Originally Posted by Wayne Highwood
So you want us to do your homework for you? It is you that refuses to look at the evidence and the conditions surrounding those conclusions, not ours.
What good are the conclusions if you don't know how they were reached? You expect people to take you seriously and offer nothing else, but a paragraph of information with no actual details?!?
Is that supposed to be scientific?
I understand some level of frustration when satisfying your curiosity necessitates paid subscription to the professional journals, but the info is there if you want it bad enough.
Sure, and I pay the subscription and... what if nothing is there? Isn't it a little convenient for you? Just cite an extract from an article, and the mysterious details are left out... and that's supposed to be your hard evidence!?!
Don't complain to those who already are aware of this stuff, go see for yourself if you don't believe the highly qualified, evidence based, and freely provided advice already given in this thread. (General and well deserved hat-tip to the AVS community for being a bastion of reason amid the nonsense in the audio marketplace!)
I'm tired of these games. If you had ANYTHING substantial to offer, you would have already posted it. The fact you have not is admission that you have nothing to offer.
It's funny, you guys love to post links showing how strong your position is, but when the results are questioned, you demand that we (people who do not bend over) go and "search" the net for the details surrounding those results. It's frankly insulting.Edited by OllieS - 11/14/13 at 11:44am