AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD - Page 9

post #241 of 580
YMMV = your mileage may vary

As far as bracing getting in the way that kind of depends on the construction of the bracing and where it is relative to the speaker and listener. Ideally there is nothing between you and the speaker. It would not be good to place a 2x4 directly in the path between the speaker and listener. My corner speakers are slightly forward of the screen and angled. All you see are large black speaker cloth panels that are angled. Just to the inside of each horn is my screen wall framing. I've measured it with and without the screen wall and there is no difference.
post #242 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by coctostan View Post

YMMV = your mileage may vary

As far as bracing getting in the way that kind of depends on the construction of the bracing and where it is relative to the speaker and listener. Ideally there is nothing between you and the speaker. It would not be good to place a 2x4 directly in the path between the speaker and listener. My corner speakers are slightly forward of the screen and angled. All you see are large black speaker cloth panels that are angled. Just to the inside of each horn is my screen wall framing. I've measured it with and without the screen wall and there is no difference.

Thanks for the clarification all...I'm not up on all the acronyms yet biggrin.gif

I wonder how it will work out, I guess only time will tell. I certainly wouldn't want to impede the path of sound directly. I will be hard in my room, and with the width of the screen, to get the speakers corner placement and not have them send the sound toward the outside of the screen frame or any of the framing for that matter. I could certianly make sure there isn't being directly blocked by anything, but the only way to have a purely "clean" path will be with all three behind the screen. I guess we will have to experiment.
post #243 of 580
If you go with a 2.35 screen, you will need to add an Anamorphic lens and slide. So you would be looking at a 3-chip DLP, A-lens and slide. Good match with your audio.
Reply
Reply
post #244 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV Science Sales 5 View Post

If you go with a 2.35 screen, you will need to add an Anamorphic lens and slide. So you would be looking at a 3-chip DLP, A-lens and slide. Good match with your audio.

Yeah, it just kept adding up when I was planning it out. I am strongly considering the Display Development HD5 with a lens and their "veriscope" scaler. It seems like the only real contender at my budget that will do the job. It's specs are 6k lumens uncalibrated. I am planning to go out to see one in the next few weeks once the dealer has it setup.
post #245 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

Thanks for the clarification all...I'm not up on all the acronyms yet biggrin.gif

I wonder how it will work out, I guess only time will tell. I certainly wouldn't want to impede the path of sound directly. I will be hard in my room, and with the width of the screen, to get the speakers corner placement and not have them send the sound toward the outside of the screen frame or any of the framing for that matter. I could certianly make sure there isn't being directly blocked by anything, but the only way to have a purely "clean" path will be with all three behind the screen. I guess we will have to experiment.

It just depends on how you are able to build it. You are going to get reflections off of the screen wall either way. The key is that there is very little directly between the speaker and listeners. Home theaters are always somewhat compromised vs a dedicated music setup without a screen. The compromise can be made so small to not matter though.
post #246 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by coctostan View Post

It just depends on how you are able to build it. You are going to get reflections off of the screen wall either way. The key is that there is very little directly between the speaker and listeners. Home theaters are always somewhat compromised vs a dedicated music setup without a screen. The compromise can be made so small to not matter though.

That's my goal exactly...make the compromise minimal, to the point where I wouldn't really know the difference.
post #247 of 580
Building an AT screen for my system was probably the very best upgrade I have ever done to making the HT experience at home better than your average set up. I would never not use an AT ever again from on.
post #248 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Building an AT screen for my system was probably the very best upgrade I have ever done to making the HT experience at home better than your average set up. I would never not use an AT ever again from on.

+1

A-lens with 2.35 AT screen was my single biggest "theater like" improvement.
post #249 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Simonian View Post

Building an AT screen for my system was probably the very best upgrade I have ever done to making the HT experience at home better than your average set up. I would never not use an AT ever again from on.

That seems to be the concensous with those who have, so it became a must for me when hearing opinions like yours. I know I'm probably splitting hairs on sound with all these little tweaks, but they add up, just like pennies make dollars. A few % improvement with placement, a few % with eq, a few % with pro calibration....all of the sudden, it will be a notable difference...I hope:D
post #250 of 580
Thread Starter 
Well, last night, as I sit here waiting for my gear to show up, I decided to watch a movie with my Sentinels. I got about 10 mins into some music, prior to the movie and my Denon 4520 Shat the bed!! It's fried and I had to return it and won't have a replacement for 7 days mad.gif No HT fun for a week, and no AE woofers shipped yet, supposed to be by the beginning of next week now.
post #251 of 580
That sucks... Well just means you'll have to drink a bit more on St Patties day.
post #252 of 580
eek.gif that really stinks man, I hope the Sentinels had nothing to do with the failure.
post #253 of 580
Chop
Any chance that you had that 4520 plugged into an external amp? Subwoofer or speaker?
Chris
post #254 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtg90 View Post

eek.gif that really stinks man, I hope the Sentinels had nothing to do with the failure.

I wouldn't think so. I have been using it with them for like a month.

Quote:
Originally Posted by countryWV View Post

Chop
Any chance that you had that 4520 plugged into an external amp? Subwoofer or speaker?
Chris

No amps, just plugged into the wall and running the front three channels of the 4520 amps. It just went all crazy.....the speakers started cutting in and out and then I lost volume control. Every time I tried to adjust the volume it would cut out for like 2 secs and when it came back on it played at all different levels. I even tried to turn the volume to minimum and it still played full bore.
post #255 of 580
That's really funky, sounds to me like the built in amps were fine and the failure was in the volume control board. I wonder how it worked fine then just dies all of a sudden like that.

I've had nightmares of equipment failure like that where the volume control stops working and it is stuck playing full volume. Except in my nightmares the power button and unplugging it don't stop it either.
post #256 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtg90 View Post

That's really funky, sounds to me like the built in amps were fine and the failure was in the volume control board. I wonder how it worked fine then just dies all of a sudden like that.

I've had nightmares of equipment failure like that where the volume control stops working and it is stuck playing full volume. Except in my nightmares the power button and unplugging it don't stop it either.

Hahahahaha...that's exactly what it was like...I'm talking to myself going " you got to be f*^&ing kidding, this is not happening!!!" Hit the power switch, killed it and returned it. I stayed up all night worrying. The best part was the kid at geek squad telling me that even though I bought the black tie warranty they would send it out and get back to me with an answer. I almost lost it. The store GM came out and agreed to get me a new one which was cool.
post #257 of 580
Thread Starter 
Good news, the Sentinels are still ok!! I hooked the old 4311 up with an amp and tested them...still sound fantastic
post #258 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

Good news, the Sentinels are still ok!! I hooked the old 4311 up with an amp and tested them...still sound fantastic
Outstanding. Think they're fully broken in now? wink.gif
post #259 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by antisuck View Post

Outstanding. Think they're fully broken in now? wink.gif

LMAO, In all seriousness, they probably aren't even
post #260 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

Good news, the Sentinels are still ok!! I hooked the old 4311 up with an amp and tested them...still sound fantastic

Great news!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChopShop1 View Post

LMAO, In all seriousness, they probably aren't even

Man, could you imagine if that would have happened if you had the SEOSR's up and running.

eek.gif
post #261 of 580
Every home theater junkies worst nightmare! Not for the cost to fix it necessarily, but the wait to get it back. Cool that you have a spare!
post #262 of 580
ChopShop- Did you ever at one point consider going with the Radian 950PB's with perhaps Be diaphragms? I keep reading so much about how awesome the Radians sound compared to other CD's from the likes of B&C, Selenium, JBL and others. With that being said, I know that those BMS CD's you are using will also be top notch, but I can't help but wonder how the Radian 950PB would sound compared to your BMSs'.
post #263 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martycool007 View Post

ChopShop- Did you ever at one point consider going with the Radian 950PB's with perhaps Be diaphragms? I keep reading so much about how awesome the Radians sound compared to other CD's from the likes of B&C, Selenium, JBL and others. With that being said, I know that those BMS CD's you are using will also be top notch, but I can't help but wonder how the Radian 950PB would sound compared to your BMSs'.

I had not. I have no exp with them, nor do I know anyone that could give me any first hand accounts, so I didn't consider them. The BMS won purely based on my ability to talk with folks whose opinions I know and trust with regard to experience with the drivers.
post #264 of 580
I don't think anybody has compared the two, but with GB price, my rough math says the BMS coax is about 1/3 the price of the Radian with Truextent Be phragms. That makes it a pretty easy call IMO since they are both very well regarded and should both outperform titanium and aluminum diaphragms which are the only other choices in large format drivers.
post #265 of 580
I have the BA. Would Truextent be the one to go for a custom 1 inch Be diaphragm? Any others out there with the BA's who'd be interested in a GB for Be 'phragms?
Erich, do you have the exact specs/measurements to size a BE phragm for the BA?
post #266 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajacat View Post

I have the BA. Would Truextent be the one to go for a custom 1 inch Be diaphragm? Any others out there with the BA's who'd be interested in a GB for Be 'phragms?
Erich, do you have the exact specs/measurements to size a BE phragm for the BA?

I associate anything with "Be" as stupid expensive!

Back before this thread was made I had mentioned behind the scenes to Matt, Gorilla and Chop about using the TAD 4003 with the Be diaphram. It's a favorite of Klipsch Jubilee owners who are looking to upgrade their factory CD's.. I thought that would be awesome for Chop's super build...until I found out they run $3K+ each, IIRC.
post #267 of 580
$3000!eek.gif Isn't the diaphragm just a little piece of metal?tongue.gif Certainly the diaphragm alone wouldn't be close to that expensive... I hope? On well...maybe I'll give them a call. Actually, the BA measures quite well but others have said that the coated titanium supposedly imparts a sound of its own. The measurements indicate that it will go both high and low enough to match up well to SEOS 18 and TD15M.
post #268 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajacat View Post

I have the BA. Would Truextent be the one to go for a custom 1 inch Be diaphragm? Any others out there with the BA's who'd be interested in a GB for Be 'phragms?
Erich, do you have the exact specs/measurements to size a BE phragm for the BA?

Truextant currently only offers 2 Be diaphragms... an 8ohm and 16ohm 4" diaphragm that is designed to be OEM level replacement for JBL CDs like 2446, 2447, etc. The Radian 950PB CD works with this model of phragm because it's phragms are interchangeable with those JBL parts.

They have talked about offering 1.75" VC replacement diaphragms (the next most common phragm size), but I'm not sure how far off those models are from reaching the population as finished product... given the BA's 2" diaphragm, I'm not sure how closely or not it complies to the JBL or radian standard... as such, it may be a while before they would offer a drop in replacement for this driver. The Truextant folks are looking for more commercial level interest to move units in volume... the perk for us DIYers is in us using CDs that allow their product offerings to work for us. They are not looking to do this on a small batch run kind of scale that I have seen in my conversations with them before I bought my own phragms...
post #269 of 580
Quote:
Originally Posted by rajacat View Post

$3000!eek.gif Isn't the diaphragm just a little piece of metal?tongue.gif Certainly the diaphragm alone wouldn't be close to that expensive... I hope? On well...maybe I'll give them a call. Actually, the BA measures quite well but others have said that the coated titanium supposedly imparts a sound of its own. The measurements indicate that it will go both high and low enough to match up well to SEOS 18 and TD15M.

I didn't get the full breakdown, but I'm assuming the bulk of the cost was the CD itself.

Let us know what they say, I've never had a chance to compare the cost difference between the diaphrams themselves. Still confident they are not cheap compared to their titanium counterparts.
post #270 of 580
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by popalock View Post

I associate anything with "Be" as stupid expensive!

Back before this thread was made I had mentioned behind the scenes to Matt, Gorilla and Chop about using the TAD 4003 with the Be diaphram. It's a favorite of Klipsch Jubilee owners who are looking to upgrade their factory CD's.. I thought that would be awesome for Chop's super build...until I found out they run $3K+ each, IIRC.

I had to fight myself (I am the cheapest guy I know smile.gif to spring for the BMS, never mind the TAD. I remember you bringing that up though. Dude your thread is taking off, you have a lot going on over there!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DIY Speakers and Subs
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › DIY Speakers and Subs › S.E.O.S.R. MEGA BUILD