Originally Posted by Seegs108
Buddy, you need to relax. I made it clear that I was talking about bad experiences with older models. I also said SEVERAL times now that I'm sure JVC has improved upon their technology. The whole point of my post was that Sony does it better. THAT IS ALL. After all he is curious about the Sony successor.
Fair enough. And I'm perfectly relaxed.
FWIW, I haven't seen any JVC projectors other than the RS46 and RS4810. I'm simply relaying others' anecdotal statements and reviews I've read.
The bottom line is that if I were the OP I wouldn't rule out a JVC projector based simply on motion performance. I know motion performance used to be a significant problem with JVC projectors but in the reviews I've read it isn't mentioned as an issue any more. I certainly don't consider it to be a drawback from what I've seen, and others who've seen the HW50 and the JVC side-by-side seem to agree.
I upgraded to my RS4810 from a Sony VPL-VW60 and I haven't noticed any problems at all with motion on my JVC relative to the older Sony -- and the JVC's picture is so superior to the Sony's in so many ways there's just no contest -- as there shouldn't be considering my Sony is almost six years old.