Now that I'm a working man, I'm thinking about going from a 2 channel setup to 5.1 (bought Titans back in '94, they must be V1's). I never really loved their sound as they I think they sound too nasal, but being the cheap bastid that I am, I am willing to expand on them as a foundation for 5.1. I had half a mind to throw a bunch of Atoms around them as some have said the vocals are smooth and amazing (ie not nasal) and that they preferred them to the Monitor line. So armed with this knowledge I went to the local Paradigm dealer for some auditioning...
First off I get settled in for a comparison between the Atoms and Titans. Well, all I can say is they sounded vastly inferior to the Titans. It must be that they are lacking in bass? I'm no expert but there is no way I could be happy with them.
Next was an A/B comparison between the Titans and the Mini-monitors. IMHO there is a huge step up in performance going to the Minis. I am forced to spend at least the 'monitor level' now. Should've stayed home...
Wanting to hear an A/B comparison between the Minis and Studio 20 was gonna be hard since the 20's were kept in a separate room. 'No problem', the sales guy said. He went and got them with the stands and wired them up. Nothing like working hard to extract those extra duckets. Anyway, there is a definate improvement going from the Minis to 20's, although the I could be happy with the Minis, and the jump wasn't as drastic as going from the Titans to Minis (which was Drastic). However, I don't want to be yearning to upgrade like everyone else on this forum, so I think I'm going with the Reference line. No one seems happy with the 370 on here (from my limiting reading here) and they seem to eventually upgrade to a 470 or 570, so thats another reason to go Reference rather than Monitor line
With that being said, I have to ask, why is it that the cc-470 gets mentioned alot more than the cc-570? I have to figure that the CC is the most important speaker for HT, so why skimp on it...
And my other question is, should I go for the 20's or 40's? I'm gonna use it for 95% HT and 5% music (if at all). I can't go 60 or 100 since I live in a condo and may move out of this city, so I need smaller speakers for easy transportation...
First off I get settled in for a comparison between the Atoms and Titans. Well, all I can say is they sounded vastly inferior to the Titans. It must be that they are lacking in bass? I'm no expert but there is no way I could be happy with them.
Next was an A/B comparison between the Titans and the Mini-monitors. IMHO there is a huge step up in performance going to the Minis. I am forced to spend at least the 'monitor level' now. Should've stayed home...
Wanting to hear an A/B comparison between the Minis and Studio 20 was gonna be hard since the 20's were kept in a separate room. 'No problem', the sales guy said. He went and got them with the stands and wired them up. Nothing like working hard to extract those extra duckets. Anyway, there is a definate improvement going from the Minis to 20's, although the I could be happy with the Minis, and the jump wasn't as drastic as going from the Titans to Minis (which was Drastic). However, I don't want to be yearning to upgrade like everyone else on this forum, so I think I'm going with the Reference line. No one seems happy with the 370 on here (from my limiting reading here) and they seem to eventually upgrade to a 470 or 570, so thats another reason to go Reference rather than Monitor line
With that being said, I have to ask, why is it that the cc-470 gets mentioned alot more than the cc-570? I have to figure that the CC is the most important speaker for HT, so why skimp on it...
And my other question is, should I go for the 20's or 40's? I'm gonna use it for 95% HT and 5% music (if at all). I can't go 60 or 100 since I live in a condo and may move out of this city, so I need smaller speakers for easy transportation...



















except for the partial wall with dinette open behind.


