AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread - Page 114

post #3391 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdaudioguy View Post

However, I'd ignore the part about brand names... copper wire, for the most part, is copper wire. ... My understanding of the brand name stuff at CC, BB, and the like, is that the sales people make a better commission on the accessories, so of course they're going to try to "sell" you on the merits of the brand name stuff.

+1

The general consensus is that "name brand" high cost cables are snake oil. See this thread for some pertinent discussion.

Also, since there seem to be quite a few posts related to setup issues, thought I'd pass on this link to an entire AVS forum that has a huge amount of great info available.
post #3392 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by skipsterut View Post

+1

The general consensus is that "name brand" high cost cables are snake oil. See this thread for some pertinent discussion.

Also, since there seem to be quite a few posts related to setup issues, thought I'd pass on this link to an entire AVS forum that has a huge amount of great info available.

oh man, my friend talked me into 10 guage from bluejeans for my back surrounds of 25ft. Did I screw up?
post #3393 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by arango1 View Post

oh man, my friend talked me into 10 guage from bluejeans for my back surrounds of 25ft. Did I screw up?

No. Larger guage wire doesn't hurt. It's just a bit more expensive and not necessary, and it's a bit harder to handle than smaller guage. But don't worry about it. If you already have it, just use it and you'll be fine.
post #3394 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by arango1 View Post

oh man, my friend talked me into 10 guage from bluejeans for my back surrounds of 25ft. Did I screw up?

What is your cost differential between 10 guage and 16 guage?
post #3395 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post

The "designer" offerings are for folks like yourself that want the small footprint or modern look. I'm sure they sound great, but I've never heard them. That said, the speaker cabinet design and larger driver/tweeters of the traditional speaker lines will offer better bass response and a richer midrange. There are some on going demos of the new VM line and RTi A line within the Club Polk crowd. Consensus is that the VM line is good, but not as good as the RTi As. How that translates to the RM50Ts I don't know.

My best recommendation is to audition each speaker if possible, then decide what suits your needs. Also, you will need a sub. If you stay in the Polk line, move up to the DSWs. Even the little DSW400 is head and shoulders better than the 303.

Ron - Thanks so much for your response! Tweeter has a pair of RTi10's for $479... VERY tempting, but the 17.5" depth is basically a no-go for me. The specs on the tweeters are the same as my RM50T's, and the four 4-1/2" drivers seem to deliver a great mid-range. The low end was my concern from the beginning...

From one of my earlier posts:

"When I bought these from Tweeter, I told the guy that they sounded pretty good, but I'd like to add a little low end to them... he offered me the Polk PSW303, a never-used floor model, for $80. I figured I couldn't go wrong at that price, but now I'm thinking it's a little lost in my rather bright, 18x25 sunroom. Any thoughts?

I also happen to own an Acoustic Research S112PS sub, which I've been using in a smaller room - about 12x12. Should I use the AR in the bigger room and the Polk in the smaller room? Or, should I buy another sub to use in the bigger room with the RM50T's?"

About the DSW400 you suggested, would it be better for me to stick with Polk? Or would the SVS PB10-NSD or the BIC Acoustech H100 that others have recently written about be a better choice? My interests lean toward music vs. movies. (I know -- all the more reason NOT to have bought the RM50T towers...)
post #3396 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilbo3660 View Post

What is your cost differential between 10 guage and 16 guage?

According to Blue Jeans Cable web site 10 gauge (Belden 5T00UP gray jacket) is $0.85 per ft -- so 100ft is $85.00 +S/H. According to the monoprice.com web site a 100 ft reel of 16 gauge is $15.36 + S/H. So the cost differential is about $70.00 per 100 ft.

(Note that if you need 10 gauge you can find it at lower cost from other vendors (e.g. Westlake Electronics has it for $0.76 per ft) Westlake also has 12 gauge (Belden 5000UE gray jacket) for $0.43 per ft. )
post #3397 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdaudioguy View Post

Ron - Thanks so much for your response! Tweeter has a pair of RTi10's for $479... VERY tempting, but the 17.5" depth is basically a no-go for me. The specs on the tweeters are the same as my RM50T's, and the four 4-1/2" drivers seem to deliver a great mid-range. The low end was my concern from the beginning...

From one of my earlier posts:

"When I bought these from Tweeter, I told the guy that they sounded pretty good, but I'd like to add a little low end to them... he offered me the Polk PSW303, a never-used floor model, for $80. I figured I couldn't go wrong at that price, but now I'm thinking it's a little lost in my rather bright, 18x25 sunroom. Any thoughts?

I also happen to own an Acoustic Research S112PS sub, which I've been using in a smaller room - about 12x12. Should I use the AR in the bigger room and the Polk in the smaller room? Or, should I buy another sub to use in the bigger room with the RM50T's?"

About the DSW400 you suggested, would it be better for me to stick with Polk? Or would the SVS PB10-NSD or the BIC Acoustech H100 that others have recently written about be a better choice? My interests lean toward music vs. movies. (I know -- all the more reason NOT to have bought the RM50T towers...)

If you like the RM50ts than stick with them. A great sub will fill in and blend with them nicely. I hate to bust your budget, but I think you need a little more beef than the PB10 in your large room. I'm getting uncomfortable recommending particular brands, there are so many great choices, but for a music first sub that's big enough for your room, I'd consider the Epik Valor.
post #3398 of 19111
I have the RTi8's along with RTi4's for my rears. And the CSi3 for the center speaker and what to upgrade the center one should I try to find the CSi5 or is there a newer model similar to this
post #3399 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by skipsterut View Post

No. Larger guage wire doesn't hurt. It's just a bit more expensive and not necessary, and it's a bit harder to handle than smaller guage. But don't worry about it. If you already have it, just use it and you'll be fine.

Thanks, I already see how much harder it is to work with. I don't regret getting them, they weren't extremely expensive from BlueJeans.
post #3400 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by daeagles View Post

I have the RTi8's along with RTi4's for my rears. And the CSi3 for the center speaker and what to upgrade the center one should I try to find the CSi5 or is there a newer model similar to this


I have a simlar set up...I have the FXi A4 instead of the RTi4's..and i love them...anyway, to respond to your post...if you can find a CSi5 get it...if not the newer model is CSiA6....But anyway, i understand where you are coming from the the CSi3..its a great center but if you have a bigger room i can see when it comes in a lil weak...im still adjusting everything to get the sound i really really really want..Im just waiting for my Sub to come in and then i can fully adjust
post #3401 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by skipsterut View Post

According to Blue Jeans Cable web site 10 gauge (Belden 5T00UP gray jacket) is $0.85 per ft -- so 100ft is $85.00 +S/H. According to the monoprice.com web site a 100 ft reel of 16 gauge is $15.36 + S/H. So the cost differential is about $70.00 per 100 ft.

(Note that if you need 10 gauge you can find it at lower cost from other vendors (e.g. Westlake Electronics has it for $0.76 per ft) Westlake also has 12 gauge (Belden 5000UE gray jacket) for $0.43 per ft. )

So the poster bought a much better gauge wire than needed and paid a lot more than he needed.
post #3402 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by daeagles View Post

I have the RTi8's along with RTi4's for my rears. And the CSi3 for the center speaker and what to upgrade the center one should I try to find the CSi5 or is there a newer model similar to this

I had the same set up. Sold my CSi3. I couldn't find a CSi5 so I ended up picking up an RTi A6. Front soundstage sounds wonderful. IMHO it's a near dead on match.
post #3403 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Temple View Post

If you like the RM50ts than stick with them. A great sub will fill in and blend with them nicely. I hate to bust your budget, but I think you need a little more beef than the PB10 in your large room. I'm getting uncomfortable recommending particular brands, there are so many great choices, but for a music first sub that's big enough for your room, I'd consider the Epik Valor.

Everything I've been reading about the RM50T towers (or not reading as the case may be) and ESPECIALLY what I've been hearing from them is that they are not the best choice for me for "music first." I went to Tweeter this evening and checked out a few options. Basically, their deal is you can trade up (within a year) to any pair of speakers that is 50% more than what you paid and receive full credit for the returned speakers. Not being flush with cash, I decided to bump up to the RTi10's that are on sale for $479 for the pair (buy 1 at that price, get 1 free). Since I paid $396 for the old speakers, I need to spend $594 on new speakers, so that means I need to spend at least $115 more...

Bottom line - What would be a good center channel speaker to pair with the RTi10's? Polk recommends the CSI5, but Tweeter only has the newer CSIA4. A good match?

Ron - I like your recommendation on the sub. I think I'm going to do without one for a little while, since the range on the RTi10s goes quite deep. Then, as soon as my little pockets become over-stuffed with cash , I'm going sub shopping! I'll be keeping my eyes on this thread to see what subs others might be using with the RTi10s. That Epik Valor seems to be a serious sub...
post #3404 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by skipsterut View Post

According to Blue Jeans Cable web site 10 gauge (Belden 5T00UP gray jacket) is $0.85 per ft -- so 100ft is $85.00 +S/H. According to the monoprice.com web site a 100 ft reel of 16 gauge is $15.36 + S/H. So the cost differential is about $70.00 per 100 ft.

Monoprice has a better price on no-name cable. (not saying it is better or worse than Belden, just not sure) If you pay under $1 per foot for decent gauge cable though, you are doing pretty good and I would not worry about it.

Michael
post #3405 of 19111
After a little more looking, this is the set up i may put together.

Fronts- 2 Polk Monitor 60's
Center Channel- CS1
Rears- Polk Monitor 30's or 40's
Sub- ? (no clue)

Now i also have been looking at the RTi8's, not sure i could afford putting together an RTi matching system though and still be able to get a decent receiver.

I was initially just going to use the Polk RM6880, and buy an expensive receiver (Yamaha 1800, Pioneer elite 94, or Denon 3808). And just get some better speakers down the road (all though i'm not sure i'd be able to for a while considering how much i would be spending on the receiver). But many people have been telling me i should get better speakers first and not worry about a high end receiver quite as much.

Would my set up above be good for everything, as in movies, games and music?
post #3406 of 19111
I agree with spending the bulk of the money on speakers, that's sort of a 'final' expense, in that one doesn't need to upgrade their speakers in the same way one needs to upgrade a receiver. Good speakers are a much more of an investment and thus much more worthy of a heavy hit to the budget. The MSRP of my speakers is 4X that of my receiver, just for reference.
post #3407 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by imeridian View Post

I agree with spending the bulk of the money on speakers, that's sort of a 'final' expense, in that one doesn't need to upgrade their speakers in the same way one needs to upgrade a receiver. Good speakers are a much more of an investment and thus much more worthy of a heavy hit to the budget. The MSRP of my speakers is 4X that of my receiver, just for reference.

Wow, what speakers and receiver do you have? If you dont mind me asking.
post #3408 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal83 View Post

After a little more looking, this is the set up i may put together.

Fronts- 2 Polk Monitor 60's
Center Channel- CS1
Rears- Polk Monitor 30's or 40's
Sub- ? (no clue)

Now i also have been looking at the RTi8's, not sure i could afford putting together an RTi matching system though and still be able to get a decent receiver.

I was initially just going to use the Polk RM6880, and buy an expensive receiver (Yamaha 1800, Pioneer elite 94, or Denon 3808). And just get some better speakers down the road (all though i'm not sure i'd be able to for a while considering how much i would be spending on the receiver). But many people have been telling me i should get better speakers first and not worry about a high end receiver quite as much.

Would my set up above be good for everything, as in movies, games and music?

What would i be losing going with the Monitor 60's vs the Monitor 70's?
And the CS1 vs the CS2?

And would it be worth it to break my budget and just go with RTi8's (would be very hard for me to do).

I just dont want to have to buy speakers again for a long time.
post #3409 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal83 View Post

Wow, what speakers and receiver do you have? If you dont mind me asking.

Four RTi A3s, a CSi A6, and a DSW Pro 600 subwoofer (I consider it a speaker anyway). MSRP is something like $2100 altogether, and the MSRP of my Yamaha 663 is $550. It's quite a nice combination and a dramatic step up from my Panasonic HTiB.

I think that it would be better to go for higher tier bookshelf speakers as opposed to lower tier floorstanders if the higher tier floorstanders are out due to budgetary consideration.
post #3410 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdaudioguy View Post

Everything I've been reading about the RM50T towers (or not reading as the case may be) and ESPECIALLY what I've been hearing from them is that they are not the best choice for me for "music first." I went to Tweeter this evening and checked out a few options. Basically, their deal is you can trade up (within a year) to any pair of speakers that is 50% more than what you paid and receive full credit for the returned speakers. Not being flush with cash, I decided to bump up to the RTi10's that are on sale for $479 for the pair (buy 1 at that price, get 1 free). Since I paid $396 for the old speakers, I need to spend $594 on new speakers, so that means I need to spend at least $115 more...

Bottom line - What would be a good center channel speaker to pair with the RTi10's? Polk recommends the CSI5, but Tweeter only has the newer CSIA4. A good match?

Ron - I like your recommendation on the sub. I think I'm going to do without one for a little while, since the range on the RTi10s goes quite deep. Then, as soon as my little pockets become over-stuffed with cash , I'm going sub shopping! I'll be keeping my eyes on this thread to see what subs others might be using with the RTi10s. That Epik Valor seems to be a serious sub...

That's a great price on the 10s and I think you'll enjoy the difference. The CSi5 is a very popular center and is getting hard to come by. The CSiA4 like the CSi3 will timbre match and sound great, though the 5 and A6 are a bit better. I used a CSi3 for a couple of years with R50s, RTi8s and then my SDAs. I had no complaints. In fact when I gave it a separate amp it was able to keep up without a problem. So settling on the smaller center shouldn't hurt.

Take your time on the sub and have some fun.
post #3411 of 19111
I just noticed that the Polk Monitor 70's can be had on amazon for $245 shipped. Would it be worth the extra $100 to buy 2 70's instead of 2 60's?
post #3412 of 19111
I listened to the 70's compared to the 60's in a Frys the other day and the difference is noticeable. There was little difference between the 50's and the 60's but the 70' have larger speakers so they produced more bass and sounded alot better. However the Frys person told me that they are discontinuing the Monitor series and coming out with something else that was in response to my question as to why the prices were falling and why some of them were gone from their website. Anyone else hear the Monitor series is going away?
post #3413 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by moparman390 View Post

I listened to the 70's compared to the 60's in a Frys the other day and the difference is noticeable. There was little difference between the 50's and the 60's but the 70' have larger speakers so they produced more bass and sounded alot better. However the Frys person told me that they are discontinuing the Monitor series and coming out with something else that was in response to my question as to why the prices were falling and why some of them were gone from their website. Anyone else hear the Monitor series is going away?

Sounds like they are being replaced by the TSi Seiries maybe? Ron posted this a while back. Click. I agree that there is a noticeable difference between the Monitor 70' and 60'.
post #3414 of 19111
Not sure if anyone has posted yet, but here are some links to info on the TSi Series:

TSi Series brochure in PDF format
http://www.polkaudio.com/downloads/c...TSi_Series.pdf

One-page product preview
http://www.polkaudio.com/downloads/p...sheets/TSi.pdf

Product Images
http://www.polkaudio.com/partners/sh...ome/TSi+Series
post #3415 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossg View Post

Sounds like they are being replaced by the TSi Seiries maybe? Ron posted this a while back. Click. I agree that there is a noticeable difference between the Monitor 70' and 60'.

First I've heard that the Monitors are going away. I was told that the TSi line was developed for Best Buy...something to differenciate themselves from CCs offerings. Frys maybe getting on board or trimming their lines. They dropped the LSis. It's a good question...someone should ask it over on CP.

Here's a link to the TSi catalog...

http://www.polkaudio.com/downloads/c...TSi_Series.pdf
post #3416 of 19111
Thanks for posting those links. At first glance, the TSi's look very similar to the Monitors. However, if you look a bit deeper, there are some pretty noteworthy changes.

The first is that all of the speakers in the line are 4-ohm rated. For the life of me, I can't see why they'd make their entry-level line 4-ohms. I think this could deter a lot of potential customers (if they knew what it meant). The towers are bottom-ported, which is just a difference, not necessarily better or worse. And the extension seems to be a few Hz lower. Of course there are the obvious cosmetic changes. I wonder what the actual retail prices might be?
post #3417 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmccully View Post

Thanks for posting those links. At first glance, the TSi's look very similar to the Monitors. However, if you look a bit deeper, there are some pretty noteworthy changes.

The first is that all of the speakers in the line are 4-ohm rated. For the life of me, I can't see why they'd make their entry-level line 4-ohms. I think this could deter a lot of potential customers (if they knew what it meant). The towers are bottom-ported, which is just a difference, not necessarily better or worse. And the extension seems to be a few Hz lower. Of course there are the obvious cosmetic changes. I wonder what the actual retail prices might be?

Nice catch on the 4 ohm rating, I missed it when I was looking yesterday. I can't imagine this line unable to be driven by an AVR...could be a misprint, I'll check. Regarding the porting and cabinets...it can make a huge difference in sound quality, even with the same parts. I would expect these to have some signigificant sound quality improvements over the Monitors. If the line is in fact 4 ohm, they've got new crossovers and maybe parts as well.
post #3418 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmccully View Post

Thanks for posting those links. At first glance, the TSi's look very similar to the Monitors. However, if you look a bit deeper, there are some pretty noteworthy changes.

The first is that all of the speakers in the line are 4-ohm rated. For the life of me, I can't see why they'd make their entry-level line 4-ohms. I think this could deter a lot of potential customers (if they knew what it meant). The towers are bottom-ported, which is just a difference, not necessarily better or worse. And the extension seems to be a few Hz lower. Of course there are the obvious cosmetic changes. I wonder what the actual retail prices might be?

Best Buy has them on the website as coming soon, you can see the prices.
If its true that the Monitor series are phasing out, i guess i outta grab some before they do. I dont think i can afford the RTi's, or the new TSi's. My budgets around $1000 for speakers but needs to include a sub.
post #3419 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal83 View Post

Best Buy has them on the website as coming soon, you can see the prices.
If its true that the Monitor series are phasing out, i guess i outta grab some before they do. I dont think i can afford the RTi's, or the new TSi's.

Thanks. BB has them listed as $460 for the TSi300, $650 for the TSi400, and $920 for the TSi500. These are the floorstanders that are most-related to the the Monitor 50/60/70, respectively. The TSi100 is $230, and the TSi200 is $350 (similar to Monitor 30/40). As for the centers, the CS10 is $200 and CS20 is $350. If these prices hold up as being the actual retail prices rather than MSRP, they will be a significant increase in price from the current Monitors. Given the magnitude of the price increases, I would predict and expect a performance increase.
post #3420 of 19111
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmccully View Post

Thanks. BB has them listed as $460 for the TSi300, $650 for the TSi400, and $920 for the TSi500. These are the floorstanders that are most-related to the the Monitor 50/60/70, respectively. The TSi100 is $230, and the TSi200 is $350 (similar to Monitor 30/40). As for the centers, the CS10 is $200 and CS20 is $350. If these prices hold up as being the actual retail prices rather than MSRP, they will be a significant increase in price from the current Monitors. Given the magnitude of the price increases, I would predict and expect a performance increase.

Yeah, thats to rich for my blood. I wouldnt be making a mistake though choosing Monitors over RTi's or TSi's would I?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Calling all Polkies:Official Polk thread