AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › WHS 2011 / Server essential 2012 woes
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

WHS 2011 / Server essential 2012 woes

post #1 of 27
Thread Starter 
3/21/12 update: If there is an OP that can change the title of this thread that would be great. I have found my issue and it is the Seagate ST3000DM001 drives so the title should read "ST3000DM001 Problems"

see my post on 3/21 for what I have found so far.




Ok I have a really really confusing problem going on......

I recently decided to get rid of my power hog dell 690 server, replace it with something low powered, and increase the storage. It's main purpose is to house movies (mixture of MKV blu-rays and DVD).

Having a tech-net subscription I downloaded WHS 2011 and Sever 2012 essentials to play around with, and brought it all in to work to experiment with.

I started out on a biostar G41ds3 board with a celeron 3.33GHz CPU and 4GB of memory (should have been 8 but it wont see it.... sigh oh well) and for storage was going to use this 5 bay eSATA dock I had, with 5 3TB Seagate drives. For the eSATA controller I had two laying around that were SIL3132 controllers.

I start out with server 2012 Essentials (henceforth known as SE12) install it to a WD green 1TB drive since it was the only drive I had handy, install all updates, install drivers for eSATA card, play around with different configurations for storage and just said Meh, I'll just to all separate drives no biggie.

I then pull one of my 2TB drives from my old server to start copying over using a single eSATA dock. This drive has all blu-ray rips in MKV so 12-24GB approx file size for each movie.

Files start copying....it's friday and time to leave so I say the heck with it and go home. I come in Monday and out of 1.8TB to be copied.... it is at 69% and going from 3MB/s to 0 to 1.5MB/s to 0, looking at the beginning of the chart you can see it starts out strong then craps out. I thought to myself...ok.... maybe there are issues on the 2TB drive so I scan it, try it again and same thing... transfer starts out strong 100-120MB/s after a minute it goes to crap and bottoms out and stays there.

My next train of thought...maybe there is a serious issue on the 2TB drive, so I try another one...same issue.

I then think ok maybe it is the 3TB drive I am copying to...same issue

I then think ok maybe I am saturating the eSATA card so I hoook the 2TB internally and copy off on board sata to esata..same result.

I then think ok maybe there is an issue with the esata card so I swap it out with a rocketraid 622...same issue

I then think ok maybe this is a PCIe issue let's copy from drive to drive onboard, same issue

ok maybe chipset drivers need to be updated, bios updated, different memory, same issue.

I then assume this is a SE12 issue and proceed to install WHS 2011 on a 250GB drive instead....all the same issues as above.

Ok at this point I say screw it I take a little dell system I have here that has a different chipset and a core 2 quad 2.4GHz CPU 4GB mem and get SE12 going in it from my original install, I reupdate all drivers and try everything again...same freaking issue?????


I have tried every combo of copyign from point a to point b and it always starts strong for a bit 120MB/s then bottoms out to 0MB/s and stays there. I did have one instance where it teased me and peaked back up and then bottomed out again..then up and down constantly from 0-3MB/s usually hanging out at 0.

Has anyone else run in to this issue?? I mean for both WHS 2011 and SE12 to do this to me is blowing my mind, even on different hardware??

CPU use seems to be very low so it isn't like it is pegging out and preventing it from working..... The only common thing is 4GB of mem between systems...but I wouldn't think that would cause issues.

I'm getting ready to wipe the system out again and try it all over using the core 2 quad just to make sure nothing weird carried over.
Edited by nintari - 3/21/13 at 7:01am
post #2 of 27
I've run both OSs on a C2D E8400 and never had your problem. Currently running WSE 2012 (SE12) as an ESXi virtual machine and it works great.
post #3 of 27
how much is a technet subscription?
post #4 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mfusick View Post

how much is a technet subscription?

$199 for basic. It seems you get Windows 7/8 PRO and also WHS2011 and 2012 plus tons more...

http://download.microsoft.com/download/C/7/8/C78DB720-88CB-455E-AA0E-A087CB332A23/TechNet_Product_List.xlsx


Am I wrong in thinking it's cheaper than buying a few common software applications?

What is the catch?

Can I run legit Windows 7 pro on one machine and windows 8 on another ??? Or is it one at a time ?
post #5 of 27
Thread Starter 
thats whats bugging me, I have it runnign on a celeron system at my fiancees house for quite some time (2011) and my house on this dell 690 dual xeon lol

I'd just hook the 3TB drives ot the 690 system and copy things over that way but if there is an issue to start with don't want to gimp myself right out of the gate.

I tried looking at resource monitor and doing xcopy still same issues.... So I am proceeding with rebuild... found an SSD laying around to test with smile.gif
post #6 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mfusick View Post

$199 for basic. It seems you get Windows 7/8 PRO and also WHS2011 and 2012 plus tons more...

http://download.microsoft.com/download/C/7/8/C78DB720-88CB-455E-AA0E-A087CB332A23/TechNet_Product_List.xlsx


Am I wrong in thinking it's cheaper than buying a few common software applications?

What is the catch?

Can I run legit Windows 7 pro on one machine and windows 8 on another ??? Or is it one at a time ?

Yeah there must be some catch as that price is well below WS2012e.
post #7 of 27
Product keys
The software may require a key to install or access it. Not all software is provided with the same number of keys. You are responsible for the use of any keys assigned to you. You may not resell, share, assign, or otherwise transfer keys. Key activity is monitored. Microsoft reserves the right to suspend or terminate your subscription, without any notice or obligation to you, if Microsoft detects suspicious activity related to keys or activations. Microsoft reserves the right to determine in its sole discretion whether an activity constitutes suspicious activity. Suspicious activity could include, but is not limited to, keys being activated in geographic regions that are different from the geographic location of the subscription activation or purchase, downloading of a large number of keys, and other similar activities. Microsoft may deactivate or otherwise limit your keys when your subscription ends. Deactivated keys will not be able to activate software.
post #8 of 27
Talking only for personal use.
post #9 of 27
Software acquired through the Technet program is licenced only for non-production use such as in testing environments. Using the software as if it was purchased at retail or with a PC would be in violation of the agreement and it would technically be unlicenced. At that point you might as well download it from (insert torrent site here).
post #10 of 27
Some googling has revealed that your pain is shared by many others:

https://www.google.com/search?q=esata%20transfer%20speed%20slow&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

I didn't read through a lot of the links yet, but it seems that you'll likely never see transfer speeds with esata better than 300 Mb/sec (and even this is burst speed, not sustained transfer rate, which will likely hover around 50-100 Mb/sec), Still, there might be a few things you can do to maximize your transfer speeds.
post #11 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mfusick View Post

Talking only for personal use.
The TechNet program is designed for IT professionals to test the latest MS software before purchasing, deploying and recommending it to clients. MSDN subscriptions are designed for developers to write and test programs with MS software. Neither one is licensed for personal/production use (with the exception of Visual Studio). In the last couple of years, MS "severely" limited the number of keys that could be obtained via TechNet because people started using it as a way to get cheap MS software for personal/production use. I say "severely" in quotes because, even limited as it is now, it's still quite sufficient for most testing scenarios.
post #12 of 27
TechNet or MSDN copies have concurrent connection limits hard coded. Using it on a production site will reveal these limits quickly.
post #13 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mfusick View Post

Talking only for personal use.

Microsoft may deactivate or otherwise limit your keys when your subscription ends. Deactivated keys will not be able to activate software.
post #14 of 27
Thread Starter 
for the most part my home is a long term testing environment smile.gif part of the reason for looking in to SE12 was to have a domain PC setup in my home to test with clients and active directory / dns, group policy etc etc so I can get the hang of it for work later on. Then I don't have to run seperate machines for domain controller testing and etc, all I would need is a domain client machine to test with. It's just an added benefit I can use it for a storage server in the mean time.
post #15 of 27
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajkrishock View Post

Some googling has revealed that your pain is shared by many others:

https://www.google.com/search?q=esata%20transfer%20speed%20slow&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

I didn't read through a lot of the links yet, but it seems that you'll likely never see transfer speeds with esata better than 300 Mb/sec (and even this is burst speed, not sustained transfer rate, which will likely hover around 50-100 Mb/sec), Still, there might be a few things you can do to maximize your transfer speeds.

Yeah but were not just talking about eSATA, my problems exist with the onboard SATA as well going from on board to on board.


I just put the SSD in and am updating and configuring the fresh install of server 2012, hopefully I'll have no issues!
post #16 of 27
Thread Starter 
Found my issue I believe... it is the drives

for this build I ordered 5 3TB Seagate drives model number ST3000DM001 part number 1CH166-301

what I am finding is this:

If I start a copy to these drives fresh unused they work fine. Once I go to copy all the media from my 2TB drive to these drives it works fine, but after time, I assume from long writes, the drives degrade in performance and start to show the signs mentioned above.

So the first time I did this I just formatted the drive on a friday, started copying all the media from my 2TB drive to the 3TB, left it for the weekend only to come back in and find it has failed, as in it stays down at 0MB/s transfer for a few seconds, peaks up to 12MB/s for a few seconds then back down to 0MB/s for a few seconds, then peaks back up to 3.5MB/s for a few seconds and falls back down again over and over.

so going through I found two of the three drives were doing this but three werent....so I thought ok.... maybe these two are just bad drives.

So starting with a fresh unused 3TB drive last night I started another transfer form my 2TB drive and let it churn overnight, the transfer for the first several hours was strong staying around 135MB/s and dipping down once in a while to 74MB/s, I leave work. When I come in today the transfer is done! Great I think to myself, I grab another 2TB drive stick it in and go to copy over another 840GB to fill the 3TB drive up, starts out strong and then SMACK!! Down to 0MB/s, 3MB/s, 0MB/s, 12.5MB/s and has been doing this for the past hour.

So apparently these drives seem to crap out after being written to for a long time period.....

I bought these 46 days ago from our rep at tiger direct....I'm goign to try and contact him first as I would rather swap them out for WD Green drives if possible and stay away from seagate. I hope he can help as I DO NOT want to RMA these and run in to the same issues and to top it off have refurb drives already within the first 60 days!!
post #17 of 27
That's odd. I have three of those drives and don't have that problem. I did a transfer from 2TB drives when I migrated to the 3TB drives.
post #18 of 27
Thread Starter 
running the SeaTools for windows utility each drive is coming up as failed when running the Short DST test. One code given was 6C9AC2A4

bryansj do you have the PN 1CH166-301 or the 9YN166 part number that has a firmware update tool and utility available? The part number I have does not have any update frown.gif firmware is CC24
post #19 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by nintari View Post

I bought these 46 days ago from our rep at tiger direct....I'm goign to try and contact him first as I would rather swap them out for WD Green drives if possible and stay away from seagate. I hope he can help as I DO NOT want to RMA these and run in to the same issues and to top it off have refurb drives already within the first 60 days!!

All at the same time ? That sucks!!!
post #20 of 27
I echo Briansj's comment.
I have 12 of those drives and a friend has another 7 and none presented any problem.

I have standardized on those drives for our movie servers (no real-time RAID, snapRAID is used, and no 24/365 operation, they are powered up on demand), we buy externals and rip'em out of the case biggrin.gif

I put NO value on a drive's warranty, as shipping them back after a year or two is usually not cost effective from Canada... I did it once and learned the lesson mad.gif
I DO test then extensively upon receiving them before cracking the case though...
post #21 of 27
I would think that a factory burn-in would have revealed these drives to be defective before they ever left the factory. Maybe not since they only fail after a long time of write operations. This thread kinda reinforces my general reluctance to buy Seagate drives. They're cheap for a reason. I'll stick with Western Digital.
post #22 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by nintari View Post

running the SeaTools for windows utility each drive is coming up as failed when running the Short DST test. One code given was 6C9AC2A4

bryansj do you have the PN 1CH166-301 or the 9YN166 part number that has a firmware update tool and utility available? The part number I have does not have any update frown.gif firmware is CC24

I have one 9YN166 and two China 1CH166-301s.
post #23 of 27
Thread Starter 
I was able to make them all fail by leaving them copy large amounts of data (after a long time the transfer rate drops down to 0 and hangs low), form there if I run SeaTools it gives a failure code. If I turn everything off for a long time and then back on, run SeaTools, no fail code, but I can then start to copy just one MKV after a minute it goes in to fail mode where transfer bottoms out, then Run SeaTools and fail code shows up.

I already worked out with my rep to replace them with WD Greens smile.gif
post #24 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Foxbat121 View Post

TechNet or MSDN copies have concurrent connection limits hard coded. Using it on a production site will reveal these limits quickly.

To be specific, the Keys for the Technet downloads designated "Retail" will work on any version of the software from any source, not just Technet downloads. The lower cost subscription gives you, typically, 2 Keys that can each be used on up to 10 different installs. Is going over 10 concurrent connections what you're referring to?
post #25 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcrach View Post

To be specific, the Keys for the Technet downloads designated "Retail" will work on any version of the software from any source, not just Technet downloads. The lower cost subscription gives you, typically, 2 Keys that can each be used on up to 10 different installs. Is going over 10 concurrent connections what you're referring to?

I'm not refer to installation but rather network connections. MS is very vague on what these restrictions are. In the past, it is 5 concurrent connections. But I believe they have relaxed file server connection limit to 20 or so. Also, when you hit the limit, there is no explicit messages. Your software just fail for no apparant reasons. This applies to softwares you download from MSDN or Technet. I'm not sure if the keys marked retail can be used with a retail copy of the OS and what the restrictions are there. Real retail keys can only be activated once. But MSDN keys can be activated on 10 different installations.
post #26 of 27
I just did some quick research and you're correct, there is a 20 connection limit on all windows 7 editions. This is in the license agreement section 3 accessed by "winver"

"Device Connections. You may allow up to 20 other devices to access software installed on the licensed computer to use only File Services, Print Services, Internet Information Services and Internet Connection Sharing and Telephony Services."

It's not particular to TechNet or MSDN files..Those program iso's are the same as the retail versions. I don't network my computers so I can't speak for windows server.
post #27 of 27
So before anyone think TechNet subscriptions are a steal, keep that in mind in addition to that you are not suppose to use it as your daily workstations, only test machines. My company pays $5000 per MSDN license per year and it has the same limitation. MS is no fool and you are not getting a bargain from it.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Home Theater Computers
AVS › AVS Forum › Video Components › Home Theater Computers › WHS 2011 / Server essential 2012 woes