JVC dilemma, need opinions

I owned them both at one time, the Pioneer version as well the HD350.

It's strictly based on memory and individual models, so YMMV.

My recollection is the RS2 clone seems to have better contrast but less bright while the HD350 is a tad sharper.

Physically the RS2 has the outputs in the back, not on the side.

In terms of noise, the newer model is definitely quieter, noticeable but not drastic.

The vertical and horizon adjustment on the RS2 is mechanical while the HD350 is electronically controlled. I found the mechanical lens door opening sounds (like a Sanyo z4000) like scraping sandpaper. Ugh!

Unless you put them side by side, it's a toss up. Your room environment would also affect the contrast.

I'll pick the one with the lesser usage, the Pioneer in this case though it's older. If they are the same vintage, go for the HD350. Brightness matters more to me.

GL.

I've similar dilemma but with the Sony line, the HW20 vs. VW85. The former is brighter but less contrast. For wanting CRT-black, the VW85 is tempting but neither is a bad choice.

Back in 2001, my 1st Panasonic ae100 is a 480p model with a contrast ratio of 500:1 (that was stretching).

I had a RS-1 for 3 years and now a RS-35 for the last 3 years. If it were me, I'd go for the RS-2 due to concerns over the pink banding issues that some of experienced with the RS10 - RS35 series. It's hard to know how big the problem really is (people are good at posting problems but don't normally post about the lack of problems). For me, going from a RS-1 to a RS-35 was quite an improvement. I would imagine that you would be quite pleased with the HD350 (in comparision to the rebadged RS-2) but the trade- off could be longevity.

Larry

Based on what I read, all JVCs from HD1/RS1 to RS35/HD950 have this pink band issues; It really depends on your luck. Most of us are/were happy owners.

Great.

I finally settled on a Sony VW85, but it was not an easy decision over the HW20 which is newer with one year warranty left.