AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Seattle, WA - Comcast
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Seattle, WA - Comcast - Page 420

post #12571 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by quarque View Post

There was a story on KOMO news tonight about Comcast changes and the need for these new "little boxes" so people can get channels 30-80 on an analog TV. But they said the **** won't hit the fan until April. The story even had Steve Kipp explaining the new little boxes. A major drawback is the little boxes do not support a guide or any other functions, just a conversion of a certain range of channels to analog output. They mentioned something about 3 free boxes per household, then $1.99 for additional ones.

that makes more sense to me than the original seattle times story...as with my newer TV can get the comcast digital channels already, and I see no reason why they would encrypt 30-60, when above and below that are unencrypted...
post #12572 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareagle View Post

A little more on Comcast's Seattle plans:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...3_brier08.html

Then, this will be bye-bye Comcast for me.
post #12573 of 15833
Found this on the KingTV website:

http://www.king5.com/localnews/consu....42181bf3.html

which is quite different from the Seattle times article...the key point being you only need the box with older anaolg TVs, of course the implication being a newer digital TV will not require the new hardware.
post #12574 of 15833
The KING and Times articles don't seem that much different to me. One thing you can't tell is whether the digital versions of the channels above 30 will be encrypted.
post #12575 of 15833
I have read this post on page 414 of this thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike89 View Post

Important HD notes: MOJO going away, FSN HD Events gets a new full-time channel, Science Channel HD moves to Digital Starter, Golf HD and Versus HD get their own full-time channels.

This was in the Kitsap Sun legal notices on Wed 10/22: (I have retyped it from the newspaper ad graphic).

************************************************************ ***********

Important Notice to Cable Customers serviced in Kitsap County
Comcast will make the following changes to its channel line-up on the following dates or shortly thereafter:

On November 24, 2008 or shortly thereafter the following channel is changing channel numbers:

Golf channel current channel # 69 new channel # 70

On December 1, 2008 or shortly thereafter the following channels (which currently time share on a single channel) will have the following changes made:

MOJO HD current channel # 664 (shared with FSN HD Events) CEASING BROADCAST
FSN HD Events current channel # 664 (shared with MOJO HD) new channel # 627

On December 8, 2008 or shortly thereafter the following channels (which currently time share on a single channel) will become full-time channels and change channel numbers:

Golf HD current channel # 665 (shared with Versus HD) new channel # 625 (full-time)
Versus HD current channel # 665 (shared with Golf HD) new channel # 626 (full-time)

On December 8, 2008 or shortly thereafter the following channels will move from the Digital Preferred level of service to the Digital Starter level of service:

PBS Kids Sprout ch 118
Discovery Kids ch 121
Bloomberg TV ch 128
G4 ch 136
C-SPAN 3 ch 150
Science Channel ch 272
BIO ch 275
History International ch 276
WE TV ch 502
LMN ch 504
Science Channel HD ch 696

On January 1, 2009 or shortly thereafter the following channel will be added to the Digital Preferred level of service:

MLB network ch 407

************************************************************ ***********

I have got this same notice in my local paper around the same time and the date the channels are moving to digital starter service. The channel numbers in my area (Aberdeen, WA) are the same as the ones Spike89 posted.

I searched for the new channels and only got PBS Kids Sprout, on 114-5.

Did anybody get the same notice Spike89 posted in their local paper, and have the same numbers for the channels listed?

I am trying to get these channels on my set's QAM turner without getting a box from Comcast. I am getting the channels from their Digital Starter service, minus a few HD channels, without a box.

If anybody got the same notice Spike89 posted in their local paper, have the same channel numbers (If the numbers in Kitsap and Aberdeen are the same, maybe Seattle and around that area, too), and got the channels today on their TV's QAM turner, could you please post the QAM channel numbers you are receiving thme on?

Thanks for any info. Sorry if I didn't explain what I wanted very well.
post #12576 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareagle View Post

The KING and Times articles don't seem that much different to me. One thing you can't tell is whether the digital versions of the channels above 30 will be encrypted.

I think they are encrypted because none of the expanded basic channels show up on a QAM channel on my clear QAM tuner. You can find all of the limited basic QAM channels pretty readily.
post #12577 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeattleAl View Post

I think they are encrypted because none of the expanded basic channels show up on a QAM channel on my clear QAM tuner. You can find all of the limited basic QAM channels pretty readily.

After they make the actual switch they can't be encrypted because the DTAs don't have security modules, they're just little QAM boxes.
post #12578 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by narunet View Post

After they make the actual switch they can't be encrypted because the DTAs don't have security modules, they're just little QAM boxes.

If they're just little QAM tuners, then why are they necessary for newer TVs with built in QAM, unless the signals are encrypted? The KingTV article says they are only needed for older analog TVs, the newer Seattle Times article and Q&A on Dec 9th says they ARE necessary for TVs with QAM tuners!

So, with my one TV with a cable card (and extended basic analog service only) I do get Discovery HD, and about 10 other HD, in addition to the local HD, at no extra charge...with these free DTA boxes, will I then get all those extra HD channels free?
post #12579 of 15833
Federal law requires Comcast to support Cablecard devices, now and in the forseable future. If the law had changed, someone would have already posted the changes, and their interpretations of such. Others would respond with how these changes result in "end of the world" after they already spent all this money on equipment.

At this point, no one posted anything indicating that the FCC is doing away with their CableCard requirements . . . no need to jump to the conclution that the "end of the world" is near.
post #12580 of 15833
These DTAs don't have anything to do with CableCard. They are simple, cheap, "crippled" digital cable boxes for the purpose of allowing people without cable boxes OR WITHOUT CABLECARDS to keep viewing Ch. 30-80 (soon to be digital only) on their TVs. In fact, it's probably good news for Cablecard users, since it postpones the inevitable move to SDV a few more years...

As for whether ch. 30-80 will be encrypted, my guess is yes. Since you'll have to pay extra for this new "Digital Starter" tier - just like you now have to pay for Expanded Basic -Comcast will absolutely not make them available for free. These DTAs will use some form of simple 1-way conditional access to grant access to the new Digital Starter tier, as opposed to the old way of granting access to Expanded Basic (analog filter on your incoming line).

DTAs may have limited function, but they are more than *just* a tuner. At a minimum they provide channel mapping, and probably some simple form of conditional access.
post #12581 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew00001 View Post

Federal law requires Comcast to support Cablecard devices, now and in the forseable future. If the law had changed, someone would have already posted the changes, and their interpretations of such. Others would respond with how these changes result in "end of the world" after they already spent all this money on equipment.

At this point, no one posted anything indicating that the FCC is doing away with their CableCard requirements . . . no need to jump to the conclution that the "end of the world" is near.

Well, the "TV viewing" end of the world might not happen to CableCard users, but it may be happening to people invested in QAM-only devices.

I myself own 4 QAM devices and rely on them for both viewing and recording. It would be a big deal for my family to lose digital HD tuning capabilities via QAM. And no, crappy setup boxes + extra remotes + extra fees is not a viable option for us, especially for the DVR solution.

arf1410 above pretty much summed up my fear: why in the first article is written that TVs with newer digital tuners will also be affected? Since QAM is the only tuner working out of the box with cable, and currently support only the limited basic channels, wouldn't that suggest that the current clear-QAM channels might get turned off?

I hope I'm just reading too much between the lines, but any more tangible information on the matter will be greatly appreciated.
post #12582 of 15833
http://silicondust.com/hdhomerun/lin...Postcode=97339

That is one of the areas that have been switched over, all of the extended basic has been unencrypted.

Also, if Comcast were to have security on these new boxes, it would go against the FCC rule.
post #12583 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericjut View Post

Well, the "TV viewing" end of the world might not happen to CableCard users, but it may be happening to people invested in QAM-only devices.

We definitely need more information, and the mainstream newspaper/TV articles are very confused.

But it seems to me that nothing will change for existing clear-QAM digital channels. The only changes will be for ch. 30-80 - and yes, this is a *potential* problem for QAM-TV users. Currently, if you have no cable box or cablecard, you must be viewing ch 30-80 as ANALOG - even on your brand new QAM-enabled TV, since the digital simulcasts of those channels are curerntly encrypted. Once those move to digital only (and assuming they remain encrypted) then you will no longer be able to view ch 30-80 on your QAM TV without at least a DTA.

I think Comcast might have an FCC issue with these DTA boxes if they do retain encryption on (formerly analog) ch 30-80. It's my understanding they're no longer allowed to provide new boxes with "integrated security", and these DTAs certainly don't have separate cablecards or anything. On the other hand, I can't see Comcast making their new "Digital Starter" channels 30-80 available to anyone without a subscription - even with analog, they enforced access via filters/traps.
post #12584 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimre View Post

We definitely need more information, and the mainstream newspaper/TV articles are very confused.

But it seems to me that nothing will change for existing clear-QAM digital channels. The only changes will be for ch. 30-80 - and yes, this is a *potential* problem for QAM-TV users. Currently, if you have no cable box or cablecard, you must be viewing ch 30-80 as ANALOG - even on your brand new QAM-enabled TV, since the digital simulcasts of those channels are curerntly encrypted. Once those move to digital only (and assuming they remain encrypted) then you will no longer be able to view ch 30-80 on your QAM TV without at least a DTA.

I think Comcast might have an FCC issue with these DTA boxes if they do retain encryption on (formerly analog) ch 30-80. It's my understanding they're no longer allowed to provide new boxes with "integrated security", and these DTAs certainly don't have separate cablecards or anything. On the other hand, I can't see Comcast making their new "Digital Starter" channels 30-80 available to anyone without a subscription - even with analog, they enforced access via filters/traps.

Yes, they are not allowed to have integrated security. I am also baffled that they would have to put everything in the clear, but I really think they're gonna have to.
post #12585 of 15833
Comcast must have quite a bit of spare bandwidth here now if they can add the rumored HD channels next week, months before the planned digitizing of the expanded basic.
post #12586 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareagle View Post

Comcast must have quite a bit of spare bandwidth here now if they can add the rumored HD channels next week, months before the planned digitizing of the expanded basic.

Not to mention the spare bandwidth for the DOCSIS 3.0 rollout - eg, cable internet speed increase - also due this month:

http://comcastwashington.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=38
post #12587 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareagle View Post

Comcast must have quite a bit of spare bandwidth here now if they can add the rumored HD channels next week, months before the planned digitizing of the expanded basic.

I think we can assume that the areas receiving 29 new HD channels next week have a lot of spare bandwidth. I would also bet that the reason why much of the Seattle Region won't get the new channels right away is that much of the region still has bandwidth constraints.

That may also be why Comcast has been slow to add new HD channels here - they didn't want to add new HD channels to part of the Seattle Region while leaving the rest of region green with envy. The arrival of FiOS has probably forced Comcast to add HD channels to keep up, even if Cpmcast can't add them everywhere in the Seattle Region.
post #12588 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimre View Post

These DTAs don't have anything to do with CableCard. They are simple, cheap, "crippled" digital cable boxes for the purpose of allowing people without cable boxes OR WITHOUT CABLECARDS to keep viewing Ch. 30-80 (soon to be digital only) on their TVs. In fact, it's probably good news for Cablecard users, since it postpones the inevitable move to SDV a few more years...

As for whether ch. 30-80 will be encrypted, my guess is yes. Since you'll have to pay extra for this new "Digital Starter" tier - just like you now have to pay for Expanded Basic -Comcast will absolutely not make them available for free. These DTAs will use some form of simple 1-way conditional access to grant access to the new Digital Starter tier, as opposed to the old way of granting access to Expanded Basic (analog filter on your incoming line).

DTAs may have limited function, but they are more than *just* a tuner. At a minimum they provide channel mapping, and probably some simple form of conditional access.


Whay do you mean by, " since it postpones the inevitable move to
SDV a few more years"? I thought the choices Comcast had to
increase bandwidth for HD were SDV or analog migration. Since
Comcast has chosen analog migration for your area to free up
bandwidth there is no need for SDV. Analog migration seems
to be the choice for Comcast.
post #12589 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by kb11 View Post

Whay do you mean by, " since it postpones the inevitable move to
SDV a few more years"? I thought the choices Comcast had to
increase bandwidth for HD were SDV or analog migration. Since
Comcast has chosen analog migration for your area to free up
bandwidth there is no need for SDV. Analog migration seems
to be the choice for Comcast.

It's my opinion that something like SDV will ultimately happen in a few years anyway, even after the currrent analog migration happens. Why waste bandwidth sending every channel to every node, even when no one is watching? Long-term, this is where real scalability gains will happen. There's no need to have 500+ fixed channels constantly using up the vast majority of the total bandwidth coming into your home. How many program streams will you ever watch or record simultaneously? Two? Four? Eight? Then that's how many should be coming into your home at one time...
post #12590 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by wareagle View Post

Comcast must have quite a bit of spare bandwidth here now if they can add the rumored HD channels next week, months before the planned digitizing of the expanded basic.

Whoa, what am I missing here?

Also ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by snorlaxnut View Post

Did anybody get the same notice Spike89 posted in their local paper, and have the same numbers for the channels listed?

I am trying to get these channels on my set's QAM turner without getting a box from Comcast. I am getting the channels from their Digital Starter service, minus a few HD channels, without a box.

If anybody got the same notice Spike89 posted in their local paper, have the same channel numbers (If the numbers in Kitsap and Aberdeen are the same, maybe Seattle and around that area, too), and got the channels today on their TV's QAM turner, could you please post the QAM channel numbers you are receiving thme on?

Thanks for any info. Sorry if I didn't explain what I wanted very well.

The information given from Spike89 is true and has taken effect. I am a Comcast subscriber in the Kitsap area.
post #12591 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by quarque View Post

Yes. You can view the manual online. Here is an excerpt talking about the connectors on the back:

"2 ANT / CABLE IN
Connect the AIR antenna or CATV antenna here.
Connect the cable in the event that a local cable
provider is passing through 8-level Vestigial Sideband
(8VSB) and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM)
on their systems."

I had the same problem initially with this because many summaries for the product don't mention cable or QAM capability. Thanks to Dan Kurts on AVS for pointing this out.

The manual is at:

http://www.samsung.com/us/support/do...p_nm=DTB-H260F

I have been quite happy with this box! However, does anyone know how we will be affected with Comcast making us all change to using the new Digital Transport Adapters? It seems that Comcast is going to an all-digital format with includes channels 30-74. They will continue to deliver channels 2-29 and channels 75-99, which are part of their Limited Basic service in analog (no box would be required to receive those channels.) But we will need the new DTAs for the other channels. Or, is their box just a cheaper version of the QAM tuner I already have?
post #12592 of 15833
I don't think that the current digital users would have to switch their box to receive channels 30-74. In fact, I know that's a true statement because the QAM tuner in digital receivers is reading a different frequency for these channels already. For example, we can still see channel 74 as the TV Guide Network. But, when you try to view channel 74 without a Comcast digital box, all you see is static.

Here's a good example! When they bring out the new DTA boxes, you should be able to see channel 74 again.
post #12593 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by snorlaxnut View Post

If anybody got the same notice Spike89 posted in their local paper, have the same channel numbers (If the numbers in Kitsap and Aberdeen are the same, maybe Seattle and around that area, too), and got the channels today on their TV's QAM turner, could you please post the QAM channel numbers you are receiving thme on?

I just did a rescan on my QAM-equipped TV, nothing appears appreciably different from before... nothing new added to unencrypted QAM channel list that I can tell. On my comcast DVR, the Versus/Golf/Mojo stuff has changed as described. No new channels yet though (waiting for the 16th to see if the slew of new HD stuff shows up).
post #12594 of 15833
Right now I can receive 8 HD local channels and channels 2-99 through the cable connected directly to one of my secondary televisions with a built-in QAM tuner. I think that beginning next year I will no longer be able to receive the channels between 30 and 99 without using the free converter offered by Comcast. 2 questions.

a) If I choose to only receive channels 2 -29 and attach the cable directly into my television, will I still get the 8 HD channels such as 4-1 and 5-1?

b) If I install the free converter on the back of the television, will I still get the 8 HD channels (4-1, etc)? If this is "yes" is there a downside to this option?

Thanks,
post #12595 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by artseattle View Post

Right now I can receive 8 HD local channels and channels 2-99 through the cable connected directly to one of my secondary televisions with a built-in QAM tuner. I think that beginning next year I will no longer be able to receive the channels between 30 and 99 without using the free converter offered by Comcast. 2 questions.

a) If I choose to only receive channels 2 -29 and attach the cable directly into my television, will I still get the 8 HD channels such as 4-1 and 5-1?

b) If I install the free converter on the back of the television, will I still get the 8 HD channels (4-1, etc)? If this is "yes" is there a downside to this option?

Thanks,

Well, the QAM channels will still be there. And from what I know, the DTAs are RF out only and don't decode the HD stations. And again, these boxes don't have security that can be used at this time.

Also, I have limited basic cable with a DCT and today saw that they changed the channel map for me so, I can't tune to the channels I don't get anymore. Before, the channels would be there but it would just say "Not Authorized".
post #12596 of 15833
So I see the Auto Industry bailout passed, thanks to the Emergency Broadcast System switching to CSPAN at 3:05 and locking the cable box and cable card on the Tivo to that channel for 15-20 minutes (neither will respond to any commands).

Couldn't do this for 9/11, but you could do it for a bail-out bill. Thanks, Uncle Sam.
post #12597 of 15833
Between 3:25pm and 3:35 today my cable box switched to CSPAN and froze up all functionality to show the House of Representatives deliberations on the Big Three Bailout bill. I couldn't change channels or call up the menu screen. I tried it on another TV and the same result. I guess its like Big Brother (Comcast) dictating what we watch.
post #12598 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by hergertr View Post

Between 3:25pm and 3:35 today my cable box switched to CSPAN and froze up all functionality to show the House of Representatives deliberations on the Big Three Bailout bill. I couldn't change channels or call up the menu screen. I tried it on another TV and the same result. I guess its like Big Brother (Comcast) dictating what we watch.

More like Little Brother sticking his fingers in your DVR and screwing it up royally...
post #12599 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimre View Post

It's my opinion that something like SDV will ultimately happen in a few years anyway, even after the currrent analog migration happens. Why waste bandwidth sending every channel to every node, even when no one is watching? Long-term, this is where real scalability gains will happen. There's no need to have 500+ fixed channels constantly using up the vast majority of the total bandwidth coming into your home. How many program streams will you ever watch or record simultaneously? Two? Four? Eight? Then that's how many should be coming into your home at one time...

I think you may be right about SDV - it is much more efficient. But I have read/heard that channel changing on these systems is quite slow because of all the handshaking that goes on. Bad news for the channel surfers out there. Do you know anyone living with a SDV system right now?
post #12600 of 15833
Quote:
Originally Posted by artseattle View Post

Right now I can receive 8 HD local channels and channels 2-99 through the cable connected directly to one of my secondary televisions with a built-in QAM tuner. I think that beginning next year I will no longer be able to receive the channels between 30 and 99 without using the free converter offered by Comcast. 2 questions.

a) If I choose to only receive channels 2 -29 and attach the cable directly into my television, will I still get the 8 HD channels such as 4-1 and 5-1?

b) If I install the free converter on the back of the television, will I still get the 8 HD channels (4-1, etc)? If this is "yes" is there a downside to this option?

Thanks,

Just found out, even if you have limited cable, only channels 2-29 will remain clear QAM, the rest of it is going digital and will require a DTA box. While the box is free, this is in addition to all the other changes and has nothing to do with the analog to digital switch-over. Most likely you will be able to view just the channels up to 29 as you asked.

If you install the DTA box, you will be able to receive those channels. Anyone who uses a VCR is now out of luck, the DTA becomes the tuner, not the VCR! Also affects anyone with a tuner card in a PC. This really is starting to smell funny!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Seattle, WA - Comcast