AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Comcast Technology Topic
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Comcast Technology Topic - Page 14

post #391 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowbiscuit View Post

But how much of it is that the Moto boxes are crappy and how much is that iGuide is crappy?

Well my point (if you were replying to my message) was that they're not, i.e., that, "There is a long way down products in this space can go." These are the good boxes, reflections of the first generation of consumer-level HD DVRs... the crap rolls in after more of an extended time where consumers under-support quality and over-support cheapness. I think the DCX boxes qualify as second generation, but fwir, they've been of quality comparable to the DCT/DCH boxes, so perhaps the crap will roll in with the third or fourth generation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by slowbiscuit View Post

This looks like a cost reduction move, nothing more.

Indeed and that's the big question: Is that just swapping of components, like for like, to reduce cost, but the swaps made only if quality and reliability are comparable (as seems to have been the case with the DCX boxes), or will cost-reductions come from changes that shall affect quality and reliability?
post #392 of 779
Thread Starter 
Comcast Tees Up Switched Video Rollouts
Plans SDV Deployments in 2010 To Offer 150-Plus HDs
By Todd Spangler -- Multichannel News, 6/16/2010 12:25:04 PM

Comcast expects to deploy switched digital video in several cable systems later this year -- with plans to expand into other markets in 2011 and 2012 -- which will let it offer more than 150 HD channels and roll out new services like 3DTV, the company said in a filing with the Federal Communications Commission.

The operator did not indicate where it will commercially launch SDV first. Comcast said it expects SDV will "result in the launch of at least 50 additional HD channels, bringing the total number of HD channels in these systems to over 150."

As SDV capacity increases over time, the operator said, it will be able to launch 3DTV, offer additional niche-interest and ethnic channels, and deliver faster broadband services. Comcast outlined the plans in comments filed Monday in response to the FCC's proposed changes to CableCard rules, designed to "improve" CableCard rules until there's a successor solution such as outlined the agency's "AllVid" notice of inquiry.

Switched digital video more efficiently delivers less-watched linear TV channels, by transmitting them only when a customer in a given service group requests them unlike traditional cable services in which all channels are broadcast to all homes at all times.

Full article at:
http://www.multichannel.com/article/...o_Rollouts.php
post #393 of 779
Thread Starter 
Comcast Will Switch to MPEG-4 for 3DTV in August

June 16, 2010

PHILADELPHIA: Comcast was among the handful of pay TV providers opting to carry ESPN 3D, the world's first full-time stereoscopic 3DTV network. Comcast subscribers who want to see the programming in 3D just need the proper TV set and shutter glasses for now. Eventually, they'll also need a specific set-top box. Comcast plans to transmit 3D content exclusively using MPEG-4 H.264, according to Cable360Net.

The cable operator launched ESPN 3D in both MPEG-2, the video compression standard for over-the-air DTV, and in the more bandwidth efficient MPEG-4 format. Comcast plans to go all MPEG-4 with 3D content in August. It already has around 10 million MPEG-4 boxes in the field, mostly in households with HDTV subscriptions. That leaves around 15 million or so with MPEG-2 decoders.

Comcast is said to be switching from Motorola to Pace set-tops, which will feature two-way capability and MPEG-4. The two-way capability will allow Comcast to adopt switched digital video delivery, which it plans to do this year to preserve bandwidth for 3DTV. Rather than transmitting all channels simultaneously all the time, as is the case now, a SDV architecture delivers the video stream that's being watched.

-- Deborah D. McAdams

http://www.televisionbroadcast.com/article/102262
post #394 of 779
Thread Starter 
SDV: Cable's Stepping Stone to IP Video?
June 24, 2010 | Jeff Baumgartner |

ATLANTA -- Cable Next-Gen Video Strategies -- Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK) is preparing to deploy switched digital video (SDV) as the second phase of its master bandwidth management plan, but the MSO acknowledges that the technology could also be used as a stepping stone to IP-based video services.

Keynoting here this morning at a Light Reading conference dedicated to cable's multi-screen video strategies, Jay Kreiling, Comcast's vice president of video services, noted that SDV "plays a role in the [IPTV] ecosystem," when asked if there were specific linkages between the two technologies.

IPTV is no longer a four-letter word to cable, with most major operators now trying to figure out how to migrate to IP-based video services without disrupting the industry's MPEG-based digital video legacy. Among major MSOs, Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) is expected to test out Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT)'s Mediaroom platform in Los Angeles later this year. (See TWC Taps Microsoft Mediaroom for IPTV Test .)

Comcast hasn't revealed any specific IPTV activities beyond its PC-centric TV Everywhere Xfinity TV service, but Kreiling noted that cable is growing more interested in IP video as it seeks out ways to help customers consume video across different platforms and across myriad devices. "You want a common language," he said, contending that IP offers "promising potential to serve as that convergence point."

He said SDV can help cable get there "to a certain extent."

Comcast has conducted some limited SDV trials, but has generally kept the technology on the back burner as it instead went aggressively after an analog-reclamation project fueled by simple Digital Terminal Adapter (DTA) devices. Comcast has that initiative -- internally dubbed Project Cavalry -- completed in about 43 percent of its footprint and hopes to have 80 percent of the job done by the end of the year.

Project Cavalry has used standard-def DTAs exclusively so far, but hi-def versions could enter the picture if the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) OKs proposed rule changes that could clear the way for operators to use HD-DTAs with integrated security.

Kreiling noted that Comcast is supportive of HD-DTA, since up to two thirds of US homes now have HD sets, and such devices would let customers view HD programming on their secondary sets cost-effectively. Once volumes kick in, it's believed that HD-DTAs will sell for less than $50 per unit. For now, CableOne remains the only US operator to get special dispensation from the FCC to use HD-DTAs, and that's for just one small market in Tennessee.

Comcast is now getting ready to deploy SDV later this year in an undisclosed number of markets, with more on tap for 2011. A recent FCC filing from Comcast didn't describe the IPTV potential of SDV, but it did note that the MSO believes SDV could help it free up capacity for at least another 50 hi-def channels.

Jeff Baumgartner, Site Editor, Light Reading Cable

http://www.lightreading.com/document...site=lr_cable&
post #395 of 779
HD DTAs are sorely needed because of the ripoff rental charges for HD STBs and the failure of Cablecard in the marketplace.
post #396 of 779
Thread Starter 
Comcast starts offering multiroom features, 500GB hard drives with Anyroom DVR
By Richard Lawler posted Jul 1st 2010 6:21PM


Oregon and Southwest Washington are enjoying more than just the launch of Comcast's updated A28 guide today, the company also announced it has begun offering Anyroom DVR (not to be confused with Anyroom On Demand) setups in the area. It's a pretty standard MoCA implementation, one central HD DVR that allows customers to watch and control recorded programming from other hard drive-less set-top boxes in the same house. Comcast say Anyroom DVR is available in 20 markets including the Bay area, Western Mass, Augusta, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Little Rock and others, while forum posts on DSLReports indicate promos have been spotted in Chicago and Pennsylvania with a price tag of $19.95 for the main DVR, and the usual fees for the other boxes (maximum of 3).

We couldn't get an official confirmation on the amount of storage available, but the reported 500GB is an all too welcome improvement over the 160GB / 250GB drives still sitting in most standard DVRs Comcast issues or the FiOS one we tested a while back, outpaces the 250GB / 320GB options in AT&T's U-verse setups and would put it on par with DirecTV's HR24 (can be upgraded) and the new Cox Plus Package. Sure, it's a little late to record every World Cup match in HD (or 3D) but we're sure you'll find something to watch.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/01/c...ard-drives-wi/
post #397 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

Comcast starts offering multiroom features, 500GB hard drives with Anyroom DVR

The last time I checked into this, you could only watch SD, not HD at the remote locations. Does that limitation still apply? If so, it's a big one.
post #398 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom Gremlin View Post

The last time I checked into this, you could only watch SD, not HD at the remote locations. Does that limitation still apply? If so, it's a big one.

In the Comcast press release which is attached to the article it states that you can record the show on the DCX3400m in HD and finish watching it on the DCX3200M which is also an HD box, so I assume you see it on the remote boxes in HD.
post #399 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom Gremlin View Post

The last time I checked into this, you could only watch SD, not HD at the remote locations. Does that limitation still apply? If so, it's a big one.

You can view HD recording in HD on all of the networked boxes.
post #400 of 779
Thread Starter 
HITS develops 3-D interactive application for cable operators

by Michael Grotticelli July 13th, 2010

A technology team at the Comcast Media Center has developed an EBIF-enabled interactive application for MSOs that is optimized for next-generation 3-D TV services.

HITS, a business unit of the Comcast Media Center that provides content management and distribution services to MSOs, has developed an EBIF (Enhanced Binary Interchange Format)-enabled interactive application optimized for 3-D TV services.

The new 3-D interactive application is designed to operate on 3-D TVs and targets video programming that is not in 3-D source code, such as guides or tickers. HITS addresses this concern with technology that allows 3-D and 2-D content to be viewed simultaneously. The technology can be employed by MSOs to ensure that visual elements such as text or buttons can be delivered in high-quality feeds to their 3-D TV subscriber base. This can translate to a wider adoption of popular 3-D technology throughout the industry.

The application demonstrates how all content elements can coexist in a 3-D environment, according to Gary Traver, senior vice president and COO of the CMC. He aid they have successfully integrated text, images and video feeds into a seamless viewer experience. The aim is that the technology will stimulate adoption of 3-D programming and promote the continued growth of interactive TV in the future.

HITS develops and advances interactive TV through the HITS Advanced Interactive Services (AxIS) centralized suite of solutions for the development, launch and support of EBIF. Currently, the HITS AxIS interactive platform is deployed in beta to five MSOs and supports 30 EBIF applications from 23 different vendors, including caller ID and T-commerce. HITS AxIS is the first platform to create and support an EBIF application specifically designed for 3-D TV sets.

http://blog.broadcastengineering.com...ble-operators/
post #401 of 779
Thread Starter 
Panasonic Stops Selling Tru2way HDTVs
July 29, 2010 Todd Spangler

Tru2way, on the retail front, has been virtually dead on arrival.


Cable's idea with tru2way (a.k.a. OCAP) was that it would unleash a wave of devices that could access cable's two-way video services, such as program guides and interactive TV apps, without the need for an operator-leased set-top and without government mandates like the FCC's AllVid proposal.

Under the June 2008 tru2way memorandum of understanding and subsequent agreements signed with CE makers including Sony, Panasonic, Samsung, LG Electronics and others Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox, Cablevision Systems and Bright House committed to supporting tru2way across their footprints by mid-2009, while Charter was given until July 2010.

But Panasonic was the only CE company that showed up to the tru2way party. And now it's no longer selling its tru2way-enabled Viera HDTVs in the three Comcast markets (Denver, Atlanta and Chicago) where it was offering them (see Panasonic Rolls Out Tru2way Television Sets).

We currently have no tru2way products at retail and there are no announced release dates for Panasonic tru2way retail products at this time, Panasonic said in a statement.

However, Panasonic hasn't abandoned tru2way altogether. Jeff Cove, Panasonic's vice president of technology and alliances, said the company has products in the works, including a standalone set-back tru2way adapter for TVs, though he declined to provide pricing or availability info.

We decided that the most scalable way to approach tru2way was on the set-back box, he said.

So why has tru2way been a bust at retail? Cost, for one thing: For Panasonic, tru2way added around $300 per TV, according to Cove. The set-back, he added, would certainly cost less than that.

Meanwhile, tru2way is alive and kicking at the MSOs even without CE retail products.

Time Warner Cable, Comcast and Cox are using tru2way to give themselves a level of hardware independence and, theoretically, speed up the introduction of interactive TV services.

http://www.multichannel.com/blog/BIT...2way_HDTVs.php
post #402 of 779
Thread Starter 
Constant Guard Rolls Out Nationally



Security Scene: Constant Guard Rolls Out Nationally
Posted by Jay Opperman, Senior Director of Security and Privacy, in Security and Privacy

Our Constant Guard service (introduced in October 2009) is the result of a multi-year effort to create a comprehensive approach to protect our customers from increasingly sophisticated online security threats.

One of the most pressing threats has to do with bots - or robots - which are a malicious form of software that can take over your computer and command it to do things like send spam, host a phishing website or lead to identity theft by collecting all your keystrokes - like user IDs and passwords.

The National Cyber Security Alliance has called bots "one of the fastest growing cyber crimes," and recent research estimates the cost of identity theft fraud in the United States increased 12.5 percent in 2009 to $54 billion. A lot of that theft was the result of cyber criminals using bots.

As the nation's largest ISP, we're doing our part to detect bots and notify customers who we believe may have a computer that is being controlled by one. Last year, we launched an automatic bot detection and notification trial in Denver. During the trial, customers with computers that appeared to be infected with bots received a notification informing them of the potential bot infection and links to resources they could use to check and remove the bot.

Response to the trial was very positive and today we are beginning to roll-out the bot notification and detection service nationally on a market-by-market basis.

As we enter a market, customers will receive an e-mail announcement letting them know the Constant Guard service is now available in their area. Bot notifications will be first sent by e-mail. Once we are rolled out to all markets, we will add on an in-browser Service Notification (see image below), which makes it quick and easy to take action.


UPDATE - Part II: Constant Guard Rolls Out Nationally

Yesterday, we announced we were taking our Constant Guard Bot Detection and Notification service nationally. As the nation's largest ISP, we have a responsibility to protect our customers from online threats, and this is yet another step we've taken in this direction. Bots are a fairly new phenomenon, and as the Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group (MAAWG) pointed out earlier this year a healthy majority of consumers don't understand what a bot is. A good article to read is Elinor Mills' post at CNET.

One of the first things we're trying to do is educate our customers about bots and what they can do about them. Our bot detection and notification service is an effective network-based solution, which means there is no software for our customers to download, and absolutely no searching into individual's computers. So our customers can have peace of mind knowing that Comcast takes their security and privacy very seriously, and is working to protect them without customers having to take additional steps to benefit from this offering.

So what are we doing and how does this work? Let me take a step back and explain. A bot is a malicious form of software that is remotely controlled like a "robot" by someone with a criminal intent. Many bots are commanded to send spam or host phishing websites (which are "fake" websites intended to trick people into entering credit cards or social security numbers). Other bots track every keystroke typed on a keyboard. A cyber criminal can comb through that data to find usernames and passwords that lead to identity theft and financial fraud.

To set up a bot, a cyber criminal establishes what is known as a "command and control center" (CNC). This is essentially the bot's brain, which is sent instructions by the person who set it up. The command and control center sits out in the Internet somewhere at a specific IP (Internet Protocol) address. Many of these IP addresses can be identified and flagged by security professionals, Internet engineers and others. Since we know that any communication with the known CNC is from a bot, when contact is made our system sends a notification to the Customer IP address that made contact with it.

Many customers have multiple devices connected to their modems - desktop PCs, wireless laptops, gaming consoles, smart phones, iPads and more - so any one of them could be the one that is receiving commands from the bot.

Cyber criminals are getting more and more sophisticated and we encourage our customers and all consumers to remain vigilant. Be careful what you download to your computers and devices, use up-to-date anti-virus software and take the time to talk with your kids or grandkids or friends about how to remain safe online. For more information, visit www.comcast.net/security
post #403 of 779
Paul, PLEASE tell me that as a Comcast customer with a cablecard I can refuse SDV. If needed, a patition can be signed to block it.
The technicians in my area all agree that because there is no high load on the cable system there is a very large amount of bandwidth thats currently not being used, and their own words "Comcast could literally do whatever they want and still have bandwidth to spare"
post #404 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

Paul, PLEASE tell me that as a Comcast customer with a cablecard I can refuse SDV. If needed, a patition can be signed to block it.
The technicians in my area all agree that because there is no high load on the cable system there is a very large amount of bandwidth thats currently not being used, and their own words "Comcast could literally do whatever they want and still have bandwidth to spare"

Since I don't work for Comcast my my opinion is just as a customer. I don't as think as a cablecard subscriber switched digital video will work without some kind af adapter box (which Comcast might offer) since SDV requires two way communication.

SDV is important to Comcast because it frees up more spectrum which they need to be competitive with Verizon fios. The need more HD and 3D HD channels and thaat requires a lot more bandwidth also they need to have even faster internet speeds - again more bandwidth. They only other alternative is to squeeze in more channels by doing a higher compression and you know what a pushback they got by going to three channels per QAM.

According to their CTO SDV will happen nationwide probably starting very soon.
post #405 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

Since I don't work for Comcast my my opinion is just as a customer. I don't as think as a cablecard subscriber switched digital video will wok without some kind af adapter box (which Comcast might offer) since SDV requires two way communication.

SDV is important to Comcast because it frees up more spectrum which they need to be competitive with Verizon fios. The need more HD and 3D HD channels and thaat requires a lot more bandwidth also they need to have even faster internet speeds - again more bandwidth. They only other alternative is to squeeze in more channels by doing a higher compression and you know what a pushback they got by going to three channels per QAM.

According to their CTO SDV will happen nationwide probably starting very soon.

In my area there IS no competition, Verizon stopped installation in my county three years ago with no plans on starting up. The only thing left is DSL, and directv.
post #406 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

In my area there IS no competition, Verizon stopped installation in my county three years ago with no plans on starting up. The only thing left is DSL, and directv.

This is a nationwide strategy. Just expect more channels because of switched video. Generally the thinking is to put channels in switched video that not many people watch. Comcast wants to keep similar technology throughout the country since it is easier to maintain their system and also easier to negotiate transmission rights contracts.
post #407 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

This is a nationwide strategy. Just expect more channels because of switched video. Generally the thinking is to put channels in switched video that not many people watch. Comcast wants to keep similar technology throughout the country since it is easier to maintain their system and also easier to negotiate transmission rights contracts.

No offense but I call BS on that, because if Comcast really wanted to keep everything uniform Boston wouldn't be recieving over 60 HD channels without the use of SDV while I only recieve 20, and all subs would be using the same brand of set top box instead of a mix of Motorola, Pace, Cisco, SA, and Arris.
post #408 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

No offense but I call BS on that, because if Comcast really wanted to keep everything uniform Boston wouldn't be recieving over 60 HD channels without the use of SDV while I only recieve 20, and all subs would be using the same brand of set top box instead of a mix of Motorola, Pace, Cisco, SA, and Arris.

You should probably post your complaints in your local thread. I find it very hard to believe you have only 20 HD channels though, but even if you do, SDV would help equalize all that out, as an example, Boston would probably get 100 channels through a combination of linear feeds and SDV, and so will you, maybe a bit more SDV than Boston. Some channel lineups are different from one market region to the other so you may not get every single channel that Boston has, but you'll likely get nearly all the national channels Boston has.

The reason for the different equipment is that Comcast purchased and swapped many of these systems from other cable companies. I have no doubt that Comcast would love to have their infrastructure uniform across the country, but that's just not going to happen due to the original equipment deployments and the huge cost to change it.
post #409 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

You should probably post your complaints in your local thread. I find it very hard to believe you have only 20 HD channels though, but even if you do, SDV would help equalize all that out, as an example, Boston would probably get 100 channels through a combination of linear feeds and SDV, and so will you, maybe a bit more SDV than Boston. Some channel lineups are different from one market region to the other so you may not get every single channel that Boston has, but you'll likely get nearly all the national channels Boston has.

The reason for the different equipment is that Comcast purchased and swapped many of these systems from other cable companies. I have no doubt that Comcast would love to have their infrastructure uniform across the country, but that's just not going to happen due to the original equipment deployments and the huge cost to change it.

I counted them, and its 49, I was going off an old count, but its still pail in comparision to what Boston has, and the point I was making was that if Comcast wanted each area uniform my area would have the exact same channels that Boston and Philly and other Comcast regions would have.
Also I'm aware of everything you've said, again the point I was making was uniformity. With the amount of money Comcast has, they should spend it on uniformity of their channel lineups.
post #410 of 779
Thread Starter 
Has Comcast done the analog channels reduction in your area? If so you should not have more that 30 analog channels. After the reduction Comcast usually adds about 50 additional HD channels. Another possibility is that you are an an old area with limited (550mhz) bandwidth. Until Comcast upgrades your area you will have less HD channels. Comcast is more lightly to upgrade an area with competition such as fios first. Anyway as keenan stated SDV will give you more channels.
post #411 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

Paul, PLEASE tell me that as a Comcast customer with a cablecard I can refuse SDV. If needed, a patition can be signed to block it.
The technicians in my area all agree that because there is no high load on the cable system there is a very large amount of bandwidth thats currently not being used, and their own words "Comcast could literally do whatever they want and still have bandwidth to spare"

I have a JVC with a cable card and Cox which has SDV. Channels put on SDV are no longer available to my set. Up to now I have only lost some SD encoded QAM channels, channels not available in the analog set (which we still have). I don't have a clue how all digital Comcast's SDV will effect cable card sets.
post #412 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by txrose View Post

I have a JVC with a cable card and Cox which has SDV. Channels put on SDV are no longer available to my set. Up to now I have only lost some SD encoded QAM channels, channels not available in the analog set (which we still have). I don't have a clue how all digital Comcast's SDV will effect cable card sets.

SDV need two way communication. A cable card only has one way communication. I believe I read that for devices such as TIVO (uses a cable card) the cable companies have developed a Digital Tuning Adapter which allow two way communication.
post #413 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

SDV need two way communication. A cable card only has one way communication. I believe I read that for devices such as TIVO (uses a cable card) the cable companies have developed a Digital Tuning Adapter which allow two way communication.

I believe CableCARD is capable of 2-way communication, it's the host's CableCARD adapter that's not. For example, the CCs in a TiVo are capable of 2-way, but the TiVo itself is not, it's probably the same for the JVC TV.

TiVo already has an SDV adapter in service on some Time Warner systems.
post #414 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

Has Comcast done the analog channels reduction in your area? If so you should not have more that 30 analog channels. After the reduction Comcast usually adds about 50 additional HD channels. Another possibility is that you are an an old area with limited (550mhz) bandwidth. Until Comcast upgrades your area you will have less HD channels. Comcast is more lightly to upgrade an area with competition such as fios first. Anyway as keenan stated SDV will give you more channels.

currently i have 64 analog channels (by which i mean are accessible to analog tv's)
My area is actually in the 900Mhz-1Ghz frequency according to my techs.
If theres a way to avoid using SDV, I want to look into it. I mean like I said before from what I've been told by the techs theres plenty of bandwidth to spare because most of my neighborhood uses other means of getting tv like dish.
post #415 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

currently i have 64 analog channels (by which i mean are accessible to analog tv's)
My area is actually in the 900Mhz-1Ghz frequency according to my techs.
If theres a way to avoid using SDV, I want to look into it. I mean like I said before from what I've been told by the techs theres plenty of bandwidth to spare because most of my neighborhood uses other means of getting tv like dish.

Mike, you need to do some research as it seems as if you're getting some bad info. Cable system bandwidth has nothing to do whatsoever with how many of your neighbors are using a satellite service.
post #416 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

I believe CableCARD is capable of 2-way communication, it's the host's CableCARD adapter that's not. For example, the CCs in a TiVo are capable of 2-way, but the TiVo itself is not, it's probably the same for the JVC TV.

TiVo already has an SDV adapter in service on some Time Warner systems.

Your correct, and alot of people don't understand that. The cards themselves are capable of the two way connection (as evidenced by the fact that the exact same cards are found in the new set top boxes built after 2008 due to the whole FCC seperable security requirements) but that the devices themselves like TiVo and Moxi don't have the software written to support it. Scientific Atlanta (Cisco) and Motorola already have SDV adapters available to cable providers, what what I've been told. The reason why I'm so agaist it is because it requires a USB port and a power supply, both of which I don't have to spare, as well as a technician visit, plus theres been talk of instability with them.
post #417 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan View Post

Mike, you need to do some research as it seems as if you're getting some bad info. Cable system bandwidth has nothing to do whatsoever with how many of your neighbors are using a satellite service.

the more users on a system the less bandwidth there is to share, its the same as a home network. if you have 10 people using frostwire or something, your gonna notice your web browsing is slower. when they are no longer using your internet, its faster. I got off the phone with tech support and thats what they told me.
post #418 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

the more users on a system the less bandwidth there is to share, its the same as a home network. if you have 10 people using frostwire or something, your gonna notice your web browsing is slower. when they are no longer using your internet, its faster. I got off the phone with tech support and thats what they told me.

That is somewhat correct for Internet, but generally not for TV. Cable has nodes set up (a distribution point) based upon usage. The limitation is the resources available within the node. VOD and SDV if many people are utilizing this will use additional bandwidth but the cable companies are pretty good and adjusting the nodes so the customers will not have a problem. More nodes will also reduce the Internet slowdown. Cable companies are also using DOSIS 3 technology to increase the bandwidth available for the Internet.

As it was said in Star Trek - resistance is futile - nothing will change a cable companies position on the use of SDV.
post #419 of 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulGo View Post

That is somewhat correct for Internet, but generally not for TV. Cable has nodes set up (a distribution point) based upon usage. The limitation is the resources available within the node. VOD and SDV if many people are utilizing this will use additional bandwidth but the cable companies are pretty good and adjusting the nodes so the customers will not have a problem. More nodes will also reduce the Internet slowdown. Cable companies are also using DOSIS 3 technology to increase the bandwidth available for the Internet.

As it was said in Star Trek - resistance is futile - nothing will change a cable companies position on the use of SDV.

I'm awaiting a phone call back from Comcast Corporate.
post #420 of 779
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Wolf View Post

Actually thats not true, both a class action lawsuit and multiple filings with the FCC have already been issued against Comcast, bet you won't find that online.

maybe for other things but I cannot imagine how one would be justified for SDV.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › Comcast Technology Topic