AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Official SED, Info, Discussion, Etc Thread!!!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official SED, Info, Discussion, Etc Thread!!! - Page 59  

post #1741 of 2847
"...I have feeling a big announcement is forthcoming...."

Yeah- "We built the plant using LCD technology instead of the hyped new SED manufacturing methods so that we could actually produce something out of the plant- LCDs."
post #1742 of 2847
I am here in Japan. I will let you guys know how the SED that is set to launch next year looks.

So far, I feel that as far s PQ is concererned, right now it is, in succession from best to worst is: SXRD, 50" 1080P Pioneer Plasma, 1080P 65" Panny Plaz, 1080P DLP (albiet wobulated), 1080i/720P Panny Plaz, direct view LCD (1080p), then RP LCD (SDE on Bravia is noticeable, and the panny is just atrocious).

From what I have researched, SED should swab the deck with the above stated technologies. I just can't wait.
post #1743 of 2847
i want
post #1744 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by aud19
Flaws.....? You mean, by far, the best PQ available to date.....? I love how people think because CRT's are old and "cheap" they must be bad :rolleyes: And even still, plasma's are at least as, if not more flawed in PQ than a quality, calibrated CRT other than cabinet size.
Only with MAJOR work... CRT's can produce amazing results. Less than 1% of the people that own 'em will ever see such results (yes, even among those that get ISF calibration done). Ever see detail on what it takes to properly calibrate a CRT RPTV? It's not just going into some service menu and adjusting levels. At best, one has to crack open the set, adjust the magnetic and electrostatic focus on each CRT (which is a compromise, perfect focus across the screen CANNOT be achieved due to the short optical path in an RPTV), perform meticulous convergence adjustments (which are impossible without proper focus), etc. Sometimes more extensive mods are necessary. Mitsubishis require a PCB level mod to reduce ringing as well as a firmware mod to reduce overscan.

The major benefit to microdisplays and plasmas is that it's MUCH EASIER to get the best out of them and they are much better out of the box than CRT RPTVs. They also do some things better than a CRT can. IMO each technology has it's advantages, but new display technologies allow more people to see better quality WITHOUT labor/time/cost intensive calibration. Benefits are still very apparent once calibration has been done but it's no longer necessary to achieve even a watchable picture. That can't be said for most CRT RPTVs.
post #1745 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanebear
Only with MAJOR work... CRT's can produce amazing results. Less than 1% of the people that own 'em will ever see such results (yes, even among those that get ISF calibration done).
I happen to fall in that 1%. I had EVERYTHING done to my Mits RPTV that you mentioned and more including using a colorimeter to set grayscale properly and lining the interior of the cabinet with flat black felt to limit internal reflections. It looks amazing. I still haven't seen anything in the stores to rival it. That said, it's getting a little long in the tooth and I'm looking to replace it in a few years. Hopefully SED will be available by then and won't disappoint.

Cheers from a diehard CRT RPTV owner. :)
post #1746 of 2847
I have no doubt that SED will amaze us all. But I'm going to wait a few years when they are on the market until I get one. When they work out all the kinks and the initial release price goes down to compete with plasma and lcd. Also need to consider if there are any draw backs in the technology like IR and permanent burn in.
post #1747 of 2847
I also want to see how this pans out.

But i need hdtv right now i really dont see how ppl go RPCRT when its next to a dlp or sxrd :confused: ---- weird

I just couldn't do it

I will get a tv next next ( need a few extera bucks )

either ---------

samsung HLS6187wx

or

Sony 60sxrd1

for real

PS need HD-DVD also
as this would complament my 360 :D
post #1748 of 2847
Quote:
01-05-05, 09:39 PM #1 (Print)
wojtek
Progressive Member


Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Jersey City, NJ
Posts: 1,762 Official SED, Info, Discussion, Etc Thread!!!
':eek:'

I believe my SA8300 is twice as old as this thread! :rolleyes:

when was the last time you leased a new generation DVR?
post #1749 of 2847
new SED story. no fresh info but has some Pete Putnam quotes

http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=213

from the tvweek high definition newsletter:

http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=117
post #1750 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcinzano
new SED story. no fresh info but has some Pete Putnam quotes

http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=213

from the tvweek high definition newsletter:

http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=117
Peter Putnam is not painting a rosey picture for SED, and Canon/Toshiba has been too quiet on the matter. Not good, my friends. If Pioneer can toss out a $10,000 MSRP 50" 1080p Plasma in mid 2006, why can't SED, Inc.?? Sounds like they're having a bit more trouble in the mfg'ering process than just making the display cheaply.
post #1751 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajieboy
Peter Putnam is not painting a rosey picture for SED, and Canon/Toshiba has been too quiet on the matter. Not good, my friends. If Pioneer can toss out a $10,000 MSRP 50" 1080p Plasma in mid 2006, why can't SED, Inc.?? Sounds like they're having a bit more trouble in the mfg'ering process than just making the display cheaply.
i agree. there's always an enthusiast market willing to pay top-dollar for the potential next big thing -- if it delivers
post #1752 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcinzano
i agree. there's always an enthusiast market willing to pay top-dollar for the potential next big thing -- if it delivers
But that segment of the market is not sufficient enough to generate the ROI necessary to satisfy shareholders. The "bottom line" is, if Toshiba/Canon cannot produce a panel that can be marketed to the masses... SED will fail to come to fruition.
post #1753 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by optivity
But that segment of the market is not sufficient enough to generate the ROI necessary to satisfy shareholders. The "bottom line" is, if Toshiba/Canon cannot produce a panel that can be marketed to the masses... SED will fail to come to fruition.
They have to get a toehold in the market somehow. That's how Plasma & LCD got going. They need to start building upon some sort of marketshare before the mass market strategy kicks in, and waiting & waiting to release SED has hurt it. I'm really beginning to think there's much more to this problem than Toshiba/Canon is telling us.
post #1754 of 2847
Right, as in this article posted by "fredfa" today says... SED may be the best HDTV we never see.
post #1755 of 2847
I'm going to cry. I love my 36" and 32" Sony XBR Wega for the picture it provides and I have been looking for something to replace it for the past 4 or 5 years and have not had any luck in terms of finding something I liked. Then came the hope of SED so I waited... well I'm tired of waiting, so I'm going to buy something to hold me over for a few years and hopefully SED will come to fruition, because I have a feeling that I'm not going to be thrilled with anything I buy, no matter how much money I spend. (Looking at the new XBR SXRDs, XBR Bravia LCDs, and Pio Plasma.)

Hope SED makes it by 2008, or sooner!
post #1756 of 2847
The last I looked SED Inc. was being sued by a patent holding company. Has that issue been resolved?
post #1757 of 2847
I realize that release dates are OFTEN wrong...but just in April 2006 S&V mag, via Toshiba, they were reporting 1080p SED here "by end of 2006." Hey, I'd take spring 2007 (I think !) :rolleyes:

So I wonder if there is any reality in that S&V quote from Toshiba???
post #1758 of 2847
Here' the ONE Way that SED would sell--just put Fujitsu's name on it. The Fujitsu worshipers would slobber so much about it that even the Qualia worshipers would buy it!
post #1759 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by cajieboy
Peter Putnam is not painting a rosey picture for SED, and Canon/Toshiba has been too quiet on the matter. Not good, my friends. If Pioneer can toss out a $10,000 MSRP 50" 1080p Plasma in mid 2006, why can't SED, Inc.?? Sounds like they're having a bit more trouble in the mfg'ering process than just making the display cheaply.

SED I think should still be very strong. Especially if they reduce price faster than the normal cycle. You figure the manufacturing process should be similiar to traditional CRTs.
post #1760 of 2847
Is this the right thread to subscribe to for the latest SED info??

I really hope SED isn't vaporware, but pushbacks till 2008 worry me.
That and no real current updates.

Maybe FED will come though instead?
post #1761 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgs9455
Is this the right thread to subscribe to for the latest SED info??

I really hope SED isn't vaporware, but pushbacks till 2008 worry me.
That and no real current updates.

Maybe FED will come though instead?
Yes, this is the right thread.

No updates because Toshiba last announced goal was to start heavy production around June 2007, and have first sets to Market 4Q 2007. They left a lot of fudge language in the announcement. In other words, they appeared to have etched their projection time lines in Jello. They have a history of setting delivery dates, and then postponing. Watch for CES in January. If they are to have any chance of starting production in June, they will surely have to demo a large 1080P panel with HDMI 1.3 at the upcoming CES show.
post #1762 of 2847
I thought they said they aim to bring it to market 4Q 2007 but not start volume production until 2008. And who knows if that even includes the US market.
post #1763 of 2847
Any bets we'll see something new at CEDIA?
post #1764 of 2847
I was all set to hold off for SED with my next TV but 2008!?! By that time LED should have improved significantly and who knows, improvements in OLED might make me be willing to wait until 2009 :) TSED might show some promise during that time frame as well. I think they may be shooting themselves in the foot by not speeding up the release. I understand you can't rush inventions but since they have working prototypes, you can rush fixes.

I know that by 2008 I will be purchasing a new 80" screen of some type to replace my 65" mits. I love my mits but I'll want 1080p and better computer display (not great on CRT although for everything else it looks great).

These severe delays only make me more interested in other technologies as it is more than likely their first models will be puny - perhaps 55" at the largest.
post #1765 of 2847
something i always wondered is if SED will have the same problem with static electricity as CRT's do and collect anything in the air making you clean the screen about every 2 weeks and no matter how well you clean the screen you will always have smear marks :eek:
post #1766 of 2847
SED is a form of FED.

And yes, it might remain vaporware.
post #1767 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUGEN
something i always wondered is if SED will have the same problem with static electricity as CRT's do and collect anything in the air making you clean the screen about every 2 weeks and no matter how well you clean the screen you will always have smear marks :eek:
For me, one of the best aspects of plasma is its resistant to dust build up on the screen (the three dogs in my house make a lot of dust). I could never go back to CRT for this reason alone. The constant screen cleaning was very annoying. That said, I would imagine that SED has a much weaker magnetic field compared to tube TV. Anyone have the technical info to confirm/deny this assumption?
post #1768 of 2847
OK, this thread has REALLY gone off the edge. :rolleyes:
post #1769 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonyAteMyBaby
For me, one of the best aspects of plasma is its resistant to dust build up on the screen (the three dogs in my house make a lot of dust). I could never go back to CRT for this reason alone. The constant screen cleaning was very annoying. That said, I would imagine that SED has a much weaker magnetic field compared to tube TV. Anyone have the technical info to confirm/deny this assumption?
I like plasmas for their tube-like picture and perfect geometry.
post #1770 of 2847
Quote:
Originally Posted by WOLVERNOLE
OK, this thread has REALLY gone off the edge. :rolleyes:
Yeah, I agree. When you start talking 3 dogs & screen cleaning, the thread has hit rock bottom. If you're waiting to buy SED, get over it & look closer afield. SED tech "maybe" your NEXT HT upgrade but for now settle for 1080p whatever.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Flat Panel General & New FP Tech › Official SED, Info, Discussion, Etc Thread!!!