Originally Posted by 4DHD
Originally Posted by mcnarus
Ah, the last refuge of the science-challenged.
Well, the first time someone demonstrates in a properly controlled test that they can differentiate between those two kinds of DACs, I'll concede your point.
Well, if you are so sure there are no differences, then why don't you conduct the test yourself?
Because whenever a person says "I doubt that it will be heard" and does a test with that outcome, they will be criticized for not trying hard enough because after all they said "I doubt that it will be heard" .
There is no evidence that asynchronous DACs were ever designed to solve an audible problem.
It is known for sure that even fairly inexpensive non-asynchronous USB DACs are sonically transparent and will pass a straight wire bypass test.
Here's a <$30 USB ADC/DAC pair that passes blind listening tests: Behringer UCA 202. Prove me wrong!
Here is the frequency response and dynamic range test data from a USB DAC that cost me $6.95. Doesn't sound too bad:
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB: +0.19, -0.66 Good
Noise level, dB (A): -74.0 Average
Dynamic range, dB (A): 74.4 Average
THD, %: 0.050 Good
It's about 20 dB worse than the UCA 202 - I think it might have some audible artifacts, just barely.Edited by arnyk - 3/30/13 at 1:37pm