Both Dan Hitchman and my posts were about the way Gravity looked, sounded, felt and the filmmakers' choices on each count in presenting their movie. Of the 11 paragraphs in Mr. Wilkinson's review/opening post, two are devoted to the way it sounded. All of the others are devoted to exactly what Dan Hitchman and I brought up in our posts. However, if the AVS Moderator believes this thread should be confined to a more narrow discussion of the "3D Dolby Atmos experience in the theater", so be it. Anyone's characterization of our posts as "crapping" on a thread whose opening post and review talks more about what we brought up than the more specific subject of the "3D Dolby Atmos experience in the theater" is simply resorting to a weird diversion from points they cannot refute in some other way but wish they could...imo.
The moderators can call it anyway they see it I guess. But I think they prefer those posts to stay in the movie threads not in industry or breaking news posted by an AVS news breaker or administrator. After all Scott's article was about his experience with 3D and ATMOS. Also if you've noticed the moderators have had to "step in" on several of these articles lately. This has gone far enough off topic, my apologies to the other members and I did not mean to throw any fuel on this.