Lowell,
I did some balancing and adjusting of the crossover point last night, and the PM900s are sounding much better. I had the subs up too high, and also my separate sub (Velodyne CHT-12). Once I did that, the sound was more like the 450s, but still not quite as crystal clear as you put it.
The balance between the PM900s and all the rest is better than with the 450s, and since I adjusted it, the sound is very nice. They do sound more like the CLR3000 center. I think I like the 450s better for music, but the 900s better for HT. Since that system is used 90% for home theater, I believe the 900s are best.
I also determined that the Velodyne CHT-12 is kind of tubby and boomy. Makes me glad I ordered a new SVS PB-12 NSD to replace it.
I did notice one interesting thing about the 900s that was different from the 450s. When I play them in stereo without the rest of the speakers, the center image is so good that I had to walk up to the center speaker to make sure it wasn't playing.
All my speakers are set to small on both systems. On my system with the 2300 and 350s, I have the crossover set at 80. In the HT with the CLR3000 and PM900s, I have the crossover set to 60. I'm sure I'll want to revisit that with the SVS sub when it comes next month.
-- Martin
I did some balancing and adjusting of the crossover point last night, and the PM900s are sounding much better. I had the subs up too high, and also my separate sub (Velodyne CHT-12). Once I did that, the sound was more like the 450s, but still not quite as crystal clear as you put it.
The balance between the PM900s and all the rest is better than with the 450s, and since I adjusted it, the sound is very nice. They do sound more like the CLR3000 center. I think I like the 450s better for music, but the 900s better for HT. Since that system is used 90% for home theater, I believe the 900s are best.
I also determined that the Velodyne CHT-12 is kind of tubby and boomy. Makes me glad I ordered a new SVS PB-12 NSD to replace it.
I did notice one interesting thing about the 900s that was different from the 450s. When I play them in stereo without the rest of the speakers, the center image is so good that I had to walk up to the center speaker to make sure it wasn't playing.
All my speakers are set to small on both systems. On my system with the 2300 and 350s, I have the crossover set at 80. In the HT with the CLR3000 and PM900s, I have the crossover set to 60. I'm sure I'll want to revisit that with the SVS sub when it comes next month.
-- Martin














![Contact [Blu-ray]](http://cdn.avsforum.com/9/93/50x50px-ZC-93e07e41_B001AQT0RC-51tEC3sZBmL.jpeg)









) and a good center. i think i have a bigger problem since this little niche area would pose a huge problem with some reflections and bass traps since the bp's are bipolar...someone correct me if im wrong? due to space restrictions, i think im going to make a bold move and not get a dedicated sub for now, so im hoping the built-in subs in the bp's will hold me off till i the budget will allow it.
.
