AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Charlotte, NC - OTA
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Charlotte, NC - OTA - Page 29

post #841 of 5794
Well, my neighbor had the exact same problem last night. I e-mailed WBT and this is the reply I got:

Dear John,

First of all, we would like to thank you for taking the time to contact
us. Your feedback is greatly appreciated and taken very seriously.
Though I do not have an answer for you at this time, I will investigate
the problem and try to determine the cause. My suspicions are that the
metadata that drives presets on our Dolby encoders may not have switched
properly last evening. The encoder switches back and forth between a
stereo mix and a 5.1 surround sound mix and it sounds as if the encoder
stayed in a stereo mix throughout the HD broadcast.

We apologize for the inconvenience and will do everything possible to
avoid this problem in the future.

Again, thank you and please feel free to contact me again at anytime.

RY

Ron Yoslov
Chief Engineer
WBTV
post #842 of 5794
Noticed it when flipping on CSI:NY. It's happened on WBTV before and it isn't your system. No CC audio is present at all.
post #843 of 5794
Anyone get pixelation and severe audio drops on "24" tonight?
post #844 of 5794
We're working on the issue.
post #845 of 5794
Problems here, but last week I had problems of my own, wind+tree=servere dropouts for me, so I'm not sure if it's more of the same.

I really need to "Take care" of that tree
post #846 of 5794
AI was fine last night (although it didn't suffer problems last year when we had similar issues) and HOUSE also had no problems - at least in the first 10 minutes. I have to wait for the family to watch the rest, but PB and 24 didn't have a problem-free 5 minute stretch, so hopefully it has been corrected.

Thanks, Bob - however, I reserve the right to complain if it happens again.
post #847 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPanther95 View Post

Thanks, Bob - however, I reserve the right to complain if it happens again.

Gosh Matt, you are such a Whiner!

The micorwave problem has been corrected, so all should be more better now..
Thanks..
post #848 of 5794
AI was flawless, but house did have a few glitches for me.
post #849 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdfox18doe View Post

Gosh Matt, you are such a Whiner!

The micorwave problem has been corrected, so all should be more better now..
Thanks..


Thanks again for the quick response's Bob. I just got the chance to watch 24 last night (TIVO) and experienced the same thing, but AI always seems to have no problems.

Glad to hear it is fixed.

Chad
post #850 of 5794
Credit where credit is due...(and in the right forum)

"24" last night (5/1) was flawless. Not a single drop-out of audio or video on my HDTivo.

It was great to be able to enjoy the suspense of the story instead of wondering when the next glitch would occur.

I no longer take perfect HD for granted...but I love it when it happens.
post #851 of 5794
Same here, great signal, no glitches at all, thanks again for the hard work bdfox18doe.
post #852 of 5794
You guys notice that WB55 is already starting to use their My Network TV 12 logo?
post #853 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPanther95 View Post

You guys notice that WB55 is already starting to use their My Network TV 12 logo?

I had not noticed this yet... I wadn't been following the whole CW/MYNTV thing but I was a little worried that WJZY would be come the CW affiliate and they did , because its the ONLY local DT channel that I do not receive reliably and I do watch Smallville on WB.

Oh well!
post #854 of 5794
On that note, is WJZY broadcasting at 1000kW yet or just 400kW right now?
post #855 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPanther95 View Post

You guys notice that WB55 is already starting to use their My Network TV 12 logo?

I noticed the change over the weekend. WWWB-TV is history. The new call letters are WMYT-TV.
post #856 of 5794
I'm far enough away that I think I need to have 2 antennas pointing at the 2 transmitters inorder to keep a clear signal of Fox and CBS. 24 keeps dropping but if i turn too much towards the fox transmitter the cbs transmitter gets too low and starts dropping. I am right at 90 degrees from the 2 main broadcast towers.
Does anyone have a link to a resource I can use in order to put up anoter antenna and then somehow combine the signals from the 2 transmitters to go over 1 coaxial?
Thanks
William
post #857 of 5794
Do a search for "Jointenna"
post #858 of 5794
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by wktaylor View Post

Does anyone have a link to a resource I can use in order to put up anoter antenna and then somehow combine the signals from the 2 transmitters to go over 1 coaxial?

You would be much better off if your receiver had two inputs (like the MyHD tuner board, for instance). Another option, besides a rotor, would be two downleads and a switch (but that doesn't work well for timed recordings). Maybe the best option would be to get an antenna that isn't so directional (square shooter). The jointenna only works for adding one station to your 'main' antenna. If you go the joining route, you will need to amplify, because no matter what you do, you'll be loosing signal. Try to find an amp that doesn't introduce too much noise. You may also google-up the True-Spec MX-4U, which plucks 4 UHF channels out of the spectrum. But if you go that route, you've got to run everything through some kind of bandpass filter or when you join them you'll run into trouble. I've got an overly complicated head-end at my house that handles analog and digitals from both directions, plus 44/58, which is the oddball and has it's own receiver input. Although it all works, I would always recommend against it unless, like me, it would spoil your whole week if it worked perfectly after installation without tweaking.

--Dale--
post #859 of 5794
I had the same problem. I added a second antenna and fed both signals into the output side of a two way splitter. This reversed splitter solution worked perfectly for me.

Derek
post #860 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekH View Post

I had the same problem. I added a second antenna and fed both signals into the output side of a two way splitter. This reversed splitter solution worked perfectly for me.

Derek

I live in the University area and had the same problem and the solution above is worked for me as well. No problems and strong signal on all the key channels.

Good luck,
Chad
post #861 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by ONTHEAIR View Post

Credit where credit is due...(and in the right forum)

"24" last night (5/1) was flawless. Not a single drop-out of audio or video on my HDTivo.

It was great to be able to enjoy the suspense of the story instead of wondering when the next glitch would occur.

I no longer take perfect HD for granted...but I love it when it happens.

Agreed, 24 was perfect. I have to admit I was a little worried as the feed for the Race on Sunday was terrible, thank god it rained out, as Monday's broadcast was perfect in HD for the race and 24.

Thanks BDFox.

Chad
post #862 of 5794
As long as we're heaping on praise. Newbies should take note that Bob at WCCB has been extremely HD-friendly as an engineer, viewer, and AVS member. He had WCCB delivering HD prior to FOX's national conversion to the HD splicer system. There were a number of times that Charlotte was one of only a few cities receiving an early FOX HD broadcast.

Problems are a PITA (especially during 24 ), but it's 10 times more frustrating to have a problem and zero feedback from the station letting us know if they are even looking into the problem.
post #863 of 5794
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYURDRMS View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekH View Post

I had the same problem. I added a second antenna and fed both signals into the output side of a two way splitter. This reversed splitter solution worked perfectly for me.

I live in the University area and had the same problem and the solution above is worked for me as well. No problems and strong signal on all the key channels.

I'm all-for simplicity, and can't argue with what works. But the simple combination of antennas can not be counted upon; people tend to think 1+1=2 with antennas, and that's just not the typical case because the signal hitting the back of one antenna and the front of the other can cancel each other out. Your chance of getting away with the splitter approach is greatly increased if you have highly directional antennas that are aimed around 90 degrees from each other. But if your towers are "only" 90 degrees apart, a non-directional antenna aimed half way between the two targets might do just as well, especially in a UHF hot spot like the University area.

--Dale--
post #864 of 5794
Quote:
Originally Posted by sengsational View Post

I'm all-for simplicity, and can't argue with what works. But the simple combination of antennas can not be counted upon; people tend to think 1+1=2 with antennas, and that's just not the typical case because the signal hitting the back of one antenna and the front of the other can cancel each other out. Your chance of getting away with the splitter approach is greatly increased if you have highly directional antennas that are aimed around 90 degrees from each other. But if your towers are "only" 90 degrees apart, a non-directional antenna aimed half way between the two targets might do just as well, especially in a UHF hot spot like the University area.

--Dale--

Hey Dale,

I certainly tried to use a single antenna, however that did not work and provided constant dropouts from the University area, that is why I went and bought a second antenna and the splitter. The two Antenna I have are directional and are pointed at almost 90 degrees of seperation. Another key issue at least for me is that my antenna are in my attic, so I am sure that I am losing some signal with that, and may be why I needed the second antenna. However, mine has now been working for almost 1 1/2 now with no problems.
post #865 of 5794
"But the simple combination of antennas can not be counted upon; people tend to think 1+1=2 with antennas"

Yes to a point, If you have the two antennas sufficiently spaced apart, then the two will work well. I have a Terk TV-50 perpendicular to 350 degrees and a Radio Shack U-75R directed to 49 degrees. Both are connected with a Radio Shack signal combiner. The two antennas are 12 feet apart in my attic and I receive all the Charlotte stations with very little degradation.
post #866 of 5794
Thread Starter 
Guys, I can't argue with success! The reverse splitter method would be what I would try first (after a single amplified antenna didn't do it). But the closer you get to pointing in opposite directions, the less likely your signal will improve. Or how about this one... two antennas in the exact SAME direction that are joined by a reverse splitter that cause a signal to be worse! Maybe much worse! That's a puzzle I'll leave for you guys to answer how that could possibly be.

--Dale--
post #867 of 5794
Phasing makes all the difference!
post #868 of 5794
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry birdwell View Post

Phasing makes all the difference!

You win the virutal cup of java! It doesn't take a rocket scientist (or even a retired TV exec) to figure out that if the two signals are out of phase, you can get less than you put in. But better than my going-on about it, try it here!! Set the wavelength and amplitude to 40 for wave 1 and wave 2. Then change the phase closer to 180 (to do that in real-life, you'd lengthen or shorten a cable from one of the antennas).

--Dale--
post #869 of 5794
This is kinda off topic, but does anyone know if DirecTV is broadcasting the Charlotte locals in HD yet? I know that Charlotte was on the list of the next markets to get HD locals starting in April, but I haven't heard if they have started it yet. Thanks in advance and I apologize if this is off topic.
post #870 of 5794
Last thing I saw showed June 2006 for Charlotte.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Charlotte, NC - OTA