or Connect
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › DirecTV goes to 3 HD channels per transponder!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

DirecTV goes to 3 HD channels per transponder!  

post #1 of 666
Thread Starter 
As of today, DirecTV has HBO HD, Showtime HD, and HDNet Movies on the same transponder (C-10). It appears they are still sharing the same bandwidth as 2 channels did on a transponder, roughly 28mb/s.

I'll continue to monitor bitrates at http://www.widemovies.com/dfwbitrate.html

I took a quick sample and got the following...

HBO HD 13.9mb/s
Showtime HD 6.5mb/s (lowest I've ever recorded)
HDNet Movies 7.8mb/s (lowest for HDNet Movies I've ever recorded)

These were 5 minute samples, so I'll definitely need to collect more data, but it appears they are giving HBO more bandwidth than the other two.

Let the bit starving begin!
post #2 of 666
Is this to make room for the Sunday Ticket HD broadcasts do you think?

What a freakin' joke... At what point do they think HD is no longer HD once you compress it to more than 1/3 of it's intended bit-rate?!?
post #3 of 666
This is not good. I just cancelled cable too.. Dammit.
post #4 of 666
Who's got Stephanie Campbell's phone number? If this is true and not just a temporary thing as they are moving channels around, I am through (after 10 years). Totally ridiculous...

ron
post #5 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by Cheezmo

HBO HD 13.9mb/s
Showtime HD 6.5mb/s (lowest I've ever recorded)
HDNet Movies 7.8mb/s (lowest for HDNet Movies I've ever recorded)
I can't believe that Mark Cuban is ok with this. I hope that this is just a tempory test and the bit rates will go back up. I'm not home now, but when I get home tonight I'll check out the picture and the bit rates using the Tivo. I guess that DirecTV really doesn't have enought bandwidth to carry the Sunday Ticket channels and add the networks without severly compromising the picture quality.
post #6 of 666
Thread Starter 
Doesn't look good to me. I just took a longer sample of HDNet Movies and got 6.7mb/s.
post #7 of 666
Darn. This means that Showtime-HD is using less bandwidth (6.5Mbps) than a standard 480p DVD! That's the bandwidth that SD channels should be at!
post #8 of 666
The other night I used the Tivo to check the resolution, and DirecTV had reduced the resolution on HBO and HD-Net to 1280 by 1088. Showtime and Discovery were still 1920 by 1088 at the time. Since I'm not home now, can someone tell if they've reduced the resolution for all of the HD channels now. I guess DirecTV is offering HD-lite at this point---Not a good selling point for them.
post #9 of 666
I'll be interested in seeing what the numbers average out to as you get longer samples from all three channels. Unfortunately, you can no longer compare the entire transponder at one time, since you only have two tuners. Now I wonder if those previous numbers were low (not taking up the entire transponder) because they were seeing how low they could go, and if we'd notice.

I'm anxious to get home to see how it looks to me. I'm on a smaller set (46" from 11') than some of you, so I'm not going to be the most discriminating viewer. Can you notice any difference? If nothing else, maybe this leads credence to the rumors of much more HD by the end of the year?
post #10 of 666
Stephanie Campbell's email address
SACampbell@directv.com
post #11 of 666
Thread Starter 
By this evening I will have had a chance to grab some entire movies which will give me a better indication (I just did a longer segment of Showtime and got 8.4mb/s). Things are definitely lower, and still appear to add up to about 28mb/s per transponder.

I'll see about checking the resolutions. I already knew HBO was 1280x1088.
post #12 of 666
This is horrible news. I certainly won't pay for any of this crap.
post #13 of 666
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally posted by fire407
The other night I used the Tivo to check the resolution, and DirecTV had reduced the resolution on HBO and HD-Net to 1280 by 1088. Showtime and Discovery were still 1920 by 1088 at the time. Since I'm not home now, can someone tell if they've reduced the resolution for all of the HD channels now. I guess DirecTV is offering HD-lite at this point---Not a good selling point for them.
You got it. HBO HD, ShowtimeHD, and HDNet Movies are all at 1280x1088 now.

(For those who wonder, it is supposed to be 1920x1088). Why 1088 and not 1080? Because 1088 is a multiple of 32 (or 64) I forget which matters, but MPEG encoder/decoders care about such things.
post #14 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by fire407
I can't believe that Mark Cuban is ok with this.
FWIW, he isn't. Email him personally: mark@hd.net. I emailed Dish last week about HDNET going to hell and they turned it around in 1 day and Cuban was involved directly. You bet your ass he cares, so send him an email now.
post #15 of 666
You really think the new birds could accomplish the numbers they were stating w/o having to do stuff like this?

I hope its temporary too but if they plan on getting the channels they were stating, even with state of the art birds I would think theyd have to go to atleast 3 per transponder.
post #16 of 666
Ha! Old Rupert is conserving the bandwidth to make even more money.
post #17 of 666
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally posted by fire407
I can't believe that Mark Cuban is ok with this.
I've heard from Mark. It does concern him. They think it is temporary due to NFL games and expect the bitrates to come back up when the games are over.
post #18 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by Darin
....Now I wonder if those previous numbers were low (not taking up the entire transponder) because they were seeing how low they could go, and if we'd notice.

I'm anxious to get home to see how it looks to me. I'm on a smaller set (46" from 11') than some of you, so I'm not going to be the most discriminating viewer. Can you notice any difference? If nothing else, maybe this leads credence to the rumors of much more HD by the end of the year?
No offense Darin, but are you serious? Seeing how low they could go before we'd notice? That would have been just about 14 months ago now. FWIW, I watch all my HD on a 36" 4x3 set at just about 7.5' and HBO-HD and HDNet have looked like sh*t ever since they added the HD pack. The recently added Bravo HD has looked like total crap on the US Open. Now this? Like I said, if it's not just a temporary thing as they move channel slots about I'm finished. And people wonder why I question whether they will use their just announced capacity increase in '05-07 to restore PQ? Answer me one question. Has D* EVER restored any PQ once it was reduced?
Quote:
Stephanie Campbell's email address
SACampbell@directv.com
Thanks openhouse. I will bookmark this thread and if this ends up being a long term deal Ms Campbell will be hearing from me along with my termination request.

ron
post #19 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by Marissadad
FWIW, he isn't. Email him personally: mark@hd.net. I emailed Dish last week about HDNET going to hell and they turned it around in 1 day and Cuban was involved directly. You bet your ass he cares, so send him an email now.
email sent. thanks.
post #20 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by R11
Seeing how low they could go before we'd notice? That would have been just about 14 months ago now.
They aren't using the same stat-mux encoders they were 14 months ago.
post #21 of 666
The real question though is how much worse do the channels actually look?
post #22 of 666
Where in the world did you guys think that the bandwidth for 9 NFL:ST HDTV games was going to come from?
post #23 of 666
Quote:
Originally posted by CycloneGT
Where in the world did you guys think that the bandwidth for 9 NFL:ST HDTV games was going to come from?
Exactly the question I asked when D* annouced all these HD games. But the ST HD people didnt want to think about it I guess.
post #24 of 666
Honestly, I thought it was coming from turning off PPV. I'm not a football fan... how many, if any, of those HD games are on simultaneously?
post #25 of 666
This seemed to have started 2 nights ago. I noticed it while checking resolutions using my HDTiVo.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...hreadid=443956

I just hope that sundays football doesnt look like crap. I expect some technical issues with fox's first major HD broadcasts. With a house full of people here on sunday and some of them thinking of jumping ship to D* I hope all is well....
post #26 of 666
So it's gonna look like crap for the whole football season? That is ridiculous.
I noticed a decrease in picture quality myself the other night but had no idea they were trying to pull crap like this.
post #27 of 666
Now does anyone agree that the FCC needs to define a minimum bitrate under mpeg2 for something to be labeled "HD" ? Or are all of you still going to say that govt intervention can only be bad?
post #28 of 666
Mark responded to my email within a matter of minutes!!!!!!!!!!!

From: "mark cuban" <mark.cuban@dallasmavs.com> Add to Address Book
To: "'Brandon'" <tx_brandon@yahoo.com>, mark@hd.net
CC: "'Philip Garvin'" <philip@coloradostudios.com>
Subject: RE: DirecTV killing HDNet with compression!!!
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:05:35 -0500


You hit the nail on the head… we are monitoring it



m
post #29 of 666
Now watch the fools put Discovery HD, HBOHD and SHOHD on the same transponder instead of having HDNET Movies on there if Mark Cuban bitches at them.
post #30 of 666
I just sent an email complaining to Stephanie Cambell...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › DirecTV goes to 3 HD channels per transponder!