132 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtg90 View Post

Are you shooting for the 10cuft volume per dual 15? If that is the case I like the single 10" diameter x 10" long sonotube port out the back or you could do an 8"x8"x8" square port.

What ports options there are up front depend upon what size you are going to make the baffle.

Exactly, just what we've talked about. I think 10" ports out the back are sick!!
post #133 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by coctostan View Post

There is one other wilder option that depends on if you could fit this in your space. It is basically a take on the Pi cornerhorns. You fire one TD15M forward and the other rearward. The rear firing woofer would be the .5 woofer with a rolloff around 250hz using passive components. The port would also fire into the corner. The front fire would run all the way up to the SEOS24 crossover. This could be done with an MTM config. Of course it would require good 90deg corners.

I really have no idea if this would work but I think it might have potential. There could be issues with cancellations between the front and rear woofers. The benefits could be big...but it might not work. It could be tested with rough test boxes.

As far as tuning, I think MTG's suggestion of 35hz-40hz tune is solid. It should be a little overdamped which is good. I would highpass a few hz below that so excursion is limited.

That would be an interesting thing to try out. I think I would try the other options first, and try this as an experiment or contingency. I think I'll run that tune, 5cubes each and a 10" sono out the back of each set of duals. Matt also talked to me about trying angles awya, sort of like the everest does.
post #134 of 576
i agree with the others that the 35hz or a little higher tuning in 5 cubic feet per driver for the td15m is a good choice.
post #135 of 576
Ten ft3^ each for your LCR? That's going to be insane!! Giant port is cool as well. I'm Trying to picture them......... Geeeebus!!!
post #136 of 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFGuy View Post

A rear firing woofer would make a false wall that much deeper.

It would look like this but with one woofer on the front and just one horn:

The reason you would need the woofer on front is that the corner firing woofer should be used only up to about 250hz IIRC.

I don't see why it would add that much to a false wall.
post #137 of 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

Agreed. What do you like best for port option to achevie it?? I am gonna start building these cabs.
Oh I'm building it tongue.gif

I ordered my SEOS24s last week and put th order in for my 4595 BMS drivers and 16 TD15M today biggrin.gif I was just hashing out the detials here to make sure we have the best shot at success. I can't wait til its all here and I can post pics. Hopefully I will have a prototype at Andrews GTG in April.

You mean 4594's, right? Also, I thought you were doing 18 woofers for 9 speakers, did you decide to only do 7?
post #138 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSmithers View Post

You mean 4594's, right? Also, I thought you were doing 18 woofers for 9 speakers, did you decide to only do 7?

Yes I meant 4594s, thank you...didn't even see that typo.

I was loving the idea of 4 18s in each main, but there is enough concern about how the seos24 may measure and what it could mean to me if it dicates a higher xover point. This could make the 18s a problem. If the seos 24s get here and will work with 18s, I may order up a few of them too and try that as well, but for now, I think the 15s are the safest bet. We will be able to test them in vertical and horizontal arrangements and see what works best.
post #139 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian6751 View Post

Ten ft3^ each for your LCR? That's going to be insane!! Giant port is cool as well. I'm Trying to picture them......... Geeeebus!!!

No, no, no....ten cubes per pair, 20 cubes per main. It seems that the feeling is that the TDs will work best in 5 cubes each. The ten cubes will be for the pair on bottom, and ten more for the pair on top. Each will have their own giant 10" port. This way the cabs are fairly modular. A seperate section will be build to house the waveguide so it can suppot the top section and also be able to try offsets. Continuosly modeling though until they arrive. I actually think I like them a bit better in 4 cubes each, so 8 per pair, 16 per main. In 4 cubes per driver, and 1200watts to just the woofers, the 35hz cross...I am seeing about 134db in my model all the way down to about 70hz, high 120s down to 40hz, and pretty usable output all the way down to just below 20hz! It feels like the sweet spot for efficiency, size, excursion control, etc. This would put each main at about 7'5" tall and 2 feet wide biggrin.gif I love it, they will stare out at the audience like they want to eat them! They'd be 20" deep as well. If it seems like they want a touch more airspace, I can stuff them a bit too.
post #140 of 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

Yes I meant 4594s, thank you...didn't even see that typo.

I was loving the idea of 4 18s in each main, but there is enough concern about how the seos24 may measure and what it could mean to me if it dicates a higher xover point. This could make the 18s a problem. If the seos 24s get here and will work with 18s, I may order up a few of them too and try that as well, but for now, I think the 15s are the safest bet. We will be able to test them in vertical and horizontal arrangements and see what works best.

Sorry Chop, I meant quantity of woofers, not size. I thought you were doing 3x with 4 15's apiece, and then 6 more with singles? Did you decide to only go with a 7.x system instead?

I'm just trying to live vicariously through your build, but to do that I need to know how many speakers are present in this scenario!
post #141 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSmithers View Post

Sorry Chop, I meant quantity of woofers, not size. I thought you were doing 3x with 4 15's apiece, and then 6 more with singles? Did you decide to only go with a 7.x system instead?

I'm just trying to live vicariously through your build, but to do that I need to know how many speakers are present in this scenario!

Hahahahahaha...for sure, you gotta have the detials!

I have decided that multiples sets of side surrounds may cause more issues in the soundfiled than benefits. I may experiment once its up and running. If a side surround per row works, tahn I'll do it. Unil then, its just 7.16 biggrin.gif
post #142 of 576
Thread Starter 
I wanted to throw this piece out there too....Matt and I have been discussing it, and really feel that multiple rows of side surrounds will effect the sound field in a negativ way. I am going to build one set of side srruonds for now, but have three rows of seating, with just over 7feet beween them each. Does anyone have solutions for for a situation like this, keeping in mind that I will be building these seos24/TD15 surrounds for rear and sides??
we thought simply mounting them a bit higher and angling down toward the lp might help.
post #143 of 576
This past week I asked if we could get a SEOS-24 shipped here quickly by UPS or DHL, but they said it was too much trouble. They've done it before, but not on these. I'm not sure why that is, but I'll ask them again. It would be nice to get a pair before the pallet arrives.
post #144 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erich H View Post

This past week I asked if we could get a SEOS-24 shipped here quickly by UPS or DHL, but they said it was too much trouble. They've done it before, but not on these. I'm not sure why that is, but I'll ask them again. It would be nice to get a pair before the pallet arrives.

no problem Erich, I appreciate you trying! I have put the order in for almost 20 of the AS TD15M woofers, as we thought these would offer the most flex and ability to try different things depending on how the 24s measure. Thanks for trying smile.gif
post #145 of 576
What's the distance from the wall to the edge of seating positions?
post #146 of 576
Thread Starter 
If I place them directly to the side of the second row, which is being set as the optimum row of seating, the end seat on either side will be about 3 feet from the face of the speaker. The first row is forward about 7' from there and the third row is back about 7'. The ceiling is going to be high enough that I can place them anywhere from ear height to 4 feet above ear height and still have over a foot from the waveguide to the ceiling. The ceiling height in the second row is going to be almost 9.5 ft
post #147 of 576
Thread Starter 
So I have also been looking at some amp options and have one set that I like a lot...wondering what you guys think.

Looking at the Lab Gruppen C series amps.

Mains: Lab c48:4 for the mains woofer sections...up to 1200w x4 (obviously only need three of the channels..seems like a waster, but I really like the lab stuff). The other option, depending on how brave I want to be with excursion and the 48.4, is the 28:4, which will give each woofer section 700w. For the top sections ( 4594 coax), the Lab c10:4, which will give the CDs 250w each)

For the side and rear surrounds, the lab 28:4 will give 400w a piece.

All said and done, my local pro audio installer will give me a nice deal on the Lab stuff and I can be out the door with all three of these for about $6k.

Thoughts??
post #148 of 576
LG group buy?? smile.gif
post #149 of 576
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsloms View Post

LG group buy?? smile.gif[/quote/]

biggrin.gif

I have also looked at the Wyred stuff, per a prior suggestion. It actually doesn't become much more expensive. I could do a similar setup from wyred for under $7k.

Mini mc3 for the horn sections on the mains
MC7...3 channels for front woofer sections and 4 channels to the sides surrounds and rears.

I'd end up with 1140w a piece into the woofer sections of the mains, 550w a piece to the surrounds and almost 250w to each coax in the mains.

This seems right on par with what I will need for power, efficient, and not much more money at $6700. My only concern is that I have never used or even heard any of their gear. I have heard great things about it, but haven't experienced it. I am a firm believer that most amps sound pretty much the same, but my apprehension's still there. I wonder how much energy they would save compared to the labs, and if they would give up anything in terms of performance...??
post #150 of 576
Thread Starter 
Looking at the efficiency ratings, cost , form factor and convenience, I am considering the Labs very closely. They should be nearly as efficient as the wyred amps, have remote on/off, won't take up much more rack space(shich isn't really a concern anyway) and will be less $$ for more power.

Also, I am still open to thoughts on the surrounds. I am getting started on the modular cabs for the mains, and would love to start the surrounds soon too. I just want to try to build them according to placement. Thanks guys!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD