or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › F8500.. OR .. ZT60 ?????
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

F8500.. OR .. ZT60 ????? - Page 21

post #601 of 3096
It was the sweep it under the rug comment but hey truce 😄
post #602 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halimali View Post

Why CNet rushed and published the F8500 review? Couldn't they wait more until ZT or perhaps Panasonic's next year (2014) models released so they could give them their 6 or 7 stars? smile.gif

I wonder how they would justify giving Panasonic LEDs their stars in future once they stop making plasmas wink.gif
Our very own Sammy girl. tongue.gif

*ducks*
post #603 of 3096
Got to see these two again today. If you aren't interested in imaging science and THX type of hoopla, definitely go see these two sets next to each other with your own eyes. The differences are not subtle and you should be able to choose the one that pleases you pretty easily (vt60 and f8500). Flip through the modes and compare the relevant ones.
post #604 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glashub View Post

Looks like Ken Ross has been vindicated at least in part by the EU model.

What I took away from this excellent review was the comment, most 'OLED-like'. To me that says a ton and cuts through all the BS. The ability to achieve superb black levels and unprecedented brightness, certainly accounts for that. He said that while speaking about the other Panasonics (with the exception of the ZT60 which I don't think is going to be radically different).

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #605 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by mo949 View Post

Got to see these two again today. If you aren't interested in imaging science and THX type of hoopla, definitely go see these two sets next to each other with your own eyes. The differences are not subtle and you should be able to choose the one that pleases you pretty easily (vt60 and f8500). Flip through the modes and compare the relevant ones.

agreed, in the end, what "you" like the best is all that matters.....The numbers are great to ahve, but if your eyes dont agree, then whats the point?
post #606 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

What I took away from this excellent review was the comment, most 'OLED-like'. To me that says a ton and cuts through all the BS. The ability to achieve superb black levels and unprecedented brightness, certainly accounts for that. He said that while speaking about the other Panasonics (with the exception of the ZT60 which I don't think is going to be radically different).

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
That's one way to look at it. Guess I should cancel my ZT60 pre-order since OLED's already here. :X
post #607 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by dad0118 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glashub View Post

Looks like Ken Ross has been vindicated at least in part by the EU model.

I don't think anyone was disagreeing with the F8500 is most likely a great TV; just that most would prefer the VT/ZT sets if based on PQ alone (excluding those who need the max amount of brightness without going LCD). However, as is mentioned in the review, the price differences between the sets might make a difference to those looking for the best Value (but then the ST60 would come into play).

Hmm, guess I'm weird. I'm looking for the best PQ, yet I'm still considering the 8500. I'd do so even if bright room viewing were not a consideration. I like the greater apparent sharpness afforded by the 8500 too and I believe the better controlled ABL of that display helps too.

It's not just brightness. :-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #608 of 3096
Talk about beating a dead horse
post #609 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Hmm, guess I'm weird. I'm looking for the best PQ, yet I'm still considering the 8500. I'd do so even if bright room viewing were not a consideration. I like the greater apparent sharpness afforded by the 8500 too and I believe the better controlled ABL of that display helps too.

It's not just brightness. :-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

whatever, sammyboy....biggrin.gif
post #610 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by dad0118 View Post

Very True.

Good choices I just don't get the hostility on both sides truly, I'd say the only question remaining on the 8500 is the build quality we won't know about that until folks start getting some hours on these.

Guess that would be true of the Pannys too.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #611 of 3096
Unless things suddenly changed overnight at Panasonic I think they have a proven track record
post #612 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

Unless things suddenly changed overnight at Panasonic I think they have a proven track record
He's probably referring to that 2011 defect that brought the rising black levels. Annoying and a showstopper for those who view in a dark room (I would probably be back in the Sammy camp if I had suffered through one of those wink.gif), for sure, but bursting capacitors is a step above as far as oversight in QC goes.
post #613 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by jh901 View Post

If the Samsung F8500 proves to be on the same level all-around (or better- brightness...) as the ST60, then that's a big win for them. The decision between the VT60 or ZT60 and the F8500 is easy for anyone not viewing blu-ray in near broad daylight. The ST60 is looking like the clear bargain of the year.

Not for me for the reasons stated above, but I agree the ST60 is the steal of the year.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #614 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

He's probably referring to that 2011 defect that brought the rising black levels. Annoying and a showstopper for those who view in a dark room (I would probably be back in the Sammy camp if I had suffered through one of those wink.gif), for sure, but bursting capacitors is a step above as far as oversight in QC goes.
. I have one of those from late 2009 and I'm still considering Panasonic. But to me......it still looks as good today as it did when new. I'm sure to someone who really knows their panels it would be most noticeable.
post #615 of 3096
Wow, I didn't realize (or forgot) it was a running defect across multiple model years. mad.gif
post #616 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halimali View Post

Why CNet rushed and published the F8500 review? Couldn't they wait more until ZT or perhaps Panasonic's next year (2014) models released so they could give them their 6 or 7 stars? smile.gif

I wonder how they would justify giving Panasonic LEDs their stars in future once they stop making plasmas wink.gif
Our very own Sammy girl. tongue.gif

*ducks*

Amongst a whole bunch of Panny boys. ;-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #617 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by mo949 View Post

Got to see these two again today. If you aren't interested in imaging science and THX type of hoopla, definitely go see these two sets next to each other with your own eyes. The differences are not subtle and you should be able to choose the one that pleases you pretty easily (vt60 and f8500). Flip through the modes and compare the relevant ones.

Couldn't agree more.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #618 of 3096
Rising blacks 2009 and 2010 fixed in 2011
Floating blacks 2010 fixed in 2011
Fluctuating brightness 2011 fixed in 2011
post #619 of 3096
Thanks for the reminda, Chunon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post



Amongst a whole bunch of Panny boys. ;-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
If there is a hidden reference there...I'm more anti-Samdung than I am a Panny boy. If Pioqueer was still making a display, I'd be off the Panny train in a New York minute. If there was an actual OLED available, I'd be seeking out that manufacturer STAT.
post #620 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

What I took away from this excellent review was the comment, most 'OLED-like'. To me that says a ton and cuts through all the BS. The ability to achieve superb black levels and unprecedented brightness, certainly accounts for that. He said that while speaking about the other Panasonics (with the exception of the ZT60 which I don't think is going to be radically different).

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
That's one way to look at it. Guess I should cancel my ZT60 pre-order since OLED's already here. :X

Did I say that? Take it up with the reviewer Sir, not me. Never a lack of sarcasm from Vinnie.

It's amazing how you simply can't say anything pro-Samsung without the usual suspects jumping all over it.

Is it possible to simply accept someone's or some reviewers comment without sniping?

Unreal.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #621 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

Talk about beating a dead horse

Yes, and you sure do.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #622 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by airgas1998 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

Hmm, guess I'm weird. I'm looking for the best PQ, yet I'm still considering the 8500. I'd do so even if bright room viewing were not a consideration. I like the greater apparent sharpness afforded by the 8500 too and I believe the better controlled ABL of that display helps too.

It's not just brightness. :-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

whatever, sammyboy....biggrin.gif

Gotta love it Air! :-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #623 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

Unless things suddenly changed overnight at Panasonic I think they have a proven track record

Not with a totally new bonding process on the ZT that's resulting in many rejects.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #624 of 3096
You're just as guilty ken just on the opposite side
post #625 of 3096
Doesn't the fact that they are rejecting sets speak to quality control ? What's your point?
post #626 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

Thanks for the reminda, Chunon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post



Amongst a whole bunch of Panny boys. ;-)

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
If there is a hidden reference there...I'm more anti-Samdung than I am a Panny boy.

Really? I'd never ha en guessed! :-)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnie97 View Post

If Pioqueer was still making a display, I'd be off the Panny train in a New York minute. If there was an actual OLED available, I'd be seeking out that manufacturer STAT.

Well that's why I'm leaning 8500. My eyes agreed with the reviewer's remarks about most 'OLED-like'. The 8500 is a whole lot cheaper than OLED will be and it's available now. :-)

Of course this is still pending the shootout and the ZT60s performance.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #627 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

You're just as guilty ken just on the opposite side

Not true at all. I don't attack others and you know that. So let's keep these discussions factual, accept other opinions, and stop the sniping.

You guys just can't tolerate other opinions and that's the problem.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #628 of 3096
Quote:
Originally Posted by chunon View Post

Doesn't the fact that they are rejecting sets speak to quality control ? What's your point?

No, it speaks to unknowns in terms of longevity of the process. We also have no idea if displays that should have been rejected, weren't. We won't know that for awhile.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
post #629 of 3096
I don't have any problem with other opinions be careful where you lump me I was simply referring to making the same point repetitively

I think both are great sets with different strengths you can believe what you want about me
post #630 of 3096
Okay I concede that point then just dont think it would serve any company to not qc rigidly especially something touted as an exclusive signature line
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Plasma Flat Panel Displays
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Plasma Flat Panel Displays › F8500.. OR .. ZT60 ?????