Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfa 
jagouar: if you honestly believe DirecTV will be undercut on price, you have just totally failed to do research on any Rupert Murdoch operation.
Once the scale is there to go national, he will be advertising on a national basis, something it will take Verizon years to come close to.
If I lived in Killen, TX, (or Long Island!) I would have signed up for FiOS months ago. It seems like a good deal.
But to seriously believe Murdoch will be undersold is to totally ignore his history on at least three continents.

jagouar: if you honestly believe DirecTV will be undercut on price, you have just totally failed to do research on any Rupert Murdoch operation.
Once the scale is there to go national, he will be advertising on a national basis, something it will take Verizon years to come close to.
If I lived in Killen, TX, (or Long Island!) I would have signed up for FiOS months ago. It seems like a good deal.
But to seriously believe Murdoch will be undersold is to totally ignore his history on at least three continents.
When is the last time ANY DBS has EVER DROPPED prices? (voom comes to mind but that wasnt really a drop in prices). I dont remember one ever. I know all about ruperts past and not saying it wont happen but right now fios looks like the better option (even with all the sats going up for anybody in a fios deployed area). If they keep current pricing they wont compete. My point was they will have to if they want to stay competative with fios. And Keller, TX is the test market for fios TV. Hopefully our new teleom deal will get fios deployed heavily in TX now.
Quote:
2 million subs (last figure I saw posted here) wont keep D* in the black. I really think alot of people overstate how much ST means to D*'s bottom line. Yes those are important subs but 2 million isnt that many in the grand scheme of things. 85% of D*'s own subs dont even sub to ST.

















