AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Verizon FiOS HDTV
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Verizon FiOS HDTV - Page 547

post #16381 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCFan View Post


I'm curious, how much longer are you going to continue to run this by us?


You can say that again!
post #16382 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Ross View Post

No he's not. He's just trying to find a resolution to his problem.

I wonder about that. It's been a month and he's had numerous tech visits to his house with no success. Cut or fish bait because the repititious posting is way past old. But since I don't run the joint, who cares.
post #16383 of 17507
I think I may just invest in an antenna in the event things like what happened to mproper's neck of the woods happens in my market. I already have an old non-digital antenna in the attic; cabling is already in place for the most part so it would just be a matter of swapping in a new digital antenna.
post #16384 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich3fan View Post

I think I may just invest in an antenna in the event things like what happened to mproper's neck of the woods happens in my market. I already have an old non-digital antenna in the attic; cabling is already in place for the most part so it would just be a matter of swapping in a new digital antenna.

Your "non digital" antenna will likely still work. Digital antenna vs non non digital antenna is more of a marketing term than technical term. Just like the coax cable installed in your house 20 years ago before arrival of digital still works today.
post #16385 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by rich3fan View Post

I think I may just invest in an antenna in the event things like what happened to mproper's neck of the woods happens in my market. I already have an old non-digital antenna in the attic; cabling is already in place for the most part so it would just be a matter of swapping in a new digital antenna.

Ummm... your "non-digital" antenna will work fine. No need to get a "digital" antenna...
post #16386 of 17507
Looks like I better visit "The Official AVS Antenna Topic" thread huh?
post #16387 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by davelanger View Post

I too get macroblocking on fast moving scenes with Fios. I also got it with comcast as well. It does not happen on bluray movies, DVDS or video games though.

Has anyone been able to fix it that had it before?

This is what happens when you shoehorn in a 15-year-old codec that wasn't designed with high definition in mind into your HD broadcasting standards. (MPEG-2)

MPEG-2 is ancient and awful; it's half as efficient as AVC/H.264/MPEG-4.

Typical American HDTV broadcasts are MPEG-2 at bitrates lower than 18 Mbps. This standard is uniform across over-the-air broadcasts and all cable providers including Verizon. MPEG-2 requires bitrates of 30+ Mbps for no macroblocking to occur; most FiOS channels are 12-17 Mbps. So yeah. It's a shitfest. But if you think that's bad, Comcast packs 3 HD channels to a QAM so all their channels are ~12 Mbps or less. At least Verizon still retains some HD channels at bitrates higher than 12. This is why HDNet and EPIX look better than other FiOS channels; they have bitrates of 17 Mbps.

H.264 is a great codec to solve this problem, but so far, only AT&T, Dish Network and DirecTV have embraced it. All their implementations are flawed.

AT&T U-verse is terrible as they re-encode all the distribution feeds, whether they're MPEG-2 or H.264, to H.264 at very low bitrates (5.7 Mbps) with awful encoder settings. They are easily the worst looking provider.

Dish Network is pretty bad as they re-encode everything to bitrates far too low as well, and reduce resolution to 1440x1080.

DirecTV seems to be improving. They do H.264 @ 7 Mbps. They may also be distributing some networks distributed natively in H.264 without re-encoding them further. On some channels, DirecTV could look better than FiOS. On other networks which are native MPEG-2 distributed though, FiOS wins. DirecTV also suffers from a pitiful HD channel lineup which doesn't look like it will be improving any time soon. They are as bad as Verizon when it comes to new HD channel additions.

And of course Blu-ray will always look flawless, as the typical Blu-ray utilizes bitrates 4 to 6 times higher than any American HDTV channel and utilizes the greatly superior AVC codec over MPEG-2. Blu-ray is your only salvation if you want good looking HD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by obxdiver View Post

Well I am the one who has been complaining about it on Food Network.
I also see it on Discovery, Nat Geo, History, TLC....

The Discovery networks - definitely a macroblock fest. I've seen Discovery Channel as low as 9 Mbps before here on FiOS. History - I'm skeptical of your claim. I've watched quite a bit of programming on this channel. FiOS's History feed is 720p MPEG-2 @ 17 Mbps - one of their highest bitrate channels. This higher bitrate combined with half the resolution of most other HD channels which are 1080i has resulted in no macroblocking that I've ever seen. Less detail and clarity since it's only 720p instead of 1080i, sure. But macroblocking? Nope.

The Scripps networks have always looked bad to me. I blame poor MPEG-2 encoders for this. Apparently they're distributed as H.264 so they must be re-encoded to MPEG-2 for distribution on FiOS.
post #16388 of 17507
The encoders used by Verizon for the Scripps channels are pretty lousy. The quality is better than the old days when those channels were distributed in low bitrate MPEG2, but there is still room for improvement. The quality on other MPEG4-distributed channels is much better - Viacom channels (Spike, VH1, MTV, Comedy, Nick, and CMT) all look good, and I've never seen any blocking on Disney stuff.
post #16389 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

This is what happens when you shoehorn in a 15-year-old codec that wasn't designed with high definition in mind into your HD broadcasting standards. (MPEG-2)

MPEG-2 is ancient and awful; it's half as efficient as AVC/H.264/MPEG-4.

Typical American HDTV broadcasts are MPEG-2 at bitrates lower than 18 Mbps. This standard is uniform across over-the-air broadcasts and all cable providers including Verizon. MPEG-2 requires bitrates of 30+ Mbps for no macroblocking to occur; most FiOS channels are 12-17 Mbps. So yeah. It's a shitfest. But if you think that's bad, Comcast packs 3 HD channels to a QAM so all their channels are ~12 Mbps or less. At least Verizon still retains some HD channels at bitrates higher than 12. This is why HDNet and EPIX look better than other FiOS channels; they have bitrates of 17 Mbps.

H.264 is a great codec to solve this problem, but so far, only AT&T, Dish Network and DirecTV have embraced it. All their implementations are flawed.

AT&T U-verse is terrible as they re-encode all the distribution feeds, whether they're MPEG-2 or H.264, to H.264 at very low bitrates (5.7 Mbps) with awful encoder settings. They are easily the worst looking provider.

Dish Network is pretty bad as they re-encode everything to bitrates far too low as well, and reduce resolution to 1440x1080.

DirecTV seems to be improving. They do H.264 @ 7 Mbps. They may also be distributing some networks distributed natively in H.264 without re-encoding them further. On some channels, DirecTV could look better than FiOS. On other networks which are native MPEG-2 distributed though, FiOS wins. DirecTV also suffers from a pitiful HD channel lineup which doesn't look like it will be improving any time soon. They are as bad as Verizon when it comes to new HD channel additions.

And of course Blu-ray will always look flawless, as the typical Blu-ray utilizes bitrates 4 to 6 times higher than any American HDTV channel and utilizes the greatly superior AVC codec over MPEG-2. Blu-ray is your only salvation if you want good looking HD.



The Discovery networks - definitely a macroblock fest. I've seen Discovery Channel as low as 9 Mbps before here on FiOS. History - I'm skeptical of your claim. I've watched quite a bit of programming on this channel. FiOS's History feed is 720p MPEG-2 @ 17 Mbps - one of their highest bitrate channels. This higher bitrate combined with half the resolution of most other HD channels which are 1080i has resulted in no macroblocking that I've ever seen. Less detail and clarity since it's only 720p instead of 1080i, sure. But macroblocking? Nope.

The Scripps networks have always looked bad to me. I blame poor MPEG-2 encoders for this. Apparently they're distributed as H.264 so they must be re-encoded to MPEG-2 for distribution on FiOS.

@scorpiontail60:
Thank you for the very detailed info. That is all I am looking for.
I suppose the "Scripps" networks are some of the channels I watch.
I will have to take a closer look at History channel.

Gentlemen: I am not a Direct TV employee. I just want my Fios to look good so I can cancel my D*
I will stop posting since everyone hates my posts
post #16390 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

The encoders used by Verizon for the Scripps channels are pretty lousy. The quality is better than the old days when those channels were distributed in low bitrate MPEG2, but there is still room for improvement. The quality on other MPEG4-distributed channels is much better - Viacom channels (Spike, VH1, MTV, Comedy, Nick, and CMT) all look good, and I've never seen any blocking on Disney stuff.

And what brand and model of encoders would that be? Are you saying they use different encoders for other mpeg4 channels?


Content providers that uplink in mpeg4 provide an IRD with built in transcoder which converts it to mpeg2 so there is no need for encoders.
post #16391 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

The encoders used by Verizon for the Scripps channels are pretty lousy. The quality is better than the old days when those channels were distributed in low bitrate MPEG2, but there is still room for improvement. The quality on other MPEG4-distributed channels is much better - Viacom channels (Spike, VH1, MTV, Comedy, Nick, and CMT) all look good, and I've never seen any blocking on Disney stuff.

I'm going to stray... just a bit... but I do believe encoders/equipment hamper PQ. I was shocked Sunday to see how much better the FOX NFL Pregame show looked compared to last year (always watch CBS pregame at noon). Picture was much sharper than I remembered...
post #16392 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by VARTV View Post

I'm going to stray... just a bit... but I do believe encoders/equipment hamper PQ. I was shocked Sunday to see how much better the FOX NFL Pregame show looked compared to last year (always watch CBS pregame at noon). Picture was much sharper than I remembered...

Everything along the chain (bandwith,encoders,decoders,camera,wiring,etc) the way to your tv affects picture quality
post #16393 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

DirecTV seems to be improving. They do H.264 @ 7 Mbps.

Bitrates can be higher than this.
post #16394 of 17507
How are you all getting bit rates out of moto boxes?
post #16395 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepaiii View Post

How are you all getting bit rates out of moto boxes?

Who says we're getting the bitrate information out of Verizon's boxes?

I use CableCARDâ„¢ tuners. My machine is currently equipped with 16 tuners and 20 terabytes of storage space.
post #16396 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyctveng View Post

And what brand and model of encoders would that be? Are you saying they use different encoders for other mpeg4 channels?


Content providers that uplink in mpeg4 provide an IRD with built in transcoder which converts it to mpeg2 so there is no need for encoders.

OK, so even if they're providing transcoders, the idea is still the same. ESPN was the most recent to transition to MPEG4 distribution and has the benefit of the best new devices, and their HD looks better now than it did as native MPEG2. Scripps went MPEG4 nearly 4 years ago. MPEG2 is still MPEG2, but processing power and memory have gotten ever cheaper and longer caching and better analysis of the video result in better quality at equivalent rates. Maybe they need to replace that IRD+transcoder with a newer one, or an IRD with a separate encoder.
post #16397 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by VARTV View Post

I'm going to stray... just a bit... but I do believe encoders/equipment hamper PQ. I was shocked Sunday to see how much better the FOX NFL Pregame show looked compared to last year (always watch CBS pregame at noon). Picture was much sharper than I remembered...

Because it was upconverted 480i in the past.
post #16398 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by crankerchick View Post

Look in the DVR settings for the show priorities and the "modify series" option for each series and change to "any time" instead of "this time slot" only. The wording may be different, i'm going off memory here.

Will do when I get home this week. Thanks, I sure hope that's there.
post #16399 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmschnur View Post

There are repeaters that plug in to your stb and be positioned away from the plasma signal.

The STB was in another room with just a CRT above it. I had to push it in under the TV by about 6 inches or so to get decent response. There was an incandescent on in the room at the time.

I confirmed a definite plasma response to the IR sensor. If I pull out the DVR to where the face is fully exposed to the plasma screen about 10' away, it kills the remote for periods of time. If I block the plasma with my body, control is restored.

So a pretty obvious effect, I would never have thought there would be an interfering IR component from the screen.

The STB is another matter, it has to be the incandescent. No problems with the TV or VCR in the very same spot as the STB.

Thanks.
post #16400 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

Who says we're getting the bitrate information out of Verizon's boxes?

I use CableCARD tuners. My machine is currently equipped with 16 tuners and 20 terabytes of storage space.

Jesus Christ! What do you do when you're NOT watching TV?
post #16401 of 17507
Just an FYI - Verizon and TC came to an agreement.

The channels are back on here in VHO8 this morning (592 for HD).

It may take a few days for everyone to get it back - but you should have it this week.

Same packages as previously.
post #16402 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

This is what happens when you shoehorn in a 15-year-old codec that wasn't designed with high definition in mind into your HD broadcasting standards. (MPEG-2)

MPEG-2 is ancient and awful; it's half as efficient as AVC/H.264/MPEG-4.

Typical American HDTV broadcasts are MPEG-2 at bitrates lower than 18 Mbps. This standard is uniform across over-the-air broadcasts and all cable providers including Verizon. MPEG-2 requires bitrates of 30+ Mbps for no macroblocking to occur; .................

It depends on the encoding. I have plenty of BD titles using MPEG2 at 19Mb/s that don't have a bunch of macroblocking.
MPEG 2 was picked as the broadcast standard a long time ago.
post #16403 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyoteaz View Post

Because it was upconverted 480i in the past.

That, I did not know... thanks!
post #16404 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepmatt View Post

Just an FYI - Verizon and TC came to an agreement.

The channels are back on here in VHO8 this morning (592 for HD).

It may take a few days for everyone to get it back - but you should have it this week.

Same packages as previously.

Do we have to reboot the stb to get this or will it come normally?
post #16405 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

It depends on the encoding. I have plenty of BD titles using MPEG2 at 19Mb/s that don't have a bunch of macroblocking.
MPEG 2 was picked as the broadcast standard a long time ago.

MPEG-2 was picked as the broadcast standard, before MPEG-4 existed. I'm not sure there was really any viable alternative back then.

Bluray is limited to about 40Mb/s unlike ATSC. The average bitrate of a BD film may be only 19mbs but during high complexity scenes its increased as needed. Most MPEG-2 BD's that I remember watching were pretty subpar in PQ compared to VC-1 or h.264 encodes, if I remember correctly. Butch Cassidy for example.

Still better than HDTV however.
post #16406 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmschnur View Post

Do we have to reboot the stb to get this or will it come normally?

I turned on my stb and TV, and tuned to the Tennis Channel just now. I'm in D/FW on VHO1. A couple of young hotties on court right now too.
post #16407 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeepmatt View Post

Just an FYI - Verizon and TC came to an agreement.

The channels are back on here in VHO8 this morning (592 for HD).

This is going to be the only HD channel Verizon adds this year...

Quote:
Originally Posted by lobosrul View Post

MPEG-2 was picked as the broadcast standard, before MPEG-4 existed. I'm not sure there was really any viable alternative back then.

Yes, but H.264 has been around since 2003. High definition broadcasting could have been switched to H.264 if providers and broadcasters weren't so cheap. Very few people were on board the bandwagon 8 years ago; switching the standards to being MPEG-4 based would have been expensive initially but it would have future-proofed America's broadcasting standards and resulted in very few people having obsolete MPEG-2 only equipment. As a result of this shortsightedness however we are all going to be stuck with MPEG-2 and ****ty HD for years to come. It's going to get worse before it gets better.

Europe started HDTV broadcasting later so they went with MPEG-4 right off the bat, and as a result, many European HDTV channels approach Blu-ray quality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronwt View Post

It depends on the encoding. I have plenty of BD titles using MPEG2 at 19Mb/s that don't have a bunch of macroblocking.
MPEG 2 was picked as the broadcast standard a long time ago.

They don't have a bunch of macroblocking, but I bet they still have artifacts, less detail, and less sharpness. Even H.264 isn't "perfect" at a bitrate of 19 Mb/s.
post #16408 of 17507
Just because the standard was finalized in 2003 doesn't mean it was possible to actually use it at that point. It takes time for hardware to be designed and built, and for that matter, it takes time for the transistor count to be possible at a reasonable cost. DirecTV didn't have H.264 going out to customers until late 2005, and didn't really get serious about it until 2007 when they came out with the DVR and a bunch of HD channels. 2007 is also when hardware H.264 decoding support started showing up in PC video cards. Would have been a real messy shutoff in 2009 with only a couple years of readily available decoding capability.
post #16409 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpiontail60 View Post

DirecTV seems to be improving. They do H.264 @ 7 Mbps. They may also be distributing some networks distributed natively in H.264 without re-encoding them further. On some channels, DirecTV could look better than FiOS. On other networks which are native MPEG-2 distributed though, FiOS wins. DirecTV also suffers from a pitiful HD channel lineup which doesn't look like it will be improving any time soon. They are as bad as Verizon when it comes to new HD channel additions.

And of course Blu-ray will always look flawless, as the typical Blu-ray utilizes bitrates 4 to 6 times higher than any American HDTV channel and utilizes the greatly superior AVC codec over MPEG-2. Blu-ray is your only salvation if you want good looking HD.

So the question is, is H.264@ 7Mbps better than MPEG2 @12-17Mbps. I'm guessing, in general, not. Perhaps at 12Mbps, but I have no idea how many channels are at that bitrate and which ones they are.

The other question is when FIOS will move to MPEG4. I believe that will require a total swap out of all 6xxx boxes, but I could be wrong.
post #16410 of 17507
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepaiii View Post

How are you all getting bit rates out of moto boxes?

I use a tablespoon.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Programming
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Programming › Verizon FiOS HDTV