AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › 3 subs better than 2?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3 subs better than 2? - Page 2

post #31 of 35
Quote:
Quote:

I don't see how having non matching subs is any different than having surrounds that aren't the same as the fronts or centers.
(No one ever claimed it was necessary to match the subs to your speakers, so I don't see how this comparison relates to using different subs together. The principles involved in this are completely different.)

Rather than comparing surrounds that don't match your front speakers, the better comparison would be mixing a different left surround with a different right surround. For example, let's say you used a dipole right surround and a monopole left surround. The timbre-match, dispersion, sensitivity and bass extension of the left surround would be completely different than the right surround. This might "work" in the sense that you would have "sound" from each surround speaker, but it would hardly be considered an optimal solution. Of course, the more similar the left surround is to the right surround, the "better" it will work, but nothing will beat matching the surrounds with identical speakers. Similarly, using non-identical subwoofers can "work", but due to different LF extensions, roll-offs and outputs, it is hardly an optimal solution. The ideal solution will always be matched, identical subwoofers being sent a matched, identical signal.

Your comparison to having different right and left surrounds isn't accurate. Subwoofers are mono devices, while all other speakers are stereo devices. For stereo sounds, it's much more imortant to use matching speakers. Stereo speakers work together to place a single coherent sound at a specific location. Subwoofers do not. They produce a diffuse non locatable sound.
post #32 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidHorn View Post

Your comparison to having different right and left surrounds isn't accurate. Subwoofers are mono devices, while all other speakers are stereo devices. For stereo sounds, it's much more imortant to use matching speakers. Stereo speakers work together to place a single coherent sound at a specific location. Subwoofers do not. They produce a diffuse non locatable sound.

I would say it is somewhat accurate if you are using two subs with different extensions. Like a panning effect or when both speakers are used in the surrounds, I'm sure it would be easy to tell the difference. Same with playing a low loud scene, one sub is obviously going to sound different. (That is from my experience of trying two different subs:D)

I would think all speakers are "mono devices" but are used in combination to play back a stereo recording?
post #33 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokekevin View Post

I would say it is somewhat accurate if you are using two subs with different extensions. Like a panning effect or when both speakers are used in the surrounds, I'm sure it would be easy to tell the difference. Same with playing a low loud scene, one sub is obviously going to sound different. (That is from my experience of trying two different subs:D)

I would think all speakers are "mono devices" but are used in combination to play back a stereo recording?

Do you know anyone with a HT setup that has non matching fronts or surrounds? Do you wonder why fronts and surrounds are typically sold in pairs while subs are sold as single units? Could it be for the reasons I stated?
post #34 of 35
Think timbre matching vs dissimilar performance characteristics.
post #35 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidHorn View Post

Do you know anyone with a HT setup that has non matching fronts or surrounds? Do you wonder why fronts and surrounds are typically sold in pairs while subs are sold as single units? Could it be for the reasons I stated?

I'm lost now lol. All I'm saying is I think it's important to have matching subs or subs that are similar in performance.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Subwoofers, Bass, and Transducers › 3 subs better than 2?