Originally Posted by jim19611961
Originally Posted by arnyk
That's what I'm doing.
Reasoning, schemasing. Where are the reliable facts to back your wild assertions up?
For example you seem to have made the claim that thin (say 2"=4") absorbers can't be used to create a room that has reasonably flat frequency response and that what one needs is 8" absorbers or die. Not true and if I could get you off the ceiling there's a reason why.
Ive shared my views and you can make what you want of them.
Are they not flawed stories designed to scare little boys? If so, shame, shame.
If you want proof, go find it yourself.
All the internet eggspurts say that. What is the reason for that? I suspect its because they don't work on the basis of proof and facts, so when pressed for them, they have none.
Your onging miss representations of my ideas and assertions to claims I haven't made is tiring and ive had enough.
You talk about misrepresentations, but you when pressed for particulars, you run away.
It is always a good day when an internet eggspurt is put on the spot. ;-)