AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Any recent 5th generation receiver chip news?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Any recent 5th generation receiver chip news? - Page 6

post #151 of 433
Thread Starter 
My divider looks like this one physically:

http://www.radioshack.com/product.as...5Fid=15%2D1234

It has "TV" printed on one input and "FM" printed on the other. It also has printed on it "DLS 322." I may have gotten it from Parts Express, I forget, as I got it many years ago.

It is definitely passing UHF signals through both sides, as I move the Megawave around I can fine tune my reception. All my digital channels are UHF. I point the SS right at the transmitter and the Megawave slightly off to one side. It just seems to increase the size of the antenna so I get a stronger signal. My building has a metal roof and I am sure aluminum foil backed fiberglass insulation all around, and I am on the first floor with three floors about me. That is why I need the antenna amp.

I didn't plan to do it this way. I was just getting nowhere reception wise and hooked it up from parts I already had as a goof. It worked right away and works better than the Silver Sensor alone.

IB
post #152 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by inky blacks
It has "TV" printed on one input and "FM" printed on the other. It also has printed on it "DLS 322." I may have gotten it from Parts Express, I forget, as I got it many years ago.

That's similar to the Winegard CA-8800 TV/FM band seperator/combiner I provided a link to in last post, except it might have a little higher insertion loss and perhaps a bit less isolation between TV/FM ports .... I have a DLS 325 VHF/UHF Combiner/seperator laying around here somewhere that is similar except it seperates(or combines from seperate antennas) VHF and UHF instead of VHF/UHF TV and FM.

Quote:


Originally posted by inky blacks
It is definitely passing UHF signals through both sides, as I move the Megawave around I can fine tune my reception.

It shouldn't be. It might be "helping" the antennas be more "connected", and might be passing a little bit of UHF signal through the "FM" port side, but it shouldn't be much. I expect most of the "improvement" you are seeing by adding the megawave is occuring because of it affecting the Silver sensor "through the air" and acting as a sort of extra "reflector" element. As I said in last post, anything near the antenna essentially becomes a part of the antenna itself, especially so another antenna/conductive material) if it is placed a wavelenth or less away from the antenna .... You should see that sort of effect to some extent from the megawave whether or not it's actually even hooked up to your DLS 322, or anything else ....

Try hooking the silver sensor only up to the FM side and compare your UHF DTV and analog recpetion compared to having the silver sensor only hooked up it the "TV" side and I think you'll see what I mean -- Unless your DLS 322 FM/TV combiner/seperator is "defective" ....
post #153 of 433
Thread Starter 
Jeff,

Your right! I disconnected the Megawave and tuned in a strong station just using the Silver Sensor and amp. Then I reconnected through the "FM" side of the combiner-splitter and lost the signal. It makes sense as I was using the Megawave just below the Silver Sensor, so it must have been re-radiating the signal upward to the Silver Sensor. Works sort of like the Select Antenna AM booster sold by C. Crane Company. So I guess I will just keep the Megawave unconnected and use it as a wireless booster. I wonder if anything else I could construct would help in the same way.

http://www.ccrane.com/select-am-antenna.aspx - Select Antenna

I was also worried that as my Silver Sensor is designed for UHF, I would have to get a VHF antenna when my local channels switch back to lower frequencies after they give back their UHF digital air space. The lowest channel will be channel 9, so I tried channel 9 in analogue with the Silver Sensor only and got it very well. So I guess the SS can go at least down to channel 9 OK. The next station up will be 13, then 16, etc, so I guess the SS will be enough, even after the switchover. Hopefully channel 9 is high enough so that it won't have a problem with discharge noise. It looks good in analogue.

I do find I get static on channel 34 analogue and 34.1 digital every day around dinner time, and I wonder if some neighbor's microwave oven is to blame.

Thanks,

IB
post #154 of 433
S. Korea's LG Strikes Digital TV License Deal with Sharp
Associated Press
March 29, 2005

South Korea's LG Electronics Inc. said Tuesday it has signed license agreements with Sharp Corp. and Mitsubishi Electric Corp. to provide digital television reception technology to the Japanese companies, Yonhap News Agency reported Tuesday.

The agreement, Yonhap said, is between LG's U.S. subsidiary Zenith Electronics Corp. and Sharp and Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America.

LG has been in talks with about 300 digital TV manufacturers, set-top box makers and broadcasting equipment vendors to license its digital TV reception technology, according to an LG statement that said licensing revenue is expected to reach about $100 million ''within several years.''

There was no indication how much the Japanese firms alone will pay for the license, which covers technology for U.S.-type digital television reception.
post #155 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by robert123
S. Korea's LG Strikes Digital TV License Deal with Sharp
Associated Press
March 29, 2005

South Korea's LG Electronics Inc. said Tuesday it has signed license agreements with Sharp Corp. and Mitsubishi Electric Corp. to provide digital television reception technology to the Japanese companies, Yonhap News Agency reported Tuesday.

The agreement, Yonhap said, is between LG's U.S. subsidiary Zenith Electronics Corp. and Sharp and Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America.

LG has been in talks with about 300 digital TV manufacturers, set-top box makers and broadcasting equipment vendors to license its digital TV reception technology, according to an LG statement that said licensing revenue is expected to reach about $100 million ''within several years.''

There was no indication how much the Japanese firms alone will pay for the license, which covers technology for U.S.-type digital television reception.

This information quells the theory that LG has a master plan to dominate the HDTV market by making their 5th generation ATSC tuner exclusively on LG HDTVs.

-Robert
VE Advanced Digital technology Dealer
post #156 of 433
Thread Starter 
Yea, but it does not mention 5th chip technology. LG holds the basic patent for 8-VSB, so we don't know exactly what level of technology they are talking about.

That said, I hope your right and LG will give their 5th chip technology to other companies as well as the proper design for the "front end" of the receiver to makes it work. Apparently, the 5th chip is no good at all without an expensive and specifically designed front end for that chip.

IB
post #157 of 433
Thread Starter 
BTW-

Does anyone know if the famed Linx Electronics "Casper" HDTV receiver
chip is dead? It was supposed to be a big improvement because it
synchronized ghost HDTV signals into one stronger signal. Linx claimed
a 85% success rate for it. Not as high as the 94% claimed for the LG
chip, but perhaps with an improved "front end" it could match the LG.
Neither the Linx nor Micronas Web sites mention it anymore. The Linx
site use to feature it. Linx was sold to Micronas last year.

RCA-Thompson was supposed to use the Casper chip in their products in
the Fall of 2005, but according to Bob Miller they will use their own
in-house chip for their stand alone over-the-air receivers.

What gives?

links:

http://www.micronas.com/produc_ts/overview/index.php

http://www.linxelectronics.com_/

IB
post #158 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by inky blacks
Yea, but it does not mention 5th chip technology. LG holds the basic patent for 8-VSB, so we don't know exactly what level of technology they are talking about.

That said, I hope your right and LG will give their 5th chip technology to other companies as well as the proper design for the "front end" of the receiver to makes it work. Apparently, the 5th chip is no good at all without an expensive and specifically designed front end for that chip.

IB

They are talking about LG's 5th generation ATSC chip set.

You are 100% correct that the front end circuit design is critical to deliver premium performance.

In my past life I was the RF TV Broadcast systems engineer for Ikegami, Nucomm and Hitachi's professional broadcast division.

-Robert
VE Advanced Digital Technology Dealer
post #159 of 433
Thread Starter 
Just got this word from Micronas.

"The Casper brand is owned by Disney so we couldn't continue using it. The part will be available in 2H05 in multiple flavors as Micronas DRX 394xH. We will contact you as soon as we have publicly available documentation."

By "2H05," I don't know if he means just 2005, and the "H" was just a typo, or the second quarter of 2005. I am not up to date on all the business slang terms.

This is good news for people who want better tuners.

IB
post #160 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by inky blacks
By "2H05," I don't know if he means just 2005, and the "H" was just a typo, or the second quarter of 2005.

He means 2nd Half of 2005. In other words before the end of the year. Great news!
post #161 of 433
ST Microelectronics is also licensing the Linx/Micronas Casper technology. And from ST's press releases, these should be showing up in receivers very shortly. I thought I remember them mentioning full production by the end of first quarter this year.
post #162 of 433
Bob Miller posted the following to the OpenDTV forum. He had asked an LG engineer why they weren't making a low-cost STB using their 5th gen chipset. He says this is their response:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dear Bob Miller,

The price of the 5th generation VSB chip is almost same as that of the 4th generation. Furthermore VSB portion is a little of a material cost of STB. Major portion come from HD decoder/CPU chip and can-type tuner.

The STB business division of LGE launched a few STB models in the USA market but they retreated from the STB busniess due to little profit.

I will do my every best to help XXXXXXXXX or any manufacturers providing STB to you using our 5th generation VSB chip enhancing the reception
performance of their STB.

Best regards.

XXXX XXXX XXXX
DTV Laboratory LGE,
tel : XX-X-XXXX-XXXX
post #163 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by Rich Peterson
The STB business division of LGE launched a few STB models in the USA market but they retreated from the STB busniess due to little profit.

It seems a shame that the retreated just when the business stood to gain some ground. I guess I'll have to look elsewhere for a better receiver...
post #164 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by sregener
It seems a shame that the retreated just when the business stood to gain some ground. I guess I'll have to look elsewhere for a better receiver...

And what or where could anyone find a better receiver than the current LG LST-4200A? Maybe some day, and maybe not, someone, LG or maybe even some other manufacturer may develop a better STB, but none exists today.

Why look elsewhere for a better receiver when none exists? If anyone wants a terrific and unquestionably the best ATSC/NTSC/QAM receiver it's available now.

-Robert
post #165 of 433
Thread Starter 
Quote:


Originally posted by GSfromCT
ST Microelectronics is also licensing the Linx/Micronas Casper technology. And from ST's press releases, these should be showing up in receivers very shortly. I thought I remember them mentioning full production by the end of first quarter this year.

Do you have a link for this information? I checked out the
ST Microelectronics Web site and could find no mention of it, and a Goggle search turned up nothing as well.

IB
post #166 of 433
Quote:


It seems a shame that they retreated just when the business stood to gain some ground.

At CES I spoke for some time about this with an LG executive. I don't know what his position was and his English was quite poor (but much better than my Korean) so communication was difficult. However, it became clear to me they were not staying in the low-end STB business in part because of the mandate. They felt since pretty much all of their sets later this year would have built-in tuners, there just wasn't enough future market to make the product development worthwhile. I tried to point out the 9 million HD monitors out there with no tuners, but he didn't seem to care. He also said sales of the 4200 were below plan which hurt also.
post #167 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by DTV TiVo Dealer
Why look elsewhere for a better receiver when none exists?

I think you're not being fair here. Maybe it's the retailer in you, maybe not.

For those in inner-city apartments facing the wrong way, the current crop of receivers doesn't always cut it.

For me, I'm in a very bad situation for what I really want - I want stations that are 75+ miles away, with no line-of-sight, and I want them to be breakup free and always there, even when airplanes fly overhead or when it rains or it gets a little windy. Unreasonable? Probably - the analogs look like crap most of the time due to extreme snow (weak signals.) So the promises of receivers that are able to lock on with 1/4 the signal strength of current receivers has me interested.

I'm relatively happy with my Zenith built-in tuner. I get the stations I want a fair bit of the time. And it is my understanding that the 4th-generation chips (I think mine is third) do a little better with multipath and about the same for weak-signal reception. I don't need an incremental improvement. I need a miracle. And that's what Samsung and LG have promised... if only they'd deliver.
post #168 of 433
5th generation ATSC tuners are not more sensitive, just a little more selective, so they reject multi-path a little better. They will not help you pull in stations that are 75 miles away.

My point was to let consumer know that for 95% of the applications a very excellent HD OTA and Cable STB is here now, so why waite for something that 95% of the population does not need.

-Robert
post #169 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by inky blacks
Do you have a link for this information? I checked out the
ST Microelectronics Web site and could find no mention of it, and a Goggle search turned up nothing as well.

IB

Inky:
The STV0370 is licensed Linx/Micronas technology.
Here is the link from CES, hopefully it still works. I'm at work and for some reason my DNS doesn't think www.st.com is a valid address.
http://www.st.com/stonline/press/new...005/p1568h.htm
post #170 of 433
GsfromCT,

That link works fine. Thanks for the info.
post #171 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by DTV TiVo Dealer
5th generation ATSC tuners are not more sensitive, just a little more selective, so they reject multi-path a little better. They will not help you pull in stations that are 75 miles away.

So there's no truth to LG's claim that the 5th generation chipset enabled reception with 1/4 the signal strength of 4th generation models? And Samsung was making similar claims about their next-generation product.
post #172 of 433
Quote:


My point was to let consumer know that for 95% of the applications a very excellent HD OTA and Cable STB is here now, so why waite for something that 95% of the population does not need.

Robert -

Sorry, but I do not believe you. I do not believe any OTA STB has yet been shipped that would meed the needs of 95% of OTA buyers.

- Tom
post #173 of 433
Thread Starter 
Quote:


Originally posted by GSfromCT
Inky:
The STV0370 is licensed Linx/Micronas technology.
Here is the link from CES, hopefully it still works. I'm at work and for some reason my DNS doesn't think www.st.com is a valid address.
http://www.st.com/stonline/press/new...005/p1568h.htm

-------------
Here's the blurb. I did not see any reference to Micronas, but it did talk about resistance to multipath. IB
------------------------

Single chip demodulator supports ATSC and cable standards, and integrates OOB tuner for high-end 'cable ready' digital TVs

Geneva, January 6, 2005 - STMicroelectronics (NYSE: STM), one of the world's leading suppliers of System-on-Chip (SoC) solutions for digital TV and the largest supplier of silicon chips for set-top boxes*, has introduced a single-chip, fully integrated digital demodulator - the STV0370 - which is designed to be the front-end device in advanced interactive cable-ready digital TV receivers, and in terrestrial and cable set-top boxes (STBs) in the USA.

The new multistandard chip supports ATSC (Advanced Television Systems Committee) standard A/53 Annex D (8VSB2) for use in digital terrestrial receivers, as well as the ITU-T J.83/B (US Cable) specification for cable TV. In addition its support for downstream interactive OOB (Out of Band) QPSK modulation and fully integrated superheterodyne down conversion tuner, which eliminates the need for external OOB tuner circuitry, will allow TV receivers that use the chip to be labeled 'digital cable ready' under FCC (Federal Communications Commission) regulations.

Combining this cost-effective digital demodulator with ST's industry-leading STi7710 STB decoder - a highly-integrated HDTV (High Definition TV) solution which implements HDCP security for its DVI/HDMI display interfaces, and features on-chip AAC audio and a hi-speed USB interface - creates for manufacturers the lowest cost platform available on the market which is able to meet the requirements of multiple high definition (HD) Digital TV standards worldwide.

"The STV0370 is ST market best in class HD demodulator designed for the US HDTV applications, enabling NIM manufacturer and STB makers the ability to cost reduce their system while giving viewers the advanced features they now expect as standard within the new fast growing HD market" said Armando Caltabiano, Retail Multimedia and Satellite Division General Manager. The STV0370 and STi7710 US TV platform is likely to enjoy the same success that the STV0361 plus STi5518 combination have achieved in European DVB-T with current 92 per-cent market share."

The chip is extremely robust against multi-path signals and echoes, offering enhanced indoor and outdoor antenna reception. It supports the CEA Antenna Control Interface Standard (EIA/CEA-909, parts A and B) which allows viewers to use Smart Antenna technology to optimize reception by electronically adjusting the antenna gain, polarization, and beam direction, rather than by physical positional adjustment.

For easy control by system software the STV0370 is managed through a 2-wire I2C interface. Its high level of integration minimizes overall parts and assembly costs for manufacturers; on-chip features include high-performance 10-bit and 8-bit analog to digital converters (ADCs), integrated SRAM for byte interleave processing so that no external memory is required, and dedicated I2C repeaters for tuner control to improve RF performance and increase digital noise immunity.

The new chip is produced using ST's state-of-the-art 90nm process technology, ensuring lower cost through the use of a smaller sized die, and reduced power consumption. It is supplied in a low-cost, small footprint LQFP 128-pin package with exposed paddle, and is available now in sample quantities. Full production of the device, priced at US$8.00 for large volumes, is planned for Q1 2005.

About STMicroelectronics

STMicroelectronics is a global leader in developing and delivering semiconductor solutions across the spectrum of microelectronics applications. An unrivalled combination of silicon and system expertise, manufacturing strength, Intellectual Property (IP) portfolio and strategic partners positions the Company at the forefront of System-on-Chip (SoC) technology and its products play a key role in enabling today's convergence markets. The Company's shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, on Euronext Paris and on the Milan Stock Exchange. In 2003, the Company's net revenues were $7.24 billion and net earnings were $253 million. Further information on ST can be found at www.st.com.

1 IDC Worldwide Digital Set-Top-Box Semiconductor Vendor Shares - November 2004
2 8VSB: 8-level Vestigial Sideband Modulation, the RF modulation format approved by the FCC for the ATSC HDTV digital television standard.
post #174 of 433
Quote:


Sorry, but I do not believe you. I do not believe any OTA STB has yet been shipped that would meed the needs of 95% of OTA buyers.

95% may be a little high, but certainly the current generation of STBs work for the vast majority of viewers. That's why I think all the discussion surrounding the 5th gen chip is overblown.
post #175 of 433
Thread Starter 
Quote:


Originally posted by trbarry
Robert -

Sorry, but I do not believe you. I do not believe any OTA STB has yet been shipped that would meed the needs of 95% of OTA buyers.

- Tom

Tom,

You seem to have been at this a long time. I am curious, what kind of antenna and receiver do you use? Do you get all the digital signals in your area or just some of them? How is your antenna positioned? I gather from previous posts that you do not use a preamp.

IB
post #176 of 433
Quote:


ST Microelectronics is also licensing the Linx/Micronas Casper technology.

How do we know for sure ST Microelectonics' STV0370 uses the Linx technology?
post #177 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by trbarry
Robert -

Sorry, but I do not believe you. I do not believe any OTA STB has yet been shipped that would meed the needs of 95% of OTA buyers.

- Tom

Tom, I appreciate your position, but respectfully, we do not agree. I have based my post on the more than 1000 LST-4200As my company has sold since July 2004, with only one return.

Further we have spoken to most of the customers and read the avs forum and other forums with hundreds of other satisfied LST-4200A users. In fact, the only negative posts about this otherwise terrific HD STB is regarding a anomaly, where some HD clear QAM channels can not be accessed after 8:00 PM in the San Francisco area.

TV Broadcasters buy this box in very large quantity as well as HD enthusiasts and novices.

My substantial sales statistics represent a 99.99% approval rate. I was being conservative with my 95% estimate. The facts don't lie.

-Robert

VE Advanced Digital Technologies Dealer
post #178 of 433
Quote:


Originally posted by Rich Peterson
How do we know for sure ST Microelectonics' STV0370 uses the Linx technology?

Rich:
I don't know for sure. I am going on info from D-Luks. He posted this info titled "4th & 5th ATSC demodulators dictionary" in the old 5th generation terrestrial receivers thread here.
I wish he/she were around to comment further.
post #179 of 433
Quote:


You seem to have been at this a long time. I am curious, what kind of antenna and receiver do you use? Do you get all the digital signals in your area or just some of them? How is your antenna positioned? I gather from previous posts that you do not use a preamp.

I get all the available digital networks (no local UPN) plus a couple of independents. I get adequate reception on most using either a F3Q or a HiDTV card. I three different residences in two states I have not found a place where I could not get adequate reception with my then current equipment as long as I was determined enough. That has included a half dozen PCHD cards and 2-3 STB's. My F3Q card also records Comcast QAM and I also have a Comcast HD/PVR, so I'm personally pretty well covered, using the above plus a fixed attic UHF only antenna, currently with a preamp also up there.

My objections instead stem from what I've had to go through to get that reception. I feel fairly strongly that OTA digital TV may have a tough time in the future if it does not provide easy indoor plug-n-play reception with set top antennas. That may be necessary to complete the transition. And, as I stated above, I'm fairly peeved with Zenith for deciding not to sell the only STB's that survived the Shubin test.

So while I'm obviously not needing another receiver myself I still believe life would be much easier for all HD fans if the marketed receivers were a bit better. Maybe Robert has not experienced a significant return rate but other vendors have, though possibly on other models. A high return rate is the kiss of death for electronics gear.

- Tom
post #180 of 433
Tom, I believe the high return rate on ATSC tuners would be on other manufacturers products.

-Robert
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Any recent 5th generation receiver chip news?