AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread - Page 561

post #16801 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusGus748s View Post

Nice set up. You just gave me a few ideas. What brand / model subs?

I think those are Epik Empires. Not available any more. Epik be kaput.
post #16802 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobLee View Post

Good price on the Rti6's. You would not be disappointed. I too am not familiar with vintage Polk models, but I do use Rti6's with a Csi3 in the family room for TV viewing and light music with Rti4 surrounds and a smallish Klipsch 8" sub and it all works very well. $200 was NewEgg's closeout price on the Rti6's before they sold out.

I think I lost my chance for the 6's. Right after posting abt the Fry's deal today, I went back and checked and they are now listed as "Will back-order" or something to that effect. I would think that translates to "never" as I'm not sure how you backorder something that's not being made any more. 4's still available for immediate shipment. In any case, this weekend's surprise sewer line back-up into my basement - which is also my bedroom - has eaten my discretionary funds for February, at least until the insurance claim comes through.

I may take a risk and bid on a second-hand pair of the 6's I saw at auction for stupid cheap. They're listed as "like new" by a seller with limited but almost all positive feedback. I want!!!

Thanks much to RobLee and XStanleyX for the input. The Epik situation certainly seems sketchy. I'll have to evaluate what my current sub sounds like with the new fronts and center and then decide about the RW-12D in a few months.
post #16803 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by GusGus748s View Post

Nice set up. You just gave me a few ideas. What brand / model subs?

Thank you very much, Stanley called it, Epik Empires, VERY impressive dual 15" sealed subs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by XStanleyX View Post

I think those are Epik Empires. Not available any more. Epik be kaput.

WHAT?????? Say it isn't so. I noticed the site is up but no inventory. Surely they aren't a thing of the past!?
post #16804 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

Thank you very much, Stanley called it, Epik Empires, VERY impressive dual 15" sealed subs.
WHAT?????? Say it isn't so. I noticed the site is up but no inventory. Surely they aren't a thing of the past!?

Sure looks that way. He has not responded to phone calls or e-mails since he sold his last sub. No customer support at all. Really sucks for the folks who own them.
post #16805 of 18697
Bummer, wonder what the deal is?
post #16806 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

Bummer, wonder what the deal is?

Dunno, he just pulled the plug and won't communicate with any one. No update on his web site or anything. Bad way to handle things. You'd think he would at least say adios amigos.
post #16807 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by XStanleyX View Post

Sure looks that way. He has not responded to phone calls or e-mails since he sold his last sub. No customer support at all. Really sucks for the folks who own them.

Yeah, it appears no longer to be in business. Too bad. Not having any type of support sucks as well.
post #16808 of 18697
Hi all. What are everyone's opinions of the Rti A5's? Particularly used as a set of stereo only speakers.
post #16809 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinmscs View Post

Thank you all for your inputs. I think i will stick with the R300 then. I dont think surrounds would require much either but since the M60 are hard to find now i just wanted to make sure i get your advice. I got the R300 for $100 a pair 2 weeks ago and my setup is M70 fronts, CS2, R300 surrounds, and PSW505 powered by Denon 3311. Btw i cannot use bookshelf in my room just because of the wiring/mount issue.

Ah ha! That's a very respectable set up. Here's another wrench for you; go ahead and get the M60's as well, to accommodate your M70's.

70's as mains, 60's as wides, that is, if you can run a 7.1 set up.

I've tried heights, rears and wides. To my surprise and delight, the wides (set up in DSX configuration) deliver so much sound that it literally doubles your front sound stage. Some have told my set up is overkill, my motto is; too much is NEVER enough and.....once you've heard a properly set up wide config, you never go back :-)

What would that look like???? So glad you asked;

huge +1 for considering the 60s for 'wides' duty. I am currently running 60s for wides with 70s as mains, with cs2 center and 40's rounding out the surrounds. the front 5 are powered off an xpa-5 with my onk 809 powering the surrounds. audyssey dsx technology surely provides a very impressive and immerse soundsage with the inclusion of the wides. granted it is not discreet info found in proper 7.1 encoded content, it is still very very satisfying and I recommend it to anyone with the space and power to pull it off.
post #16810 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndersShadow View Post

Used both floor-standers and bookshelves as surrounds. Personally given the surrounds are supposed to be 2-3 feet above your ears when seated, bookshelves fit that mold better. Does that mean you will like em better, only you can tell.

For me I have LSi F/X surrounds right now. But if I were to stumble into another set of LSi 15's I cant say I wouldn't give it a try\ with them as surrounds.

Mostly the surrounds dont produce tons of sound requiring lots of drivers, but if you dont have a sub or have a less than decent one, you can cross floorstanders over lower normally so you would be able to better augment the bass your sub isnt producing.

depends on what standard you are going by. dolby says surrounds should be at ear level or slightly above. thx recommends surrounds should be 2 - 3 ft above ear level. I prefer dolby's recommendation for my set up and have the tweeter of my 40's about .5 ft above ear level when seated, as I find it provides better directionality of surround effects coming from the surround speakers while still maintaining enough ambiance to not be overwhelming. While thx's recommendation of 2-3 ft above ear level works, I find that I loose the directionality of surround effects and gain a more ambient feel for the surround content. I also find it odd to have the effects coming from above me rather then beside me...kinda hard to explain...but when I did experiment with placing my monitor 40 surrounds close to 3 ft above ear level it presented me with a weird sense of sound effects "beaming" down on me rather then surrounding me like I get when using dolby's recommended placement....as always though, your mileage may vary.

fwiw, i too have ran towers and bookies as surrounds, and i actually prefer towers, especially when listening to multichannel music. however in my experience it is easier to get bookshelf speakers to the proper height over towers.

disclaimer: wife and i were new couch shopping and she fell in love with a great couch with corner piece and sectional that was just delivered this past Friday (it really is a great couch, has recliners and rockers built in as well as cup holders and is super comfy) ...but it has high backs and now the corner piece blocks one of my surrounds so I am going to have to raise it....maybe I can learn to like the thx style recommendation....or....i donno....i am not sure what I am going to do just yet. ahhh the joys of compromising when one has a significant other and a HT room that doubles as a proper living room....tongue.gif
post #16811 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67jason View Post

depends on what standard you are going by. dolby says surrounds should be at ear level or slightly above. thx recommends surrounds should be 2 - 3 ft above ear level. I prefer dolby's recommendation for my set up and have the tweeter of my 40's about .5 ft above ear level when seated, as I find it provides better directionality of surround effects coming from the surround speakers while still maintaining enough ambiance to not be overwhelming. While thx's recommendation of 2-3 ft above ear level works, I find that I loose the directionality of surround effects and gain a more ambient feel for the surround content. I also find it odd to have the effects coming from above me rather then beside me...kinda hard to explain...but when I did experiment with placing my monitor 40 surrounds close to 3 ft above ear level it presented me with a weird sense of sound effects "beaming" down on me rather then surrounding me like I get when using dolby's recommended placement....as always though, your mileage may vary.

fwiw, i too have ran towers and bookies as surrounds, and i actually prefer towers, especially when listening to multichannel music. however in my experience it is easier to get bookshelf speakers to the proper height over towers.

disclaimer: wife and i were new couch shopping and she fell in love with a great couch with corner piece and sectional that was just delivered this past Friday (it really is a great couch, has recliners and rockers built in as well as cup holders and is super comfy) ...but it has high backs and now the corner piece blocks one of my surrounds so I am going to have to raise it....maybe I can learn to like the thx style recommendation....or....i donno....i am not sure what I am going to do just yet. ahhh the joys of compromising when one has a significant other and a HT room that doubles as a proper living room....tongue.gif

Placement of rear surrounds is sometimes dependent upon WAF..If I had my druthers, my center channel would be mounted to the molding above the TV. I tried the DSX setup a few months ago, liked it, but went back to my old setup. I might give DSX another shot today before the stupor bowl.

old DSX setup
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

I relocated the rear channels to they are aimed directly at the main listening position with the tweeters of the 60's at ear level. I found that inverting a few dvd spindles works ok to support and rasie the 60's to the same height as my 70's. I prefer the towers for a rear surround stage over bookshelf speakers for DVD audio and movies too. My placement options are limited due to the size of the LR. The surround rear speakers are 5 ft from the mlp. Jason, you might be interested in the new remiix of 2112 from Rush - might be worth a listen. Some other bands that mix in 5.1- Porcupine Tree, Donald Fagen....

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/blog/2013/01/25/2112-51-0

right surround


left surround

Edited by myoda - 2/3/13 at 6:52am
post #16812 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

Not a thing. BTW, bass traps don't trap bass. They trap midbass,100Hz and higher, mostly higher. They're called bass traps because what we perceive as 'boomy' bass occurs in the region from 100 to 200Hz. For a trap to function effectively below 100Hz it would have to be a few feet thick.
A wise one you are. Yes, bass does not actually travel though walls etc. It causes objects to vibrate, and those objects transfer those vibrations to the air on the other side; that air mass in turn also vibrates, passing the sound along to eardrums on the other side. When we say that sound travels through objects it's a major oversimplification of the actual process. But when the vast majority don't grasp the concepts of how sound works even when those concepts are greatly simplified it usually serves no purpose to further confuse the issue with facts.

One common example of how this works is the passing car with a sub cranked, and the one-note booming that you hear. It's not because the sub is making a one-note boom. It's because you're not hearing the sub, you're hearing the sound created by the vibration of the car body, said vibration created by the output of the sub inside the car. Since the car has a single resonant frequency what you mostly hear is that resonant frequency. The rest of the frequencies created by the sub are there, but due to precedence effect you don't hear them, being drowned out by the resonant frequency output of the car body. To a great extent this is duplicated in a room to room scenario. It's not as obvious in adjoining rooms, as there are sound pathways for other frequencies to travel from room to room. It's quite obvious in rooms up or downstairs from the sub, where the resonant frequency of the floor or ceiling will dominate.

You guys are way too smart smile.gif Glad I'm here to learn.

Thanks for the great info.
post #16813 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by XStanleyX View Post

Dunno, he just pulled the plug and won't communicate with any one. No update on his web site or anything. Bad way to handle things. You'd think he would at least say adios amigos.

Not the first time its happened IIRC. Before the empire came out all his subs were discontinued for about a year and then the Empires just showed up. Hopefully again they will emerge again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67jason View Post

depends on what standard you are going by. dolby says surrounds should be at ear level or slightly above. thx recommends surrounds should be 2 - 3 ft above ear level. I prefer dolby's recommendation for my set up and have the tweeter of my 40's about .5 ft above ear level when seated, as I find it provides better directionality of surround effects coming from the surround speakers while still maintaining enough ambiance to not be overwhelming. While thx's recommendation of 2-3 ft above ear level works, I find that I loose the directionality of surround effects and gain a more ambient feel for the surround content. I also find it odd to have the effects coming from above me rather then beside me...kinda hard to explain...but when I did experiment with placing my monitor 40 surrounds close to 3 ft above ear level it presented me with a weird sense of sound effects "beaming" down on me rather then surrounding me like I get when using dolby's recommended placement....as always though, your mileage may vary.

fwiw, i too have ran towers and bookies as surrounds, and i actually prefer towers, especially when listening to multichannel music. however in my experience it is easier to get bookshelf speakers to the proper height over towers.

disclaimer: wife and i were new couch shopping and she fell in love with a great couch with corner piece and sectional that was just delivered this past Friday (it really is a great couch, has recliners and rockers built in as well as cup holders and is super comfy) ...but it has high backs and now the corner piece blocks one of my surrounds so I am going to have to raise it....maybe I can learn to like the thx style recommendation....or....i donno....i am not sure what I am going to do just yet. ahhh the joys of compromising when one has a significant other and a HT room that doubles as a proper living room....tongue.gif

I agree for multichannel the towers are good. I also agree that where you put em depends on which standard you use.

I have my LSi F/X's up 3 feet above ear level both due to WAF and also just because IMHO they sounded a bit better up there (but didnt have a choice if they didnt anyway so maybe it was a placebo effect eek.gif). That and my couch is a high back one and if the surrounds were ear level they would have some of the sound blocked anyway. That and with how far the speakers stick out on the sides I would constantly be running into em lol.....

Regardless as with all things audio YMMV and it only matters how it sounds to you biggrin.gif
post #16814 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

In light of your statement, is it safe to say that I can reduce the overall "sound" by installing bass traps and "L" shaped sheets of foam where the ceiling and wall meet?
Before you fix anything make sure it's broken. You use bass traps to reduce midbass boom; how and why is very well explained here:
http://www.realtraps.com/articles.htm

This applies to what you hear in the listening room, not to the passage of sound into adjacent rooms. Most of that occurs in the longer wavelength lower frequencies below where bass traps work, so bass traps will have little to no effect on that.
post #16815 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by myoda View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67jason View Post

depends on what standard you are going by. dolby says surrounds should be at ear level or slightly above. thx recommends surrounds should be 2 - 3 ft above ear level. I prefer dolby's recommendation for my set up and have the tweeter of my 40's about .5 ft above ear level when seated, as I find it provides better directionality of surround effects coming from the surround speakers while still maintaining enough ambiance to not be overwhelming. While thx's recommendation of 2-3 ft above ear level works, I find that I loose the directionality of surround effects and gain a more ambient feel for the surround content. I also find it odd to have the effects coming from above me rather then beside me...kinda hard to explain...but when I did experiment with placing my monitor 40 surrounds close to 3 ft above ear level it presented me with a weird sense of sound effects "beaming" down on me rather then surrounding me like I get when using dolby's recommended placement....as always though, your mileage may vary.

fwiw, i too have ran towers and bookies as surrounds, and i actually prefer towers, especially when listening to multichannel music. however in my experience it is easier to get bookshelf speakers to the proper height over towers.

disclaimer: wife and i were new couch shopping and she fell in love with a great couch with corner piece and sectional that was just delivered this past Friday (it really is a great couch, has recliners and rockers built in as well as cup holders and is super comfy) ...but it has high backs and now the corner piece blocks one of my surrounds so I am going to have to raise it....maybe I can learn to like the thx style recommendation....or....i donno....i am not sure what I am going to do just yet. ahhh the joys of compromising when one has a significant other and a HT room that doubles as a proper living room....tongue.gif

Placement of rear surrounds is sometimes dependent upon WAF..If I had my druthers, my center channel would be mounted to the molding above the TV. I tried the DSX setup a few months ago, liked it, but went back to my old setup. I might give DSX another shot today before the stupor bowl.

old DSX setup
CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 100

I relocated the rear channels to they are aimed directly at the main listening position with the tweeters of the 60's at ear level. I found that inverting a few dvd spindles works ok to support and rasie the 60's to the same height as my 70's. I prefer the towers for a rear surround stage over bookshelf speakers for DVD audio and movies too. My placement options are limited due to the size of the LR. The surround rear speakers are 5 ft from the mlp. Jason, you might be interested in the new remiix of 2112 from Rush - might be worth a listen. Some other bands that mix in 5.1- Porcupine Tree, Donald Fagen....

http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/blog/2013/01/25/2112-51-0

right surround


left surround

nice set up...i miss running my 60's as surrounds, even though they are superb as wides in my current configuration. when i moved into my new place several months ago, it just wasn't going to work layout wise with the 60's as surrounds....even more so now with my new couch, they just aren't tall enough. But when i did it in my old house it was great. I also used the cd spindles to raise them up a bit and they worked perfect.

thanks for the multi-channel music reco's. I have only recently begun collecting sacd's and dvd-a's....as I only got a player that can play them about 6-8 months ago...a couple of months before I moved....Amazingly enough I haven't purchased any rush multi channel music yet, but plan to real soon. I've always liked them well enough.
post #16816 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67jason View Post

huge +1 for considering the 60s for 'wides' duty. I am currently running 60s for wides with 70s as mains, with cs2 center and 40's rounding out the surrounds. the front 5 are powered off an xpa-5 with my onk 809 powering the surrounds. audyssey dsx technology surely provides a very impressive and immerse soundsage with the inclusion of the wides. granted it is not discreet info found in proper 7.1 encoded content, it is still very very satisfying and I recommend it to anyone with the space and power to pull it off.

Awesome!! Someone else that has discovered the awesomeness of the wide theater! Jason, we have similar gear; I run the 807 with an XPA-2 and 3. It's amazing how much sound comes from a wide tower isn't it? Btw, I know you've recently acquired your amp, quite a nice marriage to your 809 huh?

When I first got my A9's, I had my 70's in surround and 40's in wide, when I swapped those two, WOW, what an immediate difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

Before you fix anything make sure it's broken. You use bass traps to reduce midbass boom; how and why is very well explained here:
http://www.realtraps.com/articles.htm

This applies to what you hear in the listening room, not to the passage of sound into adjacent rooms. Most of that occurs in the longer wavelength lower frequencies below where bass traps work, so bass traps will have little to no effect on that.

Bill, thank you so much for your information and provided link, which I will be getting my read on here shortly.

What can I do?????? I'm recently moved from my glorious cave and into a house converted into a duplex with my neighbors above me. I realize I won't be able to keep my LF from intruding above however, my goal is to try and at least dampen the sound if any, and I was hoping by adding bass traps and angled foam (72"x 48") on four walls and the ceiling, I could come close. Is there anything else I could attempt?
post #16817 of 18697
^^^ I had originally planned on getting the xpa-2 but when I was ready to buy emo was sold out, so I got the xpa-5 instead. I still might get the xpa-2 when emo has their next sale, likely this summer. That way I will be more then prepared for whatever speakers I upgrade to in the next year or two....or three...

The rtia's are on the short list, there are also some kef speakers I really like....then of course there is the lsim series as well....but alas speaker upgrading will have to wait for now.
post #16818 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67jason View Post

huge +1 for considering the 60s for 'wides' duty. I am currently running 60s for wides with 70s as mains, with cs2 center and 40's rounding out the surrounds. the front 5 are powered off an xpa-5 with my onk 809 powering the surrounds. audyssey dsx technology surely provides a very impressive and immerse soundsage with the inclusion of the wides. granted it is not discreet info found in proper 7.1 encoded content, it is still very very satisfying and I recommend it to anyone with the space and power to pull it off.
So the wides stay parallel to the fronts but further to the sides, correct? If so i need to see if i even have the space first.
post #16819 of 18697
Wides should be placed roughly 60* angle from the main listening position. They can be on the same plane as the mains or pulled toward some. You can also toe them in like you would with your mains if you are unable to place at a 60* angle. They should be placed at approx the distance from your mains as your mains are from the center speaker.
post #16820 of 18697
I knew there was a reason I watch the Super Bowl. Beyonce. Wow, one hot chick.
post #16821 of 18697
Guys, I have asked before but really didnt get a lot of info.

I currently have RTiA3's that will be my Rear Surrounds in my 7.1. I am wondering if getting the FXi6's would be better. I have heard that bi-di poles are better for Surrounds, but the same guy said he likes directional speakers over bi/di's as rear surrounds . Anyone have any experience with those setups. (bi-di's in REAR surrounds and Directional in Rear surrounds) Thanks
post #16822 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisu7582 View Post

Guys, I have asked before but really didnt get a lot of info.

I currently have RTiA3's that will be my Rear Surrounds in my 7.1. I am wondering if getting the FXi6's would be better. I have heard that bi-di poles are better for Surrounds, but the same guy said he likes directional speakers over bi/di's as rear surrounds . Anyone have any experience with those setups. (bi-di's in REAR surrounds and Directional in Rear surrounds) Thanks

I think it's just a matter of preference, the room and where you can mount them. I know, I ain't much help.
post #16823 of 18697
Well I am building my house so I can mount them any way thats possible.

I think the FXiA6's would look better mounted on the wall than the A3's on a suspended shelf. I just want what will produce the best sound. Remember, my room is huge. 24x36 with a 15ft.faulted ceiling with speakers in living room, opening up to dining and kitchen.

(BTW, got my A9's in the other day from FED EX eek.gif , it looked like they got dropped off the truck running 90mph going down a bumpy dirt road in West Virgina, holes all in the box, corner dented so bad when I opened it up, the styrofoam peice surrounding the top was broke in 4 places. Very, very bad!! Luckily speakers looked great. Never did hook up though!)
post #16824 of 18697
Yeah, I've had boxes look like that too. FedEx has been the worst. Luckily no damage to the contents. At least so far. I would not mind trying those FXi6's myself but I have other fish I gotta fry first.
post #16825 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by XStanleyX View Post

Yeah, I've had boxes look like that too. FedEx has been the worst. Luckily no damage to the contents. At least so far. I would not mind trying those FXi6's myself but I have other fish I gotta fry first.

Yeah, My A3's are at my stepdads so I might just pull the trigger on the FXi's and see what happens. I will just sell the ones I dont use at a discounted price. lol

Maybe someone will come along that has experience with FXi's as well as A3's
post #16826 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff4RFC View Post

What can I do?????? I'm recently moved from my glorious cave and into a house converted into a duplex with my neighbors above me. I realize I won't be able to keep my LF from intruding above however, my goal is to try and at least dampen the sound if any, and I was hoping by adding bass traps and angled foam (72"x 48") on four walls and the ceiling, I could come close. Is there anything else I could attempt?
Six inches of concrete is one option. There's no easy way to stop bass, and the effective methods all involve major structural alterations. Foam, forget about it. If it won't stop a 9mm round it won't stop a 40 foot wavelength.
post #16827 of 18697
I have Fxi6's and RtiA3's setup right now on our little family room system for TV and light music. I'm hoping in our new place which is "wide friendly" to use the Fxi6's as rears, as is shown in my sig. I don't think there will be a way to use them as surrounds as the room is very wide, but I may use the A7's as wides rather than surrounds when we move there, though that may be a few years off. Right now we're renting out the place until we retire.

Also, speaking of walls and bass... I'm hoping that the concrete block construction of the condo will minimize the transfer of most of the LFE from the neighbors. The wall behind the HT backs up to a storage room, so I'm not afraid of that. But based on what Bill has stated here, I'm concerned that the LFE may travel thru the opposing walls and thru the bedrooms and into the adjacent neighbor's bedrooms. Only time will tell.
post #16828 of 18697
Here's the floor plan. The wall to the right will be mostly lined with AV equipment. The wall to the right of the powder room and closet will be bookshelves for DVD/BD's and will house the rear speakers. Surrounds will likely be freestanding in the seating area. My concern is that bass sound waves may travel thru the bedroom into the neighbor's bedroom (mirror image floor plan) on the other side of the wall. It is concrete block, but you never know.

Grand3
post #16829 of 18697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Fitzmaurice View Post

Six inches of concrete is one option. There's no easy way to stop bass, and the effective methods all involve major structural alterations. Foam, forget about it. If it won't stop a 9mm round it won't stop a 40 foot wavelength.

Thanks again Bill. It's not the heavy bass I'm worried about, I've got my subs boxed and in the garage. I only run my towers at full during the day. But the overall sound I get from my speakers tweeters and mids is what I'd like to dampen. Would this be any different or is it a moot point? Is the sound just going to travel no matter what?
post #16830 of 18697
Can I please get some opinions of the Rti A5's???? Particularly for stereo playback of music without a sub.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread