AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Paradigm Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Paradigm Owners Thread - Page 611

post #18301 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitchen_space View Post

I upgraded my fronts with Studio 100s, center with a CC590 and now I am thinking about the surrounds. I am currently using Infinity Primus P140 bookshelf speakers. What do y'all think about swapping the Infinities out with four Studio 100s for the two rears and two rear surrounds?

Like the answer to that's going to be "no", lol!

I'd say the only things you'd have to worry about are driving them properly and getting an unblocked view of all the drivers.
post #18302 of 28061
Hi,

What do you think about Cinema Phantom?
The seller here recommended it, but i can´t find good reviews about them.
I read in the web that are discontinued, and I can´t find them in the paradigm home page.

Thanks
post #18303 of 28061
Quote:
I upgraded my fronts with Studio 100s, center with a CC590 and now I am thinking about the surrounds. I am currently using Infinity Primus P140 bookshelf speakers. What do y'all think about swapping the Infinities out with four Studio 100s for the two rears and two rear surrounds?

Unless your in a giant hall, I think it would be complete over-kill. What amp are you using?
Also, if you have the walls, ADP's are wonderful for surround duty, spreading the sound around very well. Something I don't think the 100's would do.
post #18304 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitchen_space View Post

I upgraded my fronts with Studio 100s, center with a CC590 and now I am thinking about the surrounds. I am currently using Infinity Primus P140 bookshelf speakers. What do y'all think about swapping the Infinities out with four Studio 100s for the two rears and two rear surrounds?

Did you mean the Studio 10's? That make more sense to me.
post #18305 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by kitchen_space View Post

I upgraded my fronts with Studio 100s, center with a CC590 and now I am thinking about the surrounds. I am currently using Infinity Primus P140 bookshelf speakers. What do y'all think about swapping the Infinities out with four Studio 100s for the two rears and two rear surrounds?

If you have the $$$, the space and the amp(s) to drive them, then go for it...but only if you post pictures of the final setup for all of us to drool over.
post #18306 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by plasmarulez View Post

if you have the $$$, the space and the amp(s) to drive them, then go for it...but only if you post pictures of the final setup for all of us to drool over. :d

x2 !!!! :d
post #18307 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjoyer View Post

I just want to thank you for mentioning Ebay, as I was able to purchase an Esprit Center channel from an authorized retailer in WI yesterday after my local A/V guy came back empty handed.

I also spoke with Paradigm directly, and they mentioned that the Esprits are in fact a discontinued product line, and that they have absolutely no inventory in stock. I was also told that Paradigm did release an Esprit v5, but I cannot for the life of me find any reviews, listings or references to anything post v4. The retailer I spoke with yesterday also said that, to the best of his knowledge, Paradigm never released a v5 of the Esprit LCR's.


Awesome! I noticed that LCR set they had up. Glad you got it!
post #18308 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum7 View Post

I have 60's in a room about the same size as you. I sit about 11 feet away. I am using the 690 for a center channel. I also had a 590 before it. I think the 690 might be a little over kill in my room, but I was thinking long-term which means moving into a bigger room. If you can afford it, I would at least get the 590. I haven't heard the 490, but I don't think you'd be disappointed going a little bigger. However, with either of them, I doubt you'll have any
"panning" issues.

I also have the ADP 590's and while I agree, they are alot of money, they are the best thing about my system.

PS. I'm a huge Pioneer fan, (down with denon), but to make those 60's really sing, think about an amp in the future.

Which amp would you recommend? I see Emotiva is a sponsor. Is the XPA-3 good? Should I consider just a 3-channel amp or a 5-channel amp?
post #18309 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

Which amp would you recommend? I see Emotiva is a sponsor. Is the XPA-3 good? Should I consider just a 3-channel amp or a 5-channel amp?

I added a xpa-3 when moving to Studio Esprit LCR due to the lower sensitivity, higher amp range and "value perception" of emotiva brand. I guess you could say that if I replaced my receiver with a pre and added an amp that there is room, but that was more than I wanted to spend so just adding an xpa-3 was sustainable improvement at the time.

I have been very happy with the combination, but the increased dynamics can be overwhelming at times (this is a PROBLEM) later at night when the kids are in bed. The difference in volume between dialog scenes and action scenes is substatial. So, for now, we really crank it out when everyone's awake but that means watching "UP" again, intead of sneaking in that Star Trek that (unbelievably) is still in the wrapper. On the positive side, sounds that come out of know where add a lot of punch - the down side, is that they send you leaping from your seat... to grab the remote.

The more center channel, the better, IMHO. My first cinema setup switched out a cinema 330 for the 110 and I would always top out a matching center when there are options. I'd like to hear how cc-690 or c3,c5 would fit in to what I have now, just for grins.
post #18310 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by grasshoppers View Post

Did you mean the Studio 10's? That make more sense to me.

Oops - yes, I meant Studio 10s. I have an Outlaw 7700 (7 x 200W) amp. I see on the i/net that there is an older Paradigm product, the ADP-170 for sale. Would those make a good replacement for the surrounds/rears? Or, would four Studio 10s be the way to go?
post #18311 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

Which amp would you recommend? I see Emotiva is a sponsor. Is the XPA-3 good? Should I consider just a 3-channel amp or a 5-channel amp?

I agree with cueCrew. I'm using an xpa-3 with my 100s and cc-690. I am very happy. Good sound and no problems. My 906 runs my surrounds just fine. I'm using pre-outs from my 906 to the Emotiva.

I also agree with a larger center. I had a 590 and then spent $ to upgrade to the 690. Very happy I did it. Can't say the same for my wife.
post #18312 of 28061
I've gone and done it. Picked up a pair of Studio 60s, the CC-590, and decided to go the middle way with a pair of ADP-390s for surrounds. Had the system on most of the day with both music and movies. We're hearing sounds in the source material that we've never heard before (in a good way!). The sound stage is excellent. Imaging is excellent. Surround sound is very good and I think I might still need to tweak positions and/or channel levels. The CC-590 is definitely the right match. Vocals and dialogue are alive and articulate. On my Pioneer 1120K the sweet volume level seems to be between -22 db and -19 db. Definitely worth the money.
post #18313 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

I've gone and done it. Picked up a pair of Studio 60s, the CC-590, and decided to go the middle way with a pair of ADP-390s for surrounds. Had the system on most of the day with both music and movies. We're hearing sounds in the source material that we've never heard before (in a good way!). The sound stage is excellent. Imaging is excellent. Surround sound is very good and I think I might still need to tweak positions and/or channel levels. The CC-590 is definitely the right match. Vocals and dialogue are alive and articulate. On my Pioneer 1120K the sweet volume level seems to be between -22 db and -19 db. Definitely worth the money.

leadfoot24 Congrat's

Pictures? Position of 390's, etc. Running from Pio amps or?

.....envy......

Mike
post #18314 of 28061
Does anyone know where I can get some outriggers for a pair of Paradigm p90's?
post #18315 of 28061
Leafoot,
Good job and good choices. I love the Pioneer with the 'Digms.

Quote:


Which amp would you recommend? I see Emotiva is a sponsor. Is the XPA-3 good? Should I consider just a 3-channel amp or a 5-channel amp?

I haven't heard the Emotiva stuff, but they get good remarks.
Adcom, is good. Parasound is good. Not a fan of Rotel, however.

Quote:


I see on the i/net that there is an older Paradigm product, the ADP-170 for sale. Would those make a good replacement for the surrounds/rears? Or, would four Studio 10s be the way to go?

Again, ADP's require room boundaries to work their best. If you have none, then go with direct radiating. In my experience, ADP's will immerse you in sound better than D-R's will.

Quote:


I have been very happy with the combination, but the increased dynamics can be overwhelming at times (this is a PROBLEM) later at night when the kids are in bed. The difference in volume between dialog scenes and action scenes is substatial.

Have you calibrated your system? If you have, maybe try boosting the center just a touch. Does your receiver have a compression mode? Like "midnite" or whatever?
post #18316 of 28061
I'm in the market for a pair of front speakers that will redefine my home theater system. I had bought a pair of Def Tech's 7002 from Best Buy at an incredible deal a couple months ago and ever since then I've been looking to upgrade to complete my system. They will be used almost exclusively for home theater, almost no music.

I've been trying to hunt down a pair of used/demo BP7000/1sc from Def Tech but have been unable to find any on audiogon or ebay. So I figured I'd look at what there is some stock of, Paradigm S8s.

From most of what I've read on the forums the common theme is to listen to both speakers yourself to compare. Well, I probably won't have the opportunity to listen to either of them so I will make my purchase blindly which is unadvised but necessary at the moment.

Knowing that I will listen mostly to home theater, would not the BP7000/1sc be a better choice? I only have the Def Tech 7002s and they create incredible presence in the room. The idea I have in my head is that the S8's are more of a musical speaker with very neutral sound reproduction. Looking at the actual drivers and cabinet, they seem to be of higher quality than that of Def Tech (I've never compared them however, only through pictures).

Which do you think is better for movies? A pair of S8s with one good sub like a Def Tech Trinity/Reference or a pair of BP7000sc? Again I know there is no right or wrong answer and I've read through the comparison thread already, I'd just like to gather your opinions. Thanks!
post #18317 of 28061
Had plans for Studio/SE/New Monitors with appropriate Centers. Had most of the scratch for the Studio 20's too. Then:
Found out I need 2 root-canals. Besides the ouch factor, that just pretty much eliminated any hopes of fun money for the rest of the year!!

But I still need to upgrade my fronts. Really. Atoms will go to surround L/R. I plan to maintain pdr-10 and cc-170 (all V.3) for now. No plans for external amp this year.

Can anyone speak to me about the version 1, or original Monitor 7's? Person has original receipt from 2000 and is selling Ash Black pair @100miles away for just under 2bills. Pictures in her home look nice, no reason to think they've been abused. I might not be able to listen before I buy so I need some feedback from those that might have lived with them.

My frontstage is no wider than about 9ft, max clearance from back wall will be @14-18". At least one side of each speaker will have no more than 6-10" clearance to nearest furniture object. Hardwood floors, 24ft ceilings sloping side-side, 26ft wide x 14ft deep room so @volume is just under 6000 cuft. Seating is about 11 ft away.

Feedback, suggestions, references to a dentist cousin?

Thanks all, in advance.

Mike
post #18318 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mkard View Post

leadfoot24 Congrat's

Pictures? Position of 390's, etc. Running from Pio amps or?

.....envy......

Mike

I'm driving all from the Pio receiver. So far it's clearly up to the task.

At first I got the 390's angled so the center woofers were pointed toward the center of the room. The diffusion was very good but the directionality was too much at times. I now repositioned the 390's so the woofers point toward each other and the dipoles fire forward and aft, then re-ran MCACC. The diffusion field is wider now, and the directionality is only there when necessary. For example, there was one scene (I can't recall now from which movie!) where a projectile moved from front right to overhead to back left. Before I repositioned the 390's, the transition broke apart after going overhead and the sound collapsed to the left surround. After I repositioned the 390's, the track is smooth from front right to rear left, and keeps going farther rear. If you have an old copy of Golden Eye, play the classic opening 007 target scope panning from left to right and close your eyes. Also, if you have a copy of The Fifth Element, play the ZF1 scene with Gary Oldman and hear the bullets curve around the room.

The bass is still not quite right. I have a 20+ years old Yamaha subwoofer that worked very well with my previous speakers, giving robust but tight bass. I'm now thinking that's because my previous fronts (Infinity) had 10" woofers and somehow the combo sounded great (the Yamaha has two 7" woofers). I might have to get a new sub with a 10" woofer to bring back the tight bass I like.

It's never just upgrade the one thing, is it
post #18319 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum7 View Post

Leafoot,
Good job and good choices. I love the Pioneer with the 'Digms.

So do I. I've always loved the Pioneer sound. Have always owned Pioneer receivers. One thing that's exceptional with this combination is brass instruments really come alive. Allen Vizzutti, Summit Brass, Wynton Marsalis all sound fantastic and better than ever.
post #18320 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

So do I. I've always loved the Pioneer sound. Have always owned Pioneer receivers. One thing that's exceptional with this combination is brass instruments really come alive. Allen Vizzutti, Summit Brass, Wynton Marsalis all sound fantastic and better than ever.

You think it sounds good now just add some seperates . I added a 3 ch amp to my studio and Pio elite avr and it really came to life and I was totaly happy before but im beyond that now
post #18321 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by cueCrew View Post

I added a xpa-3 when moving to Studio Esprit LCR due to the lower sensitivity, higher amp range and "value perception" of emotiva brand. I guess you could say that if I replaced my receiver with a pre and added an amp that there is room, but that was more than I wanted to spend so just adding an xpa-3 was sustainable improvement at the time.

I have been very happy with the combination, but the increased dynamics can be overwhelming at times (this is a PROBLEM) later at night when the kids are in bed. The difference in volume between dialog scenes and action scenes is substatial. So, for now, we really crank it out when everyone's awake but that means watching "UP" again, intead of sneaking in that Star Trek that (unbelievably) is still in the wrapper. On the positive side, sounds that come out of know where add a lot of punch - the down side, is that they send you leaping from your seat... to grab the remote.

Hmm. We also do movies at night after the kids are in bed and that might be a problem. I have to think that's correctable somehow by adjusting the channel levels?
post #18322 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFactor View Post

You think it sounds good now just add some seperates . I added a 3 ch amp to my studio and Pio elite avr and it really came to life and I was totaly happy before but im beyond that now

You are bad bad bad bad bad .... (for my bank account).
post #18323 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum7 View Post

Have you calibrated your system? If you have, maybe try boosting the center just a touch. Does your receiver have a compression mode? Like "midnite" or whatever?

Oh yeah, it's like spring cleaning. Every six mons I get the urge to run audyssey (sp?) again on my denon (4306). I get the tripod out and take readings from. Half dozen spots atoned the room. I do mess around with channel settings now and then, but always forget what the settings were before I messed with them. The receiver does have night mode, but this won't work with BD.
post #18324 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

You are bad bad bad bad bad .... (for my bank account).

Im sorry but I know what you mean lol The More I hang out on different forums the less steak and more top ramen I eat but my HT has come a long nicely lol . BTW you are correct by calibrating your speakers you can channel your new found power and dynamics. I used my spl meter and dialed everything in and now even at lower listening levels its so amazing and so much more dynamic with a what seems to be a wider sound stage . I find myself listening to more music now then I ever have before even 2 ch pure direct is just plain ear candy . BTW I also have beer breath and champagne taste and so im running a EMO XPA-3 and what a great amp with bang for the buck. I plan on getting mono blocks next a couple of UPA-1's . Would you like a link
post #18325 of 28061
Quote:


Hmm. We also do movies at night after the kids are in bed and that might be a problem. I have to think that's correctable somehow by adjusting the channel levels?

It is. Are you just using the MCACC for calibration? If so, I would invest in an SPL meter.
If I run the MCACC and go back with the SPL meter and do manual calibration of the speaker levels, the differences are pretty big. Then I will usually boost the center channel up a notch.
post #18326 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maximum7 View Post

It is. Are you just using the MCACC for calibration? If so, I would invest in an SPL meter.
If I run the Mcacc and go back with the SPL meter and do manual calibration of the speaker levels, the differences are pretty big. Then I will usually boost the center channel up a notch.

Thats strange because im also running MCACC and I've ran it to and was very surprised how close it was to just using test tones and my Spl meter . But I also fine tune/calibrate after to my preference . I imagine the size of the room and setup can affect Mcacc differently as far as how accurate it is . I also have some bass traps and acoustic panels whitch might make a difference .
post #18327 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by CFX View Post

I'm in the market for a pair of front speakers that will redefine my home theater system. I had bought a pair of Def Tech's 7002 from Best Buy at an incredible deal a couple months ago and ever since then I've been looking to upgrade to complete my system. They will be used almost exclusively for home theater, almost no music.

I've been trying to hunt down a pair of used/demo BP7000/1sc from Def Tech but have been unable to find any on audiogon or ebay. So I figured I'd look at what there is some stock of, Paradigm S8s.

From most of what I've read on the forums the common theme is to listen to both speakers yourself to compare. Well, I probably won't have the opportunity to listen to either of them so I will make my purchase blindly which is unadvised but necessary at the moment.

Knowing that I will listen mostly to home theater, would not the BP7000/1sc be a better choice? I only have the Def Tech 7002s and they create incredible presence in the room. The idea I have in my head is that the S8's are more of a musical speaker with very neutral sound reproduction. Looking at the actual drivers and cabinet, they seem to be of higher quality than that of Def Tech (I've never compared them however, only through pictures).

Which do you think is better for movies? A pair of S8s with one good sub like a Def Tech Trinity/Reference or a pair of BP7000sc? Again I know there is no right or wrong answer and I've read through the comparison thread already, I'd just like to gather your opinions. Thanks!

I suppose I have a weirds combo as I have Paradigm S8s/C5 up front but a def tech Trinity Sub. Ill actually be selling my Trinity later this year and buying a Paradigm Sub 2 (assuming it gets good reviews from the consumer who are finally beignning to receiver this Sub 2s after months of waiting).

I have not heard the Def Tech 7000s, I Have however heard the Def Tech BP 3000s paired with a CLR 3000 center and BP2000 rears. My friend is a die hard Def Tech guy who actually got me started on Paradigm for some odd reason and Ive never really looked back. We argue alot about whos stuff is better... I think a lot of it is really simply subjective to the listener tastes. For Def Tech you can get a 5.1 or 7.1 set up of their top model speakers (bp7000,70001m clr3000, bpvx etc) for far cheaper than you can for a Paradigm system of top Paradigm models.

When your comparing the speakers for music, def tech really cant hang with the paradigms, atleast thats my opinon. The paradigms simply sounded smoother, cleaner and more defined. For home theater however its a bit different. If you were to compare 2 systems of only speakers and no subs, the def techs would probably come out ahead as they have the built in subs. However integrating a good sub into a Paradigm set up (especually signatures) will yield the awesome top end you were already getting but also a good low end ie bass.

In my opinion if you are on a budget go with def tech. They are just so much cheaper than the Paradigms that I think most people write off the def techs as being cheap and lousy because they cost so much less than their competetors.

If your not on to stringent a budget and want the best overal package Id suggest Paradigms with a nice sub. If your interested in a Trinirt sub let me know
post #18328 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

I've gone and done it. Picked up a pair of Studio 60s, the CC-590, and decided to go the middle way with a pair of ADP-390s for surrounds. Had the system on most of the day with both music and movies. We're hearing sounds in the source material that we've never heard before (in a good way!). The sound stage is excellent. Imaging is excellent. Surround sound is very good and I think I might still need to tweak positions and/or channel levels. The CC-590 is definitely the right match. Vocals and dialogue are alive and articulate. On my Pioneer 1120K the sweet volume level seems to be between -22 db and -19 db. Definitely worth the money.

Nice system. Good move picking up the 390's. Now all that is left is a sub.
post #18329 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfoot24 View Post

Hmm. We also do movies at night after the kids are in bed and that might be a problem. I have to think that's correctable somehow by adjusting the channel levels?

I have young kids as well. The majority of movies that get played are kids movies. Toy Story 1&2, Cars, Princess & Frog on BD are good movies on a quality HT setup.
post #18330 of 28061
Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobygt68 View Post

I suppose I have a weirds combo as I have Paradigm S8s/C5 up front but a def tech Trinity Sub. Ill actually be selling my Trinity later this year and buying a Paradigm Sub 2 (assuming it gets good reviews from the consumer who are finally beignning to receiver this Sub 2s after months of waiting).

I have not heard the Def Tech 7000s, I Have however heard the Def Tech BP 3000s paired with a CLR 3000 center and BP2000 rears. My friend is a die hard Def Tech guy who actually got me started on Paradigm for some odd reason and Ive never really looked back. We argue alot about whos stuff is better... I think a lot of it is really simply subjective to the listener tastes. For Def Tech you can get a 5.1 or 7.1 set up of their top model speakers (bp7000,70001m clr3000, bpvx etc) for far cheaper than you can for a Paradigm system of top Paradigm models.

When your comparing the speakers for music, def tech really cant hang with the paradigms, atleast thats my opinon. The paradigms simply sounded smoother, cleaner and more defined. For home theater however its a bit different. If you were to compare 2 systems of only speakers and no subs, the def techs would probably come out ahead as they have the built in subs. However integrating a good sub into a Paradigm set up (especually signatures) will yield the awesome top end you were already getting but also a good low end ie bass.

In my opinion if you are on a budget go with def tech. They are just so much cheaper than the Paradigms that I think most people write off the def techs as being cheap and lousy because they cost so much less than their competetors.

If your not on to stringent a budget and want the best overal package Id suggest Paradigms with a nice sub. If your interested in a Trinirt sub let me know

Thanks for your post Scooby. And I would be interested in a trinity sub, PM when you're ready to sell.

As for the S8 vs BP7000sc, I think it's a case of accurate reproduction vs large but not so accurate sound stage. Like I said I've never heard either but just by looking at their designs, this is what I think it boils down to. Being that this will be used almost 100% for home theater, the best bang for the buck may be Def Tech but they are hard to find.

My problem is that I'm trying to build my home theater using demo/used units, so Audiogon and ebay will be my main resources. I see a Paradigm S8 v1 on sale at Audiogon for $2000. Is it worth it to upgrade to the v2 if one becomes available? I know the v2 has beryllium tweets and cobalt mids, though I've never heard either of those two in person.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Paradigm Owners Thread