or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Elysium - movie of the year
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Elysium - movie of the year - Page 10

post #271 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Is the BD a D.C.?

No it's the theatrical cut.
post #272 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Is the BD a D.C.?
No, it's B. D. tongue.gif
post #273 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by archiguy View Post

If you think the idea that could be our future is ridiculous, you kinda' haven't been paying attention. wink.gif I don't mean the space station - we'll never spend the money to build something so ambitious - but technologically advanced, privileged enclaves supported by a docile servant class? That's not nearly so far-fetched. Some might say we're halfway there already.
Don't get me started....wink.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcruiser View Post

No, it's B. D. tongue.gif
There's always a comedian in the audience....tongue.gif
post #274 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

Don't get me started....wink.gif

Nor I...
post #275 of 495
Just finished it up. Solid flick. Not perfect, but what is? The reported hammering home of the message was more of a nudge. It's no worse than any of a million other movies with a message. The current social climate requires you to pick a side and pretty much be damned whatever you do because you'll still be wrong. I think it used a familiar modern parlance and held a mirror to current events that might have struck a chord with many.

My biggest issue was Foster. She probably could've been removed entirely and the movie would be better. There was plenty of good guy bad guy with Damon and Copley and I saw a cleaner way to get from point A to B with no Foster.

All in all if you liked District 9 you should enjoy this. Excellent effects and weaponry are also on display. I feel they are equal but like many would have liked to see it surpass it. Maybe next time Neill can slow it down a bit. I was really surprised by Copley. He appears to have a good range in his work and there wasn't enough of him here. I can't say much about Damon. He stuck out like a sore thumb for obvious reasons. As a scifi/fantasy fan this can stay on the keeper pile.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
As for removing Foster, I'd do the story similar to this:
Microwaved Damon seeks Spider to get to Elysium, hit goes out on suit BUT Damon and Spider make him write that code, suit in distress gets Kruger called in to save suit (previously fired for shooting down civilians), Kruger is like I CAN USE THIS TO GET ELYSIUM, Damon is like OH HELL NO, fight, Damon escapes, Kruger chases, Damon goes to see Dr., etc, etc...No Foster more crazy arse Kruger

Also might ditch Damon for a more appropriately flavored actor

post #276 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthrsg View Post

The current social climate requires you to pick a side and pretty much be damned whatever you do because you'll still be wrong.

It’s a sickness that has permeated our society. You can see an example being played out in the - At the Premier of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug thread.

I dumped this from my queue this week after watching the trailer. It didn’t do much for me and looks similar to so many other futuristic movies. That, and I didn’t want to deal with my wife being upset about the political overtone. She is the type that would say it was a hammer over the head message. I can live without that.
post #277 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliens View Post

It’s a sickness that has permeated our society. You can see an example being played out in the - At the Premier of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug thread.

I dumped this from my queue this week after watching the trailer. It didn’t do much for me and looks similar to so many other futuristic movies. That, and I didn’t want to deal with my wife being upset about the political overtone. She is the type that would say it was a hammer over the head message. I can live without that.

I can respect that. I enjoyed Oblivion, Pacific Rim, Into Darkness more myself. The message in Pacific Rim was pretty hammer over the head too but was still fun.
post #278 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliens View Post

It’s a sickness that has permeated our society. You can see an example being played out in the - At the Premier of The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug thread.

I dumped this from my queue this week after watching the trailer. It didn’t do much for me and looks similar to so many other futuristic movies. That, and I didn’t want to deal with my wife being upset about the political overtone. She is the type that would say it was a hammer over the head message. I can live without that.

Honestly (IMO) the political message was pretty much de-fanged by the over the top caricatures of the "downtrodden" and the "evil rich". Add in no backstory for this condition and the political message was neutralized.

It's a fun enough movie I guess, but I have to disagree with Darth, it was no District 9.
post #279 of 495
BTW whenever "Spider" was on screen I kept thinking Cuervo Jones from EFLA .
post #280 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthrsg View Post

My biggest issue was Foster. She probably could've been removed entirely and the movie would be better. There was plenty of good guy bad guy with Damon and Copley and I saw a cleaner way to get from point A to B with no Foster.
Say wha?!? You mean you would remove the lead bad guy / master mind Sith Lord from Star Wars and just keep its henchman Darth Vader?
Quote:
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
As for removing Foster, I'd do the story similar to this:
Microwaved Damon seeks Spider to get to Elysium, hit goes out on suit BUT Damon and Spider make him write that code, suit in distress gets Kruger called in to save suit (previously fired for shooting down civilians), Kruger is like I CAN USE THIS TO GET ELYSIUM, Damon is like OH HELL NO, fight, Damon escapes, Kruger chases, Damon goes to see Dr., etc, etc...No Foster more crazy arse Kruger

Also might ditch Damon for a more appropriately flavored actor

Sorry, it's missing about half of the reasons thus half of the story.
Quote:
Not perfect, but what is?
Umm..., any movie starring Tom Cruise? biggrin.gif
post #281 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcruiser View Post


Umm..., any movie starring Tom Cruise? biggrin.gif

You had me at "Tom".






tongue.gif
post #282 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tack View Post

Honestly (IMO) the political message was pretty much de-fanged by the over the top caricatures of the "downtrodden" and the "evil rich". Add in no backstory for this condition and the political message was neutralized.

It's a fun enough movie I guess, but I have to disagree with Darth, it was no District 9.

Couldn't agree more. As I have said here before, I didn't see much of a currently relevant political message in the film, which was probably because it was so loud and dumb. It was so filled with deliciously bad guys, and a gal, I couldn't take it seriously enough to be either bothered or convinced by its heavy-handed theme.

Like you, I thought it was "fun enough" but certainly not in a class with Blomkamp's District 9.
post #283 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwsat View Post

I didn't see much of a currently relevant political message in the film
The "political message" in the movie I didn't really find very political.

We humans, throughout history, have always known the rich and powerful live differently and do so on the backs of the non-rich.
With the possible exception of the ignorant, this isn't news to anyone.

Quote:
it was so loud and dumb.
Agreed.
post #284 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tack View Post

Honestly (IMO) the political message was pretty much de-fanged by the over the top caricatures of the "downtrodden" and the "evil rich". Add in no backstory for this condition and the political message was neutralized.

It's a fun enough movie I guess, but I have to disagree with Darth, it was no District 9.

I mean in terms of tone more than anything. Like you know what you're in for style wise, if that makes sense?
post #285 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcruiser View Post

Say wha?!? You mean you would remove the lead bad guy / master mind Sith Lord from Star Wars and just keep its henchman Darth Vader?
Sorry, it's missing about half of the reasons thus half of the story.
Umm..., any movie starring Tom Cruise? biggrin.gif

Nah. I never watched Star Wars for the Emperor. Not once ever.
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
I'm just saying you could take away the President and Foster and all that political machinating (what if an illegal landed in your yard?!) and let all of the reasons to run Elysium fall on Kruger and Damon. You'd end up with more of what I like about the movie. A little crawl at the beginning could have setup things nicely

I'll see your Tom Cruise and raise you PAUL RUDD! smile.gif Can you even imagine how awesome Oblivion would have been with all those Paul's running around!
post #286 of 495
Okay, I’ll reconsider. Back in queue.
post #287 of 495
Just finished this myself. I was thinking I might purchase (in spite of plot-holes and weak script), but what happens to the "villain" in the hospital killed the deal...

Fail
post #288 of 495
Watched it, looked like District 9 with more shooting. Waste of 2hrs.
post #289 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueroomelectro View Post

Watched it, looked like District 9 with more shooting. Waste of 2hrs.

SEE. Equal to D9. biggrin.gif
post #290 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by oink View Post

The "political message" in the movie I didn't really find very political.

We humans, throughout history, have always known the rich and powerful live differently and do so on the backs of the non-rich.
With the possible exception of the ignorant, this isn't news to anyone.

Yep. F. Scott Fitzgerald said it best: "Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me."
post #291 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthrsg View Post

Can you even imagine how awesome Oblivion would have been with all those Paul's running around!
LOL.
post #292 of 495
Making eggnog and rum to keep the Christmas spirit alive. Will rent this later if I'm not blown away by the storms here.
post #293 of 495
Great production and visuals, but total horse$h1t of a storyline and premise. The term "over the top caricatures" used in an earlier post pretty much nails this movie. The caricatures are so cliche and narrow-minded, it's practically insulting to the viewer. It's sort of like overt racism w/o the skin color.

It's not so much a "political message" rather customized styling to be the perfect jerk-fest to an audience of particular political ideology. That's how I would describe it.
post #294 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by tezster View Post

Saw this movie a couple of days ago, and I wasn't too impressed with it... seems like a pretty vanilla dystopian, rich vs. poor plot. And the plot holes - that is the most idiotically under-defended space station imaginable. I can forgive errors like these if there are other parts of the movie that are of redeeming quality, but there weren't any. 95% of the characters are two-dimensional, cardboard cut-out templates lacking any depth.

...and why bother programming robot-police droids to be dicks on purpose?...or did they "become" that way from emergent AI development? tongue.gif ...and where did the labor unions go, when evidently their balance would have been needed the most to help the factory working man?
post #295 of 495
Just finished it. I won't rehash what's been said already. I'll just say that it wasn't quite as bad as I was expecting, but there seems to be some useful film on the cutting room floor and some odd directorial choices. This could have been a great movie. I'll cut Blomkamp a break since I think D9 is freaking fantastic..…but I thought The Sixth Sense was fantastic too, and you see how Sham a lama Dingdong turned out with his subsequent films after a great first effort.
post #296 of 495
I would also put it in the 'not a complete waste of time' category, but it's so straight out of the Standard Hollywood Script school. All the standard buttons pushed in the standard order, and all the standard characters in the standard poses. It struggles to rise above the "CGI-Fest with the occasional accidental bursts of acting or character development" sort of movie that seems almost inevitable for these types of movies these days.
post #297 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Roddey View Post

I would also put it in the 'not a complete waste of time' category, but it's so straight out of the Standard Hollywood Script school. All the standard buttons pushed in the standard order, and all the standard characters in the standard poses. It struggles to rise above the "CGI-Fest with the occasional accidental bursts of acting or character development" sort of movie that seems almost inevitable for these types of movies these days.

I'd blame Damon for this. An unknown might've made all the difference. Someone more like the Spider fellow.
post #298 of 495
I thought he did a pretty good job. Someone else wouldn't have changed the basic nature of the script.
post #299 of 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by sb1 View Post

Making eggnog and rum to keep the Christmas spirit alive.
Mmmmmm.....eggnog & rum.smile.gif

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Hanky View Post

It's not so much a "political message" rather customized styling to be the perfect jerk-fest to an audience of particular political ideology.
FWIW, I think it's too f_cking stupid for anyone of a political bent.wink.gif
post #300 of 495
I could buy that, but then I think...wonder how many awards and/or nominations will get showered on this one by the Hollywood elite?... I think that will pose an interesting context to your use of the term "anyone". wink.gif Would also be interesting to get the Hispanic viewpoint on this one...

What I really came back to this topic today about was to say that the more I think about it (plus the vid reviews posted earlier by zoey67), this movie really does seem like a full-on and genuine propaganda piece, cleverly (or not so cleverly) skinned as a "sci-fi" film, that was snuck in along with the other regular blockbuster films of the year. I guess I'm saying there is a "whiff" about this one that is just not right, despite it being legitimized by top-shelf production value and actor roles.
Edited by Mr. Hanky - 12/22/13 at 9:19am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
AVS › AVS Forum › Other Areas of Interest › Movies, Concerts, and Music Discussion › Elysium - movie of the year