After much research I've pretty much narrowed it down to the Marantz NR1603 and the Denon AVR-1713 or AVR-1613. I'll be listening to music and watching shows and movies with a pair of Totem Forest speakers in a 15x13 foot room. I don't like cranking the volume too high so I'm not worried about power. What I am wondering is whether the AVR-1713 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for the upgraded Audyssey, or whether the NR1603 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for its better(?) internal components, keeping mind my 2.0 setup and room size. I have no plans to add speakers so future proofing is not a concern. I do like the looks and low profile of the Marantz but I don't want to pay that much more for looks, I only want to pay for sound quality. Built-in airplay is a must which why I'm not considering the NR1403. Any thoughts?
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Marantz NR1603 vs Denon AVR-1713/AVR-1613 for stereo use.
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
Related Forum Threads
- What would be best AV Receiver for under $1000 Last post on 2/21/13 at 8:12am in Receivers, Amps, and Processors
- Denon 1613 or 1713 (Help) Last post on 2/14/13 at 4:07am in Receivers, Amps, and Processors
- Denon AVR-1713 or AVR-1613 Last post on 10/24/12 at 1:06pm in Receivers, Amps, and Processors
- The **OFFICIAL** Denon AVR-XX13 Model Owner's Thread & FAQ Last post on Today at 2:19 pm in Receivers, Amps, and Processors
- When do the 2013 Denon's come out? Any new features we should expect? Last post on 2/5/13 at 3:39pm in Receivers, Amps, and Processors
Related Articles
-
Denon 2011 and 2012 AVR FAQ, Setup, and Troubleshooting Guide
Edited on 9/13/12
Related Reviews
Marantz NR1603 vs Denon AVR-1713/AVR-1613 for stereo use.
Gear mentioned in this thread:
post #2 of 4
2/15/13 at 7:32am
- darcyb62
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 20 Posts. Joined 11/2010
- Thumbs Up: 10
- Select All Posts By This User
I can't do a comparison to the Denon's but I am currently using the Marantz NR1403 in my fairly small music room with a 2.1 setup. Primary purpose is music but also use it connect my iMac, AppleTV and BluRay player to a TV. It works just fine. I was initially concerned with output but it has more than adequate power to fill the room I'm. I was initially going to go with the 1603 but found the networking stuff to be redundant given that I already had the AppleTV.
post #3 of 4
2/16/13 at 2:34pm
- dta721
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 83 Posts. Joined 1/2013
- Thumbs Up: 11
- Select All Posts By This User
Interesting to find you mentioned all 3 of the AVRs that I actually bought and returned/exchanged
!
I first got the Denon AVR-1613 and intended to keep it, until a week later the 1713 came along, on sale w/ about $30 higher than the 1613 (also on sale from BB). I though I may as well try out the slighter higher power, an added HDMI ...etc. However, having listened to both, I'd say one can go with either model. Both can handle my old Paradigm Performance series 11seMk3 just fine, in my smaller but open at one end to kitchen (12x11) family room.
My only luxury need is to re-use the now-abandoned power amp (Bryston 4BST) that was used with the old non-HDMI Denon avr-3300 to drive these speakers. I don't seem to have this need any more, but it would be nice to re-use it to fully enjoy the speakers.
Today I went window shopping at BB and FS, only to find out FS has the Marantz 1603 (some says designed similar to a Denon 1913) offering what I just need: 2.1 pre-outs, at a sale price of $699 (BB in the US quotes $649 but not avail in BB Can). I could not resist so I brought it home to test it out. If I really need the FR, FL pre-outs, this receiver is perfect.
I'll let you know which one I'll keep, right now inclined to the pricey Marantz if money is no object
?
!I first got the Denon AVR-1613 and intended to keep it, until a week later the 1713 came along, on sale w/ about $30 higher than the 1613 (also on sale from BB). I though I may as well try out the slighter higher power, an added HDMI ...etc. However, having listened to both, I'd say one can go with either model. Both can handle my old Paradigm Performance series 11seMk3 just fine, in my smaller but open at one end to kitchen (12x11) family room.
My only luxury need is to re-use the now-abandoned power amp (Bryston 4BST) that was used with the old non-HDMI Denon avr-3300 to drive these speakers. I don't seem to have this need any more, but it would be nice to re-use it to fully enjoy the speakers.
Today I went window shopping at BB and FS, only to find out FS has the Marantz 1603 (some says designed similar to a Denon 1913) offering what I just need: 2.1 pre-outs, at a sale price of $699 (BB in the US quotes $649 but not avail in BB Can). I could not resist so I brought it home to test it out. If I really need the FR, FL pre-outs, this receiver is perfect.
I'll let you know which one I'll keep, right now inclined to the pricey Marantz if money is no object
?
post #4 of 4
2/18/13 at 8:39am
- dta721
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 83 Posts. Joined 1/2013
- Thumbs Up: 11
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehfz 
After much research I've pretty much narrowed it down to the Marantz NR1603 and the Denon AVR-1713 or AVR-1613. I'll be listening to music and watching shows and movies with a pair of Totem Forest speakers in a 15x13 foot room. I don't like cranking the volume too high so I'm not worried about power. What I am wondering is whether the AVR-1713 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for the upgraded Audyssey, or whether the NR1603 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for its better(?) internal components, keeping mind my 2.0 setup and room size. I have no plans to add speakers so future proofing is not a concern. I do like the looks and low profile of the Marantz but I don't want to pay that much more for looks, I only want to pay for sound quality. Built-in airplay is a must which why I'm not considering the NR1403. Any thoughts?

After much research I've pretty much narrowed it down to the Marantz NR1603 and the Denon AVR-1713 or AVR-1613. I'll be listening to music and watching shows and movies with a pair of Totem Forest speakers in a 15x13 foot room. I don't like cranking the volume too high so I'm not worried about power. What I am wondering is whether the AVR-1713 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for the upgraded Audyssey, or whether the NR1603 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for its better(?) internal components, keeping mind my 2.0 setup and room size. I have no plans to add speakers so future proofing is not a concern. I do like the looks and low profile of the Marantz but I don't want to pay that much more for looks, I only want to pay for sound quality. Built-in airplay is a must which why I'm not considering the NR1403. Any thoughts?
To summarize your needs:
- listening to music and watching shows and movies with a pair of Totem Forest speakers in a 15x13 foot room - a 2.0 setup and room size;
- don't like cranking the volume too high so I'm not worried about power.
Not a need but rather best bang for the buck:
- wondering is whether the AVR-1713 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for the upgraded Audyssey, or whether the NR1603 is worth it over the AVR-1613 for its better(?) internal components.
For your 2.0 setup, I doubt that Audyssey XT (1713) adds any value over the MultiEQ (1613) => go w/ 1613
As for music listening, usually at lower level but requires clarity, I am inclined to the Marantz 1603. Apparently, the 1603 offers better internal audio components (see ref post below) than the 1613.
But here is the kicker: how efficient is the Totem Forest speakers? When its dynamic impedance dips below 4 ohms, can the amp (either 1613 or 1603) perform with ease? You also have the need to watch movie too, correct?
I tested my 1713 with the Super 8 DVD, particularly with the train crash and throughout the movie, then compared with the 1603, it was difficult to be conclusive. Perhaps because I don't have a parallel setup, switching from one to another directly and quickly with a "switch box", then replaying the same scenes, not sure if it is at the same sound level pressure. Even my wife who is pretty much a "bystander" threw in this question: unless it is a blind test, i.e. don't tell me which system is on, it can be a biased opinion ...etc.
Then, one thing is clear: the Marantz 1603 offer 2.1 pre-outs, which is indeed one of "my important requirement", as my tower speakers are not efficient. Hooking the external amp (Bryston 4BST) made a real different, though not very much, about 20% more as quantified by the wife
, it is much closer to a real home theater experience. The sound and sound fields are much deeper, thicker if you will, more impressive throughout the frequency range. Not just movie, simple, pure audio listening is enhanced as my speakers are properly driven.And you may know from an audio/video-phile point of view, a 20% improvement requires 100% or 200% cost to upgrade, exponentially!
There you have it: your requirements may have become something called "scope creep", but in a good way!
Have a good "AV" day!
(source: http://www.avsforum.com/t/1409015/marantz-nr1403-and-nr1603-slim-line-receiver-thread/60#post_22504819)
Return Home
Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
- Marantz NR1603 vs Denon AVR-1713/AVR-1613 for stereo use.
Gear mentioned in this thread:
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Marantz NR1603 vs Denon AVR-1713/AVR-1613 for stereo use.
Currently, there are 1963 Active Users
(500 Members and 1463 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Have You Heard Exotic Audio Cables Improve Sound Quality? 1 second ago
- › New Seagate NAS HDD's 1 second ago
- › Moving and need a new projector 4 seconds ago
- › Onkyo TX-NR818 "official" owner's thread discussion 13 seconds ago
- › Marantz AV8801 Preamp/Processor Official Owner's thread 22 seconds ago
- › Definitive Technology ProCinema Series 600/800/1000 (or 60/80/100)... 1 minute ago
- › Official JVC DLA-RS46 / DLA-X35 owners thread 1 minute ago
- › Comcast DTA, convert to any other input type 1 minute ago
- › best speakers under $500 that look nice, need no sub 2 minutes ago
- › Purchasing screen/PJ... please help (BenQ W1070 vs W1080ST vs... 2 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Sony BDP-S5100 3D Blu-ray Disc Player with Wi-Fi by imagic
- › Yamaha Aventage Blu-ray Player Black - BD-A1020 by foursticks
- › Panasonic DMP-MST60 Smart Network Media Streaming Player with... by amesdp
- › Sonax E-0062-BF Fiji 60-Inch TV Component Bench, Ravenwood Black by DDT0C
- › OPPO BDP-93 Blu-ray Player by KingLeerUK
- › Sony Blu-ray Disc Player - BDP-S790 by wisccheese
- › Samsung BD-C6500 1080p Blu-ray Disc Player by NeonSignedOff
- › Panasonic DMP-BDT220 Integrated Wi-Fi 3D Blu-ray DVD Player by bettzysdaddy
- › Panasonic DMP-BD65 Blu-Ray Disc Player (Black) by dasher123
- › Where's The Wires, LLC Streaming Media/Soundbar Power tool by wheresthewires
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Why is LED light known as long life by Davidsmith001
- › Blu Ray Player Review Contest by Mike Lang
- › Projector Review Contest by Nick Val
- › "List Your Gear to Win Some Gear"... by Nick Val
- › Most Economical Thin Client PC`s from RDP... by RDPThinClients
- › Media Browser 3 Announced by xzener
- › AVS Guide to Media Servers, Part 1 by Scott Wilkinson
- › Join the AVS Team! by Nick Val
- › 25 Top Blu-ray releases for 2012 by Ralph Potts
- › Sony Launches 4k Ultra HD Flat Panel - AVS... by Scott Wilkinson
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Reviews | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About AVS | Join the Community | Advertise | Contact Us
© 2013 AVS is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About AVS | Join the Community | Advertise | Contact Us
© 2013 AVS is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map












