I watched all three hours of CBS's HD broadcast of Lucy last night. The PQ of entire program was stunnning on the P50! The outdoor scenes were stunning. The indoor scenes were stunning. The night scenes ,you guessed it, stunning.Why can't all HD programming produce these results. In another thread I complained about CBS's CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond. I think Raymond is shot on film while Raymond is shot on video.
Was the Lucy movie shot with video cameras? If so why aren't all programs shot in video so uniformally spectacular? Outdoor scenes,no matter the source, always look great. However, indoor and night HD scenes are often a disappointment. Not Lucy. ALL scenes were great.Some of the indoor scenes were the best. In most HD shows the indoor scenes are too contrasty. There is a lack of detail in the background. Not Lucy? Any theories?
Also I have have been experimenting with backlighting and have discovered it greatly enhances the PQ and relieves eye fatique. I haven't purchased the Lume-Ideal yet. I don't think jml or Mark Rubin ever reported back after their initial reviews of the lamp. I take that, perhaps incorrectly, as disappointment in the product.
I'm wondering whether they, or anyone else who purchased the lamp, have any further thoughts on the bias light? At the moment I'm just using a cheap 6500K fluorescent light from Home Depot. It's a little bright at 20watts but it is remarkable how much better the PQ appears...once you get accoustomed to the light emanating from the back of your Plasma. Thanks
Was the Lucy movie shot with video cameras? If so why aren't all programs shot in video so uniformally spectacular? Outdoor scenes,no matter the source, always look great. However, indoor and night HD scenes are often a disappointment. Not Lucy. ALL scenes were great.Some of the indoor scenes were the best. In most HD shows the indoor scenes are too contrasty. There is a lack of detail in the background. Not Lucy? Any theories?
Also I have have been experimenting with backlighting and have discovered it greatly enhances the PQ and relieves eye fatique. I haven't purchased the Lume-Ideal yet. I don't think jml or Mark Rubin ever reported back after their initial reviews of the lamp. I take that, perhaps incorrectly, as disappointment in the product.
I'm wondering whether they, or anyone else who purchased the lamp, have any further thoughts on the bias light? At the moment I'm just using a cheap 6500K fluorescent light from Home Depot. It's a little bright at 20watts but it is remarkable how much better the PQ appears...once you get accoustomed to the light emanating from the back of your Plasma. Thanks












