Quote:
Originally Posted by
DreamCatcher 
From the Sound & Vision bench test:
"only the largest, heaviest, and most expensive receivers and amplifiers perform perfectly in these tests."
Makes sense to me. I like what S&V is doing with their reviews lately

Second only to Audioholics

dc
From Hal:
Quote:
Test Bench: Pioneer VSX-74TXVi receiver (S&V)
Output at clipping (1 kHz into 8/4 ohms)
1 channel driven: 172/296 W (22.4/24.7 dBW)*
5 channels driven (8 ohms): 61 W (17.9 dBW)*
6 channels driven (8 ohms): 52 W (17.1 dBW)*
* Speaker-impedance setup switch set to 8-ohm position.
For reference, here is an older test report, from Home Theater Mag, of the 55TXi (I couldn't find a test report of the 56TXi, but I don't think the weight, etc, changed much between these two. The short summary of the amp:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Pioneer Elite VSX-55TXi
Five channels driven into 8-ohm loads: 0.1% distortion at 87.9 watts; 1% distortion at 97.7 watts
This graph shows that the VSX-55TXi's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 110.2 watts and 1% distortion at 129.3 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 192.6 watts and 1% distortion at 220.8 watts.
Interestingly, I also found a Home Theater Mag test of the 52. Here is the test report of it. Short summary of the amp:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Pioneer Elite VSX-52TX A/V Receiver
Five channels driven into 8-ohm loads: 0.1% distortion at 115.3 watts; 1% distortion at 129.7 watts
This graph shows that the VSX-52TX's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 121.2 watts and 1% distortion at 143.1 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 197.0 watts and 1% distortion at 231.4 watts.
So it looks like in comparing the 55 to the 74 that the 55 had 129 w/ch with 2 channels driven at clipping at 1K, and the 74 had 172 w/ch with 1 channel driven to clipping at 1K; so the output per channel looks to be higher on the 74 (granted they aren't tested exactly the same).
Driving all channels is another story, though: the 55 put out almost 98 w/ch at clipping (1% distortion; I'm assuming at 1K); the 74 only put out 61 under those conditons.
So it kind of looks to me like Pio is going more towards the Yamaha philosophy of sizing the power supply assuming that all channels will never be driven simultaneously in a real-world enviornment (the Audioholics guys have an article on their website with regard to how they feel all channels driven is an un-realistic spec, but other manufacturers (esp. HK and NAD) have always used this as a marketing point). I always thought Pio fell somewhere between the HK/NAD approach and the Yamaha approach, but this receiver looks like its moving toward the later.
What I thought was odd, though, was that the cheaper 52 put out 142 w/ch with 2 channels driven and almost 130 watts/ch with 5 channels driven (both at clipping at 1K). I wouldn't have expected that result (I understand the amp section of the 52 is almost identical to that of the non-Elite 1015 as well).
For a frame of reference, here's a Home Theater Mag test of Denon 3805. Amp summary:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Denon AVR-3805
Five channels driven into 8-ohm loads: 0.1% distortion at 114.9 watts; 1% distortion at 125.0 watts
This graph shows that the AVR-3805's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 132.2 watts and 1% distortion at 162.3 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 218.4 watts and 1% distortion at 243.0 watts.
And here is a test report of a Yamaha 2400. Amp summary:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Yamaha RX-V2400 A/V Receiver
This graph shows that the RX-V2400's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 102.9 watts and 1% distortion at 130.5 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 158.4 watts and 1% distortion at 195.3 watts. With five channels driving 8-ohm loads, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 43.5 watts and 1% distortion at 44.1 watts. With seven channels driving 8-ohm loads, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 32.3 watts and 1% distortion at 36.9 watts.
For HK I found a review of the 630, which should be close to the 635 here.
Amp summary:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Harman/Kardon AVR 630
Five channels driven into 8-ohm loads: 0.1% distortion at 79.7 watts; 1% distortion at 93.3 watts
This graph shows that the AVR 630's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 84.6 watts and 1% distortion at 100.6 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 146.9 watts and 1% distortion at 170.8 watts.
And for NAD, here is a test of the T753. Amp summary:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: NAD T 753 A/V Receiver
Five channels driven into 8-ohm loads: 0.1% distortion at 93.7 watts; 1% distortion at 105.0 watts
This graph shows that the T 753's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 110.7 watts and 1% distortion at 136.1 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 122.6 watts and 1% distortion at 146.3 watts.
Finally, just for fun, here's a Home Theater Mag test of the Sunfire UR.
Amp summary:
Quote:
HT Labs Measures: Sunfire Ultimate A/V Receiver
This graph shows that the Ultimate's left channel, from CD input to speaker output with two channels driving 8-ohm loads, reaches 0.1% distortion at 150.9 watts and 1% distortion at 231.3 watts. Into 4 ohms, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 265.5 watts and 1% distortion at 398.1 watts. With five channels driving 8-ohm loads, the amplifier reaches 0.1% distortion at 132.6 watts and 1% distortion at 190.7 watts.