AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Madison, WI - HDTV
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Madison, WI - HDTV - Page 174

post #5191 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mborland View Post
I believe Red Zone is in the Sports View package. A little unclear, but for the HD Red feed, it seems you have to have HD Ultra.
Both NFL Net & RedZone (SD & HD) are available in the Sports View but if you're just looking for NFL Net (SD & HD) are also in the Digital View Plus. Here are the channel locations for WI: NFL Net 315, NFL Net HD 669, RedZone 316, RedZone HD 670
post #5192 of 5551
Hi,

I'm East Side Madison, WI.

I'm looking to add an outdoor antenna and am wondering if it's possible to pick up any Milwaukee stations?

Madison is 863’ in elevation.

Milwaukee is at 634' in elevation and approx. 75 miles away. Madison is much higher and so I’d think it would be fairly easy to get those stations for there would be little “line of sight” blockage. I would think.

I’ve read that several people in Madison can pick up Janesville, WI stations. Janesville is at 858 elevation 41 miles away. We are only a few feet higher than Janesville.

I’ve read too, that several in Madison can also pick up Rockford, IL stations. Rockford is at 740' elevation and is 72 miles away.

So when I compare these 2 cities to Milwaukee, it’s comparable in distance but we are much higher up in elevation.

My questions are... can anyone recommend an outdoor antenna, amplifier, pre-amplifier, rotor, etc? A complete package?

I would be mounting this to the SIDE of the house (not the roof) about 15' (feet) off the ground.

I found 2 possibilities from Denny’s, Denny’s EZ-HD antenna and his Double Decker, but I’m unable to find any reviews on his products. Both of these antenna’s are, I believe, designed and built by his shop and not name brands. I know they have a great return policy but, it costs $$ to return, $$ I’d rather put into a good antenna.

I have done considerable reading and to be quite frank... I’m totally confused. There are so many different makes, models, rotor types, amplifier and preamplifier types, etc... that I just don't know what to do. Plus, seems there are a lot of opinions on both sides with most of these. I’m not finding any landslide opinions about what to go with or stay away from.

Can anyone please advise and provide recommendations which includes the entire package... from the mounting hardware (not roof mounted, probably a bracket across the eves or a J Mount or just a 10' pole straight up) to the antenna make/model as well as additional hardware (amp's/pre-amp's)?

I also don’t know what the difference is between a PRE-Amplifier and a regular Amplifier. I may need both. Yes?

What I currently have is this… I have 4 RG59 cables from and older sat. dish running to the location where the Antenna will go. All 4 runs terminate in one spot in the basement. In that same spot, I have 3 RG6 Quad Shield cables running to every room in the house (2 for sat. connections and one for either CATV or a future OTA antenna).

The run from where the antenna is, to the spot in the basement is approximately 40 feet. Maybe 50, but I think it’s closer to 40. From that same spot, the LONGEST run in the house to the furthest room is 25 feet.

Immediately, I would be connecting the OTA antenna to 3 televisions. I will likely add a 4th TV in a few years when my son gets older.

Please advise on a full package/recommendations and/or whether you think this is even possible.

Here is my TVFOOL report that I’ve seen others post. This accounts, though, for just my local stuff and not stations 40 – 70 miles away: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...14f35b306ba9d4

Please advise if I have the right forum for this posting and then SPECIFIC recommendations.

Thanks!

T
post #5193 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by terster View Post

Hi,

I'm East Side Madison, WI.

I'm looking to add an outdoor antenna and am wondering if it's possible to pick up any Milwaukee stations?

Madison is 863' in elevation.

Milwaukee is at 634' in elevation and approx. 75 miles away. Madison is much higher and so I'd think it would be fairly easy to get those stations for there would be little line of sight blockage. I would think.

I've read that several people in Madison can pick up Janesville, WI stations. Janesville is at 858 elevation 41 miles away. We are only a few feet higher than Janesville.

I've read too, that several in Madison can also pick up Rockford, IL stations. Rockford is at 740' elevation and is 72 miles away.

So when I compare these 2 cities to Milwaukee, it's comparable in distance but we are much higher up in elevation.

My questions are... can anyone recommend an outdoor antenna, amplifier, pre-amplifier, rotor, etc? A complete package?

I would be mounting this to the SIDE of the house (not the roof) about 15' (feet) off the ground.

I found 2 possibilities from Denny's, Denny's EZ-HD antenna and his Double Decker, but I'm unable to find any reviews on his products. Both of these antenna's are, I believe, designed and built by his shop and not name brands. I know they have a great return policy but, it costs $$ to return, $$ I'd rather put into a good antenna.

I have done considerable reading and to be quite frank... I'm totally confused. There are so many different makes, models, rotor types, amplifier and preamplifier types, etc... that I just don't know what to do. Plus, seems there are a lot of opinions on both sides with most of these. I'm not finding any landslide opinions about what to go with or stay away from.

Can anyone please advise and provide recommendations which includes the entire package... from the mounting hardware (not roof mounted, probably a bracket across the eves or a J Mount or just a 10' pole straight up) to the antenna make/model as well as additional hardware (amp's/pre-amp's)?

I also don't know what the difference is between a PRE-Amplifier and a regular Amplifier. I may need both. Yes?

What I currently have is this I have 4 RG59 cables from and older sat. dish running to the location where the Antenna will go. All 4 runs terminate in one spot in the basement. In that same spot, I have 3 RG6 Quad Shield cables running to every room in the house (2 for sat. connections and one for either CATV or a future OTA antenna).

The run from where the antenna is, to the spot in the basement is approximately 40 feet. Maybe 50, but I think it's closer to 40. From that same spot, the LONGEST run in the house to the furthest room is 25 feet.

Immediately, I would be connecting the OTA antenna to 3 televisions. I will likely add a 4th TV in a few years when my son gets older.

Please advise on a full package/recommendations and/or whether you think this is even possible.

Here is my TVFOOL report that I've seen others post. This accounts, though, for just my local stuff and not stations 40 - 70 miles away: http://www.tvfool.com/?option=com_wr...14f35b306ba9d4

Please advise if I have the right forum for this posting and then SPECIFIC recommendations.

Thanks!

T

I took your TVfool report and reverse engineered it to find where you actually live. If I am correct, you are just about half way between MATC and the intersection of 51/151 near what looks to be an apartment complex. Am I correct?

If so, you are in a hole. Well, not so much a hole, but you will not have a line of sight to Milwaukee no matter how high you go (within reason). If my location for you is correct, a 250' tower with a truly fringe antenna, top quality preamp and quality constructed coax could reliably get you most Milwaukee stations. Other than that...your location is not good for what you are trying to achieve.

I'm sorry...70 miles is not a long way. I reliably (100% of the time with 95% or better signals) receive Wausau stations 62 miles away and I nearly always (95% of the time with signals varying from 60-95%) receive Rhinelander at 92 miles. Even Eau Claire, LaCrosse and Madison can be received well at 100+ miles if I choose to turn the antennas in their directions.

I live on a hill and have line of sight for miles to the west and north. I can watch Wausau stations with an antenna 5' off the gropund. Yet, my GB locals 38 miles away require 35' of tower to get over a nearby hill. Without the tower, my reception is spotty at best. You have the same problem. Even at 250' high, Milwaukee stations would be a 2 edge capture with a NM of between 0 and +10 dB.

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I hope this helps!
post #5194 of 5551
This helps more than you know! Thank. You.
post #5195 of 5551
I get Rockford CBS and ABC with an indoor Terk antenna here in Edgerton. 70%

Also, will WKOW suck for PQ the rest of my life? Ohio St/Nebraska game is BRUTAL.
post #5196 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by feh View Post

I live 10 miles south of Madison, with no obstructions to the south. I get channel 13 no problem. There have been times when I received another Rockford station, but I don't seek it out, so I can't tell you what it was (maybe 23?).

I have a UHF antenna in my attic.

Did NBC 13 in Rockford change back to UHF? I thought they were on VHF 13?
post #5197 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehren View Post

I get Rockford CBS and ABC with an indoor Terk antenna here in Edgerton. 70%

Well, you are closer to Rockford than those of us here in Madison that are also stuck behind hill blockage.

Quote:


Also, will WKOW suck for PQ the rest of my life? Ohio St/Nebraska game is BRUTAL.

Yes. Send your complaints to the General Manager of WKOW.

Just watching their newscasts can be horrendous as well. Their HD video is bitstarved, to say the least.
post #5198 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehren View Post

Did NBC 13 in Rockford change back to UHF? I thought they were on VHF 13?

I don't know what their frequency is. You'd have to look it up.
post #5199 of 5551
WREX is still on VHF-13
post #5200 of 5551
Although they apparently flash cut to digital on UHF 38 on February 17 2009, I'm only now seeing this channel with a digital scan. Maybe they moved their transmitter or upped their power?

Not that I'd ever watch this station anyway. Just curious as to what folks know.
post #5201 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by whosbest1 View Post

Although they apparently flash cut to digital on UHF 38 on February 17 2009, I'm only now seeing this channel with a digital scan. Maybe they moved their transmitter or upped their power?

Not that I'd ever watch this station anyway. Just curious as to what folks know.

If you go back a page, you'll see a thread about this from early August when they signed on with their digital signal. I believe in this case, 'flash cut' was a misnomer -- they were off the air for a while until they could get the digital transmitter in place.

I do see that since the thread from August, the station has changed its call sign to WMWD-LD (from W38CT).

The owners actually reduced power when they flash cut to digital, but I believe you need less power for DTV. In analog, they ran 38.4 kW @ 86m AGL. They're now running 15 kw at the same height, from the same tower behind the WKOW studios.
post #5202 of 5551
15 kW is the FCC limit for low-power digital.

- Trip
post #5203 of 5551
Fox 47: SD weather warnings are unacceptable, especially during a Packers game in 2011 and when Weather Central's LIVE:Wire and LIVE:Wire LX products interface with the splicer. (Hint, Hint...)
If you don't want to drop the money, you may want to consider loading the images for Severe Thunderstorm Watch, Severe Thunderstorm Warning, Tornado Watch and Tornado Warning into the Splicer.
(The preceding was NOT a paid sponsorship, although one of my family members is a former employee of said company.)
post #5204 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post

Fox 47: SD weather warnings are unacceptable, especially during a Packers game in 2011 and when Weather Central's LIVE:Wire and LIVE:Wire LX products interface with the splicer. (Hint, Hint...)
If you don't want to drop the money, you may want to consider loading the images for Severe Thunderstorm Watch, Severe Thunderstorm Warning, Tornado Watch and Tornado Warning into the Splicer.
(The preceding was NOT a paid sponsorship, although one of my family members is a former employee of said company.)

Yes, that was lame. My son asked what happened to the picture, and I explained how the station was too cheap to buy the necessary equipment.
post #5205 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post

Fox 47: SD weather warnings are unacceptable, especially during a Packers game in 2011 and when Weather Central's LIVE:Wire™ and LIVE:Wire™ LX products interface with the splicer. (Hint, Hint...)
If you don't want to drop the money, you may want to consider loading the images for Severe Thunderstorm Watch, Severe Thunderstorm Warning, Tornado Watch and Tornado Warning into the Splicer.

Since you are relatively new to this forum, you probably do not know that Fox47 has extremely little say as to what happens to the facility. Sinclair holds the purse strings. I've been told, face-to-face, at times they have no idea what they will be getting until it shows up at their door. Big ticket items, like transmitters, antennas, etc., is known.

As for getting the station updated for Splicer 2.0, I do not know if Fox has done that yet (should have by now). But, it is up to Sinclair to spend the money to buy the gear to interface to the upgraded splicer. Madison, unfortunately, is low on the totem pole when it comes to Sinclair spending money for upgrades.
post #5206 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by feh View Post

Yes, that was lame. My son asked what happened to the picture, and I explained how the station was too cheap to buy the necessary equipment.

See the post preceding this one for the explanation.
post #5207 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Since you are relatively new to this forum, you probably do not know that Fox47 has extremely little say as to what happens to the facility. Sinclair holds the purse strings. I've been told, face-to-face, at times they have no idea what they will be getting until it shows up at their door. Big ticket items, like transmitters, antennas, etc., is known.

As for getting the station updated for Splicer 2.0, I do not know if Fox has done that yet (should have by now). But, it is up to Sinclair to spend the money to buy the gear to interface to the upgraded splicer. Madison, unfortunately, is low on the totem pole when it comes to Sinclair spending money for upgrades.

I was a casual observer before I joined, so I kind of know what's going on. I know that Sinclair controls the station, but I find it hard to believe that FOX 47 can't tell Sinclair, "Hey, I just heard about this new piece of gear that can give us HD weather warnings, and won't break the bank." Matt will have to chime in here.
post #5208 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Since you are relatively new to this forum, you probably do not know that Fox47 has extremely little say as to what happens to the facility. Sinclair holds the purse strings. I've been told, face-to-face, at times they have no idea what they will be getting until it shows up at their door. Big ticket items, like transmitters, antennas, etc., is known.

As for getting the station updated for Splicer 2.0, I do not know if Fox has done that yet (should have by now). But, it is up to Sinclair to spend the money to buy the gear to interface to the upgraded splicer. Madison, unfortunately, is low on the totem pole when it comes to Sinclair spending money for upgrades.

FYI, We are planning to upgrade Fox47 to locak HD in the first quarter of next year.
post #5209 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post

but I find it hard to believe that FOX 47 can't tell Sinclair, "Hey, I just heard about this new piece of gear that can give us HD weather warnings, and won't break the bank."

Believe me when I say that Sinclair engineering knows all about what Fox engineering is doing.

It still comes down to pecking order.

Keep in mind that the main blame for what Fox affiliates are forced to do is because of Fox network not allowing the affiliates to have access to the HD video for these types of warning. Of course, with Fox47 still being an analog plant, having access to the HD video wouldn't have helped.

IMHO, if it weren't for the splicer system (as much as it is universally hated by a lot of people), I doubt that Fox47 would be HD for network programming. Don't know if the situation would have forced Sinclair to open the purse strings to do the minimum that WMTV did to go HD with network programming. We'll never know the answer to that situation.
post #5210 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Believe me when I say that Sinclair engineering knows all about what Fox engineering is doing.

It still comes down to pecking order.

Keep in mind that the main blame for what Fox affiliates are forced to do is because of Fox network not allowing the affiliates to have access to the HD video for these types of warning. Of course, with Fox47 still being an analog plant, having access to the HD video wouldn't have helped.

IMHO, if it weren't for the splicer system (as much as it is universally hated by a lot of people), I doubt that Fox47 would be HD for network programming. Don't know if the situation would have forced Sinclair to open the purse strings to do the minimum that WMTV did to go HD with network programming. We'll never know the answer to that situation.

The system that I'm referring to (Weather Central's LiveWIRE) interfaces with the FOX Splicer, providing HD weather warnings. No splicer upgrade should be needed.
post #5211 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRacer View Post

FYI, We are planning to upgrade Fox47 to locak HD in the first quarter of next year.

Have you heard about the LiveWIRE? Did you consider buying it? Will you buy it?
post #5212 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRacer View Post

FYI, We are planning to upgrade Fox47 to locak HD in the first quarter of next year.

I knew that it was going to be happening, didn't know when and wasn't allowed to say anything. But, since you've now officially posted it

But, that said, notice how long it has taken Sinclair to finally open the purse strings.
post #5213 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post

The system that I'm referring to (Weather Central's LiveWIRE) interfaces with the FOX Splicer, providing HD weather warnings. No splicer upgrade should be needed.

Yes there is indeed a Splicer upgrade required. Splicer V1 doesn't not do anything that allows for the Fox Network tested boxes to be attached. V1 just doesn't have the ability to do emergency stuff.

It takes Splicer V2 for this to happen. All stations should be at V2 by now.

Plus, all devices to do this emergency stuff, have to be tested and approved by Fox engineering. I'm not ssaying that LiveWire is not approved, only that thid party devices will not be allowed to talk to the splicer unless approved.

Fox is damn picky when it comes to this stuff.
post #5214 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Yes there is indeed a Splicer upgrade required. Splicer V1 doesn't not do anything that allows for the Fox Network tested boxes to be attached. V1 just doesn't have the ability to do emergency stuff.

It takes Splicer V2 for this to happen. All stations should be at V2 by now.

Plus, all devices to do this emergency stuff, have to be tested and approved by Fox engineering. I'm not ssaying that LiveWire is not approved, only that thid party devices will not be allowed to talk to the splicer unless approved.

Fox is damn picky when it comes to this stuff.

The LiveWIRE is approved. Fox asked Weather Central to make it. http://weathercentral.tv/news/2011/1...oxsplicer.html
post #5215 of 5551
Like I said, never said that it wasn't. The main point was that the splicer upgrade is necessary before anyone's box can be used at a station.
post #5216 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrvideo View Post

Keep in mind that the main blame for what Fox affiliates are forced to do is because of Fox network not allowing the affiliates to have access to the HD video for these types of warning. Of course, with Fox47 still being an analog plant, having access to the HD video wouldn't have helped.

Not entirely true. The weather alert system can be installed as the last thing before the encoder. Quite a few stations set-up HD weather alerts before converting their local studios to HD/digital. Up-converters and A->D converters are relatively inexpensive.

Very true about the Fox network splicer situation. The Splicer 2.0 solution is not ideal, but at least it makes this possible.

- LoopinFool
post #5217 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoopinFool View Post

Not entirely true. The weather alert system can be installed as the last thing before the encoder. Quite a few stations set-up HD weather alerts before converting their local studios to HD/digital. Up-converters and A->D converters are relatively inexpensive.

It is true that some station have opted to DSK the weather stuff at the output of the splicer rack, instead of where it would normally be done. It is indeed a way around the fact that Fox won't let them at the HD video/audio. Why more Fox affiliates haven't gone that route is unknown.

Thanks for reminding me about that solution. I forgot all about it.
post #5218 of 5551
Via @WMTVTech: http://twitter.com/#!/WMTVtech/statu...98452400701441
I think Tom is happy it's not his station.
post #5219 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgmv123 View Post

Via @WMTVTech: http://twitter.com/#!/WMTVtech/statu...98452400701441
I think Tom is happy it's not his station.

Not much info here. All of a sudden in the last 2 weeks or so I'm having trouble getting Fox47 (DTV UHF 49) at times after many months of no problems since they moved to that frequency from VHF 11. It cuts out momentarily at random on some days. More than one tuner is seeing this, some older and some newer external tuners all hooked to the same fixed roof antenna in the Vilas area. No problem with WISC (DTV UHF 50).

Anyone else seeing this?

This article give me some understanding of the 4G potential issues. Anyway, my particular problem could be caused by a number of things, not necessarily 4G.

http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/124128
post #5220 of 5551
Quote:
Originally Posted by whosbest1 View Post

Not much info here. All of a sudden in the last 2 weeks or so I'm having trouble getting Fox47 (DTV UHF 49) at times after many months of no problems since they moved to that frequency from VHF 11. It cuts out momentarily at random on some days. More than one tuner is seeing this, some older and some newer external tuners all hooked to the same fixed roof antenna in the Vilas area. No problem with WISC (DTV UHF 50).

Anyone else seeing this?

This article give me some understanding of the 4G potential issues. Anyway, my particular problem could be caused by a number of things, not necessarily 4G.

http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/124128

Same for me on the near west side (near the intersection of Mineral Point & Midvale). I have a TV tuner card in my computer and can watch all of the local DTV stations, except for Fox 47. Even WMTV, which has at times been dicey with my $15 RadioShack settop antenna, comes in fine (probably helps that the leaves are coming off), but no signal for Fox 47. Haven't had time to troubleshoot further and try rescanning, but I had successfully rescanned after they moved from VHF 11.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Madison, WI - HDTV