Paul:
Please note the edit added two posts back.
Penton-man:
You speak of reviewing the entire thread. If you review the first page of this thread, you will see my great praise for what Paul is addressing through his reviews. Anyone who read my first post in this thread should realize I was not being critical. Moreover, anyone who really thought about what I was asking most recently should conclude the same.
-- and --
Most importantly, it was a complete misunderstanding if it sounded like I was accusing Paul of bias. I was only trying to connect the dots and complete my understanding of his Sony vs Pany comparison.
There WAS another poster a few pages back who did accuse Paul of timing issues, and bias. I chose to ignore him -- because he obviously didn't take time to read what I had to say. I thought about addressing the lack of sense in his remarks -- but his post was not addressed to me. I felt the same invasion at your response to my post TO PAUL.
It is ironic that THINKING (or not thinking) about what a person is really trying to say/ask is the reason for these conflicts! And, I also agree to an end to this conflict.
gp
Please note the edit added two posts back.
Penton-man:
You speak of reviewing the entire thread. If you review the first page of this thread, you will see my great praise for what Paul is addressing through his reviews. Anyone who read my first post in this thread should realize I was not being critical. Moreover, anyone who really thought about what I was asking most recently should conclude the same.
-- and --
Most importantly, it was a complete misunderstanding if it sounded like I was accusing Paul of bias. I was only trying to connect the dots and complete my understanding of his Sony vs Pany comparison.
There WAS another poster a few pages back who did accuse Paul of timing issues, and bias. I chose to ignore him -- because he obviously didn't take time to read what I had to say. I thought about addressing the lack of sense in his remarks -- but his post was not addressed to me. I felt the same invasion at your response to my post TO PAUL.
It is ironic that THINKING (or not thinking) about what a person is really trying to say/ask is the reason for these conflicts! And, I also agree to an end to this conflict.
gp














