AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic! - Page 476

post #14251 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThoraX695 View Post

...I agree with arxaw's suggestion to remove the reflector. Many people in Cincinnati who have a legitimate shot to get the Dayton stations have done the same thing too. The only downside using that antenna is that it's not explicitly designed to get WKRC - the only channel on (high) VHF around here...

With the OP's high signal strength on WKRC VHF 12, he should have no trouble receiving it with the 4228HD with reflector bars removed.
post #14252 of 15407
A small unobtrusive RCA ANT751 should be all you need for your channels of interest. It is a well built antenna that should last for many years. It also comes with a J-mount to install it on wall that faces the towers; or roof or gable end of the house.
Point it about 220° or so, (compass direction).
post #14253 of 15407
At the San Francisco airport "Museum" there is an exhibition of vintage TV gear, including a beautiful collection of mint condition indoor antennas from the 50s an 60s. If you can't get there, check out the photos:

Exhibition with descriptions.

Antennas

Caption
post #14254 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpasadena View Post

At the San Francisco airport "Museum" there is an exhibition of vintage TV gear, including a beautiful collection of mint condition indoor antennas from the 50s an 60s. If you can't get there, check out the photos:

Exhibition with descriptions.

Antennas

Caption

Thanks. The second from the left, center UHF portion, is a ...uh.....umm......FRACTAL.
post #14255 of 15407
Quote:


The second from the left, center UHF portion, is a ...uh.....umm......FRACTAL.

Actually closer to a upwardly polarized zig zag lpda sized wrong.
post #14256 of 15407
I think it's nothing more than a FAT Vertical Monopole for Omni UHF,
where the (twisted?) vertical structure improves SWR vs a simple whip:
http://imageevent.com/holl_ands/dipoles/monopole
post #14257 of 15407
Quote:


where the (twisted?) vertical structure

Look closely at the blow up. Its not twisted, just bent.


At the flea market today, I saw a pair of rabbit ears with a small plastic parabola in the middle for uhf. Upon closer inspection, it just had a simple wire around the outside of the plastic parabola, so it was just a plain uhf loop.
post #14258 of 15407
ok i am new to the whole ota antenna game, my father is getting ready to retire and wants to get rid of cable but keep cable internet. Because there will still be cable coming into the house and the qam tuner on the tv's all pick up a few channels will i gain any channels by adding a antenna... also is there any way to combine the channels coming in through cable and the channels from the antenna since it will be 2 different sources. Also is one antenna able to work for all 3 different tv's in the house sometimes 2 running at once.
post #14259 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by card16969 View Post

Because there will still be cable coming into the house and the qam tuner on the tv's all pick up a few channels

That's not always the case. In many areas if you have only cable internet you won't get any TV channels.

Quote:


also is there any way to combine the channels coming in through cable and the channels from the antenna since it will be 2 different sources.

Nope. You'll need 2 seperate cables.

Quote:


Also is one antenna able to work for all 3 different tv's in the house sometimes 2 running at once.

depends. You need to post a TVFool report before we can help you further
post #14260 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by card16969 View Post

... Because there will still be cable coming into the house and the qam tuner on the tv's all pick up a few channels will i gain any channels by adding a antenna...

With a suitable antenna for your location, you can receive any main or sub channels your local cableco may not carry. Which ones, depends on what's available OTA and which ones your cableco carries.

Quote:


...also is there any way to combine the channels coming in through cable and the channels from the antenna since it will be 2 different sources.

No, you will need separate cables to each TV and an A/B switch at each one to jump between the two sources.

Quote:


...Also is one antenna able to work for all 3 different tv's in the house sometimes 2 running at once.

You can connect multiple TVs to one antenna, providing the signal received is strong enough. Splitting the signal weakens it significantly, though. The weakening comes from splitting the signal, not how many TVs are on at any given moment. Depending on signal strength, you may need to add a suitable preamp before the splits, or a distribution amplifier/splitter.
post #14261 of 15407
i had to go look for what tv fool was haha but heres what it came up with
post #14262 of 15407
sorry says i have to have 3 posts so its not working
post #14263 of 15407
post #14264 of 15407
Quote:

It would be good to see what you might have on the internet cable before looking to an antenna.
post #14265 of 15407
Currently using a DB2 antenna on the side of the house and would like better signal. Right now we are receiving 30-40% signal strength if we are lucky and about 5 local canadian channels including 2 American (sometimes up to 5 extra if we rescan). Would adding an amp. help increase signal strength? How about replacing the antenna with a better one one...and include an amp? Would a DB4 antenna be better? Should the antennas I look at be multi-directional? I guess MD means that it looks at different towers?

Here is the tv fool report....we normally receive 2, 6, 17, 10, 12, 15 (canadian) and sometimes 3.0001 3.0002 (american) and on the odd scan 5.0001 and 5.0002 (american)....and rarely on the "odder" scan vermont 33.0001/2/3/4

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...60b514edf3eda3
post #14266 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by silvercity22 View Post

Currently using a DB2 antenna on the side of the house and would like better signal. Right now we are receiving 30-40% signal strength if we are lucky and about 5 local canadian channels including 2 American (sometimes up to 5 extra if we rescan). Would adding an amp. help increase signal strength? How about replacing the antenna with a better one one...and include an amp? Would a DB4 antenna be better? Should the antennas I look at be multi-directional? I guess MD means that it looks at different towers?

Here is the tv fool report....we normally receive 2, 6, 17, 10, 12, 15 (canadian) and sometimes 3.0001 3.0002 (american) and on the odd scan 5.0001 and 5.0002 (american)....and rarely on the "odder" scan vermont 33.0001/2/3/4

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...60b514edf3eda3

What you do will probably depend on how long you will be having the analog VHF stations available. If your recieving 2, 6, 10 and 12 OK, a DB4 probably won't hurt. Those are the VHF's, and if you want a better signal, you might hunt an old used antenna to pick them up. You will probably lose those stations eventually, and then the DB4 would be good. But I wouldn't get the DB4 now unless your receptio on the DB2 is OK for the VHF stations. That make any sense? As for the odd scans, a rotor will help. When you get good atmospherics you can get them in the scan. Then do not rescan, but use the rotor to turn the antenna correctly. Or you could try a multidirectional antenna, and you might, or might not get good results. What stations do you absolutely want?
post #14267 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by difuse View Post

What you do will probably depend on how long you will be having the analog VHF stations available. If your recieving 2, 6, 10 and 12 OK, a DB4 probably won't hurt. Those are the VHF's, and if you want a better signal, you might hunt an old used antenna to pick them up. You will probably lose those stations eventually, and then the DB4 would be good. But I wouldn't get the DB4 now unless your receptio on the DB2 is OK for the VHF stations. That make any sense? As for the odd scans, a rotor will help. When you get good atmospherics you can get them in the scan. Then do not rescan, but use the rotor to turn the antenna correctly. Or you could try a multidirectional antenna, and you might, or might not get good results. What stations do you absolutely want?

Thanks for your reply...but I'm a bit confused The 2, 6, 10, 12 are actually 2.0001, 6.0001, 10.001, 12.001....I don't think they are analog signals....aren't these digital? I receive those channels clear but most of the time I get digital signal low...so I'd like to boost the signal. Main goal is to get 2.0001, 6.0001, 10.001, 12.001, 15.001...the local canadian channels and if possible 3.001/2 and 5.001/2 (american) which we get sometimes. Why would a rotor help and not an amp? Wouldn't an amp help boost signal? Note that the current antenna is on the side of the cabin and there are alot of trees around..it's in the country.
post #14268 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by silvercity22 View Post

Thanks for your reply...but I'm a bit confused The 2, 6, 10, 12 are actually 2.0001, 6.0001, 10.001, 12.001....I don't think they are analog signals....aren't these digital? I receive those channels clear but most of the time I get digital signal low...so I'd like to boost the signal. Main goal is to get 2.0001, 6.0001, 10.001, 12.001, 15.001...the local canadian channels and if possible 3.001/2 and 5.001/2 (american) which we get sometimes. Why would a rotor help and not an amp? Wouldn't an amp help boost signal? Note that the current antenna is on the side of the cabin and there are alot of trees around..it's in the country.

TV FOOL might not be current; the chart seemed in indicate they were analog. The rotor would be useful as the antenna you are using is somewhat directional. Generally the first thing to do to recieve a weaker signal is to point the antenna to the transmitter. An amp wll only help if the signal is present and steady. An amp might be the second step. The trees don't help, and may argue for the rotor, to find a duct through them. Of the options, I'd rank using a rotor as 1st, putting up a second antenna pointed generally toward desired stations and joining the two antennas as 2nd,
adding an amp as 3rd. If you could buy some things to experiment that you could return, that would be good. Almost everybody's reception situation is different, no one solution is possible.
post #14269 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by arxaw View Post

A small unobtrusive RCA ANT751 should be all you need for your channels of interest. It is a well built antenna that should last for many years. It also comes with a J-mount to install it on wall that faces the towers; or roof or gable end of the house.
Point it about 220° or so, (compass direction).

I have the antenna suggested above - thanks.

Just want to make sure on the direction - 220° compass direction is aprox 90° away from pointing the antenna right at the 2 towers...Is that right?

Just want to make sure, so I am not up on the roof too much asking my wife "is that better?" !!!

Thanks again - this antenna looks like a great fit. I won't be installing it till we get power hooked up sometime next week hopefully.
post #14270 of 15407
montl,
Looking back at your TVFool, it appears you should aim at ~117° compass direction, not 220°, as I previously typed. I do apologize for that error!


.
.
post #14271 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by difuse View Post

TV FOOL might not be current; the chart seemed in indicate they were analog. The rotor would be useful as the antenna you are using is somewhat directional. Generally the first thing to do to recieve a weaker signal is to point the antenna to the transmitter. An amp wll only help if the signal is present and steady. An amp might be the second step. The trees don't help, and may argue for the rotor, to find a duct through them. Of the options, I'd rank using a rotor as 1st, putting up a second antenna pointed generally toward desired stations and joining the two antennas as 2nd,
adding an amp as 3rd. If you could buy some things to experiment that you could return, that would be good. Almost everybody's reception situation is different, no one solution is possible.

According to Wikipedia, CBFT is digital on channel 19, CBMT is on 21, CIVM is on 26, CFTM on 10 and CFCF is on 12.
I am curious about the odd channel numbers being discussed with four digits after the decimal place. I have only seen that type of nomenclature with cable TV. Is it specific to some unusual tuner?
If it were me, I would get a large UHF/Vhf High and put it on a high mounted rotor and try for everything in the area.
post #14272 of 15407
I would like to cut the cable or dish network in my case...what would the experts suggest with this report?
Antenna. amps, anything?

Thanks!

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...40330e7da04b19
LL
post #14273 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickthestick View Post

I would like to cut the cable or dish network in my case...what would the experts suggest with this report?
Antenna. amps, anything?

Thanks!

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...40330e7da04b19

1. Move
2. Experiment with different antenna heights to see whether you can improve signal strength with a height you can live with,
post #14274 of 15407
FWIW, I tried this location in your city that I got from Wikipedia, and I got signal strengths about 30dB better than your table showed, and curiously, they were about the same at 100 feet as at the 14 foot height that you used.

41.510192
-112.015011

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...4033664d28a320
post #14275 of 15407
I am right along the mountain, and may not have the best line to the SLC area where most of the signals come from. And moving isn't a viable option...lol
post #14276 of 15407
Another option to investigate; ask a local dish retailer if they still offers a locals-only package.
post #14277 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickthestick View Post

I would like to cut the cable or dish network in my case...what would the experts suggest with this report?
Antenna. amps, anything?

Thanks!

http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...40330e7da04b19

Are you actually trying to use an antenna now?
post #14278 of 15407
Can you locate a very high Gain UHF antenna & high Gain Preamp on
top of a nearby hill and then run a long length of coax to your house?
TVFool might not have enough resolution to show the difference, so
could you give us some accurate coordinates for that location?
post #14279 of 15407
I guess that is what I am asking, what equipment (ant, amp) is the best to get weak signal? I do not have any now, just dish network. I have an indoor, and it only gets the chan 12 from that list of chan on tvfool.
post #14280 of 15407
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickthestick View Post

I guess that is what I am asking, what equipment (ant, amp) is the best to get weak signal? I do not have any now, just dish network. I have an indoor, and it only gets the chan 12 from that list of chan on tvfool.

That's useful information. If it were I, the next step would be to get a cheep antenna, like a Radio Shack single bowtie, and get it up a few yards outside on a pole or tree limb, in such a way it could be turned. It will take a while, but a search for the SLT stations should be made. If you can get a steady picture, even if broken at times, or pixilateing, on any of them over a period of days( as atmospherics could get you almost anything for a few minutes), then I'd procede with a more permanent arrangement. Remember when turning the antenna, the reciever will not act immediately to a signal, as was the case with analog. Its possible you are completely "over the cliff" and nothing can be done. It's also possible you can recieve some stations. I think I'd want some proof reception could be had before buying a lot of stuff.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic!