AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › New York, NY - OTA
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New York, NY - OTA - Page 378

post #11311 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyctveng View Post

sorry reddice nyc stations cant make changes (or go off the air!!) because of your specific situation. just because you have outrageous theories that ch7 is taking away signal from ch 13 and because WKOB conflicts with your WCBS. we get it you're frustrated with not picking up channel 13 put posting it every day will not change things unless you move or try a better antenna.

I keep telling people. My aunt is 7 miles from ESB. Never once had trouble with 13.

it is either their area or antenna.

Unless we are just incredibly lucky.
post #11312 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpace View Post

I have today written to the heads of both WLIW and WNET to suggest that in order to provide the WLIW signal to the thousands of NYC OTA viewers that is now denied them that WNET switch the programming on sub-channel 13.2 from WNET-KIDS to the WLIW signal at 7 PM every evening. The viewers of WNET-KIds are in bed by then, or should be.

This would enable NYC OTA viewers who are now unable to receive WLIW
OTA to receive their programming.

If you think this would be a good idea send an email to the heads of both station and help bring it to fruition.

Larry

I don't think that's going to fly.

In my opinion, you're not missing much on WLIW. Sometimes I put it on in the morning for the kids, but you can get that on WNET 24 hours on 13.2, and plus WNET is HD, and has some good HD programming.
Are you able to pick up WNJN 50.1 in Jersey?
post #11313 of 16570
I tried about 5 different indoors and the RCA outdoor. I am not getting no more antennas. Should have just gotten a moter outdoor antenna but I thought this cheap one would be good enough. I get great reception with it except for channels 11, 13 & 31 on the esb.
post #11314 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddice View Post

I tried about 5 different indoors and the RCA outdoor. I am not getting no more antennas. Should have just gotten a moter outdoor antenna but I thought this cheap one would be good enough. I get great reception with it except for channels 11, 13 & 31 on the esb.

I don't understand why not go to your local store or J&R and try an antenna then return it if no good. Or trade in.

Why buy 5 antenna's?
post #11315 of 16570
If you buy antennas online or mail order - return policies are much stricter (as in we won't take them back) compared to buying in person. Also, not everyone can get into the city to visit J&R if you are living in the fringe areas like me. Radio Shack is not a option either.
post #11316 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by NervousCat View Post

If you buy antennas online or mail order - return policies are much stricter (as in we won't take them back) compared to buying in person. Also, not everyone can get into the city to visit J&R if you are living in the fringe areas like me. Radio Shack is not a option either.

I should also point out that I am talking about rooftop outdoor antennas.
post #11317 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by trumpace View Post

[...] in order to provide the WLIW signal to the thousands of NYC OTA viewers that is now denied them that WNET switch the programming on sub-channel 13.2 from WNET-KIDS to the WLIW signal at 7 PM every evening.

i'd rather get PBS World on 13.2.
post #11318 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnellKrell View Post

One station (7) boosting its power on the VHF Combiner has absolutely nothing to do with 13's reception problems. It's not that there's a specific amount of power that is divided among the constituent stations.

According to management at 13, it's nothing more than coincidence!

sorry, but PBS saying it's a coincidence does not cut it. there's a reason for their signal quality to have gone down. it could be Solar flares, interference from other channels, financial difficulties, disdain, etc, etc.... sure, the problem might not be related to ABC's power boost, but saying it's a "coincidence" makes their engineering staff look like a bunch of hacks, which they certainly arent. there has to be an explanation for their signal problem. PBS should either give it, or shut up about it and pretend all is fine.

i'm glad they put their shows online. i havent missed a single episode of Nova yet.

ps: i'm not shooting the messenger. i'm just disappointed at PBS's response. very lame.
post #11319 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by nordloewelabs View Post

sorry, but PBS saying it's a coincidence does not cut it. there's a reason for their signal quality to have gone down. it could be Solar flares, interference from other channels, financial difficulties, disdain, etc, etc.... sure, the problem might not be related to ABC's power boost, but saying it's a "coincidence" makes their engineering staff look like a bunch of hacks, which they certainly arent. there has to be an explanation for their signal problem. PBS should either give it, or shut up about it and pretend all is fine.

i'm glad they put their shows online. i havent missed a single episode of Nova yet.

ps: i'm not shooting the messenger. i'm just disappointed at PBS's response. very lame.


Whoa! Please take it easy.

When I was in contact with 13 a few weeks ago, I was told that at that time the station personnel didn't know what was causing the problem. A problem, by the way, of which they are very much aware. I was further told that the increase in Channel 7's power did not impact 13's signal.

For your edification the word "coincidence" is mine - not uttered by anyone at 13. Nevertheless, it's a perfectly apt word when one considers the situation:

"An accidental and remarkable occurrence of events or ideas at the same time, suggesting but lacking a causal relationship."

Sounds just fine to me!
post #11320 of 16570
PBS has there shows online. How is the quality?
Like I said when I can get 13 it is fine (in the high 50s to low 60s should be in the high 70s) but many times it just gets weak or I lose it completely.
post #11321 of 16570
[PBS has there shows online. How is the quality?
Like I said when I can get 13 it is fine (in the high 50s to low 60s should be in the high 70s) but many times it just gets weak or I lose it completely.)

Reddice, your signal fluctuation could be your cable, are you using rg6q with digicon connectors it really can make a difference. i had issues with signal fluctation before i used the cable from cable company. it was degrading my signal by half. my ota reception issues are not that unlike yours, i get my ota signal from 1 outdoor uhf antenna (small yagi) on roof of a 2 story house. signals are good, to excellent, surprisingly vhf stations come in. what i don't get is NJ Pbs station, which i would love to get its HD, cos i have buildings right on my path to the esb and nj. so don't feel your the only one with ota issues. I'm not ota guru, expert
post #11322 of 16570
I'd also love to get PBS-World on 13.2. Especially if they did like ABC does and have 2 HD channels.

In this case having 2 HD channels would actually make sense.
post #11323 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by NervousCat View Post

If you buy antennas online or mail order - return policies are much stricter (as in we won't take them back) compared to buying in person. Also, not everyone can get into the city to visit J&R if you are living in the fringe areas like me. Radio Shack is not a option either.

Well one trip to the city you could get 3 or more antenna's to try.

Over the years I have got 7 or more antenna's to my aunt. I am over 50 miles away. The terk 50 just fit inside my car. Had to turn it diagonal.

Anyway my point is I tried many different antenna's. I even tried a clear vision C2 months ago.

My point is I was not lazy and whined. I did whatever it took. I changed the coax to terk HD cable. That also improved the signal by 5.

After checking the clearvision C2. I am convinced that the Terk 50 is the best antenna for us. Nothing beats it. The C2 tied it though.

So I am done with antennas. But I did much work getting and trying them up to this point.

Antennas are more of an art form then science. It takes patience and much trial and error.
post #11324 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvdchance View Post

I'd also love to get PBS-World on 13.2. Especially if they did like ABC does and have 2 HD channels.

In this case having 2 HD channels would actually make sense.

pbs world used to be on 13.3 before it was replaced with V-me. regardless, it is highly unlikely WNET/WLIW will shuffle things around to accomodate OTA viewers that don't receive one or the other station.
post #11325 of 16570
13 is just FINE here ~48 miles from the ESB. I can even pick it up at ground level with the YA1713.
post #11326 of 16570
[13 is just FINE here ~48 miles from the ESB. I can even pick it up at ground level with the YA1713.
__________________
Ryan, N2RJ

raj did you put ups your winegard ya1713 yet? you know what i don't like too much about the antenna (all winegard antennas) the matchin balun, looks flimpsy specially the 2 small legs inside the balun ? i rather much have wingnuts on connectors, i think winegard purposely does that, other than that peeve, the ya1713 looks like solidly built. ps have you tried pickin up philly stations from your location?
post #11327 of 16570
Yes I have put it up on the tower, temporarily mounted though. I have the permanent fixture for the mast which will go up maybe this weekend. 7, 11 and 13 come in just fine. 13 is the weakest but there are no dropouts at all.

When it is aimed to NYC I lose WNJB on channel 8 because the antenna is that sharp. But that is not an issue because I get WNJN 50 just fine. When W36AZ goes digital on channel 35 that will be an additional backup.

The balun box doesn't bother me at all.

I haven't really tried philly but I can receive KYW and WCAU here with no problems if I turn the 4228 stack south. That was just when I was up the tower. I haven't tried properly peaking and aligning it yet. I'll need a low band antenna for WPVI. I might build instead of buy that one and get a separate antenna system for philly. It's too bad that Channel Master discontinued all of their good antennas otherwise I'd get another pair of 4228As for the philly receive system.
post #11328 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by raj2001 View Post

Yes I have put it up on the tower, temporarily mounted though. I have the permanent fixture for the mast which will go up maybe this weekend. 7, 11 and 13 come in just fine. 13 is the weakest but there are no dropouts at all.

When it is aimed to NYC I lose WNJB on channel 8 because the antenna is that sharp. But that is not an issue because I get WNJN 50 just fine. When W36AZ goes digital on channel 35 that will be an additional backup.

The balun box doesn't bother me at all.

I haven't really tried philly but I can receive KYW and WCAU here with no problems if I turn the 4228 stack south. That was just when I was up the tower. I haven't tried properly peaking and aligning it yet. I'll need a low band antenna for WPVI. I might build instead of buy that one and get a separate antenna system for philly. It's too bad that Channel Master discontinued all of their good antennas otherwise I'd get another pair of 4228As for the philly receive system.

What is a balun box? ty
post #11329 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by keyboard21 View Post

What is a balun box? ty

Instead of having the balun (a 300 ohm balanced to 75 ohm unbalanced transformer) hanging off your antenna as a add-on piece, it is integrated into the antenna usually as plastic black box mounted to the boom. You attach the 75 ohm cable directly to the balun box on the antenna.
post #11330 of 16570
Channel 13 can shove it. I am back typing this on the computer so I can say more. Not to sound like a grumpy person but yesterday I watched Frontline and at times it would break up a lot for a bit but it was fine. Today it is back at a blank screen. In matter of fact when I put it on channel 13 my TV showed low signal and it deleted it from the channel lineup. This channel is a pathetic mess and I don't even care no more what happens. I broke my last transformer trying to get the channel good by moving the wires and twisting it too much. That was last month.

I am not buying no more stinking antennas for a channel that has craphole reception. I know I am going to hear but I am 45 miles away and I get channel 13 in the 90's. Bull to you. I am only stinking 4 miles and it is the most unreliable channel next to channel 31. No it is not my antenna or cable. My cable is the extra one that I had when I had HD receiver installed which now with the Eastern Arc dish I don't need it so it is being used for the RCA antenna. As I said before all of my other channels 2, 4, 5, 7, even 11 lately has been good 25, 41, 47 and 68 come in great ranging from the 70's to the 90's as with channel 7 and 47.
post #11331 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddice View Post

Channel 13 can shove it. I am back typing this on the computer so I can say more. Not to sound like a grumpy person but yesterday I watched Frontline and at times it would break up a lot for a bit but it was fine. Today it is back at a blank screen. In matter of fact when I put it on channel 13 my TV showed low signal and it deleted it from the channel lineup. This channel is a pathetic mess and I don't even care no more what happens. I broke my last transformer trying to get the channel good by moving the wires and twisting it too much. That was last month.

I am not buying no more stinking antennas for a channel that has craphole reception. I know I am going to hear but I am 45 miles away and I get channel 13 in the 90's. Bull to you. I am only stinking 4 miles and it is the most unreliable channel next to channel 31. No it is not my antenna or cable. My cable is the extra one that I had when I had HD receiver installed which now with the Eastern Arc dish I don't need it so it is being used for the RCA antenna. As I said before all of my other channels 2, 4, 5, 7, even 11 lately has been good 25, 41, 47 and 68 come in great ranging from the 70's to the 90's as with channel 7 and 47.

Reddice, I think you should throw an AVS party at your place one night and invite all of us so we can help all solve your problems once and for all.

Seriously, are there any transmission antennas near you, like radio transmitters, CB antenna's, etc?

Why don't you change that cable that used to be for the dish? That is the only thing that you didn't rule out.
post #11332 of 16570
All I can add is there are lots of querks with OTA reception.

I have a CM4228 installed outside and I can get 7.1 (VHF) in the low to mid 90s. the CM4228 is supposed to be a UHF antenna. The only channel I get as well is 5.1 (UHF). All the rest of my UHF channels are not as strong as 7.1. CBS 2.1 is dicey with some dropouts and pixelation. So go figure. I out up a cheap UHF bowtie which is not even mounted as high just to view and record shows on 2.1 which is gets better than the CM4228. The rest of the channels it does not get as well....with one exception...31.1. For some reason if I get 2.1 well I get 31.1 well.

My point is that it is not all that strange or unusual to get one or two channels that are a problem. It may be that you will need different antenna to pull in 13.1.

By the way I can get it with only the CM4228 but in the mid 60's to mid 70's and with a preamp. Sometimes there are dropouts and sometimes it is decent.

Weather plays a roll here too. It may explain the varying reception for you on the weaker channels.

I built 2 homemade antennas which I hope to mount in the comming weeks. One a VHF only anntenna which I will join with the simple UHF bowtie to see if I can pick up the VHF channels the UHF alone can't. The other is an 8 bay like the CM4228 but a different design.

You could look at building a simple VHF antenna to pick up 13.1.
post #11333 of 16570
I think location is the problem. It does not matter how close or far away you are. I did rule out the cable and found the transformer to be the fault. With the new transformer channel 7 hit the 90s. Just channel 13 is still a royal pain.
post #11334 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by LenL View Post

All I can add is there are lots of querks with OTA reception.

I have a CM4228 installed outside and I can get 7.1 (VHF) in the low to mid 90s. the CM4228 is supposed to be a UHF antenna. The only channel I get as well is 5.1 (UHF). All the rest of my UHF channels are not as strong as 7.1. CBS 2.1 is dicey with some dropouts and pixelation. So go figure. I out up a cheap UHF bowtie which is not even mounted as high just to view and record shows on 2.1 which is gets better than the CM4228. The rest of the channels it does not get as well....with one exception...31.1. For some reason if I get 2.1 well I get 31.1 well.

Well guess what? I am NW of you and I can get everything reliably except 5.1 (44). I had to stack two CM4228s and align them exactly to get WNYW reliably. Otherwise I don't even get a lock. Apart from 50.1 WNJN, 31.1 is the strongest signal here, with WCBS 2.1 (33) being a close second.

With my Winegard YA1713 VHF antenna pointed to NYC I get 7, 8, 11, 13 reliably.
post #11335 of 16570
I would get much better reception if only I was not on the downside of a hill. Right now my CM4228 is high up on the chimmney and just about peaking over the top of the hill in front of it. That is my problem and I can't do anything about it except to pick my house up and move it higher up the hill....and that ain't going to happen.

That being said....still strange that I get 7.1 and 5.1 great and other stations are so-so or bad. Go figure? That's why I buit two anntennas with spare parts to add them to the mix.
post #11336 of 16570
Perhaps this is a good time to recommend a page from Ken Nist's excellent HDTV site. This is a nice illustrated tutorial of how VHF/UHF reception can be disrupted/enhanced by local features.
post #11337 of 16570
(I think location is the problem. It does not matter how close or far away you are.)

thxs reddice, its weird because i was contemplating this same idea yesterday


I could not get lock on wnjn ch 51.1 from my antenna location, i have buildings right in the path west to nyc, nj but i was looking around, and i think i can get around the problem, if I move my rig over 10 ft over there is a clearance that i can aim my yagi over the high rises, i think i might be able to rescue wnjn finally!! I"m gonna need to put a tripod on the roof , and move the antenna over from the chimney mount. I let you know how it comes out.
post #11338 of 16570
Don't know if I should try a cheap amp. It could make reception worse for the strong channels. Any places where they take them back?

I think channel 13 must have noise and multipath issues a lot so a amp might make it worse.
post #11339 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddice View Post

Don't know if I should try a cheap amp. It could make reception worse for the strong channels. Any places where they take them back?

I think channel 13 must have noise and multipath issues a lot so a amp might make it worse.

If it were me I would get an high band 7 - 13 antenna & a pre amp. The channel master cm 7777 has two seperate inputs VHF & UHF so you only get a good clean signal from each antenna. The connect the high band to the VHF & the uhf you now have the the UHF. I did this at my Dad's house & it made a big difference.
post #11340 of 16570
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddice View Post

Don't know if I should try a cheap amp. It could make reception worse for the strong channels. Any places where they take them back?

I think channel 13 must have noise and multipath issues a lot so a amp might make it worse.

You experience is the double whammy of the US digital standard: multipath resulting in lower signal through cancellation and higher noise generated in the Rx by the equalizer. The European and Asians standards are COFDM-based and thus are to a much greater extent immune to multipath.

The advice by David the DTV Ma is good and I would add one more suggestion:insert a 6dB pad between the VHF antenna and the amp, which should be installed as close as possible to the antenna's terminals. The pad may be needed in case the antenna has high mismatch (VSWR) at channel 13 or too high a signal at channel 7. The amp gain should be enough to compensate for the pad but not too high so as to avoid higher noise generation.

So there's some experiments involved, you should be able to get 13 if you get 7.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › New York, NY - OTA