AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Backlighting and Lucy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Backlighting and Lucy  

post #1 of 36
Thread Starter 
I watched all three hours of CBS's HD broadcast of Lucy last night. The PQ of entire program was stunnning on the P50! The outdoor scenes were stunning. The indoor scenes were stunning. The night scenes ,you guessed it, stunning.Why can't all HD programming produce these results. In another thread I complained about CBS's CSI and Everybody Loves Raymond. I think Raymond is shot on film while Raymond is shot on video.

Was the Lucy movie shot with video cameras? If so why aren't all programs shot in video so uniformally spectacular? Outdoor scenes,no matter the source, always look great. However, indoor and night HD scenes are often a disappointment. Not Lucy. ALL scenes were great.Some of the indoor scenes were the best. In most HD shows the indoor scenes are too contrasty. There is a lack of detail in the background. Not Lucy? Any theories?

Also I have have been experimenting with backlighting and have discovered it greatly enhances the PQ and relieves eye fatique. I haven't purchased the Lume-Ideal yet. I don't think jml or Mark Rubin ever reported back after their initial reviews of the lamp. I take that, perhaps incorrectly, as disappointment in the product.

I'm wondering whether they, or anyone else who purchased the lamp, have any further thoughts on the bias light? At the moment I'm just using a cheap 6500K fluorescent light from Home Depot. It's a little bright at 20watts but it is remarkable how much better the PQ appears...once you get accoustomed to the light emanating from the back of your Plasma. Thanks
post #2 of 36
Something about the film-to-HD transfers does tend to leave indoor / dark scenes typically wanting. I am of the opinion that this is not an inherent weakness of going from film to HD, but is more of a "it happens if you don't prepare for it." It's pretty likely Lucy was shot on film and not on HD video (not guaranteed, but likely), just with an eye for the HD transfer.

Mark
post #3 of 36
The 6500K bulb is available from Lume-Ideal without the fixture. I ordered it and the filters.
We will see how it looks.

John
post #4 of 36
Thread Starter 
John: Thanks. Let us know how well it works. Are you using any type of backlighting now?
post #5 of 36
All Im using is a small halogen desk lamp and even that works.
post #6 of 36
Thread Starter 
I probably should have left the Lucy review out of my original post and just asked if people use backlighting and if so how is it setup and what type of light source is being used.

After my original post I watched Raymond and noticed that it was not as contrasty as in the past and that the colors were more vibrant.The black levels were improved over previous weeks. So while I think the Lucy movie had incredible PQ I also now think the cheap backlighting I am using is partially responsible.

I'm surprised because very few people discussed their use of backlighting when it was brought up in the thread about my impressions on the P50. It may be because backlighting wasn't discussed until the middle of the thread.

I first tried the halogen desk lamp which it sounds like matg3 is using. I then purchased a cheap 6500K fluoresent. Both seemed to work well. Last night I used the Halogen (Micro) desk lamp because it can sit on the top back of my Bello PVS 4260 stand and be angled (the light hood swivels) to disperse the light evenly to the sides and top and bottom. I don't have any idea what the color temperature of the Halogon would be? However because it doesn't need to be mounted and can be adjusted easily I used it last night and will probably continue to use it until I decide if a more expensive solution would work even better.

My wall is off white and the stand is about 5" from the wall. Anyone else use backlighting with success? Anyone know the color temperature of a Micro 10-20 watt halogen desk lamp? Thanks:)
post #7 of 36
Sounds like you are now doing exactly what I'm doing with a halogen.I went around looking for a cheap 6500K light but I didn't want to have to mount it and wasn't sure if fluorescent or halogen or a regular bulb was the best.since i had the halogen i went with it.What was the difference between using fluorescent and halogen since they have such different light qualities?Interested in what the color temperature of 20 watt halogen would be.I think this back lighting is something many are are going to be exploring on the forum in the coming weeks.it really makes a difference.
post #8 of 36
Why or how does backlighting enhance PQ?
post #9 of 36
Thread Starter 
Quote:
I think this back lighting is something many are are going to be exploring on the forum in the coming weeks.it really makes a difference.
I agree with you that backlighting really makes a difference. I'm not using the "proper" color temperature but the PQ, at night, has improved dramatically. I now can't watch the P50 at night without the backlight. I guess I will keep experimenting on my own to see if I can refine the effect.

I'm not sure about your comment that many on this forum are going to be exploring backlighting in the coming weeks. For some reason there doesn't appear to be much interest in the subject. This thread was ready to disappear from the front page before you rescued it. I expected more comments from members who have used backlighting.

The only way I found out about backlighting was when PF (a member) told me, in the middle of a thread, that I should buy a bias light (Ideal-Lume). The discussion started at the bottom of this page: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0&pagenumber=2

There was some very technical and helpful information in the rest of the thread. However, the posts were mainly between two members. I assumed that the lack of input from others meant that everyone already knew what a dramatic impact backlighting makes on PQ ( black level, vibrancy of colors) not to mention easing eye strain. The lack of input from others could also have meant that most hadn't used it and didn't think it would benifit them. I now tend to believe the latter.

Kweezr: The link I gave above discusses some of the benifits of backlighting. How many others have experienced the same dramatic improvement in PQ, with backlighting, that I have remains a mystery for the moment.

mattg3: I too would still like to know the technical differences between using flourescent and halogen. For some reason halogen works like magic.
post #10 of 36
I had ordered my Ideal-Lume about the same time that Mark had and decided to wait till it got here and then use it a few times before posting anything.

I do wish that they shipped a little more information regarding best mounting location (something beyond the obvious behind the display).

I have off white walls as well and I agree with Mark's assessment that the filters are needed in order to achieve an appropriate match.

I have to say that I am pleased with the result. Eye strain is markedly improved. PQ improvement has not wowed me as yet. However, there is improvement. I am wondering if I would have noticed a greater improvement with the 503CMX that I had previously as opposed to the P50 that I have now. I think that improved black levels and the other PQ variables that are improved as a consequence of improved black levels are at the heart of the improved PQ claims.

I can get to the switch pretty easily so the whole issue of convenient on/off is not as much of an issue for me.

It might be a bit pricey compared to something not so "designed to task". On the other hand, whatever one uses, the cost is not going to be 0 and there is no questioning in my mind that there is a benefit. As stated above at least for me so far, I am more impressed with the improvements or lack of eye strain than I am with the improvements in PQ.

As to the cost....heck, add $20 to a good set of 2 meter component video cables from this site's favorite cable supplier and yo are about there so its not that bad. That said I do empathize with the notion that if something standard did just as well, one could save a good deal of money. Based on their impact, I think that the filters are a big deal. Some have questioned the use of that type of filter in this application and as I recall the issue was the life expectancy of the filters. I do not know enough about the topic to offer a comment there.

If it is enough of an endorsement to indicate whether it is staying or going, in my case it is definitely staying.
post #11 of 36
How much is this magic "Ideal-Lume" thing?
post #12 of 36
On their web site at http://www.cinemaquestinc.com/ideal_lume.htm

The cheapest model is listed as $55 plus another $13 for a dimming/filter kit. Deluxe models run $150 to over $400.
post #13 of 36
The "Plasma display" model is $150.00 with a filter kit included.

I guess the biggest difference between the various models once you get to the plasma and above versions is the bulb.

That said, it would take some real serious salesmanship to nudge me into any of the models that are more expensive than the plasma model especially since that is the display that I am using the Ideal-Lume with.
post #14 of 36
As Dobe and I have stated try just a cheap 20 watt halogen desk lamp set up behind the plasma(mine is just resting on top of the right speaker of my surround sound so its not even in an optimal balanced location) but it still improves things on my 433.Just put any lamp you can behind the plasma.If it works go for the more expensive stuff if you feel you need it.
post #15 of 36
Kweezer,

Video backlighting or "bias" lighting is used consistently in the professional video production arena to relieve viewer fatigue. Since those technicians perform critical analysis of picture quality over long hours in the studio, this is an important issue for them. Another area of concern is accurate color perception. 6500 Kelvins fluorescents are used because that color temperature is the standard for video white.

Occasional mention of these principles has appeared in the various home theater magazines for years. Some discussion also appears on the popular DVDs for setting up and calibrating home theaters. You may be familiar with 'Video Essentials', 'Avia Guide to Home Theater' or 'Sound & Vision Home Theater Tune-Up', etc. Video experts and consumers have discovered that the technology transfers well to home theater use.

Considerable detail on this topic and related issues is available at www.ideal-lume.com along with links to other articles. A Google search on video bias lighting or video backlighting should also yield further information.

Best regards and beautiful pictures,
G. Alan Brown, President
CinemaQuest, Inc.

Insist on HDTV!:eek:
post #16 of 36
Apparently tungsten-halogen lamps have a low 3200K color temperature (yellowish tint), that isn't ideal as a backlight since you should go for 6500K (close to daylight sun color temp) which is what the Ideal-Lume models have.
post #17 of 36
I put a cheap desk lamp with a 40watt incandescent bulb back of my plasma (which sits on a Bello stand in the corner where my old CRT stood). The backlighting helps enormously. Since I don't know the technical information, I can only state that I think the backlight makes the blacks look blacker, and consequently I have adjusted the blacks to a shade of gray which looks quite black (with the backlighting) but is probably one shade above, which helps the monitor deal with the grayscale ramp, and shows less contouring, etc. The backlighting also helps my eyes to adjust the constant changing brightness of picture.
post #18 of 36
I'm doing something similar as DFletcher with a 40 watt (or soft 60) bulb in a gooseneck desk lamp behind the plasma, with the cup of the lamp pointed to the wall (which BTW is made of lovely 70's wood paneling- I rent) to reflect back off that. So it's a nice diffused light.
post #19 of 36
The Plasma Lite is 1 1/2" wide, thats the main difference. We don't have much room back there, so there is a benefit for considering the $150. purchase price.

Dave
post #20 of 36
That's right. The plasma model is configured specifically for wall-mounted panels where space behind the set is usually severely limited. Plasmas on stands can use the less expensive model if ultimate color accuracy and the other benefits of an electronic ballast are not a priority.

Best regards and beautiful pictures,
G. Alan Brown, President
CinemaQuest, Inc.

Insist on HDTV!:eek:
post #21 of 36
GeorgeAB,

One question did come up about placement- could you help us with this one.

What would be optimal?

Thanks

Dave
post #22 of 36
I tried Deeann's soft 60 watt method and compared it to my 20 watt halogen.The regular 60 was brighter and more white but it seemed to light up the room too much.I went with the Halogen for it gave just enough light and kept a 3d effect on the screen by bringing out the blacks and on a 433 thats definitely a good thing.
post #23 of 36
Same as deeann however with the white wall diffusion from a 40 watt incandescent. It works great, less eye fatigue and greater perceived contrast.
post #24 of 36
Thread Starter 
I agree with mattg3 about the halogen Vs the the 40 watt incandesecent. The halogen gives more of a backlite feel. The 40 watt lights up too much of the room. The halogen does seem to give more of a 3D feel to the picture.

I'm glad people are experimenting. I think the results of those experiments could be beneficial to many on this forum. I have been using a 20 watt halogen bulb. I will replace it with a 10 watt bulb shortly to see if I can get the same results with less light.

If the halogen really gives off a temperature of around 3000K I may end up buying the Lume-Ideal. I hesitate only because of the mounting issues and because I'm not convinced that, with my off white walls and non ISF calibrated P50, the temperature will make that much difference.

Like cheridave I am wondering about the mounting location with the Ideal-Lume. Once the lamp is mounted it would be a pain to raise, lower or move it at all. I have swiveled the halogen a lot to get it in the correct position......not too much light from the top, bottom or sides. It seems like it would be more difficult to do that with a wall mounted unit. GeorgeAB has given a lot of useful information but he hasn't indicated if the ideal-Lume should be mounted near the top, middle or bottom of the wall. My question assumes the display is within one foot of the wall.

There is no question that I will always use some type of backlighting for night viewing.
post #25 of 36
I appreciate the education this thread provides a great deal. I will be sure to give this stuff a try with my black-challenged displays in particular.
post #26 of 36
I just received the Ideal-Lume BULB and GRAY FILTERS ONLY, for a plasma display (18 watt, 24" bulb) and bought an under counter fixture for the bulb. I just could not spend $150 on an experiment!
I have not had much time to "play" with the setup.
The display is mounted on the wall so there is only about 4" between the wall and the back of the display (using a tilt bracket, un-tilted). The light and filters (2 darkest, gives about the recommended 10% of the display intensity) are sitting against the back of the display facing up. Because the bulb is only about 2" from the wall it produces an illuminating pattern a little longer than the bulb, and about 10" up the wall. There is not illumination along the sides of the display, which would require 2 more lamps.
Given the conditions, I see only some improvement in the imaging. I will need to "play" with it some more, but I never have viewed any TV in a completely dark room. I learned that is bad news for the eyes many years ago!

More to follow!

John
post #27 of 36
My halogen is resting on the right speaker next to my plasma and Ive bent it over to the top right side of the plasma with the actual bulb facing the wall.I know this sounds crazy but that seems to work better than putting the light directly behind the screen with light shooting out evenly from back.
post #28 of 36
I will second CheriDave's request above....

Looking in my handy dandy W.W Grainger catalog it seems that the T8 flourescent bulbs are not an easy item to find with the above characteristics.

BTW, T8 means the maximum bulb diameter in 1/8's", IOW = 1" diameter bulb.

Second, of the ones listed, finding a 6500K bulb is even harder, and only @ CRI=75%.

Most of the 24" length listed are 3000 - 4000k with CRI=75-84, fyi.

So the price for the bulbs sold thru the discussed web site is not bad at all for the bulb price (only about $7 premium over standard, but with more accurate specs).
post #29 of 36
I think a wall mount set up would necessitate the use of 4 lights
for even background illumination; and might still not work due to
the hot spots on the wall closest to the bulbs.

The color correction rooms I’ve seen have the CRT a
good distance in front of the (gray painted or fabric) back wall.

Jorge
post #30 of 36
Quote:
Originally posted by editedby
I think a wall mount set up would necessitate the use of 4 lights
for even background illumination; and might still not work due to
the hot spots on the wall closest to the bulbs.

The color correction rooms I’ve seen have the CRT a
good distance in front of the (gray painted or fabric) back wall.

Jorge
Taking into account the depth of the CRT and the space from the wall, What would you describe as "a good distance in front of" ???? In terms of inches and or feet?

My initial thoughts, for wall mounted, are to try to incorporate the lighting as "recessed" in the wall.

Hopefully George will give us some feed back here.

PS. Also, I would like to know how 'dimmers' affect the specs of the bulbs?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Backlighting and Lucy