The HD Leeza will deinterlace 1080i to 1080p and then downscale it to the native res of the projector (1400x1050). It will be connected via DVI for 1:1 pixel mapping. No secondary scaling by the projector.
Quote:
| Have you seen this result? |
Obviously I haven't seen it, because the scaler is not in my possession yet (duh).
What I have seen is 1080i displayed on a Hitachi 5500 (LCOS, 1365x1024 with Panamorph) and Sharp Z10000 (1280x720 DLP). The Hitachi bobs to 540p and upscales, so 1080i material looks inferior to native 720p material. The Sharp performs proper 1080i > 1080p deinterlacing, then downscales it to match the panel. Easily superior to the Hitachi despite the lower resolution of the panel itself thanks to the higher amount of source detail. In this case, I saw no appreciable difference between good 720p and good 1080i.
Quote:
| I stand by what i said, 1080p is a nonstarter. Sure I would like to have it and the pj that it would make a difference on, but i don't and neither do you. |
You keep blathering on about the display rendering full 1080p, which is not what this is about. It's about proper deinterlacing of 1080i into 1080p so as not to lose any info when scaling to native res. I'm happy that you have a CRT projector that can display an interlaced signal natively, but I don't have the space for such a monster. That means digital, which means converting any incoming signal to match the native res of the projector. So 1080i > 1080p deinterlacing done properly is an important feature for digital projector owners such as myself.
Therefore, paying almost 3 times as much for a scaler that can't perform this function--and will likely have SD scaling that isn't noticeably superior to the HD Leeza--is asinine.