AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Definitive Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Definitive Owners Thread - Page 510

post #15271 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocksarkar View Post

My current setup...
bp7002 front l/r
clr2500 center
supercube1
bp2x
denon 3808ci
ps3 slim
samsung ln52b750

I was wondering if i need to buy a power amplifier. I am looking at Emotiva UPA-5 and what would be the advantage and disadvantage of having or not having...

advance thanks
rock.....

was kinda curious about this myself and was looking into a XPA-3 since I didn't think the surrounds needed to blast my doors off.. anyone out there with a set of BP7001SC's a CLR3000 and a power amp have any input? The surrounds are BPVX's but like I said I don't think i'd benefit from boosting the rears..
post #15272 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

was kinda curious about this myself and was looking into a XPA-3 since I didn't think the surrounds needed to blast my doors off.. anyone out there with a set of BP7001SC's a CLR3000 and a power amp have any input? The surrounds are BPVX's but like I said I don't think i'd benefit from boosting the rears..

good point i dont need to power surrounds and get xpa-3 ...now i need to wait and see if i really need to buy xpa-3 or denon 3808 is good enough for my setup. I highest volume i play on bluray movies are around -20
post #15273 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocksarkar View Post

I was wondering if i need to buy a power amplifier. I am looking at Emotiva UPA-5 and what would be the advantage and disadvantage of having or not having...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

was kinda curious about this myself and was looking into a XPA-3 since I didn't think the surrounds needed to blast my doors off.. anyone out there with a set of BP7001SC's a CLR3000 and a power amp have any input? The surrounds are BPVX's but like I said I don't think i'd benefit from boosting the rears..

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocksarkar View Post

good point i dont need to power surrounds and get xpa-3 ...now i need to wait and see if i really need to buy xpa-3 or denon 3808 is good enough for my setup. I highest volume i play on bluray movies are around -20

I think you guys might be confusing power with volume. Giving the speakers more power is not really something you do to make them louder. DefTech's are very efficient, so I think they perform very well driven by a typical AV receiver (like the 3808). On the other hand, many here who have moved to separates have reported improved performance. Ohjay, I run almost exactly the system you describe (my surrounds are BPVX/Ps) with two Anthem amps. An A2 drives the two front towers and an A5 drives everything else. I really like the bottomless noise floor and, for lack of a better way to describe it, the effortless dynamism of my system.

The obvious disadvantages with separates are the added cost, and the added complexity of more boxes and cabling.
post #15274 of 29423
I use 2 external amps to drive my 7 definitive spekers. A mcintosh 250x2 for the mains and a rotel 200x5 for the cc and surrounds. They are connected to a onkyo reciever that is rated at 110wpc. I did not go that route because I was not getting enough db's in the room. Mcintosh amps have a reputation as being a very musical amp, providing more detail. I believe this to be true. I got the rotel to help keep up with the mac. I think it provides more dynamic headroom then the amps in the onkyo. Just my unscientific opinion. I have heard good things about emotiva but know many dt owners who are perfectly happy using their receiver to power their system.
post #15275 of 29423
you're probly right in that i assumed more power would = rock arena for me. I guess I have to do more research on what benefits I'll receive.
post #15276 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

you're probly right in that i assumed more power would = rock arena for me. I guess I have to do more research on what benefits I'll receive.

my $0.02 with similar gear.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showp...ostcount=14747

i would absolutely give your BPVX better power as well.
post #15277 of 29423
I sure would appreciate your advice on this scenario. BTW, have a Denon 3808 AVR. I recently had a couple of techs in the home theater to install a screen and front PJ, and they also went about "rehooking" speakers, my beloved (about) seven year old Def Tech BP-2004 towers. Well, when the guy plugged one of the 2004's into the wall socket, it gave out a loud "POW !" The fuse was smoked, and the red light indicator for the amp would not come on, and consequently also the powered sub was not operating. Subsequent fuses installed burned as well. The tech said "Looks like you have a bad amp." He had inadvertently had the "volume" knob cranked all the way up...Def Tech hotline does not feel that was a problem, and the AVR to the speaker was NOT on. The other "speakers" in that unit are still OK and sound fine...just not the sub.
OK, so I have a one-bad BP-2004 that is over eight years old. Should I
(a) repair, or (b) buy a similar-7004, or (c) sell the pair as is, and go up to...whatever. I kind of like those side-firing subs in the towers, but on the negative ledger, I don't like the reflective piano-black top, and I do question the rear-firing speakers and the potential it may leave for second-sound reflection (???)
Also, I wonder just what actual (real world) sound improvement there is between similar models BP-2004 and updated BP-7004 ?
Oh, if I buy up, are there any recommended retailers that offer a fairly generous discount over the "Magnolia/Best Buy" go-to option?
Advice, please ! Thanks.
post #15278 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

was kinda curious about this myself and was looking into a XPA-3 since I didn't think the surrounds needed to blast my doors off.. anyone out there with a set of BP7001SC's a CLR3000 and a power amp have any input? The surrounds are BPVX's but like I said I don't think i'd benefit from boosting the rears..

I can hardly believe you just posed the above question... I have those exact same speakers (I even just upgraded the rears to BPVX's) and was toying with sending more wpc to increase sound output. I learned from experience that putting the receiver in bi-amp mode for the fronts is a bad choice. My receiver is an Onkyo "605" which is rated at 90 wpc, with all channels driven the sound seems choked. Just flipping bi-amp mode off yielded a remarkable improvement in sound quality and output. With some advice from my friend on www.avtruths.com I decided to try the multiple stereo receiver setup. So I ordered from amazon a Pyle Home PD1000A (2x200w stereo for $155) and an Onkyo TX-8555 (2x100 stereo for $250). So here was the setup... Using my samsung blu ray "3600" set to PCM as the source for all testing and I used the L and R rca preouts (not the front L and R outs the full signal L and R) plugged into the receiver being tested. I then connected my two "7001" towers as these have the capability to produce a full bandwidth reproduction. We ran a Corrine Bailey Ray cd, Norah Jones Live dvd, and the motorcycle scene from wolvorine origins blu ray. Then of course switched receivers and did the same thing. Let me first say that we (my friend was assisting) were completely blown away at what we heard from both stereos!! The amount of sound we heard from just those 2 towers was far more sound than my entire system has ever produced at one time, no exaggeration. Then on top of that the sound quality was thru the roof, I literally did not even know that my speakers could do what we were hearing. I definitely learned the power of using multiple power sources in stereo mode.

Onto what we found. Sound production for movie effects, voice reproduction, and instrumental reproduction was basically identical and top notch for both receivers. I did not expect this. We could not get the speakers to clip on either receiver even when turned up to the point that we had to cover our ears because of the spl's, still clean and sharp. There is no reason I would ever need to go beyond this i.e. 200wpc is obviously excessive when it comes from a clean power source, but now I know from experience. The only negative I had with the Onkyo compared to the Pyle was the price. I did have a couple of negatives with the Pyle, when listening at high levels there is a subtle hiss/static background noise that we noticed. Also, the Pyle has 2 fans and when there is not a lot of noise like in a dialogue instance they can be distracting, I can only imagine much noise fans for 3 of these receivers would make. The final negative for the Pyle was that there were no less than 40 bright blue lights on the front face and a lighted graphic equalizer that bounced up and down according to the sound thru put. I decided that the clean quietness of the Onkyo was worth and extra $95 per unit so I shipped back the Pyle and ordered 2 more onk's.

So now my system consists of one stereo controlling the fronts, one controlling the rears, and one controlling the center (I have 5.1 setup). And all the receivers receive input from the multi channel analog outs on the player. I will never run my speakers with a single multichannel receiver again. Having just put this together I would highly recommend matching output to the rears, well, all speakers for that matter. It's the reason I upgraded the rears from the bp2x because the sounds coming from those locations were not near the same level as what was happening across the front stage and therefore I couldn't really distinguish anything from them.

Sorry if I got a little wordy, in case you can't tell I'm a little excited about the new setup!
post #15279 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by WOLVERNOLE View Post

I sure would appreciate your advice on this scenario. BTW, have a Denon 3808 AVR. I recently had a couple of techs in the home theater to install a screen and front PJ, and they also went about "rehooking" speakers, my beloved (about) seven year old Def Tech BP-2004 towers. Well, when the guy plugged one of the 2004's into the wall socket, it gave out a loud "POW !" The fuse was smoked, and the red light indicator for the amp would not come on, and consequently also the powered sub was not operating. Subsequent fuses installed burned as well. The tech said "Looks like you have a bad amp." He had inadvertently had the "volume" knob cranked all the way up...Def Tech hotline does not feel that was a problem, and the AVR to the speaker was NOT on. The other "speakers" in that unit are still OK and sound fine...just not the sub.
OK, so I have a one-bad BP-2004 that is about seven years old. Should I
(a) repair, or (b) buy a similar-7004, or (c) sell the pair as is, and go up to...whatever. I kind of like those side-firing subs in the towers, but on the negative ledger, I don't like the reflective piano-black top, and I do question the rear-firing speakers and the potential it may leave for second-sound reflection (???)
Also, I wonder just what actual (real world) sound improvement there is between similar models BP-2004 and updated BP-7004 ?
Oh, if I buy up, are there any recommended retailers that offer a fairly generous discount over the "Magnolia/Best Buy" go-to option?
Advice, please ! Thanks.

First, don't try to match a 7004 with a 2004. Your fronts need to match.....period. So that eliminates your "Option (B)." Repair is certainly an option if you like the 2004s and you can get a new amp at reasonable cost. Selling them as-is would seriously diminish their value, since one is busted (and these things are a PITA to ship).

But the more salient point may be that you don't necessarily like bipolars all that well. Maybe you should consider looking at something else rather that other DefTechs that will have the same qualities.
post #15280 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideofpotatos View Post

I decided to try the multiple stereo receiver setup. So I ordered from amazon a Pyle Home PD1000A (2x200w stereo for $155) and an Onkyo TX-8555 (2x100 stereo for $250). So here was the setup...
.......
So now my system consists of one stereo controlling the fronts, one controlling the rears, and one controlling the center (I have 5.1 setup). And all the receivers receive input from the multi channel analog outs on the player.

You're driving your system with three different receivers? Why didn't you just get amps?
post #15281 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by progprog View Post

First, don't try to match a 7004 with a 2004. Your fronts need to match.....period. So that eliminates your "Option (B)." Repair is certainly an option if you like the 2004s and you can get a new amp at reasonable cost. Selling them as-is would seriously diminish their value, since one is busted (and these things are a PITA to ship).

But the more salient point may be that you don't necessarily like bipolars all that well. Maybe you should consider looking at something else rather that other DefTechs that will have the same qualities.

Thanks prog-
I may check out other manufacturers that are NOT bi-polar, but have side-firing sub built-in. I know Paradigm Monitor 11 was that sort of build. Any knowledge of this or others?
post #15282 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by badgerpilot View Post

You may also want to consider the 450's. Here is a link to a new pair on ebay. Combine with the 8% Bing and you have a very sweet deal. I am tempted even though I don't need them I don't see how you can improve on the BPX's though unless you go to the BPVX IMO. I really like the BPX's for surround. Even mounted high, I get very good dispersion.

You may be right about the BPX's, it was just that there has been some discussion about direct radiating speakers for the backs providing a better soundfield. I certainly enjoy my Def Techs and have gone to a great deal of trouble installing a pair of BPX's on my ceiling for my side surrounds .
post #15283 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by progprog View Post

You're driving your system with three different receivers? Why didn't you just get amps?

Yes, they are only stereo (2 channel) receivers and not 7.1 channel receivers, you might call them stereo amplifiers The main reason I got these instead of amps is that my onkyo "605" receiver does not have multi channel analog outputs. I searched high and low for "line output converters" for home audio so I could turn my speaker level outs into line outputs but nobody I've talked to in the HT world seems to have heard of such a thing except for car audio. So I could not find a way to get the "signal" from my receiver to an amp. I suppose I should have asked this before but does anybody know how to do this? (get a signal from my particular receiver to an amp)
post #15284 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideofpotatos View Post

Yes, they are only stereo (2 channel) receivers and not 7.1 channel receivers, you might call them stereo amplifiers The main reason I got these instead of amps is that my onkyo "605" receiver does not have multi channel analog outputs. I searched high and low for "line output converters" for home audio so I could turn my speaker level outs into line outputs but nobody I've talked to in the HT world seems to have heard of such a thing except for car audio. So I could not find a way to get the "signal" from my receiver to an amp. I suppose I should have asked this before but does anybody know how to do this? (get a signal from my particular receiver to an amp)

Sure, that makes sense. If your older receiver simply doesn't have the MCh pre-outs, it can't accommodate external amps.

But....and I'm not trying to judge or belittle your choices here.....since you had to buy new gear to be able to drive all the channels anyway, why not get one new receiver actually designed for your current setup, which is a home theater? Even a lower-end one would give you much better/easier system control, the full-range of audio decoding for all your current and future sources, some handy bells & whistles that can be very helpful in optimizing HT performance, and finally, those pre-outs that would allow you to add external amplification (while retaining central system control) any time you want.
post #15285 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by progprog View Post

Sure, that makes sense. If your older receiver simply doesn't have the MCh pre-outs, it can't accommodate external amps.

But....and I'm not trying to judge or belittle your choices here.....since you had to buy new gear to be able to drive all the channels anyway, why not get one new receiver actually designed for your current setup, which is a home theater? Even a lower-end one would give you much better/easier system control, the full-range of audio decoding for all your current and future sources, some handy bells & whistles that can be very helpful in optimizing HT performance, and finally, those pre-outs that would allow you to add external amplification (while retaining central system control) any time you want.

Thank you prog, you hit that right on the head. I knew going into this that I would be giving up a certain amount of control with my setup and I'm finding it to be a little tedious. I knew if it became too troublesome I could always add the type of receiver you mentioned to get back full control. I have been browsing for one but haven't found a way to get in for less than $600-700 and considering that I won't be using the speaker level outs I couldn't care less about it's power ratings, I've even been watching ebay for a "broken" receiver or some of the infamous overheaters that keep shutting off.

Any suggestions on finding a receiver with a decent "brain" and maybe has crappy power ratings I could use?
post #15286 of 29423
I have SuperCube I connected via LFE input to my receiver's LFE output. Are the low pass, high pass and phase alignment adjustments on the back of the sub disabled when using LFE input?

Regarding the Volume(Level) control, I have mine set to 50% for now as I'm testing various features of my speaker setup. I'm finding out that especially for movies I have to set it to about 70% to get a good effect with explosions, buildings falling, etc. I've never had a sub woofer and was wondering what sub volume level do most of you use. I know it's subjective and varies based on room, equipment, source material, etc., but what is your normal reference level from where you then individually adjust. I'm trying to make sure I'm within the norm.

Thank you.
post #15287 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by WOLVERNOLE View Post

I sure would appreciate your advice on this scenario. BTW, have a Denon 3808 AVR. I recently had a couple of techs in the home theater to install a screen and front PJ, and they also went about "rehooking" speakers, my beloved (about) seven year old Def Tech BP-2004 towers. Well, when the guy plugged one of the 2004's into the wall socket, it gave out a loud "POW !" The fuse was smoked, and the red light indicator for the amp would not come on, and consequently also the powered sub was not operating. Subsequent fuses installed burned as well. The tech said "Looks like you have a bad amp." He had inadvertently had the "volume" knob cranked all the way up...Def Tech hotline does not feel that was a problem, and the AVR to the speaker was NOT on. The other "speakers" in that unit are still OK and sound fine...just not the sub.
OK, so I have a one-bad BP-2004 that is over eight years old. Should I
(a) repair, or (b) buy a similar-7004, or (c) sell the pair as is, and go up to...whatever. I kind of like those side-firing subs in the towers, but on the negative ledger, I don't like the reflective piano-black top, and I do question the rear-firing speakers and the potential it may leave for second-sound reflection (???)
Also, I wonder just what actual (real world) sound improvement there is between similar models BP-2004 and updated BP-7004 ?
Oh, if I buy up, are there any recommended retailers that offer a fairly generous discount over the "Magnolia/Best Buy" go-to option?
Advice, please ! Thanks.

The statement, "my beloved... Def Techs" seems to indicate that there is something about the life-like sound stage of the bipolar design you like.
Good deals can be had with a phone call to authorized dealers as Dave41200 has suggested. Great deals can be had also, but they could have more risk... http://cgi.ebay.com/Definitive-Techn...item27adb3a66b
post #15288 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felton007 View Post

From Def Tech's site:
"Bipolar Surrounds are the Easiest to Use
Definitive's bipolar surrounds are designed for easy and unobtrusive placement in your room. Easy-to-use mounting plates are included for wall mounting. Positioning is non-critical; unlike dipolar surrounds, which are limited by their specific sidewall placement requirements, Definitive's bipolars may be located on the sides or rear of the room (or both as in 6.1 and 7.1 channel installations) or on the ceiling. They may be mounted on the rear wall (with their front drivers shooting towards each other and their rear drivers shooting toward the side walls) with excellent results."

Does that mean if I use a set of say BP30's for my rear surrounds, I should face the drivers toward the side walls and each other, not towards the front and rear?

You will find you get a slightly different effect depending on which orientation you use. In fact in the case of a BP tower you can face them in either directionthis is more a matter of preference as to which sounds best to your earsJ
Best Regards,
*
Adam Abramson
Definitive Technology
Customer Service Tech
post #15289 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by otk View Post

i would think even with the RCA input that it would go through the crossover to keep the mids and highs out of the sub

i calibrate my clr-3000 with avia which sends high frequencies pink noise to the center and then low frequency pink noise to the center (for adjusting built in subs)

using just speaker wire and all brass jumpers left in place, my level ends up around 11 o'clock

with avia you can do this with each channel which is pretty cool

Which avia disc are you using? I need to get me one .
post #15290 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by headedforhighend View Post

The statement, "my beloved... Def Techs" seems to indicate that there is something about the life-like sound stage of the bipolar design you like.
Good deals can be had with a phone call to authorized dealers as Dave41200 has suggested. Great deals can be had also, but they could have more risk... http://cgi.ebay.com/Definitive-Techn...item27adb3a66b

Well you are correct. I think what I really particularly appreciate about the BP-2004's (and their group) is the side-firing sub, built-in, so to speak. I mean, I really like Paradigms and especially the Studio series. The Studio 100 is a beast, but hey, without that nice 10" sub how could it compete bass-wise? It can't. The side-firing subs make this series VERY competitive, IMHO. I am not quite as technically "sold" on the rear-firing bipole aspect. I think, at least in theory, it can introduce what people work to eliminate..."second wave" sound...call it what you like...I just am not sure.
I noted that the newer SST series have the sub but without the bipole design...hmmm.
post #15291 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Felton007 View Post

You will find you get a slightly different effect depending on which orientation you use. In fact in the case of a BP tower you can face them in either directionthis is more a matter of preference as to which sounds best to your earsJ
Best Regards,
*
Adam Abramson
Definitive Technology
Customer Service Tech

Thanks for your help on my amp issue Adam. Spoke w/ you on the phone today.
BTW folks, Adam is a VERY knowledgable, and helpful professional !
post #15292 of 29423
I've upgraded my way to a mismash of Def. Tec. speakers as I worked on building a surround sound system. I started with a 60.1 system and added a Denon 2309 and a 50 inch Panasonic Plasma. Picked up a pair of Pro Monitor 1000's and then a pair of SM350's on Ebay. The found a pair of BP8B's. Still not settled on a center so I've been using one of the 350's as a center. And the whole 6.0 system went to my son so I need a sub(PROsub 60 wasn't going to last anyway). Here's the issue. I enclosed the builder's drawing of the townhome we bought. The TV and BP8's are centered on the living room wall opposite the kitchen. That puts one front speaker close to the corner with the angled wall and the other BP8 on the other side of the TV. To get the surrounds up quickly I ran the wire around wall and placed one PM1000 down on the dining room wall and one on the wall on the kitchen side of the door wall. They're really on the sides instead of in back. I've since learned the place is wired for surround sound with wires pulled to ceiling drops for fronts, a center and backs all from a plate behind where the TV is now. The ceiling is drywall attached to furring strips glued(?) to the cement beams that support the unit over me. Can I use the PM1000's by utilizing a mount which could be screwed into the drywall/furring strip? Could I use BPX's or BP2X 's and if so any mounting suggestions(top to the ceiling, back to the ceiling)? And is dry wall strong enough to hold their increased weight? As for surround sides it seems that the BPx's or BP2X's would works best. But I do have the 1000's and the 350's. Sorry for the long winded post and thanks for any input.
LL
post #15293 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sideofpotatos View Post

I can hardly believe you just posed the above question... I have those exact same speakers (I even just upgraded the rears to BPVX's) and was toying with sending more wpc to increase sound output. I learned from experience that putting the receiver in bi-amp mode for the fronts is a bad choice. My receiver is an Onkyo "605" which is rated at 90 wpc, with all channels driven the sound seems choked. Just flipping bi-amp mode off yielded a remarkable improvement in sound quality and output. With some advice from my friend on www.avtruths.com I decided to try the multiple stereo receiver setup. So I ordered from amazon a Pyle Home PD1000A (2x200w stereo for $155) and an Onkyo TX-8555 (2x100 stereo for $250). So here was the setup... Using my samsung blu ray "3600" set to PCM as the source for all testing and I used the L and R rca preouts (not the front L and R outs the full signal L and R) plugged into the receiver being tested. I then connected my two "7001" towers as these have the capability to produce a full bandwidth reproduction. We ran a Corrine Bailey Ray cd, Norah Jones Live dvd, and the motorcycle scene from wolvorine origins blu ray. Then of course switched receivers and did the same thing. Let me first say that we (my friend was assisting) were completely blown away at what we heard from both stereos!! The amount of sound we heard from just those 2 towers was far more sound than my entire system has ever produced at one time, no exaggeration. Then on top of that the sound quality was thru the roof, I literally did not even know that my speakers could do what we were hearing. I definitely learned the power of using multiple power sources in stereo mode.

Onto what we found. Sound production for movie effects, voice reproduction, and instrumental reproduction was basically identical and top notch for both receivers. I did not expect this. We could not get the speakers to clip on either receiver even when turned up to the point that we had to cover our ears because of the spl's, still clean and sharp. There is no reason I would ever need to go beyond this i.e. 200wpc is obviously excessive when it comes from a clean power source, but now I know from experience. The only negative I had with the Onkyo compared to the Pyle was the price. I did have a couple of negatives with the Pyle, when listening at high levels there is a subtle hiss/static background noise that we noticed. Also, the Pyle has 2 fans and when there is not a lot of noise like in a dialogue instance they can be distracting, I can only imagine much noise fans for 3 of these receivers would make. The final negative for the Pyle was that there were no less than 40 bright blue lights on the front face and a lighted graphic equalizer that bounced up and down according to the sound thru put. I decided that the clean quietness of the Onkyo was worth and extra $95 per unit so I shipped back the Pyle and ordered 2 more onk's.

So now my system consists of one stereo controlling the fronts, one controlling the rears, and one controlling the center (I have 5.1 setup). And all the receivers receive input from the multi channel analog outs on the player. I will never run my speakers with a single multichannel receiver again. Having just put this together I would highly recommend matching output to the rears, well, all speakers for that matter. It's the reason I upgraded the rears from the bp2x because the sounds coming from those locations were not near the same level as what was happening across the front stage and therefore I couldn't really distinguish anything from them.

Sorry if I got a little wordy, in case you can't tell I'm a little excited about the new setup!

really appreciate the response.. I'm using a onk 805 to run all 5 right now and I can tell when I crank it up the AVR is stressed and I kow the towers have a tonne left in them.. but i'm not sure I want to go the 3 receiver route.. however I may have to look closer at a power amp..
post #15294 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

really appreciate the response.. I'm using a onk 805 to run all 5 right now and I can tell when I crank it up the AVR is stressed and I kow the towers have a tonne left in them.. but i'm not sure I want to go the 3 receiver route.. however I may have to look closer at a power amp..

Yeah, I'm actually in the market now for an onk 805, 806, or 807 so I can have central control again via the multichannel outputs. I only went the separate stereo route because of the limitations of the receiver I was using. You should (if you have not already) have a look at the Onkyo M-282. It doesn't have any adjustments, volume control, or even a front display, it's simply a workhorse for whatever your receiver tells it to do including volume. 3 of those bad boys ran by your onk 805 would blow you away and I highly doubt you would ever mess with your power supplies again, unless of course you decide to start hosting concerts

Don't be afraid of the 2x100w power rating on the M-282 amp, I guarantee it will shame your 805.
post #15295 of 29423
Help with positioning of front and center speakers needed.

Please help me figure out what the appropriate height is for my front right and left speakers (SM350s). The center is a CLR2002. The center will sit on a shelf a
few inches above the top of the TV.

I have included a sketch of the dimensions of the room and layout of the wall. The distance from the wall the TV is on straight across the room where the main couch will be is 15' 1".

Please help me figure out the value of X in the diagram below.





Thanks,
Mike
post #15296 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecountofzero View Post

Help with positioning of front and center speakers needed.

Please help me figure out what the appropriate height is for my front right and left speakers (SM350s). The center is a CLR2002. The center will sit on a shelf a
few inches above the top of the TV.

I have included a sketch of the dimensions of the room and layout of the wall. The distance from the wall the TV is on straight across the room where the main couch will be is 15' 1".

Please help me figure out the value of X in the diagram below.


Thanks,
Mike

Hi Mike. I would suggest you put the 350s at ear level (when you're seated watching movies) and position the 2002 as close to that as possible. Of course, a center can hardly ever be at ear level, so the next best thing is to angle it toward ear level from its place above or below the display.

Ergo...... X = ear level
post #15297 of 29423
Thanks progprog...

Should I put the SM350s and CLR2002 on shelves or can anyone recommend some
sort of mounting bracket or whatnot that will allow me to angle the speakers?
post #15298 of 29423
^^^ To echo progprog in a slightly different way, the tweeter should be at ear level. Tower speakers tend to put the tweeter at about 3-1/2 feet, give or take. It's also desirable to center the speaker on the screen to heighten the illusion of the sound coming from it. These two things may or may not coincide exactly, but at your seating distance, you have some latitude anyway. You (or your SO) might be concerned about esthetics as well, so pick a height that doesn't look awkward. It's not brain surgery, so a few inches one way or the other won't damage your setup.
post #15299 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecountofzero View Post

Thanks progprog...

Should I put the SM350s and CLR2002 on shelves or can anyone recommend some
sort of mounting bracket or whatnot that will allow me to angle the speakers?

I'd think the 350s would look better on stands, but maybe that's just an aesthetic choice. Stands do allow much more precise placement. As for the 2002, any way to put it below the TV? When the center sits on a shelf below the TV, it's pretty easy to prop the front up a little bit. But when it's above, angling down can look a little funny and resorting to tilting arms and such adds cost and complexity.

Macfan424: Good point about the tweeters. But in 350s, unlike towers, the tweeter is so close to the midrange driver that it might be a moot point.
post #15300 of 29423
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohjay View Post

really appreciate the response.. I'm using a onk 805 to run all 5 right now and I can tell when I crank it up the AVR is stressed and I kow the towers have a tonne left in them.. but i'm not sure I want to go the 3 receiver route.. however I may have to look closer at a power amp..

Must be some pretty serious db levels, as the 805 is still widely revered for its excellent (especially for an AVR) power reserves. I'm certain it exceeds 100 WPC, even with all channels driven without breaking a sweat...although she does get a little warm (I owned one).

SO, given the DT's "sensitivites" of around 90-92 db's 1watt/1meter, a mere 64 watts inout should yield an output level of 100+db's @ ~ 10 feet. And that's just an approximate with a traditional stereo array, the additional 3 speakers of a 5.1 set-up pushed the levels higher still ATLP.

Either way, that's pretty loud by just about any standard, and certainly shouldn't be an issue for the 805.

How large is your room and what kind of SPL's are you looking for?

James
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Definitive Owners Thread