AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › Lets talk AntiCables...;)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lets talk AntiCables...;) - Page 3

post #61 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by beaveav View Post

This thread was ignored for four days before it got its first response.

I liked it better that way.
You don't have to participate now do you?...if it bothers you don't read it...were just having a conversation...wink.gif
post #62 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 View Post

...were just having a conversation...wink.gif
Not really.
post #63 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

Not really.
Sure we are.
post #64 of 268
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire

. "To justify claims of enhanced audio quality, many marketers of high-end speaker cables cite electrical properties such as skin effect, characteristic impedance or resonance; properties which are generally little understood by consumers. None of these have any measurable effect at audio frequencies, though each matters at radio frequencies.[12] Industry experts have disproved the higher quality claims through measurement of the sound systems and through double-blind ABX tests of listeners.[4][13] There is however agreement that the overall resistance of the speaker wire should not be too high.[4]"


Thanks for posting that link that clearly refutes your contention:
Quote:
The point of all of this is that there a subtle differences in cable...I've heard it and 1000's of others have too.
.
post #65 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by kraut View Post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire

. "To justify claims of enhanced audio quality, many marketers of high-end speaker cables cite electrical properties such as skin effect, characteristic impedance or resonance; properties which are generally little understood by consumers. None of these have any measurable effect at audio frequencies, though each matters at radio frequencies.[12] Industry experts have disproved the higher quality claims through measurement of the sound systems and through double-blind ABX tests of listeners.[4][13] There is however agreement that the overall resistance of the speaker wire should not be too high.[4]"


Thanks for posting that link that clearly refutes your contention:
.
Who are these Industry experts and why isn't the test all over the place?...still doesn't prove anything...but the possibility is there.
post #66 of 268
You might try reading some of the reference material in that Wiki link you posted.

http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wire.htm#differences
post #67 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

You might try reading some of the reference material in that Wiki link you posted.

http://www.roger-russell.com/wire/wi#differences
I know all about roger Russell...I've read it many times...and when I posted the link I said it was a fun read...doesn't prove anything...just talks about why wire shouldn't have a different sound...doesnt prove anything...alot of you keep trying to debunk what I'm experienceing but havent proved otherwise....there are more people out there that do hear a difference than not it just hasn't been correctly proven yet....as you said Bislander the stereophile test I posted was flawed well show me a test that wasnt?
post #68 of 268
I guess you missed the parts about testing in the many times you read it. "Gordon Gow's Speaker Wire Listening Test" and "Stereo Review Dares to Tell the Truth".

Meanwhile, I suggest you open your checkbook and start buying all sorts of exotic cables and power cords because they all feature testimonials about how they improve sound. And you'll never know whether you are missing something if you don't try them all out.

Of course, spending on better speakers and room treatments might actually make a difference. But why bother with something so pedestrian as that.
Edited by BIslander - 2/23/13 at 5:59pm
post #69 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

I guess you missed the parts about testing in the many times you read it. "Gordon Gow's Speaker Wire Listening Test" and "Stereo Review Dares to Tell the Truth".
I guess it is all about "belief". If you don't believe those-then they are not true

And if you "believe" that the speaker wire make a difference---then it does
at least to you.

As with most audio "tweaks"-it is ALL about belief-there is no reason to "confuse" them with the truth.

Don't let the power grid switching hit you in the but on the way out.
post #70 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

I guess you missed the parts about testing in the many times you read it. "Gordon Gow's Speaker Wire Listening Test" and "Stereo Review Dares to Tell the Truth".

Meanwhile, I suggest you open your checkbook and start buying all sorts of exotic cables and power cords because they all feature testimonials about how they improve sound. And you'll never know whether you are missing something if you don't try them all out.

Of course, spending on better speakers and room treatments might actually make a difference. But why bother with something so pedestrian as that.

So I gather what you posted is the end all truth about it huh?...and the one thing about the anti cable testimonials is that the majority of people use multi hundreded or multi thousand dollar wire and most are impressed with the much CHEAPER anti cable and hear an IMPROVED difference...smile.gif
post #71 of 268
I know a lot of Bose owners (sorry fellas) who love to praise their cubes!
post #72 of 268
Time for the moderators to close this thread. Past time, actually.
post #73 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIslander View Post

Time for the moderators to close this thread. Past time, actually.
Oh please...my thread was closed on the bluray forum because of threating remarks but I made my case and it was reopened.Just because you can't prove your point doesn't make it invalid...just your opinion...grow up and relax....this is a forum and were discussing cable...yelling for a thread to be closed because of your inability to prove or dissprove a topic is moot....relax and have fun discussing the topic...if you cannot then do not partake in it....thank you...now back on topic.
post #74 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 View Post

...alot of you keep trying to debunk what I'm experienceing...
I don't think anyone here would argue with what you experienced, just your interpretation. Everyone has their own reality, even if it isn't the same reality most of use live in.
Quote:
..there are more people out there that do hear a difference than not...
Now you are getting ridiculous. There is absolutely no evidence for that. The usual argument is that discerning listeners can hear a difference even if the average Joe cannot. That would have been a much better claim to make. At least you could argue that one.
post #75 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colm View Post

I don't think anyone here would argue with what you experienced, just your interpretation. Everyone has their own reality, even if it isn't the same reality most of use live in.
Now you are getting ridiculous. There is absolutely no evidence for that. The usual argument is that discerning listeners can hear a difference even if the average Joe cannot. That would have been a much better claim to make. At least you could argue that one.
I can still argue because you can't tell me there are more people that don't hear a difference than do...this is your opinion and that's OK...one fact is no one in this thread has tried the anti cable and offered there honest opinion...this escapes most on here because of there inability to try something new that there not used to...or disbelieve...smile.gif
post #76 of 268
I think disbelieve is the operative word. The other word that comes to mind is snakeoil...
post #77 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colm View Post

I think disbelieve is the operative word. The other word that comes to mind is snakeoil...
How do you know if you've not tried them in your system?...a few words come to my mind aswell... Ignorance and disbelief.
post #78 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 View Post

How do you know if you've not tried them in your system?
If you don't understand that, I am afraid I cannot explain it to you. How do you know if you have tried them? The problems with the kind of "test" you performed have already been explained to you.
Quote:
Ignorance and disbelief.
Yes, you apparently are ignorant of the physics underlying cable performance and I disbelieve that anticables are audibly superior to the equivalent gauge zip cord.

In any case, this thread is becoming boring. Enjoy your anticables, I'll being enjoying my zip cord.
Edited by Colm - 2/23/13 at 9:03pm
post #79 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 
...and the only way for you to know what the cables will do for your system is to try them
This is perhaps an understandable mistake, but nonetheless is absolutely untrue.
post #80 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 
...maybe I hear things that you cannot...
No, actually. I have and still might hear a difference after swapping cables. But I understand why I have heard a difference, you do not.

The difference between us is not in our hearing ability, but rather in our education. And, perhaps, in our willingness to receive it.
post #81 of 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by josh6113 View Post

I can still argue because you can't tell me there are more people that don't hear a difference than do...this is your opinion and that's OK...one fact is no one in this thread has tried the anti cable and offered there honest opinion...this escapes most on here because of there inability to try something new that there not used to...or disbelieve...smile.gif
I would love to give them a try. There are several sets of GOOD EARS that I work with.

We could setup a BLIND test and see how often we could pick them out.

We would compare against standard 12 ga "tour" type speaker cables. Nothing special at all-except a tougher outer jacket.

We could even do it with score cards and nobody talks during the testing.

If you can't pick them out in a blind test-then there is no difference.

So please send me a pair (or even one and I will be glad to test it.

We will send it right back in the condition it was received.

But I am sure that when it comes back that we could not tell a difference-the excuse would be the "standard"- WELLLLLLL the rest of your system under test was not up to the same quality as the cables-so you can't appreciate the difference until you upgrade the system"

OR "You did not leave the cables in place long enough for them to break in with the new electronics connected-therefore they weren't working as good as they could"--You know-the electrons had not settled in yet.

Or some other excuse. For the hard core believer there will always be an "excuse" why others cannot hear the difference.. But yet THEY are not willing to do blind testing-because it will suspend their "belief" that the cables are better.
post #82 of 268
Thread Starter 
If I had the extra money I would be glad to send you a stereo pair but sadly I do not...I used my taxes for a few goodies...smile.gif..a blind test in itself is flawed...the reasons why are for someone who knows how the brain works to explain. You don't have to be blindfolded...the setup can be behind a screen or curtain with 2 sets of wires hooked into a switch so you can go back and forth rather quickly.People want a blind test because it tips the tables in the non believers favor.Do you listen at home blindfolded?...of course not...there are other ways to test without knowing what is being done...just my 2 cents...smile.gif
post #83 of 268
You seem to have a misconception of blind tests requiring the subject to actually be blindfolded. That may be the case when you visit your local dominatrix but then you have to have one of those ball gags.
post #84 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

You seem to have a misconception of blind tests requiring the subject to actually be blindfolded. That may be the case when you visit your local dominatrix but then you have to have one of those ball gags.
You don't have to be blindfolded...and your the second person in this thread to reference porn...why is that?...anyway back on topic.
post #85 of 268
Since when are relations between two consenting adults, porn?

Btw, how do you feel about women playing with men in symphonies and orchestras?
post #86 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

Since when are relations between two consenting adults, porn?

Btw, how do you feel about women playing with men in symphonies and orchestras?
A blind test with cable has nothing to do with dominatrix...you getting way off topic...stick with the topic please...if you want to talk about something else send me a P.M....thanks
post #87 of 268
Quote:
If I had the extra money I would be glad to send you a stereo pair but sadly I do not...I used my taxes for a few goodies.....a blind test in itself is flawed...the reasons why are for someone who knows how the brain works to explain. You don't have to be blindfolded...the setup can be behind a screen or curtain with 2 sets of wires hooked into a switch so you can go back and forth rather quickly.People want a blind test because it tips the tables in the non believers favor.Do you listen at home blindfolded?...of course not...there are other ways to test without knowing what is being done...just my 2 cents..
If someone offers you two cents for it, take it. You will definitely be getting the better of the deal.
post #88 of 268
It was a joke son but the part about your feelings regarding the influx of women in orchestras and such was serious.
post #89 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnarus View Post

If someone offers you two cents for it, take it. You will definitely be getting the better of the deal.
The 2 cents remark means my opinion...I'm not selling anything...your post is weird
post #90 of 268
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chu Gai View Post

It was a joke son but the part about your feelings regarding the influx of women in orchestras and such was serious.
?...I didn't offer any fellings about women in an orchestra... That was your reference... Again your off topic...send me a P.M. if you want to have an off topic debate...stay on topic please...thank you
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Audio theory, Setup and Chat
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Audio theory, Setup and Chat › Lets talk AntiCables...;)