please read heuristically the scientific method again:
The scientific method – the method wherein inquiry regards itself as fallible and purposely tests itself and criticizes, corrects, and improves itself.
By claiming ABX tests are not capable of proving anything i find my self greatly amused since double blind tests are approved way of showing differences in science in several fields...
THEY SHOW you if something is different or not and then if positive difference we can try to explain why is that and figure out how to improve.
(if the original abx test had only retarded engineers with tin ear's and spectrum analyzers, nobody is denying re-trial with other listeners)
by ignoring ABX you drop into lalaland where everybody's moronic opinion count's and no work gets done because its just arguments in internet that burrbrowwn dac is bestest instead philips and measurements can be ignored completely, since you won't ABX test actually verify if somebody can HEAR it, its merely enough for you if he says oh yeah i can hear da-thing but can you hear thiz-dathing?
obviously nobody would really hear it since it would be mere lie to get you buy the hypersuperuberdacvn+1.
Engineers would just revert trolling each other and make even more ridiculous mumbojumbo to cash you out... (FOR godsake it's in your own good to familiarize your self with testing)
and if your willing to spend big bucks on placebo, im not to judge but atleast i would buy LSD/THC or alcohol to get REAL effects...)
thanks for link diomania.
Edited by nufi - 10/10/13 at 10:19am