AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official LG 84LM9600 (Ultra HD 4K) Owners' Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official LG 84LM9600 (Ultra HD 4K) Owners' Thread - Page 2

post #31 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

Can any of the owners here let me know what the width and depth of the stand are?

Thanks.smile.gif

Stand Dimensions

36" W x 15.5" D and I'd say the bottom of the panel is 4" off the deck. I've wall mounted my set (and had planned to post some details on that) so I have an "extra" stand. Note that the panel does pivot plus or minus maybe 10+ degrees (again just a guess but roughly).

There was no real wobble that I noticed in the set on its stand at the local showroom. My room is 19' x 19' and the 20' span is supported (improperly) single 2x10s on 12" centers. A couple of years ago when my (then) 300 pound plus brother brought his Connect over... Well... a trampoline comes to mind. The floor deflects a serious 4" and items around the periphery angled inches off the walls. It was scary. Needless to say there is now a temporary lolly column and a brace in the basement across the underside of the room. A more permanent solution is on some ToDo list somewhere.

The point is... this panel on the stand would had I had it then have toppled over! It is heavy and would have destroyed itself let alone anything in its way. For me, the wall mounting is a much better place for it. Now I am sure that none of you have the floor issue like I did/do. I wish that I had some high-speed photography. It would have gone viral.

Oh, and the nice component cabinet that the store has theirs on is listed at like $3000! I decided to save the bucks for an AVR upgrade or something. Besides, if you are a renter, you pay for square footage, the wall space is FREE! smile.gif

Bruce
post #32 of 436
Thread Starter 
3D Experience

So we finally picked up the 3D version of Avatar having heard that it is sort of reference 3D content. We didn't have any 3D to watch to this point. I had verified the 3D capability of this 84LM9600 with the built-in 2D-to-3D but, frankly, that simulation tries hard but the results are really disconcerting. We just needed something filmed for 3D to check it out.

I had not been a fan of 3D. I had chuckled at it as the industry seemed to want to force it upon us searching for something they can charge us more for. We went to see Avatar in 3D when it came out in the theaters and afterwards I remember questioning whether the 3D really enhanced our experience or not. I recall saying that it would be interesting to watch the feature in 2D perhaps to help with that question. I still haven't seen it in 2D though. Back then I had said that the 3D was interesting and that we didn't need it and I certainly wouldn't buy a 3D panel for the house. I am still of that mindset.

Now I have this sweet 4K panel and like most other panels the 3D is there. Well last night we watched Avatar in 3D in the comfort of our own home. I was concerned when we were sitting down that my wife might complain and punt. When we tried 3D on other panels in the showroom, she had complained that it hurt, that it was giving her a headache and I had felt that she was close to saying that she wouldn't watch anything like that.

Now to be fair she did only try on some active 3D glasses; The demo was on a 1080p set; She was standing probably too close to the screen at that point; And, the content I think was converted to 3D. It was not filmed for 3D.

Okay so last night. I think she said "Oh! Wow!" maybe 6 or 7 times through the movie. Afterwards she declared that the experience "was a lot more comfortable than she thought it was going to be". And now I'd bet that when we sit down to watch Avatar again she won't want to bother in 2D. So what made the difference?

First I think being in your own home starts you out at a level of comfort. Secondly, there isn't the sales situation hanging over your head. I mean, we have made the investment and so you are watching now for your entertainment and not trying to find excuses to help protect your life savings from vulture sales people. It sounds silly but can bias you to some extent.

More importantly I can't say enough about the 3D experience with passive glasses on a 4K panel. It gives you a full brightness 1080p image. You are not time-sharing pixels between eyes! The glasses are light weight (and inexpensive). You do not have to worry about batteries or synchronizing the glasses with the panel. There is absolutely no flicker!

Except for a couple of moments early in the movie where I felt that I needed to reset my eyes, the 3D was seamless. From what I remember it was every bit as good as that in the theater. It was a very positive experience. I will be looking to get additional 3D content now.

So I think there were a couple of scenes in the movie where they had to simulate the 3D. I am not sure. Most of the movie had a continuous depth to it. That is very nice. There were a couple of times where I think the depth became layered. I don't blame them if they had to do that. Those were very minor and brief scenes. I bet they made the trade-off for plot which is probably the way it should be. All in all though... very nice!!

I believe that Prometheus was shot for 3D. I'll have to get that one. I tend toward science fiction and action films. Any others that any of you would recommend for 3D? This LG 84LM9600 is 3D heaven!

I did skip over telling you all about how I had to rewire so we could watch 3D and that we had to compromise with Neo-6 audio. All because my Pioneer VSX-21TXH's HDMI is not compatible with 3D (and 4K). The Oppo dual HDMI outputs won't run at different HDMI levels and so the Split A/V mode would not send audio to the AVR that my AVR would accept. I couldn't get the lossless HD audio stream to the AVR using the Oppo optical out (had lip sync issues with that as well) and the analog 7.7 outputs... the AVR only accepted 5.1 input and I figure there would be sync issues with that as well. So long story short, I am looking now to upgrade the AVR.

But the 3D video from the monster panel! Really cool!

Bruce
post #33 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

Stand Dimensions

36" W x 15.5" D and I'd say the bottom of the panel is 4" off the deck. I've wall mounted my set (and had planned to post some details on that) so I have an "extra" stand. Note that the panel does pivot plus or minus maybe 10+ degrees (again just a guess but roughly).

There was no real wobble that I noticed in the set on its stand at the local showroom. My room is 19' x 19' and the 20' span is supported (improperly) single 2x10s on 12" centers. A couple of years ago when my (then) 300 pound plus brother brought his Connect over... Well... a trampoline comes to mind. The floor deflects a serious 4" and items around the periphery angled inches off the walls. It was scary. Needless to say there is now a temporary lolly column and a brace in the basement across the underside of the room. A more permanent solution is on some ToDo list somewhere.

The point is... this panel on the stand would had I had it then have toppled over! It is heavy and would have destroyed itself let alone anything in its way. For me, the wall mounting is a much better place for it. Now I am sure that none of you have the floor issue like I did/do. I wish that I had some high-speed photography. It would have gone viral.

Oh, and the nice component cabinet that the store has theirs on is listed at like $3000! I decided to save the bucks for an AVR upgrade or something. Besides, if you are a renter, you pay for square footage, the wall space is FREE! smile.gif

Bruce

Thanks for your very helpful info.wink.gif

The room where the TV will be in has a concrete flooring with carpeting on top of that. I checked the TV stand and it's level front to back and side to side, so I should be good there. On a level surface does the TV have a risk of toppling forward, or is it pretty stable?
post #34 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

3D Experience

So we finally picked up the 3D version of Avatar having heard that it is sort of reference 3D content. We didn't have any 3D to watch to this point. I had verified the 3D capability of this 84LM9600 with the built-in 2D-to-3D but, frankly, that simulation tries hard but the results are really disconcerting. We just needed something filmed for 3D to check it out.

I had not been a fan of 3D. I had chuckled at it as the industry seemed to want to force it upon us searching for something they can charge us more for. We went to see Avatar in 3D when it came out in the theaters and afterwards I remember questioning whether the 3D really enhanced our experience or not. I recall saying that it would be interesting to watch the feature in 2D perhaps to help with that question. I still haven't seen it in 2D though. Back then I had said that the 3D was interesting and that we didn't need it and I certainly wouldn't buy a 3D panel for the house. I am still of that mindset.

Now I have this sweet 4K panel and like most other panels the 3D is there. Well last night we watched Avatar in 3D in the comfort of our own home. I was concerned when we were sitting down that my wife might complain and punt. When we tried 3D on other panels in the showroom, she had complained that it hurt, that it was giving her a headache and I had felt that she was close to saying that she wouldn't watch anything like that.

Now to be fair she did only try on some active 3D glasses; The demo was on a 1080p set; She was standing probably too close to the screen at that point; And, the content I think was converted to 3D. It was not filmed for 3D.

Okay so last night. I think she said "Oh! Wow!" maybe 6 or 7 times through the movie. Afterwards she declared that the experience "was a lot more comfortable than she thought it was going to be". And now I'd bet that when we sit down to watch Avatar again she won't want to bother in 2D. So what made the difference?

First I think being in your own home starts you out at a level of comfort. Secondly, there isn't the sales situation hanging over your head. I mean, we have made the investment and so you are watching now for your entertainment and not trying to find excuses to help protect your life savings from vulture sales people. It sounds silly but can bias you to some extent.

More importantly I can't say enough about the 3D experience with passive glasses on a 4K panel. It gives you a full brightness 1080p image. You are not time-sharing pixels between eyes! The glasses are light weight (and inexpensive). You do not have to worry about batteries or synchronizing the glasses with the panel. There is absolutely no flicker!

Except for a couple of moments early in the movie where I felt that I needed to reset my eyes, the 3D was seamless. From what I remember it was every bit as good as that in the theater. It was a very positive experience. I will be looking to get additional 3D content now.

So I think there were a couple of scenes in the movie where they had to simulate the 3D. I am not sure. Most of the movie had a continuous depth to it. That is very nice. There were a couple of times where I think the depth became layered. I don't blame them if they had to do that. Those were very minor and brief scenes. I bet they made the trade-off for plot which is probably the way it should be. All in all though... very nice!!

I believe that Prometheus was shot for 3D. I'll have to get that one. I tend toward science fiction and action films. Any others that any of you would recommend for 3D? This LG 84LM9600 is 3D heaven!

I did skip over telling you all about how I had to rewire so we could watch 3D and that we had to compromise with Neo-6 audio. All because my Pioneer VSX-21TXH's HDMI is not compatible with 3D (and 4K). The Oppo dual HDMI outputs won't run at different HDMI levels and so the Split A/V mode would not send audio to the AVR that my AVR would accept. I couldn't get the lossless HD audio stream to the AVR using the Oppo optical out (had lip sync issues with that as well) and the analog 7.7 outputs... the AVR only accepted 5.1 input and I figure there would be sync issues with that as well. So long story short, I am looking now to upgrade the AVR.

But the 3D video from the monster panel! Really cool!

Bruce

Thanks for your in depth impressions of this TV's 3D capabilities. The full resolution passive 3D this TV offers is one of the main reasons I'm getting one. And if I don't have the audio sync issues, I'll be good to go!smile.gif
post #35 of 436
I curious, is the bezel on this TV plastic or aluminum?
post #36 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

On a level surface does the TV have a risk of toppling forward, or is it pretty stable?

It seemed pretty stable with the one in the showroom. The set is pretty heavy and so the cabinet it sits on had better be well built. I'd bet that it is just fine on the stand.

To another question... it's hard to tell. I think the outer chrome frame is metal. The black bezel might be plastic. It presents well that's for sure.
post #37 of 436
Great to know that the TV on its stand (on a level surface of course) is pretty stable.

The reason I was curious about the bezel is because from a few reviews on the European model (84LM960V), they state that the bezel is brushed aluminum. And it's interesting that the European model bezel is all silver and the North American and Korean model is black front with silver edge. If the European models bezel is indeed metal, it would be very odd if the North American model is plastic.
post #38 of 436
Can anone comment on the backlight?

The set is edge-lit and there are reports of some backlight banding in really pastel scenes. Is this true of the Sony unit as well? I mean for $8k more I dont need the media server, tablet and side speakers that Sony adds to the set.

Thanks
post #39 of 436
There was some slight uniformity issues mention in the Sony review, despite supposedly being hand inspect for such defects. I would assume the LG is inspected in a similar way also, for the huge price tag. The LG sourced panels are edge lit with dimming. IGZO technology should make it less of an issue, as it should require even less back-lighting. AOU has a 65" 4K IGZO panel that should start showing up in the Chinese brands soon. Once Sony picks which interface to use to transmit 4K on the PS4, most likely HDMI 2.0 or they could go with the current DisplayPort 2.0 interface that is already capable of 4K@60fps.
post #40 of 436
Thread Starter 
If you are looking for it you can notice some effects related to the edge lighting. While you wish it wasn't there I would have to say that you really have to know what you are looking for. I have been leaving the LED Dimming set to LOW which is what is recommended for movies and that might make some things more obvious.

An interesting effect occurs with the Oppo screen saver (the word "Oppo" in pong motion with white on black background). As the word Oppo crosses mid screen it momentarily dims. I suspect that this is a crossover point where the edge lighting shifts say from the top edge to the bottom. One edge dims out and the other dims up but it is not quite enough to hold the brightness across the center. The other is the DirecTV screen saver with the bright logo ponging around. With this you can detect a slight lighter haze appear near the edge as the logo approaches.

With a pastel scene you can notice a slight white haze appear at the closer edge above or below a bright white object somewhere in the middle of the scene.

So I can see where this is a reasonable complaint but in my opinion it is a fair trade-off in order to have the panel size and 4K resolution at this point. My understanding is that the Sony is using the same glass. It is edge lit as well and should have all the same effects in similar modes and situations.
post #41 of 436
Are you not seeing any vertical banding?
post #42 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS View Post

Can anone comment on the backlight?

The set is edge-lit and there are reports of some backlight banding in really pastel scenes. Is this true of the Sony unit as well? I mean for $8k more I dont need the media server, tablet and side speakers that Sony adds to the set.

Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS View Post

Are you not seeing any vertical banding?

I hope this isn't a super obvious thing when watching Blu-ray's and HD satellite. I want to enjoy the show, not be presented with various artifacts detracting from that.

On another subject, do you have your TV in a surround sound setup? And if so, have you experienced any audio sync issues?
post #43 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

3D Experience

So we finally picked up the 3D version of Avatar having heard that it is sort of reference 3D content. We didn't have any 3D to watch to this point. I had verified the 3D capability of this 84LM9600 with the built-in 2D-to-3D but, frankly, that simulation tries hard but the results are really disconcerting. We just needed something filmed for 3D to check it out.

I had not been a fan of 3D. I had chuckled at it as the industry seemed to want to force it upon us searching for something they can charge us more for. We went to see Avatar in 3D when it came out in the theaters and afterwards I remember questioning whether the 3D really enhanced our experience or not. I recall saying that it would be interesting to watch the feature in 2D perhaps to help with that question. I still haven't seen it in 2D though. Back then I had said that the 3D was interesting and that we didn't need it and I certainly wouldn't buy a 3D panel for the house. I am still of that mindset.

Now I have this sweet 4K panel and like most other panels the 3D is there. Well last night we watched Avatar in 3D in the comfort of our own home. I was concerned when we were sitting down that my wife might complain and punt. When we tried 3D on other panels in the showroom, she had complained that it hurt, that it was giving her a headache and I had felt that she was close to saying that she wouldn't watch anything like that.

Now to be fair she did only try on some active 3D glasses; The demo was on a 1080p set; She was standing probably too close to the screen at that point; And, the content I think was converted to 3D. It was not filmed for 3D.

Okay so last night. I think she said "Oh! Wow!" maybe 6 or 7 times through the movie. Afterwards she declared that the experience "was a lot more comfortable than she thought it was going to be". And now I'd bet that when we sit down to watch Avatar again she won't want to bother in 2D. So what made the difference?

First I think being in your own home starts you out at a level of comfort. Secondly, there isn't the sales situation hanging over your head. I mean, we have made the investment and so you are watching now for your entertainment and not trying to find excuses to help protect your life savings from vulture sales people. It sounds silly but can bias you to some extent.

More importantly I can't say enough about the 3D experience with passive glasses on a 4K panel. It gives you a full brightness 1080p image. You are not time-sharing pixels between eyes! The glasses are light weight (and inexpensive). You do not have to worry about batteries or synchronizing the glasses with the panel. There is absolutely no flicker!

Except for a couple of moments early in the movie where I felt that I needed to reset my eyes, the 3D was seamless. From what I remember it was every bit as good as that in the theater. It was a very positive experience. I will be looking to get additional 3D content now.

So I think there were a couple of scenes in the movie where they had to simulate the 3D. I am not sure. Most of the movie had a continuous depth to it. That is very nice. There were a couple of times where I think the depth became layered. I don't blame them if they had to do that. Those were very minor and brief scenes. I bet they made the trade-off for plot which is probably the way it should be. All in all though... very nice!!

I believe that Prometheus was shot for 3D. I'll have to get that one. I tend toward science fiction and action films. Any others that any of you would recommend for 3D? This LG 84LM9600 is 3D heaven!

I did skip over telling you all about how I had to rewire so we could watch 3D and that we had to compromise with Neo-6 audio. All because my Pioneer VSX-21TXH's HDMI is not compatible with 3D (and 4K). The Oppo dual HDMI outputs won't run at different HDMI levels and so the Split A/V mode would not send audio to the AVR that my AVR would accept. I couldn't get the lossless HD audio stream to the AVR using the Oppo optical out (had lip sync issues with that as well) and the analog 7.7 outputs... the AVR only accepted 5.1 input and I figure there would be sync issues with that as well. So long story short, I am looking now to upgrade the AVR.

But the 3D video from the monster panel! Really cool!

Bruce

I agree with you on the 3D same experience through and through. I do have avatar 3D and prometheus 3D and I like Prometheus better for the 3D mode from my Oppo BDP-103. The comfort of the 3D glasses are above on another level compared to my Panasonic active 3D glasses in my other room.
post #44 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS View Post

Are you not seeing any vertical banding?

No. Not really.

None of these effects have in any way detracted from the quality during any movie in my opinion. You have to be really picky and really watch to see anything and even then you are not sure that you see it. When the back lighting is obvious is when you are walking left and right through the scenes menu in pause on Roku. And then only when you have LED dimming set to LOW.

Most of the time when the screen goes black and a title is displayed or credits start to role, I am impressed with how black it is. Of course this is not an 84" 4K plasma panel.
post #45 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post


I hope this isn't a super obvious thing when watching Blu-ray's and HD satellite. I want to enjoy the show, not be presented with various artifacts detracting from that.

On another subject, do you have your TV in a surround sound setup? And if so, have you experienced any audio sync issues?

The back lighting effects haven't been an issue for me in watching Blu-rays, satellite or Roku. You really have to be specifically looking for it. Frankly, this is so much less of an issue than a half dozen things that we lived with in the rear projection set. And, we were happy with that for so many years.

As for Audio Sync... Go back to Post #6 in this thread. This can be an issue and it is likely that your system can deal with it. It just helps to know what is needed.
post #46 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

No. Not really.

None of these effects have in any way detracted from the quality during any movie in my opinion. You have to be really picky and really watch to see anything and even then you are not sure that you see it. When the back lighting is obvious is when you are walking left and right through the scenes menu in pause on Roku. And then only when you have LED dimming set to LOW.

Most of the time when the screen goes black and a title is displayed or credits start to role, I am impressed with how black it is. Of course this is not an 84" 4K plasma panel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

The back lighting effects haven't been an issue for me in watching Blu-rays, satellite or Roku. You really have to be specifically looking for it. Frankly, this is so much less of an issue than a half dozen things that we lived with in the rear projection set. And, we were happy with that for so many years.

As for Audio Sync... Go back to Post #6 in this thread. This can be an issue and it is likely that your system can deal with it. It just helps to know what is needed.

I may be a tad picky, but not excessively so. Even on my current Sony 70XBR2, there's some obvious banding that appears when there are scenes of dark colored areas transitioning to lighter areas (like underwater scenes, but even my 1080p widescreen PC monitor does this, so it doesn't even faze me anymore. Even if the black levels are only a bit better than on my current TV, I'll be very very happy! And I think that the blacks on my TV are pretty decent. And the contrast ratio is no doubt leaps and bounds better than on my current Sony (7,000:1). I LOVE the PQ on my current TV, so if this new LG surpasses what I'm currently seeing, it'll be a treat for me.smile.gif I'm really looking forward to seeing some 3D on this TV, as everything I read and heard on its 3D performance is the ultimate.

So more than likely, any minor video artifacts that are only noticeable if you're looking for them, shouldn't bother me in the slightest bit.

I'm hoping that I can connect my sources to the TV and my Denon AVP pre/pro the way I want to without any audio sync issues, because I have not owned a finer, or better sounding pre/pro than the Denon AVP. If I do encounter audio issues, I will first try to connect it the way that Jon Martin has his connected, going through his Oppo 103. If even this connection method presents an issue, then I very well may have to purchase another pre/pro that offers certified ARC on the HDMI's, like the new Marantz AV8801.

All I can do now is wait and see what happens once I finally get this TV.


Seth
post #47 of 436
Have you guys read the review at digital trends.com which is found as a link on the first page of googling "LG84LM9600" ?
There is a video showing how essential it is to use its "zone dimming" LEDs and you can clearly see its dreaded edge illumination when set to OFF but turning dimming to LOW or MEDIUM - but not HIGH, according to reviewer - resolves the problem almost completely with a full black onscreen image going totally dark.
He also noticed very faint vertical banding every 2 1/2 inches to 3 inches that could be seen especially with large images displaying light pastel colors.
Meanwhile, the review of the LG 55LM8600 at Home Theater Magazine pointed out that its LED edge-light dimming function was outstanding with a black floor level at or below 0.001 ft-L, which is the minimum reliable reading of the luminance meter used, and i imagine that LG uses the same type of LED edge-light dimming tech on all these new sets.
It was also mentioned the poor native contrast ratio of these IPS panels from LG, with a reading of less than 1.000:1 Full On/Full Off AND the best horizontal viewing angle of all LCD panels tested (as expected), and that is why a well implemented LED dimming function is essential for these panels.
post #48 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCaugusto View Post

Have you guys read the review at digital trends.com which is found as a link on the first page of googling "LG84LM9600" ?
There is a video showing how essential it is to use its "zone dimming" LEDs and you can clearly see its dreaded edge illumination when set to OFF but turning dimming to LOW or MEDIUM - but not HIGH, according to reviewer - resolves the problem almost completely with a full black onscreen image going totally dark.
He also noticed very faint vertical banding every 2 1/2 inches to 3 inches that could be seen especially with large images displaying light pastel colors.
Meanwhile, the review of the LG 55LM8600 at Home Theater Magazine pointed out that its LED edge-light dimming function was outstanding with a black floor level at or below 0.001 ft-L, which is the minimum reliable reading of the luminance meter used, and i imagine that LG uses the same type of LED edge-light dimming tech on all these new sets.
It was also mentioned the poor native contrast ratio of these IPS panels from LG, with a reading of less than 1.000:1 Full On/Full Off AND the best horizontal viewing angle of all LCD panels tested (as expected), and that is why a well implemented LED dimming function is essential for these panels.

I read the review (and every other review I could find online smile.gif), and once I get the TV I plan on trying both low and medium settings for dimming, and see which works the best. From what Bruce was saying, the vertical banding isn't very obvious, so it shouldn't be a distraction when watching stuff. And if the black levels are better than what I'm used to seeing on my Sony 70XBR2 SXRD TV, I'll be ecstatic!
post #49 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Martin View Post

I agree with you on the 3D same experience through and through. I do have avatar 3D and prometheus 3D and I like Prometheus better for the 3D mode from my Oppo BDP-103. The comfort of the 3D glasses are above on another level compared to my Panasonic active 3D glasses in my other room.

Does anyone know how it is handling the 3D for now? Is it being unconverted to 3840x1080 or is it standard 1980x1080 passive? Even if it is 1980x1080p passive it should still be the best 3D set out there. Once the PS4 is released in November will we get to see the native 6MP Passive 3D at 3840x1080p resolution, which should be even better.
post #50 of 436
I've got some questions for you owners here. I know that the TV comes with 4 pairs of 3D glasses for movie watching (with the other two included for gaming), but I'm curious, will the RealD 3D glasses that are used in theaters work with this TV?

And does this TV come shipped in a wooden crate on a pallet? I've heard that it does, but curious to know for sure?

And one more question, is the stand already attached, or does one need to do that?

Thanks.


Seth
Edited by ohyeah32 - 3/12/13 at 2:23am
post #51 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

I've got some questions for you owners here. I know that the TV comes with 4 pairs of 3D glasses for movie watching (with the other two included for gaming), but I'm curious, will the RealD 3D glasses that are used in theaters work with this TV?

And does this TV come shipped in a wooden crate on a pallet? I've heard that it does, but curious to know for sure?

And one more question, is the stand already attached, or does one need to do that?

Thanks.


Seth

  1. The "TV" (I avoid the term... seems archaic to me) comes with 6 pair (3 boxes of 2) or at least mine did. I was under the assumption that the theater glasses would work. I have a pair around here but haven't found them yet to try. There are "Dual Play" glasses (a pair has two left eyes and a pair has two right eyes in essence). I had to buy a pair separately of those and haven't tried that feature yet.,
  2. Yes it ships in a wooden crate all bolted together. Inside it is in a box supported by Styrofoam. It is also wrapped in a thermal blanket.
  3. The stand is not attached but is easily attached. My set is on the wall though. Making connections with the panel mounted 1-1/2" off the wall is a particular challenge. It is not like you can easily lift it off. That is a team effort.
post #52 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

  1. The "TV" (I avoid the term... seems archaic to me) comes with 6 pair (3 boxes of 2) or at least mine did. I was under the assumption that the theater glasses would work. I have a pair around here but haven't found them yet to try. There are "Dual Play" glasses (a pair has two left eyes and a pair has two right eyes in essence). I had to buy a pair separately of those and haven't tried that feature yet.,
  2. Yes it ships in a wooden crate all bolted together. Inside it is in a box supported by Styrofoam. It is also wrapped in a thermal blanket.
  3. The stand is not attached but is easily attached. My set is on the wall though. Making connections with the panel mounted 1-1/2" off the wall is a particular challenge. It is not like you can easily lift it off. That is a team effort.

Thanks for your helpful and informative reply.wink.gif

From what I've read, the RealD 3D glasses are supposed to work perfectly, as they are of the same type of polarized lens. I guess I'll find out once my TV arrives.smile.gif

Good to know that it ships in a wooden crate, and is very well packaged on the inside. At least this helps a bit with protecting the TV while in transit.

I can imagine that it was quite the job to get that behemoth wall mounted.eek.gif And while it would have been nice if the stand was already attached, at least it should be pretty straight forward to attach it.
post #53 of 436
What settings do you all have your TV's set at when you calibrated? And do any of you have yours on the "Cinema" mode? Also, do you all use the "Just Scan" setting for aspect ratio? The dynamic contrast is supposed to help with contrast ratio, does this work, or does it add any unwanted artifacts? Just some things that will be very helpful once the TV arrives.

And regarding the 3D, does the TV automatically switch to 3D mode when playing a 3D Blu-ray? And I've read that there are user setting for 3D, things like checkerboard, frame sequential, and an adjustment for the amount of 3D effect one wants. What should these be set to?


Thanks in advance.


Seth
Edited by ohyeah32 - 3/12/13 at 5:54pm
post #54 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

What settings do you all have your TV's set at when you calibrated? And do any of you have yours on the "Cinema" mode? Also, do you all use the "Just Scan" setting for aspect ratio? Just some things that will be very helpful once the TV arrives.

Thanks in advance.


Seth

Seth,

If you don't use "just Scan" you end up with a lot of overscan and maybe 5% is off screen. With Just scan the entire image field fits exactly on screen. That's a real pleasure to see if you are at all familiar with projection setups.

I have the True Motion turned OFF. While it seems to perform well, I believe that the panel gets too far behind the incoming video and has to skip a bunch of frames every half second or so. I've coined this as a "Cha-Cha" affect. It is only apparent when certain types of steady motion occurs. So... with True Motion off there is no "soap opera" look and no "cha-cha" (if the camera follows someone walking past a continuous field of background image you can play the Cha-Cha tune in your head and on the pause imagine the character jerking forward a tiny bit -- annoying enough).

Most of the setting issues that I have had relate to the audio and in making sure that the panel is cooperating with my AVR to produce the correct and delicate combination that makes the "lip sync" work. I have a 3+ year old AVR and it predates the ARC capabilities in HDMI.

I had thought to share my calibration experience and to post about the wall mounting. I haven't had time. I did try to make a time lapse of the installation but the (free) software that I used crashed unknowingly and the attempt failed.
post #55 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

Seth,

If you don't use "just Scan" you end up with a lot of overscan and maybe 5% is off screen. With Just scan the entire image field fits exactly on screen. That's a real pleasure to see if you are at all familiar with projection setups.

I have the True Motion turned OFF. While it seems to perform well, I believe that the panel gets too far behind the incoming video and has to skip a bunch of frames every half second or so. I've coined this as a "Cha-Cha" affect. It is only apparent when certain types of steady motion occurs. So... with True Motion off there is no "soap opera" look and no "cha-cha" (if the camera follows someone walking past a continuous field of background image you can play the Cha-Cha tune in your head and on the pause imagine the character jerking forward a tiny bit -- annoying enough).

Most of the setting issues that I have had relate to the audio and in making sure that the panel is cooperating with my AVR to produce the correct and delicate combination that makes the "lip sync" work. I have a 3+ year old AVR and it predates the ARC capabilities in HDMI.

I had thought to share my calibration experience and to post about the wall mounting. I haven't had time. I did try to make a time lapse of the installation but the (free) software that I used crashed unknowingly and the attempt failed.

So engaging Just Scan is a must, and turn True Motion off. Great! Thanks for sharing that!wink.gif

What about the 3D? What settings should be used?
post #56 of 436
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

So engaging Just Scan is a must, and turn True Motion off. Great! Thanks for sharing that!wink.gif

What about the 3D? What settings should be used?

It just switches into 3D on its own and I haven't adjusted any settings from what are otherwise set. The 2D to 3D conversion is a bit interesting but falls short of realistic. There is enough strangeness to cause your brain to go on strike. I find that I break out laughing when something unnatural occurs when you know better what should be. I can only stand about a minute of that but it is a very good test mode for 3D operation. Toss a 3D disk in the Oppo and the panel flashes a pop-up telling me that it is in 3D mode and away you go... helps to put on the glasses.

The calibrator tells me that he was taught that the first step is to "turn off all the crap". He explains that this means everything that tries to process the image like True Motion, Energy Saver, LED Dimming and all of that. It messes with the calibration procedure. I pretty much have left most of the "crap" off. I do have the LED Dimming set to LOW. I also have the Oppo set for 1080p output resolution. I prefer to let the panel do the up-conversion. If I switch the Oppo to 4K the images are still great but there is a slight difference that I cannot put my finger on. So... I prefer letting the panel do what it knows best there.
post #57 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by bscloutier View Post

It just switches into 3D on its own and I haven't adjusted any settings from what are otherwise set. The 2D to 3D conversion is a bit interesting but falls short of realistic. There is enough strangeness to cause your brain to go on strike. I find that I break out laughing when something unnatural occurs when you know better what should be. I can only stand about a minute of that but it is a very good test mode for 3D operation. Toss a 3D disk in the Oppo and the panel flashes a pop-up telling me that it is in 3D mode and away you go... helps to put on the glasses.

The calibrator tells me that he was taught that the first step is to "turn off all the crap". He explains that this means everything that tries to process the image like True Motion, Energy Saver, LED Dimming and all of that. It messes with the calibration procedure. I pretty much have left most of the "crap" off. I do have the LED Dimming set to LOW. I also have the Oppo set for 1080p output resolution. I prefer to let the panel do the up-conversion. If I switch the Oppo to 4K the images are still great but there is a slight difference that I cannot put my finger on. So... I prefer letting the panel do what it knows best there.

Thanks for your reply.wink.gif I think I have most of the initial set up info I need now to get me started. And having a "standard" LG remote is going to really help with all the set up stuff. I'm glad I had LG send me one.smile.gif

I just bought Life of Pi on 3D Blu-ray today, but I'm going to wait until I get the TV to watch it in 3D. Should be a real treat!
post #58 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohyeah32 View Post

I can imagine that it was quite the job to get that behemoth wall mounted.eek.gif .
One would actually be surprised how easy it is to wall mount, as long as one is "semi" handy. Its not a rocket science, the main part is, secure the wall plate correctly for your application ( Meaning lag bolts for wood 2 X 4, Tap Cons for Brick and concrete walls ). Once this is done, hang from the wall mount, if it does not rip out of the wall, your good wink.gif
Reply
Reply
post #59 of 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Plasma View Post

One would actually be surprised how easy it is to wall mount, as long as one is "semi" handy. Its not a rocket science, the main part is, secure the wall plate correctly for your application ( Meaning lag bolts for wood 2 X 4, Tap Cons for Brick and concrete walls ). Once this is done, hang from the wall mount, if it does not rip out of the wall, your good wink.gif

Probably the toughest part is lifting the TV to the mounting bracket.
post #60 of 436
Bruce,

If you can, could you find out what your picture settings are? Things like backlight, brightness, contrast, color level, sharpness, etc. Also what mode is yours set at? Expert mode 1, etc.

Thanks in advance.smile.gif
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: LCD Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › LCD Flat Panel Displays › Official LG 84LM9600 (Ultra HD 4K) Owners' Thread