AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Dallas, TX - HDTV
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Dallas, TX - HDTV - Page 204

post #6091 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by K5ING View Post

I'm confused. If you're getting stations like 5, 8, 33, etc., you should be getting the subchannels as well. Are you sure you're scanning on the antenna and not just what Dish is giving you? I get over 50 OTA channels up here (between Denton and Decatur) including the LP Ch. 31's. With you at Cedar Hill, you should get everything with as little as a bent coat hanger for an antenna.

Okay, with the tuner that came with my PC (and NO antenna--just the coax plugged into it with no live Time Warner connection, no DISH connection)...I only get like 4.1, 5.1, 8.1, 11.1, 13.1, 21.1, 33.1...etc. (sorry I'm not at my home PC now to get all the exact channels).

I bought another TV tuner that comes with a small antenna, and now I get more sub channels (like 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 8.1, 8.2, plus Spanish channels).

My point was that while I had a LIVE Time Warner cable connection going, I was able to get all locals with subchannels, Spanish channels, AND cable channels with the coax plugged into my PC-tuner card. Well, I canceled cable and switched to D*TV, and now my PC with tuner card-coax gets only 14 basic local subchannels (no Spanish channels, no cable channels)

Hope this helps.
post #6092 of 6921
My point is that if you didn't get the subchannels on a station that has them, then your settings are not correct. You can't, for example, get 8 without also getting 8.2 and 8.3. If you get one, you get them all.

Are you sure you don't have the Spanish channels deleted or something? Almost every television station in Dallas broadcasts from Cedar Hill. There is no reason why you would get 14 English speaking stations and no Spanish stations unless your tuner card is set up that way. Do a rescan and set it to show everything.

BTW, what is D*TV?
post #6093 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by K5ING View Post

My point is that if you didn't get the subchannels on a station that has them, then your settings are not correct. You can't, for example, get 8 without also getting 8.2 and 8.3. If you get one, you get them all.

Are you sure you don't have the Spanish channels deleted or something? Almost every television station in Dallas broadcasts from Cedar Hill. There is no reason why you would get 14 English speaking stations and no Spanish stations unless your tuner card is set up that way. Do a rescan and set it to show everything.

BTW, what is D*TV?

Well, just using Media Center and the "dead coax" since Time Warner must have removed their "signal" when I disconnected, I have scanned and scanned. Yeah it's weird how I don't get all subchannels OR Spanish channels. Maybe I don't know what I'm doing when I'm scanning. Maybe there's something I'm doing wrong. I don't know what all the digital qam clear is or whatever.

Now with the small antenna hooked up (instead of the "dead coax") and Media Center I do get all subchannels AND Spanish channels.
post #6094 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick22 View Post

Well, just using Media Center and the "dead coax" since Time Warner must have removed their "signal" when I disconnected, I have scanned and scanned. Yeah it's weird how I don't get all subchannels OR Spanish channels. Maybe I don't know what I'm doing when I'm scanning. Maybe there's something I'm doing wrong. I don't know what all the digital qam clear is or whatever.

Now with the small antenna hooked up (instead of the "dead coax") and Media Center I do get all subchannels AND Spanish channels.

I don't recall you saying what internet service you use. If you use TWC for internet access, then your coax isn't really dead - and you can receive the non-encrypted, analog channels between 1 and 99.
post #6095 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie33 View Post

I don't recall you saying what internet service you use. If you use TWC for internet access, then your coax isn't really dead - and you can receive the non-encrypted, analog channels between 1 and 99.

That's exactly what I thought! I DO use Time Warner for Internet Access, so I had/have a splitter for the coax going to (1) the router, and (2) my PC for TV.

Two days after I canceled Time Warner though, all those 1-99 channels were gone, and all I was getting was like 14 total channels! I don't know what happened then.

Any ideas?
post #6096 of 6921
Depending on the filter on the line, you might receive some of the clear QAM channels but not others.
post #6097 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

Depending on the filter on the line, you might receive some of the clear QAM channels but not others.

I'm not sure what that means. I don't know the difference between analog and clear QAM. I'd like WMCenter to scan for both (I think that pops up when it does a channel search). I'd like to take the most channels I can get.

Is there a way to check the filter on the line.

thanks
post #6098 of 6921
Analog is analog. The channels will normally just be a number, like 4 or 31. Clear QAM is digital. The channel numbers will have a . or - in them, like 4.1 or 103.6. The local broadcast channels are carried on clear QAM on TWC, mostly on channels 104 through 110, and mapping back to their familiar channel number (4.1, 5.1, 8.1, etc.). You should be able to find 5.2, 5.3, 8.2, 8.3, and 13.2, but the other subchannels either aren't mapped or aren't carried at all so you won't find them without some digging.
post #6099 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

Analog is analog. The channels will normally just be a number, like 4 or 31. Clear QAM is digital. The channel numbers will have a . or - in them, like 4.1 or 103.6. The local broadcast channels are carried on clear QAM on TWC, mostly on channels 104 through 110, and mapping back to their familiar channel number (4.1, 5.1, 8.1, etc.). You should be able to find 5.2, 5.3, 8.2, 8.3, and 13.2, but the other subchannels either aren't mapped or aren't carried at all so you won't find them without some digging.

Thanks. So I guess NO analog channels will be in HD?? I just don't know why my PC tuner won't get the subchannels/Spanish channels without an antenna when the same coax is active for Internet??

Does that have to do with the user asking about the filter?
post #6100 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick22 View Post

Thanks. So I guess NO analog channels will be in HD?? I just don't know why my PC tuner won't get the subchannels/Spanish channels without an antenna when the same coax is active for Internet??

Does that have to do with the user asking about the filter?

First of all, there are only a couple of analog channels, all low power infomercial stuff, that are left. Everything else is digital. And no, analog channels are not capable of broadcasting in HD.

Second, the reason you can get all of the channels with the antenna is that these stations are broadcasting OTA (over the air). When you hook up to the cable, you will only get the stations that TW or the cable company carries. Just like you need an antenna on your car to pick up locally broadcast AM/FM radio stations. It's the same thing.

I really don't know how to explain it any simpler than that.
post #6101 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

Analog is analog. The channels will normally just be a number, like 4 or 31. Clear QAM is digital. The channel numbers will have a . or - in them, like 4.1 or 103.6. The local broadcast channels are carried on clear QAM on TWC, mostly on channels 104 through 110, and mapping back to their familiar channel number (4.1, 5.1, 8.1, etc.). You should be able to find 5.2, 5.3, 8.2, 8.3, and 13.2, but the other subchannels either aren't mapped or aren't carried at all so you won't find them without some digging.

TWC also now using 27 (243MHz) 23.1 KUVN HD, KSTR 49.1 HD and KFWD HD 52.1 , and 81-1 KXTX HD (567MHz) for local HD channels too
post #6102 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin120 View Post

TWC also now using 27 (243MHz) 23.1 KUVN HD, KSTR 49.1 HD and KFWD HD 52.1 , and 81-1 KXTX HD (567MHz) for local HD channels too

My TWC coax appears to be not working though since I cancelled and switched to D*TV. Should I still get those channels you just listed b/c my Internet uses that same coax with TWC?

thanks
post #6103 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by K5ING View Post

First of all, there are only a couple of analog channels, all low power infomercial stuff, that are left. Everything else is digital. And no, analog channels are not capable of broadcasting in HD.

Second, the reason you can get all of the channels with the antenna is that these stations are broadcasting OTA (over the air). When you hook up to the cable, you will only get the stations that TW or the cable company carries. Just like you need an antenna on your car to pick up locally broadcast AM/FM radio stations. It's the same thing.

I really don't know how to explain it any simpler than that.

Okay thanks!
post #6104 of 6921
KTXA's move to RF-29 from 18 won't happen on Friday 14 JAN 2011 after all:

Quote:


Due to the recent cold weather and snow, the conversion has been delayed until Monday, January 17 at 12 noon.

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2011/01/04/t...gnal-strength/
post #6105 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick22 View Post

My TWC coax appears to be not working though since I cancelled and switched to D*TV. Should I still get those channels you just listed b/c my Internet uses that same coax with TWC?

thanks

When you canceled TWC TV they probably put a filter on to block anything except Internet. But the filter may not be perfect and some TV stations may still get through. Based on the station list you provided, I think that's what's happening.

Also, cable is different than over-the-air. OTA digital broadcasts use a different modulation scheme than digital cable, as well as different frequencies. And every TV station (except one low-power station you won't care about) is now broadcasting OTA in digital. I don't have cable, but TWC probably broadcasts several local stations in both analog and digital.

If you unhook the TWC cable and hook up an antenna, you'll have to set your tuner to receive OTA rather than cable for it to scan the right frequencies and make sense of the digital broadcasts it's receiving.

Based on your location in Cedar Hill, a simple rabbit-ears-plus-loop combo antenna should work fine. The rabbit ears are for WFAA/8 and KFWD/52, which broadcast on VHF frequencies, and the loop is for the other stations, all of which broadcast on UHF frequencies.

Each OTA broadcast is all-or-nothing. So, for instance, you'll either receive all three subchannels for WFAA/8, or none of them. This is different from cable, which may not transmit all the subchannels, and may either keep them on one frequency or reorganize them onto different frequencies any way TWC sees fit.

HTH
post #6106 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHBrandt View Post

When you canceled TWC TV they probably put a filter on to block anything except Internet. But the filter may not be perfect and some TV stations may still get through. Based on the station list you provided, I think that's what's happening.

Also, cable is different than over-the-air. OTA digital broadcasts use a different modulation scheme than digital cable, as well as different frequencies. And every TV station (except one low-power station you won't care about) is now broadcasting OTA in digital. I don't have cable, but TWC probably broadcasts several local stations in both analog and digital.

If you unhook the TWC cable and hook up an antenna, you'll have to set your tuner to receive OTA rather than cable for it to scan the right frequencies and make sense of the digital broadcasts it's receiving.

Based on your location in Cedar Hill, a simple rabbit-ears-plus-loop combo antenna should work fine. The rabbit ears are for WFAA/8 and KFWD/52, which broadcast on VHF frequencies, and the loop is for the other stations, all of which broadcast on UHF frequencies.

Each OTA broadcast is all-or-nothing. So, for instance, you'll either receive all three subchannels for WFAA/8, or none of them. This is different from cable, which may not transmit all the subchannels, and may either keep them on one frequency or reorganize them onto different frequencies any way TWC sees fit.

HTH

Thanks--great info! That helped me a lot. So yeah basically using the cable isn't good anymore due to the TW filter.

I do have a small antenna that came with a new tuner I bought (from hauppauge.com) . You see, I thought getting a new tuner would help, but it's actually just the antenna that's helping. My PC tuner was fine.

I wouldn't actually mind using the software that came with the Hauppauge tuner. Does anyone know if I can use the WinTV software with the tuner that came with the PC? I'd like to return the Hauppauge tuner and just maybe get another antenna (but keep the WinTV software downloaded on my PC).
post #6107 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick22 View Post

I do have a small antenna that came with a new tuner I bought (from hauppauge.com)

If you don't mind my asking (and this is absolutely not intended to be inflammatory), do you have an objection to using an antenna with your tuner? All things being equal, does connecting it to the TWC outlet seem more appealing in contrast?

The reason I bring this up is that I've found my attempts to persuade friends, neighbors and colleagues to "cut the cord" and go with an over-the-air setup is often met with "Eeewwww, I hate those ugly antennas". Even small antennas (like the Terk HDTVa or the Clearstream models from AntennasDirect) are perceived as big, ugly, old fashioned and something appropriate only for Fred Flintstone's dwelling.

By the very nature of this forum, there's typically NOT that reaction since the self-selected participants are largely male and tech-oriented. We're all aware of (and possibly have to deal with) the "wife acceptance factor". What a good number of us find intriguing on the roof of a house (as is the 91XG pictured here) is found to be downright gruesome to some, limiting the "curb appeal" of the home.
LL
post #6108 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by re_nelson View Post

If you don't mind my asking (and this is absolutely not intended to be inflammatory), do you have an objection to using an antenna with your tuner? All things being equal, does connecting it to the TWC outlet seem more appealing in contrast?

The reason I bring this up is that I've found my attempts to persuade friends, neighbors and colleagues to "cut the cord" and go with an over-the-air setup is often met with "Eeewwww, I hate those ugly antennas". Even small antennas (like the Terk HDTVa or the Clearstream models from AntennasDirect) are perceived as big, ugly, old fashioned and something appropriate only for Fred Flintstone's dwelling.

By the very nature of this forum, there's typically NOT that reaction since the self-selected participants are largely male and tech-oriented. We're all aware of (and possibly have to deal with) the "wife acceptance factor". What a good number of us find intriguing on the roof of a house (as is the 91XG pictured here) is found to be downright gruesome to some, limiting the "curb appeal" of the home.

The small atenna as shown in the pic above (that came with the new tuner) works well. The Time Warner coax does not work well since that line is somewhat "dead." I have no problem using the small antenna shown above.

I don't even mind buying the old rabbit ears and hooking that up to my PC. She would prefer the smaller antenna shown above though.
post #6109 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverick22 View Post

I don't even mind buying the old rabbit ears and hooking that up to my PC. She would prefer the smaller antenna shown above though.

That squares with an incident from long ago with an ex-girlfriend. We took a road trip up to King's Island (outside Cincinnati) and close to Mason, Ohio, the home of the legendary WLW transmitter and its distinctive Blaw-Knox tower (shown below).

I wanted to take a brief detour to snap a picture of it. She was appalled. "Why would anyone want to see THAT UGLY THING!?!?". Note, for the record, she's an ex-girlfriend! :-)
LL
post #6110 of 6921
And in Cedar Hill you shouldn't need anything more than that. In fact, a piece of coathanger wire or a straightened paper clip jammed into the center hole of the coax socket will probably get you good coverage. (I used to pick up the university radio station that way when I lived in on-campus.)

In fact, a high-gain directional like that could very well get you no channels at all — tuner inputs do saturate at some point!
post #6111 of 6921
I think that sometimes we forget that younger people today have never experienced OTA television. TV has always come in on a cable, and that's just the way it is. I know of some younger (early 20's) people who didn't even know what OTA television was, or that there was such a thing. I'm flabbergasted, of course, but it's similar to if we were suddenly confronted with having to drive a Model T and have to manually adjust the choke, spark advance, hand cranking and driving a planetary transmission with a hand throttle. Even though we've driven cars all of our lives (and I'm 56), we'd have a hell of a time trying to get it going, but at one time, it was common knowledge.
post #6112 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by K5ING View Post

I think that sometimes we forget that younger people today have never experienced OTA television. TV has always come in on a cable, and that's just the way it is. I know of some younger (early 20's) people who didn't even know what OTA television was, or that there was such a thing. I'm flabbergasted, of course, but it's similar to if we were suddenly confronted with having to drive a Model T and have to manually adjust the choke, spark advance, hand cranking and driving a planetary transmission with a hand throttle. Even though we've driven cars all of our lives (and I'm 56), we'd have a hell of a time trying to get it going, but at one time, it was common knowledge.

I've had OTA since I was born. (1994).
post #6113 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukeboy67 View Post

I've had OTA since I was born. (1994).

Whoa, there's someone on here younger than I am. (1988) Am I now allowed to start feeling old?

And same story for me, OTA since I was born.

- Trip
post #6114 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip in VA View Post


Whoa, there's someone on here younger than I am. (1988) Am I now allowed to start feeling old?

And same story for me, OTA since I was born.

- Trip

I also bought a indoor TV antenna for my scanner from SolidSignal. And we have satellite. I just don't watch it since I can't pick up RTV and I like having a steady stream of TV.
post #6115 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by nukeboy67 View Post

I've had OTA since I was born. (1994).

My TV viewing has been OTA for the first 10 years of my life. My family later switched to cable (1997); while they still have cable, as of the early-to-mid 2000's, I stopped caring about cable for numerous reasons (which I'll save for another thread). Upon hearing about the switch to DTV and channels like This and RTV, I am more interested in OTA...again!
post #6116 of 6921
Here's the KTXA/KTVT antenna being put into place last month:

post #6117 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by re_nelson View Post

Here's the KTXA/KTVT antenna being put into place last month:


I'm curious of what kind of money those "tower climbers" make!?!
post #6118 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by wreck58 View Post
I'm curious of what kind of money those "tower climbers" make!?!
Two words...

Not
Enough!
post #6119 of 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChocoLab

Two words...

Not
Enough!
So, for not enough, they stay up there for 10 hours?! That's cold blooded.
post #6120 of 6921
Anyone notice that 27 is off the air this morning? Does this have anything to do with the big switch (now scheduled for Monday, the 17th)?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Local HDTV Info and Reception
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › Local HDTV Info and Reception › Dallas, TX - HDTV