AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic! - Page 291

post #8701 of 15401
Any one have any thoughts on the Eagle Aspen ROTR100? I noticed that it uses coax cable for its signal instead of the three wire cable like others do, which would be convenient for me to not have to drill any more holes to run wire through.

Three wires or not, what's the general opinion as to the best rotator available?
post #8702 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by videobruce View Post

Obviously paranoid and anti social. Must have something to hide.IOW's he doesn't need anyones help.

I'm putting my money on "he lives 6 miles from the furthest towers" and it just dawned upon him a ganged antenna would be a really bad idea in that scenario.
post #8703 of 15401
johnied; Ok, but one would never know that since you posted directly after me.

If we ignore this anti social, ultra paranoid whinner, he might go away. I bet he lives just outside of East Farmers Bumf*ck, in the middle of nowhere and wonders why he can't get anything.
post #8704 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwiser View Post

Any one have any thoughts on the Eagle Aspen ROTR100? I noticed that it uses coax cable for its signal instead of the three wire cable like others do, which would be convenient for me to not have to drill any more holes to run wire through.

Three wires or not, what's the general opinion as to the best rotator available?

nwiser - check this discussion
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...+Aspen+ROTR100
post #8705 of 15401
Cool find!

It hasn't been a problem for, what, 40 years now to run two wires from antenna to TV, why should it be any different now? The loss through those two devices just isn't worth it. It might not make much difference with anlaog, but this isn't your Fathers TV any more.
post #8706 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lmvine View Post

nwiser - check this discussion
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...+Aspen+ROTR100

thank you for pointing me to that thread. it seems that running it through the coax causes up to 5 db loss on some frequencies...and the main reviewer ended up running a seperate wire with f connectors on each end anyway. I already have coax running into my house from the previous owners cable installation, and since I'm not much of a handyman I was hoping I could get away with just using it for everything. darn.

I have a cordless drill but I dont have a bit long enough to drill through the cinderblock into my basement...so if I run additional wiring I have to go buy a long masonry bit....and then after the holes are drilled I have to seal off the gap with something. I could use some silicone caulk I guess...though some of the other holes that have been sealed around look like they have this black/grey rubbery stuff around them...anyone have a guess as to what that stuff might be?

Since it looks like I will need to use a rotor with its own wire...what's the best one for the money?
post #8707 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwiser View Post

I could use some silicone caulk I guess...though some of the other holes that have been sealed around look like they have this black/grey rubbery stuff around them...anyone have a guess as to what that stuff might be?

Butyl rubber caulk.
post #8708 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splicer010 View Post

You want 75ohm cable...NOT 50ohm...

With typical antenna VSWR of 3:1 and ATSC Tuner VSWR not much better,
50 vs 75-ohm won't make much difference....
might even be better.....
post #8709 of 15401
Quote:
I already have coax running into my house from the previous owners cable installation

How old is it? I would just replace it with RG6.
Quote:
I'm not much of a handyman I was hoping I could get away with just using it for everything.

How much of a "handyman" do you have to be to drill a hole?
Quote:
I dont have a bit long enough to drill through the cinderblock into my basement...so if I run additional wiring I have to go buy a long masonry bit.

Ok and............
Quote:
I could use some silicone caulk I guess.

Almost anything. Since it is above ground on a vertical surface, you have no concern about anything.
Quote:
Since it looks like I will need to use a rotor with its own wire...what's the best one for the money?

Your are already here.

If you don't care about repeated accuracy (which is the selling point of this), anything will do. Even though they are all imported, I would only deal with models from Channel Master since you have their support vs dealing with a no name wonder.
post #8710 of 15401
Quote:


...so if I run additional wiring I have to go buy a long masonry bit....

Or you could buy a drill bit extention. That may come in handy on other projects.
post #8711 of 15401
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is all RG-6 quad shield cable the same?

I've looked at some places like Summit Source, Solid signal, Amazon.com, etc...and the prices seem to vary. What's a reasonable price one should expect to pay for 100ft of RG6 quad shielded cable?

Is the more expensive stuff the price it is only for the name...or is there a quality difference in manufacturers? Is it a big deal to get the copper coated vs. solid copper cable? Also are the compression F-connectors better than the crimp on ones?
post #8712 of 15401
I have a station that currently shows no signal during the day, and 20-30 percent every night, but not enough to lock on (on my STB, it takes about 50 percent to lock on) and it does lock on occasionally a couple nights a week. TVfool lists it's signal for me at -127.9 . This station will be increasing it's power after transition, and my signal for this station after transition is listed at -113.1. Roughly, how much of a difference in reception might this translate into? The station is goin from 48 KW to 1000 KW
post #8713 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphanguy View Post

I have a station that currently shows no signal during the day, and 20-30 percent every night, but not enough to lock on (on my STB, it takes about 50 percent to lock on) and it does lock on occasionally a couple nights a week. TVfool lists it's signal for me at -127.9 . This station will be increasing it's power after transition, and my signal for this station after transition is listed at -113.1. Roughly, how much of a difference in reception might this translate into? The station is goin from 48 KW to 1000 KW

Every 3db is a doubling of signal power. (does this rule apply to TVFool figures ?) So 127.9 minus 113.1 equals 14.8, almost 15db. So that would be 3 X 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = about 243 times more signal. Even at -113.1dbm, you may not get that station consistantly.
post #8714 of 15401
I finally got around to taking pictures of my 91XG/VIP306 setup.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_mu3nxD8i5WE/...h/100_3622.JPG

This is a pretty potent combo for deep fringe reception.
post #8715 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddUGA View Post

I finally got around to taking pictures of my 91XG/VIP306 setup.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_mu3nxD8i5WE/...h/100_3622.JPG

This is a pretty potent combo for deep fringe reception.

And, it appears, the birds like it, too.
post #8716 of 15401
No rotor???
post #8717 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splicer010 View Post

No rotor???

Some of us don't really have two good locations to aim at. All of mine, for example, are pretty much in the same area:



Just point a stacked 91XG and YA-1713 to maximize KNVA and KTBC and I'm set. The YA-1713 is primarily for when KTBC returns to channel 7 in February.
post #8718 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splicer010 View Post

No rotor???

Nope. All of our towers are in the same direction. I get ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, and PBS in HD.
post #8719 of 15401
You may want to attach the coax to your mask pipe, as it is causing additional stress on the antenna leads. This will break in a matter of time.

Also, route the coax out the back of your 91XG.

Nice set-up, but cable management is POOR.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddUGA View Post

I finally got around to taking pictures of my 91XG/VIP306 setup.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_mu3nxD8i5WE/...h/100_3622.JPG

This is a pretty potent combo for deep fringe reception.
post #8720 of 15401
These Channel Master antennas look so CHEAP...

Cost cutting again...

Quote:
Originally Posted by n4yqt View Post

Channel Master's new line up of antennas:

New versions of the UHF CM-42xx series of antennas:

http://www.channelmasterintl.com/doc...nas_200807.pdf

Don't they look familiar (DB2, DB4, DB8)? It looks like Channel Master has sold out their souls to the devil (China). How disappointing

Here is their complete new line up of antennas:

http://www.channelmasterintl.com/doc...g_20080731.pdf

If you are looking for a Channel Master antenna, you had better snatch up their 'old line' stock of traditional antennas before they disappear, otherwise go with a Winegard product.
post #8721 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by n4yqt View Post

Channel Master's new line up of antennas:

New versions of the UHF CM-42xx series of antennas:

I wonder if they resized them to work better in the channel 14 - 52 range.
post #8722 of 15401
I can't help but notice that a lot of the models aren't available until the end of 2008.

I've not seen a lot of comment on this, but doesn't winter weather cause a great difficulty to an installer's ability to work on a roof or even a tower?

Could a worse time of year for our transition to have been chosen than February?

And shouldn't a company like CM have seen this coming and had their products available for a couple years ahead of time for people to have bought them and installed them before winter weather hit?
post #8723 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobias Ziegler View Post

I've not seen a lot of comment on this, but doesn't winter weather cause a great difficulty to an installer's ability to work on a roof or even a tower?

Could a worse time of year for our transition to have been chosen than February?

In Texas? Yes -- July or August when the temperature on a metal roof or composite shingles can get up to 150º or higher. Working outside in February is a treat out here for installers.
post #8724 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCTools View Post

You may want to attach the coax to your mask pipe, as it is causing additional stress on the antenna leads. This will break in a matter of time.

Most of the coax IS connected to the mast with two exceptions...the coax running from the 91XG to the mast (it is attached once it reaches the mast) and from the mast (where, again, it is attached) to the balun on the 306. The coax running to the 306 serves more as a sort of drip loop to keep water from constantly flowing over the balun and seeping into the coax when it rains. I'll take replacing a balun to replacing water logged coax.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCTools View Post

Also, route the coax out the back of your 91XG.

The coax IS routed out the back of the 91XG. Not sure what picture you are looking at. It runs out the back of the 91XG through the screen (per the instructions that came with the 91XG), then back to the mast where it is attached (instead of running it straight to the 7777 and putting stress on the UHF input), then up to the CM777. The slack cable coming out the back of the 91XG is pretty much unavoidable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCTools View Post

Nice set-up, but cable management is POOR.

Poor? The only bit of coax that may be a little poor is the coax running from the mast to the 306. Considering it has survived a direct hit from an F0 tornado as well as a ton of southern thunder storms, I think it works pretty well. But thanks for your constructive criticism. Feel free to post pictures of your setup so we can see how it's done.
post #8725 of 15401
The top part of board of a Radio Shack/Archer 15-1117 10db preamp cut open:

The bottom part of the board:
post #8726 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by mclapp View Post

I wonder if they resized them to work better in the channel 14 - 52 range.

Very hard to tell, especially since the new catalog lists 2 different dimension for the CM4228. The original was 5"L X 39.5"W X 36"H, and thats what is listed in the bottom specs of the catalog for the new one.
But under the picture of it, it lists 5"L X 49"W X 32" H. So they may have, but they shortened the height ??

post #8727 of 15401
Quote:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but is all RG-6 quad shield cable the same?

Stupid, no. Asked before, yes.
No they aren't. Are all 4 cylinder engines the same?

Solid vs stranded vs copper clad center,
Percent of braid coverage & type of and amount of foil shield,
Quality of dielectric and outer jacket,
Where it is made.

All the 'cheaper' stuff is from China. I would NOT buy from Summit Source. They run misleading product listings and threaten you with fees if you chalenge a charge. I'm also less inclinded to buy from Solid Signal.
post #8728 of 15401
300ohm; nice pics. A good reason I would never buy anything like that, RS or not.
post #8729 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by videobruce View Post

All the 'cheaper' stuff is from China. I would NOT buy from Summit Source. They run misleading product listings and threaten you with fees if you chalenge a charge. I'm also less inclinded to buy from Solid Signal.

It might help to add where you would buy buy from. Trusted recommendations on buying are always helpful.
post #8730 of 15401
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwiser View Post

Is the more expensive stuff the price it is only for the name...or is there a quality difference in manufacturers? Is it a big deal to get the copper coated vs. solid copper cable? Also are the compression F-connectors better than the crimp on ones?

Copper coated versus solid matters only if you are running a long run with DC power (between power injector and pre-amp, for instance) or other low-frequency signals. Though even the voltage drop from the entire 100 feet of copper-coated steel (which presents about 3 ohms of resistance) probably wouldn't bother a pre-amp much.

The next thing to consider is braid coverage, which runs from miserable (some radio shack cables) to 95%, with 60% being pretty typical. I've found 60% to be adequate, but I have no nearby interference sources (like very close TV or FM stations). There's also things like the quality of the dielectric which are harder to quantify. If the cable is very easy to crimp/crease (Phillips, many premade cables), it's probably no good.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › The Official AVS Antenna and Related Hardware Topic!