Quote:
Yes, in other markets the local Comcast management made the decision to put their HD channels in the 600 tier, 700 tier, while here in Atlanta they are mostly in the 800 tier. Although some of the premium movie channels are even in the 700 tier.

They need a channel line-up strategy.
They need to reorganize so the channels flow logically. For instance, all the premium movie channels (HBO, Showtime) should be together, not at the end of the 700s AND some at the end of the 800s. They also need to carve out enough space for all the regular HD channels.
PLUS, Comcast is coming under increased regulatory pressure due to their impending ownership of NBC (with MSNBC and CNBC). Critics are afraid that what Comcast is doing already accidentally with haphazard planning it will start doing on purpose
, in an effort to increase ratings for properties it owns outright.Bloomberg News, a competitor to Comcast-owned business news cable network CNBC, suggests that Comcast could "hide" channels -- like Bloomberg and Fox Business News -- in the nether part of the channel range, while putting channels it wants to promote next to already popular channels (like putting CNBC next to ESPN).
Quote:
Bloomberg News says that once Comcast owns CNBC, it will discriminate against other networks such as itself, leaving them higher up on the channel lineup or on different tiers.
Bloomberg News says that once Comcast owns CNBC, it will discriminate against other networks such as itself, leaving them higher up on the channel lineup or on different tiers.
Bloomberg is calling upon regulators to make "neighborhooding" a condition of Comcast's ownership. Channel line-ups with genre "Neighorhooding" would include categories like “News & Local,” “Kids,” “Sports,” “Movies,” where channels with similar content would be grouped together. That way, consumers would make an informed choice of what they wanted to watch -- not because they couldn't find the non-Comcast owned competing channels easily.
Years ago -- before small dish satellite TV became ubiquitous -- I worked at a local NBC station in a mountainous area of Virginia. Most people used over-the-air (OTA) antennas for TV viewing. We were far and away the #1 station in the market. Our local newscasts got a 70 share.
Why? Sure NBC was pumping out popular programming at the time, "Must See TV", and our local newscast ratings benefited from that. But mostly our advantage was GEOGRAPHICAL. With a low channel VHF frequency we had the best signal that could carry and penetrate the furtherest. We had a clear signal, whereas one of our competitors had a higher channel (weaker) VHF signal and the others all had UHF signals which cannot carry well in mountainous regions. Ha! Viewers couldn't watch the competition because they couldn't find the competition. In this case it was nothing my station did, it was just luck. But competitors are afraid Comcast will rig the channel line-up to make their channels harder to find.


























