AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › >>> The Official Sony Grand Wega V (A10 series) Thread <<<
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

>>> The Official Sony Grand Wega V (A10 series) Thread <<< - Page 37

post #1081 of 10825
In regards to the stand dimensions, just look at the PDF for it. It has just about every dimension you could ask for. It's not that hard to find on SonyStyle.com, but I'll even help you out: http://www.sonystyle.com/intershopro...11M_manual.pdf

Also, as far as price and discounts: You can walk into pretty much any BB, CC, Sears, etc. on any day of the week and ask for at least 10% off of MSRP on a TV. If you're talking to a junior salesman, he may have to walk over and ask his manager, but generally, they don't even blink over 10% off.
post #1082 of 10825
*wavies to everyone*

I'm seeing an awful lot of rather happy KDF-E42A10 owners in this thread and I'm starting to get a major case of the envies. :P ^__^

Had a few questions for those of you who purchased already:

1. I'm the uber technogeekette (hubby just is happy if things look nice and he can play his consoles) in the family and, after talking it over with my hubby, we pretty much decided on the KDF-E42A10. However, after trying to find a place locally online (we reside in the SF Bay Area) that has one I've struck out so far. Some of you mention CC where you purchased but on their website they only show the 42" WE655 one.

Is this something that they have'nt put in their system yet or am I going about this the wrong way? I hate calling places because as soon as they hear a woman on the phone, well, let's just say they try and bamboozle me and leave it at that. *rolls eyes*

2. We are going to be using this for our main TV in the living room for cable, DVD, and console gaming. Right now we have one of the Pelican component switchboxes for all of our devices to go to the TV via component. However, this new set, while having component inputs on it already also has a HDMI connector. After looking at the prices of some of the switchers out there and wincing over the cost I was wondering if someone could shed some light on this.

If we're going to get a nice TV like this then I'd like for us to be able to take full advantage of it but not for $400+. :P

3. We were soon going to be getting a Oppo DV971H DVD player and was wondering if anyone could advise if this player will have any hidden issues with this particular set?
post #1083 of 10825
1. the 42 and 50in will probably be on CC's website by the end of this weekend. They should be in the stores also to see. I personally just went to the store manager, said I wanted the 50in, it was already in the warehouse when I ordered it, and got it last saturday. Love the tv. No problems at all (the HL-R4667 which I tried had so many issues)

2. My cable is running via monster component cables and the picture is great. saving the HDMI for dvd player.
post #1084 of 10825
could someone who has the sony stand for the 50A10 please tell me if the shelves are made of glass or another material? i have a 15 month old child and just a bit concerned if they are glass shelves, considering there are no doors on this stand. thanks!!!
post #1085 of 10825
ph3, jeeper78 and Morley -- thanks for your replies.

I didn't dig deeper into the pdf-file, but went with what Sony had listed as the specifications on their website -- pretty amazing that they can't get this right... oh well -- glad that cleared it and will be ordering this instead of last year's stand that I had on order.

Now just have to pick up the tv on Friday and all is ready to go
post #1086 of 10825
pjlady,

Try Video Only in the Bay Area. I ordered a 50A10 from their SF store on Monday 8/8 (it's not on display yet, of course, so it's coming directly out of their warehouse), delivery this Sat. Decent price, in my opinion (always below MSRP with them). Beware, however: One particular sales guy tried to wring full MSRP out of me, since I was obviously anxious to get the set without even looking at it first. Hold out for their "floor" price, or just keep calling until you get a salesperson who isn't so, well, I dont' know - what would you call that, greedy? Or just reacting to the laws of supply and demand? Whatever. Guy's gotta make a living I guess.

PS - I've been waiting, as have many on this thread, for months for this set, and had kept tabs on all the local main video places in SF. V-Only seemed to have the 50A10 sooner than anyone else in the bay area, to my knowledge, so it stands to reason (or at least to hazard a wild-a** guess) that they'll have the 42's in first or near-first as well.
post #1087 of 10825
tweeter just told me. that 42a10 shipping date has change 2 aug 18!!!
post #1088 of 10825
Just went on circuitycity.com and punched in son kdf-e50a10 and got the STAND for the tv set, but not the A10 itself...can't seem to pull that up. Plus, the stand is $50 more than msrp. I guess things are getting closer.
post #1089 of 10825
Anyone here using the 42" or 50" with HD TiVo through DirecTV??? Curious on how you may have tuned it for SD and HD signals.
post #1090 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJArciola, III View Post

Just went on circuitycity.com and punched in son kdf-e50a10 and got the STAND for the tv set, but not the A10 itself...can't seem to pull that up. Plus, the stand is $50 more than msrp. I guess things are getting closer.


No dash.

Just SON KDFE50A10
post #1091 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwk123 View Post

Maybe I'm 'seeing things', but when watching the football clips on the HD loop in both Costco and BB/CC (don't remember which) both the dlp's and the plasmas (several brands in both cases) seemed very difficult to follow - things seemed to jump from frame to frame almost like stop-motion. Granted, I was way too close in most cases due to aisle width, but I didn't notice this on the Sony LCD's.
Has anyone else noticed anything like this? Since sports (primarily hockey) is going to be a large part of my viewing, performance under 'high motion' conditions is critical. I wouldn't normally expect LCD to be at the same level for this type of programming, but IMHO the Sony (older 655 series - haven't seen an A10 yet) looked best on these types of clips in all places I've seen it. Maybe I'm nuts, though

I thought I was going nuts also. On my search for an a10 I hit Tweeter. All lined up was a sammy dlp/Mits/Panasonic/and an old Sony 655. I was sitting about 5 feet away and watching an HDnet broadcast of one of those "Law" shows with the quick cuts and zooms. The others looked to be in "stop-motion" but as my eyes jumped back to the Sony it looked clean. I second the need for Dallas Stars Hockey this season and wonder if this "stop-motion" thing has shown up in the A10? or if what I saw is common or a feed problem?
post #1092 of 10825
hey all, my first post here. I got the 42" A10 from Vanns 2 days ago. It came in perfect condition, no dead pixels..whew!

I'll be getting cablecard through cablevision for hdtv and will report back on how that works. I'm getting pbs hd and cbs hd which look pretty damn good on this set. On the pbs channel i do frequently get pixelation and some stuttered movement. It might be my signal strength. cbs has gray bars on the sides.

I have a tivo series 2 hooked up through svideo port and a sony dream sound system, dav-fr9 hooked up via component my pc hooked up at vga port, and saving my hdmi port for the ps3.

SD channel look ok, but I guess it was to be expected, I've been using wide zoom which gives minimal distortion. DVD looks great, i still need to calibrate using DVE as the red push is noticeable. DVD's are on full setting. I was trying out LOTR and I noticed that hte picture doesn't use up the full screen, i still have bars at top and bottom. Am I doing something wrong here? I have the DVD player set for 16:9, tv on full.

I have issues with the pc connection. I have an xfx 6800gt card that can put the resolution at native 1280x720, but at full1 and full2 I get a 1" border on all sides (underscanning I guess?). On zoom, I lose about an inch on all sides off the screen...overscanning? In any case, while web surfing, I find the text very difficult to read on any setting. This was disappointing, I wanted to use my tv as my monitor too. It would seem that even with my res at 1280x720, cleartype or not, these is no 1:1 pixel mapping leading to text bleeding into adjacent pixels. I 'm curious if others have had more luck.

Fabulous as a TV though, It'll only get better once I calibrate the set, I don't know how to do any service menu mods, but I'll have to make do with basic calibration. Maybe we could start a umr fund to do his magic? I'm in!

observations:
This tv is surprisingly light
not much space on top of tv for a center speaker (may have to do a piece of velcro).
I find 42" to be just right for me sitting at 12' away. (for those who don't want their tv to be the dominant part of the room)
amazingly wide viewing angle
games on the computer look fabulous, text is another story
more to come as I play with it more
ask questions if you have 'em
post #1093 of 10825
Velcro is your friend for a center channel speaker on top of the set.
post #1094 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by scttj8 View Post

I thought I was going nuts also. On my search for an a10 I hit Tweeter. All lined up was a sammy dlp/Mits/Panasonic/and an old Sony 655. I was sitting about 5 feet away and watching an HDnet broadcast of one of those "Law" shows with the quick cuts and zooms. The others looked to be in "stop-motion" but as my eyes jumped back to the Sony it looked clean. I second the need for Dallas Stars Hockey this season and wonder if this "stop-motion" thing has shown up in the A10? or if what I saw is common or a feed problem?


Try and catch the Dallas game where the Leafs kick their arses!
That should be a great benchmark to judge the speed of
pucks entering your net and red lights flashing!
post #1095 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by lander215 View Post

Velcro is your friend for a center channel speaker on top of the set.

An alternative... Blu Tac not only can secure the center channel to the top of the set, but it also improves the sound. And you can even change the angle of the speaker.
post #1096 of 10825
Well, I've had my 50A10 and here's my take on things:
[With some second day edits to address a mistake I made, and to note a couple of other things.]

My Setup:
HD/Big Screen Experience: None. This is my first HDTV and I've never watched anyone else's HDTV/Big Screen TV. The 50A10 is replacing a 32" JVC CRT I've had for about 10 years.
TV: 50A10 (duh)
Cable feed: Basic cable package from Wideopenwest (analog channels from 1 to 100, basically) with cable directly connected to TV's cable coax input (i.e. no set top box, no CableCARD).
DVD: Toshiba DVD player - NOT progressive scan. Connected with component cables.
HDTV: I'm using an antenna I mounted in the attic about 20 years ago when I first moved into the house and before I got cable service. It is connected, naturally to the UHF/VHF coax input on the TV.
Sitting area: 9-10 feet away.

Aesthetics: Great looking set. But that 3LCD sticker is coming off on day 31.
As noted there appears to be a slight up and down wave of the baffle below the speakers but, it's hardly noticeable and generally symmetric - on my set at least.
I have it on a 43.5" wide stand (Tech Craft MT400) and it fits on there very nicely - the 1.5" overhang on each side looks fine.

General PQ: I see SDE a good amount of the time. But, I'm also looking for it. Time will tell if my brain is eventually able to filter it out.
[Day 2 edit: Mr. Brain appears to be activating the SDE filter a bit already.]
I would definitely be fine with the 42A10 in this regard given my sitting distance since watching the 50A10 from a longer distance, say 12-15' shows no SDE. But, I'm digging the big picture of the 50. But, I got another 29 days to decide whether or not I can live with it.
That said, the colors are very nice and vivid even with toning down some of the settings.
And, finally, I do need to at least run a calibration DVD through the system.

Cable feed PQ: Looks fine. Some channels better than others. There are push and takes between the A10's PQ and my old TV's PQ. In other words, the A10's picture has some issues with it that are different than the issues with the CRT picture. These different issues cancel each other out over all, and to be honest the bigger screen A10 makes it easier to see these issues. The problems are basically blurriness or maybe its a form of ghosting or blooming of colors - maybe I need to turn down the colors a bit more, I'm not sure. I also notice that some text doesn't look very good while other text displays look pretty good. I find that kind of annoying. Anyway, it's that sort of thing I'm talking about and is probably something I just have to learn to live with. But, it will require some more couch time to decide whether or not I can get used to the standard cable PQ on the A10. And, this is pretty important since we watch alot of standard cable shows. I don't think going to a digital cable package via a CableCARD will help since I think the channels I watch now will still be analog. But, I might try it out and just cancel the service if it doesn't do much for me.

DVD feed PQ: [Edit: I had forgotten to change the setup on the DVD player to account for a 16:9 TV - it was still set up for 4:3. This change made a HUGE difference. The TV seems to do a fine job with my DVD player's 480i input over component cables.]

HDTV: Only saw part of one show that appears to be a "true" HDTV broadcast and that was a show on PBS. It looked *very* nice. Some pixelation during some fast moving scenes (PBS broadcasts in 1080i which may account for this). But, it was really nice to look at. Very enjoyable. I also, looked at some "normal" broadcasts being shown on local HDTV channels (e.g. noon-time news) and they looked pretty good, but not that much different than what I see via my cable connection.
(For you Chicago western suburb folks, channel 2 is basically worthless which is currently the norm for this channel. Though I understand they are moving their HDTV up to a higher frequency which should help.)
[Day 2 Edit: Channel 2 is actually coming in a bit better now. Also, I watched Law and Order and some Leno in HD and it was really great.]

Summary: Am I gushing over the set? No. [Day 2 Edit: However, with my DVD setup correction, I feel some gush forming.] Am I upset about the purchase. Not at all. Are my expectations too high for a $2000-ish set? Maybe. Will I keep it? We'll see. Am I going to get a bunch of couch time with the TV? You bet. Will I bend your ears more in the future? Yep.



Mitch
post #1097 of 10825
Get a progressive DVD player. Night and day on PQ IMHO.
post #1098 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mitch G View Post

Well, I've had my 50A10 and here's my take on things:

My Setup:
HD/Big Screen Experience: None. This is my first HDTV and I've never watched anyone else's HDTV/Big Screen TV. The 50A10 is replacing a 32" JVC CRT I've had for about 10 years.
TV: 50A10 (duh)
Cable feed: Basic cable package from Wideopenwest (analog channels from 1 to 100, basically) with cable directly connected to TV's cable coax input (i.e. no set top box, no CableCARD).
DVD: Toshiba DVD player - NOT progressive scan. Connected with component cables.
HDTV: I'm using an antenna I mounted in the attic about 20 years ago when I first moved into the house and before I got cable service. It is connected, naturally to the UHF/VHF coax input on the TV.
Sitting area: 9-10 feet away.

Aesthetics: Great looking set. But that 3LCD sticker is coming off on day 31.
As noted there appears to be a slight up and down wave of the baffle below the speakers but, it's hardly noticeable and generally symmetric - on my set at least.
I have it on a 43.5" wide stand (Tech Craft MT400) and it fits on there very nicely - the 1.5" overhang on each side looks fine.

General PQ: I see SDE a good amount of the time. But, I'm also looking for it. Time will tell if my brain is eventually able to filter it out. I would definitely be fine with the 42A10 in this regard given my sitting distance since watching the 50A10 from a longer distance, say 12-15' shows no SDE. But, I'm digging the big picture of the 50. But, I got another 29 days to decide whether or not I can live with it.
That said, the colors are very nice and vivid even with toning down some of the settings.
And, finally, I do need to at least run a calibration DVD through the system.

Cable feed PQ: Looks fine. Some channels better than others. There are push and takes between the A10's PQ and my old TV's PQ. In other words, the A10's picture has some issues with it that are different than the issues with the CRT picture. These different issues cancel each other out over all, and to be honest the bigger screen A10 makes it easier to see these issues. The problems are basically blurriness or maybe its a form of ghosting or blooming of colors - maybe I need to turn down the colors a bit more, I'm not sure. I also notice that some text doesn't look very good while other text displays look pretty good. I find that kind of annoying. Anyway, it's that sort of thing I'm talking about and is probably something I just have to learn to live with. But, it will require some more couch time to decide whether or not I can get used to the standard cable PQ on the A10. And, this is pretty important since we watch alot of standard cable shows. I don't think going to a digital cable package via a CableCARD will help since I think the channels I watch now will still be analog. But, I might try it out and just cancel the service if it doesn't do much for me.

DVD feed PQ: The jury is still out for me on this. I expected the DVD image to look better than it does. I expected the A10's line doubler/de-interlacer/do-hicky/whatever to handle the DVD player's 480i output better. I'm seeing too many jagged edges on DVDs like the Incredibles and Finding Nemo. Sky Captain looked good, but Sky Captain has a strange look to it to begin with. Harry Potter looked OK, but I didn't spend too much time with that one yet. So, I'm currently researching a new DVD player and will at least try a 480p via HDMI to see if that helps. I'm also going to try my current 480i DVD player via S-Video to see if maybe the A10 dithers an S-Video signal more. (I'm thinking that the TV might assume the component cable input shouldn't be processed as much as a stupid old S-video input.) I'll report back on these tests later.

HDTV: Only saw part of one show that appears to be a "true" HDTV broadcast and that was a show on PBS. It looked *very* nice. Some pixelation during some fast moving scenes (PBS broadcasts in 1080i which may account for this). But, it was really nice to look at. Very enjoyable. I also, looked at some "normal" broadcasts being shown on local HDTV channels (e.g. noon-time news) and they looked pretty good, but not that much different than what I see via my cable connection.
(For you Chicago western suburb folks, channel 2 is basically worthless which is currently the norm for this channel. Though I understand they are moving their HDTV up to a higher frequency which should help.)

Summary: Am I gushing over the set? No. Am I upset about the purchase. Not at all. Are my expectations too high for a $2000-ish set? Maybe. Will I keep it? We'll see. Am I going to get a bunch of couch time with the TV? You bet. Will I bend your ears more in the future? Yep.



Mitch

Most of your issues are being caused by poor source material....NOT the TV. Judge the TV watching DiscoveryHD, INHD, or a good HD sports program. This will show what it is REALLY cabable of. The TV can't help it that a lot of programming is lower quality. HD TV's have higher resolution, and therefore bad quality looks even worse, plus your screen is way larger than your old TV, which also magnifies picture defects. I expect that the quality of shows should improve rapidly over the next several years. I also suggest you at least get a decent DVD player with progressive scan. I have a fairly inexpensive Sony DVD player, and I don't see jagged edges on my 42 inch GWIII at all. But it certainly doesn't look as good as the best HD programs, and never will until the DVD format is upgraded to the new HD generation.
post #1099 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaguaraja View Post

...doesn't use up the full screen, i still have bars at top and bottom. Am I doing something wrong here? I have the DVD player set for 16:9, tv on full...

I suspect that LOTR is 1.85:1 or higher, i.e. not 16:9, and therefore you see bars on the bottom.
post #1100 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by abward View Post

I suspect that LOTR is 1.85:1 or higher, i.e. not 16:9, and therefore you see bars on the bottom.

LOTR is 2.35:1
post #1101 of 10825
I've had a little over a week with my new KDF-E50A10 and I'm very happy with it. If you'll indulge me, here's my mini snapshot' review.

The Setup:

Digital Cable running into Moxi DVR (from Charter), Component into tv; audio into Sony receiver via RCA.
Antenna signal (via Terk HDTVi) running directly to tv; Optical audio out of tv and into Sony receiver.

The Good:

--The design, of course. It's really a good-looking television. I have not seen any bowing' or any flaws in the outer plastics, as some posters noted.
--The remote is well designed, and I like the easy access to the inputs through the Wega Gate. This is my first HDTV, and my first tv purchase since 1996, so forgive me if some of the menu features have been around for a while, but I like having the capability to actually name the inputs. (DVR, DVD, Cable box, etc.) Very handy.
--THE PICTURE. Wow. High Def programming looks phenomenal. Great color production and very bright and crisp. CSI, Leno, and HBO look great. But my new favorite channels are Discovery HD and HDNet. You can sit there all night and watch those nature programs on Discovery. Last night (8/9) we watched a special about the shuttle launch on HDNet, and it was so clear it was like looking through the cleanest window you've ever seen. Truly amazing.
--I have not experienced any SSE or SDE, but I know that is a person-by-person thing. Our viewing distance is about 10 or more feet.
--Each video input has its own color settings. Neato.

Not Bad, but
--There is a significant amount of red push.' It's not a deal breaker by any means, but it is noticeable. I have tweaked the image to where I am happy with it, but even now when something that is really red comes on screen, I think, Wow, that is really red, and keep watching. Don't worry, I'll keep fiddling with it until its just right. Like I said, not a deal breaker, but it does bring me to
--I would have liked to see even more color tweaking options, like what is in the 55 and 60 models. (you can access a few more options by choosing custom' color in the Wega gatebut it would have been really handy to have 3 sliders for red, green and blue. I would, as mentioned above, turn down the red a bit more)
--I'm not completely sold on the dynamic iris. It works great 95% of the time, producing nice darks. But sometimes, when switching between a shot that is very dark to one that is light (or has a lot of flashes, like CSI), you can really notice the iris working its mojo. Again, not a deal breaker, and it may be something I can tweak to perfection.
--Standard definition looks pretty bad. BUT it is going through the Moxi (see the Moxi forum and get an eyeful of words about how their SD compression blows). Last week, before we received our new digital cable, the SD picture from analog cable was fine. Not mind blowing, but fine. It was only until we got the Moxi that we noticed how bad SD was. We have noticed that the pure digital SD channels look much better than the pure analog ones. I'm going to chalk this one up to the Moxi/digital cable situation and not the television. (Also, SD coming from the Terk antenna looks much better than digital Moxi) So yeah, it's the cable.

Well, that's really all I can think of. Overall, a great television that I'm really happy with. I recommend it.
post #1102 of 10825
I've reviewed this thread but am not sure there has been information specific to my question (I apologize if there has). Like others, I'm debating between the 42" and the 50". For SD channels, is there a noticable picture quality difference between the two sizes? It seems intuitive that the 42" would have higher PQ on SD content that the 50". Has anyone compared the two A10 sizes for PQ?
post #1103 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailing View Post

I've reviewed this thread but am not sure there has been information specific to my question (I apologize if there has). Like others, I'm debating between the 42" and the 50". For SD channels, is there a noticable picture quality difference between the two sizes? It seems intuitive that the 42" would have higher PQ on SD content that the 50". Has anyone compared the two A10 sizes for PQ?

All things equal (and with the 2 sizes of A-10 it should be ), a smaller tv using the same chassis etc should always have a better PQ than a bigger model. The more you enlarge the picture, the more it shows flaws. Question is how far will you sit from the TV. If 10 feet plus, I would imagine you would prefer the 50. 8-10 you might like either size. 7 or closer. most people would probably prefer the 42, even though some 'experts' think you should sit 5.5 feet from a 42. My experience is that most people don't like the distances that the experts think are 'ideal', and prefer to sit somewhat farther from the tv.
post #1104 of 10825
I can't wait till I get my set to review it. I am replacing my 10 month old Samsung HLP with this set. Previous to the Samsung I had a Toshiba RP HDTV for 5 years.

I also have perfect vision so if there is a visual flaw I will notice it.

WHY DOESN'T CANADA HAVE THESE SETS YET!?
post #1105 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Oliver View Post

WHY DOESN'T CANADA HAVE THESE SETS YET!?


Same reason we don't have them where I live. It takes time to get them into the distribution network and not everybody is going to get them at the same time.
post #1106 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimP View Post

He's partially correct. Sears discounts are not always stackable, so don't expect to get 25% off. Get real.

As to when the 30 days start, 2 year ago when I purchased my WE610 from Sears, many others on this forum were doing this from Sears also. There were multiple push backs of the delivery date. At that time, Sears policy was that the warranty, began on delivery. I'm making the presumption that the 30 day satisfaction guarantee would also being at time of delivery. I know for a fact that many of us did not even get our TVs for 40 days, so that wouldn't have left us any time on a 30 day satisfaction guarantee if it had begun at time of sale. If I were you, I'd get them to double check this. You don't know when they'll actually deliver the set.


I'm a little behind in this thread, but I thought I'd respond to this anyway, as it might help someone. My father in law was in exactly this situation; buying a WE610 from Sears two years ago. He just attempted to get warrantee work done on it (using the credit card warrantee extension) and they definitely started the warrantee period when he bought the set NOT when he received delivery, which I believe was almost two months later. I thought this was rediculous, as he didn't even have the tv for that period, but he said they wouldn't budge.

Now, in this case, he was still barely within the period even measured from when he bought it, so maybe if push had come to shove because he had really needed it, he would have been able to get them to honor it. The could have told him that in this case just because he didn't really need it yet. Just to be clear however, this was Sears not the credit card company, that was indicating the warrantee started at the purchase data not delivery date.
post #1107 of 10825
Has anyone tried the audio sync with external device option capabilites?
post #1108 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanBuck View Post

Most of your issues are being caused by poor source material....NOT the TV. Judge the TV watching DiscoveryHD, INHD, or a good HD sports program. This will show what it is REALLY cabable of. The TV can't help it that a lot of programming is lower quality. HD TV's have higher resolution, and therefore bad quality looks even worse, plus your screen is way larger than your old TV, which also magnifies picture defects. I expect that the quality of shows should improve rapidly over the next several years. I also suggest you at least get a decent DVD player with progressive scan. I have a fairly inexpensive Sony DVD player, and I don't see jagged edges on my 42 inch GWIII at all. But it certainly doesn't look as good as the best HD programs, and never will until the DVD format is upgraded to the new HD generation.

I agree with everything you say. Don't get me wrong, the TV is excellent when fed a healthy diet. I was just hoping I wouldn't notice the effects of junk food as much.

And, yes, I will definitely be trying a progressive scan DVD player.
(BTW, my S-Video experiment did not show any noticeable improvement.)

And, I'm looking forward to watching some HD primetime material this evening - at least until my wife makes me reattach the cable feed for the bedroom's TV - it has to do with how the coax is wired in my house.


Mitch
post #1109 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joanr View Post

Has anyone tried the audio sync with external device option capabilites?

Joanr,

I did have some moderate sync issues when I first got the set. I tried the sync option to no avail. There are three levels of sync adjustment, and for me it just went from bad to worse. My solution was to go into the receiver's menu and tell it that my speakers were farther away than what they actually were. (I told it they were 19 feet away!) In theory, if I tell the speakers they are farther away, I'd think the sound would be sent out sooner, so as to hit your ears with the video, but that must not be the case. Anyway, it worked for me.
post #1110 of 10825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Oliver View Post


WHY DOESN'T CANADA HAVE THESE SETS YET!?

Sony is scheduling their arrival for the drop of the puck. Very smart marketing on their behalf!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Rear Projection Units
AVS › AVS Forum › Display Devices › Rear Projection Units › >>> The Official Sony Grand Wega V (A10 series) Thread <<<