AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Boston Acoustics Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Boston Acoustics Owners Thread - Page 85

post #2521 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC225 View Post

Hello, I have a question. I finally came to my senses to get rid of my Bose system(selling it now). I went a bit retro and got a good deal on some BA T-1000 tower speakers. They sound great btw. I have a pioneerVSX-1021-K receiver. Once I sell the Bose, I will need to purchase some center channel speakers along with a sub, and rear speakers. Do I keep the speakers or do I get a whole new system? If I do keep , what should I pair with these classic T-1000?

According to BA's discontinued product info, these rolled off the assembly line between 1986-1988, so it might be safe to say it's doubtful there's a matching center channel speaker for them considering the earliest center was produced in 1991.

I'd consider re-purposing them if possible and go with a newer line from BA if you're going to use them in a 5.1 or greater setup, otherwise it'd be pretty hit or miss trying to match them up with a center that blends well... -TD
post #2522 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYC225 View Post

Hello, I have a question. I finally came to my senses to get rid of my Bose system(selling it now). I went a bit retro and got a good deal on some BA T-1000 tower speakers. They sound great btw. I have a pioneerVSX-1021-K receiver. Once I sell the Bose, I will need to purchase some center channel speakers along with a sub, and rear speakers. Do I keep the speakers or do I get a whole new system? If I do keep , what should I pair with these classic T-1000?

Check the tweeters on those T-1000's. I am pretty sure they are a soft dome tweeter. If it is thn any of the Boston's that have a soft dome or Kortec dome tweeter....such as the older CR series centers or the new A series center would be fine for it. If it's an aluminum dome (would be silver) then anything with an older VR Lynnfield or VRHO tweeter would be fine.....such as the VR10, VR12, VR910, VR920, VRMC or VRC.

I know somebody said you should go with a ll new speakers in a current lineup.....but don't. I'd drive those 1000's to the ground. Early BA Speakers were some GREAT speakers. They may not be the prettiest in the world but THERE ARE centers out there for you. Check Ebay....you can find some I mentioned above for pretty inexpensive. Just make sure the tweeters matched. Forever Boston only made 2 tweeters...the soft dome 'Kortec' or the 'VR Lynnfield'...... they are all over the place...

Good luck....and thanks for the blast from the past!!! I still have my old A-70 and LOVE THEM!!
post #2523 of 2769
Thank you, I will let you know what happens
post #2524 of 2769
Hi, I'm in the process of building a 5.1 and eventually 7.1 system slowly. I've been putting to get pieces that I've come across for what I believed were good deals. Yesterday I found the VS 325C on Vanns for $249 and I picked it up. Do you think it is a good deal? My question is what are some options that I can have for my front left and right speakers. Do I have to match them with other VS speakers for them to sound the best? or Can I use speakers from the other series. Realistically I would also want to keep the option open of getting completely different speakers. Currently I also am pairing the set with a Jamo C80 sub. I am open to both bookshelf speakers as well as floorstandings for the fronts- my living room area is pretty small- about 17' x 12'. I would appreciate all advice. Thanks in advance.
post #2525 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by as3969 View Post

Hi, I'm in the process of building a 5.1 and eventually 7.1 system slowly. I've been putting to get pieces that I've come across for what I believed were good deals. Yesterday I found the VS 325C on Vanns for $249 and I picked it up. Do you think it is a good deal? My question is what are some options that I can have for my front left and right speakers. Do I have to match them with other VS speakers for them to sound the best? or Can I use speakers from the other series. Realistically I would also want to keep the option open of getting completely different speakers. Currently I also am pairing the set with a Jamo C80 sub. I am open to both bookshelf speakers as well as floorstandings for the fronts- my living room area is pretty small- about 17' x 12'. I would appreciate all advice. Thanks in advance.

$249 for the VS325C is definitely a good deal.

You're best off matching it with other VS series speakers... but as a 2nd option if you absolutely can't find something from the VS line, you could consider something from the RS line, since they use similar tweeters...

Check Accessories4Less... They have some refurb VS336 towers and RS 260 bookshelves for decent prices...
http://www.accessories4less.com/make...er-Each/1.html
http://www.accessories4less.com/make...h-Black/1.html
http://www.accessories4less.com/make...h-Black/1.html
post #2526 of 2769
hey, thanks for all the advice, i really appreciate it. unfortunately, all those speakers are still out of my price range. however, i did notice the vs325c is still on sale. Is it possible to use the 325C as the left right and center combo? i would have the center under my tv, and the left and rights horizontally mounted on either side of the tv. (i read earlier in the thread that they wouldnt sound good vertical?)
post #2527 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by as3969 View Post

hey, thanks for all the advice, i really appreciate it. unfortunately, all those speakers are still out of my price range. however, i did notice the vs325c is still on sale. Is it possible to use the 325C as the left right and center combo? i would have the center under my tv, and the left and rights horizontally mounted on either side of the tv. (i read earlier in the thread that they wouldnt sound good vertical?)

I don't see any reason why you couldn't use VS325C's as left and rights, but they aren't supposed to wall mounted and they're pretty wide (28").
post #2528 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by as3969 View Post

Is it possible to use the 325C as the left right and center combo? i would have the center under my tv, and the left and rights horizontally mounted on either side of the tv. (i read earlier in the thread that they wouldnt sound good vertical?)

They were not designed to be used vertical - and Boston does not
promote them as a l/c/r speaker - for one thing, the imaging will
be poor.

This is the l/c/r speaker - VS224
http://www.bostonacoustics.com/VS-22...shed-P519.aspx

http://www.accessories4less.com/make...h-Black/1.html

The VS240
http://www.vanns.com/shop/servlet/it..._c=site_search
post #2529 of 2769
What does that mean? "the imaging would be poor?" sorry I'm sort of a newb
post #2530 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillJulyan View Post


I don't see any reason why you couldn't use VS325C's as left and rights, but they aren't supposed to wall mounted and they're pretty wide (28").

Actually they can be wall mounted. It says so in the manual and comes with a bracket. The manual does not advise on vertical mounting, but the bracket is designed for both vertical and horizontal mounting.
post #2531 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by as3969 View Post

What does that mean? "the imaging would be poor?" sorry I'm sort of a newb

When the speaker radiates sound - a good one should have the ability
to project a soundstage, where there is a sense of the origional location
of the instruments and vocals, with the image/information. The vocals
and instruments are placed in a sense of space, where you can imagine
so to speak, the location of the musical instruments and human voice.

The speaker cabinet design, speaker drivers and driver placement - and
the crossover work, have a lot to do with this.
And then, your speaker placement and seating position, will also play
an important part, so you can listen and enjoy.


VS 325C

A 5 1/4-inch 3-way speaker system engineered specifically for the demands of center-channel sound
http://www.bostonacoustics.ca/-VS-325C-P238.aspx
post #2532 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowellG View Post

Actually they can be wall mounted. It says so in the manual and comes with a bracket. The manual does not advise on vertical mounting, but the bracket is designed for both vertical and horizontal mounting.

Oops. You're right. It's the vs260s that aren't supposed to be wall mounted.
post #2533 of 2769
What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?
post #2534 of 2769
Yamaha RX-A1000 for VR-M60, VR-M50, VRC and PV900 in 5.1 mode.
post #2535 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?

An Onkyo 709 with an Outlaw Audio 7125 amp.
post #2536 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?


Yamaha RX-A800 with CS series L/C/R and front presence (Fluance surrounds for 7 channel). On the fence about the need for external amplification for the system.
post #2537 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?

Onkyo 608 running a pair of CS226 towers, CS225 center, and CS23 rears.
post #2538 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?

Currently using a Yamaha RX-A2000 as a pre/pro and Emotiva UPA-7 external amp driving my VR-3s, VR-12 and two sets of Emotiva ERD-1s. I'm sure the 2000 would do just fine driving everything to more than loud enough volumes, I've grown accustomed to the external amplification and you never know when you may swap out for a standalone pre/pro...

Will be setting up my VS-336s tomorrow along with a VS-325c I previously purchased, interested to see how they sound in comparision... -TD
post #2539 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?

Pioneer Elite SC-37 - Fronts: VS336's, Center: VS325C, Rears: VS260's, SUB: VPS210
post #2540 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfeldman721 View Post

What brand amp or av receiver do you all use to drive your BA speakers?

Onkyo 5008 driving the E70 surrounds, Emotiva XPA-1's driving the E100 L/C/R.


Max
post #2541 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post

Onkyo 5008 driving the E70 surrounds, Emotiva XPA-1's driving the E100 L/C/R.


Max

I use a Parasound Halo A21 to drive my E100 mains and an Anthem MCA 30(200x3) for the Vr12 and Cambridge multi-pole surrounds, How do the big E's sound with 500 watts on them, as I can see a set of JC1 mono blocks on these gorgeous sounding towers But for now the A21 at 250 watts a channel produces visceral impact and finesse
post #2542 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by audiofan1 View Post

I use a Parasound Halo A21 to drive my E100 mains and an Anthem MCA 30(200x3) for the Vr12 and Cambridge multi-pole surrounds, How do the big E's sound with 500 watts on them, as I can see a set of JC1 mono blocks on these gorgeous sounding towers But for now the A21 at 250 watts a channel produces visceral impact and finesse

The E100's sound amazing powered by the 500watt XPA-1's. The noise floor is really low with these amps but when the material calls for it, man can they rock the house!

After running the Audyssey XT32 calibration, the crossovers for the E100's were set to 40Hz. I measured the in-room frequency response of the E100's with the Seaton Submersive HP and wow, incredibly flat response. I then ran 10hz to 20kHz sweeps at 75db, 85db, 95db and 105db from the MLP. Compared all the graphs for signs of power compression and driver distortion and all the graphs traced each other.

Yup, the E100's with 500 watts can hit THX Reference cleanly with a flat frequency response at 10 feet without a problem. Something the majority of speakers out there can't do. They sound SO good with music too.

Before getting the XPA-1's, I first tried powering the E100's with the 5008, then with the 5008 bridged. They still sounded great powered just by the avr, but with 145 watts, I could hear power compression on the calibrated system at about -15db. With the 5008 bridged to the E100's, they would sound good to about -10 to -5db. They weren't distorting or clipping, but I could hear a difference in dynamics and... the ease of audio. I don't know how else to explain it. When you have s sound system that can hit the volumes you want easily without being near its power of mechanical limits, the sound is natural and relaxed.

Most people I know personally wouldn't notice it, but on my own system in my own house, I could hear that they needed more power if I wanted to hit THX Reference, so I got the XPA-1's. I probably could have gotten away with running the E100's bridged (at least for the left and right) if I'd changed the crossover point to 80Hz (takes a lot more power to drive the lower octaves), but I did some a/b testing with 40 and 80Hz testing and discovered that I can hear the effects of stereo bass and can localize bass below 80Hz, so I prefer the 40Hz crossover.

BTW, I ran a sweep of the speakers without any EQ to see how they did in my room and the frequency response was very good. In fact, in my treated room, some people might prefer the unEQ'd response because it follows the 'Harman curve'. The Audyssey frequency response produces a flat FR out to 15kHz then has a slight rolloff to 20kHz. It also has the 'BBC dip', a slight dip at 2kHz that BBC discovered reduces harshness in voices when played back in smaller than studio/theater spaces. The Harman blind testing preferred curve is a flat/even frequency response that produces a gentle slope with the lowest frequencies being louder and the SPL gently decreasing as the frequency increases.

The reason folks might prefer the Harman curve is because anyone used to unEQ'd systems is probably used to a sloping response due to room gain on the low end. This curve is what the unEQ'd E100's produces, and in my room, DOES sound very good. After a/b'ing both many, many times though, I find I prefer the slightly better tightness and imaging with Audyssey XT32.

Music sounds so good on these. There's an SACD called Art Lande:While She Sleeps, Piano Lullabies. This SACD on this setup is the first time I've personally heard what sounds like a real Steinway being played in front of me(from a recording). Before this, it always sounded like a recording of a piano played on a sound system. But this SACD on these speakers... Amazing. Oh, and one of my favorite songs on these is Nella Fantasia by Jackie Evancho. Her voice is incredible. Gives me goose bumps.

Don't know why they ever stopped making the E-series. They're amazing speakers. Even the E70 and E60's sound good. They don't dig as deep or go as loud as the E100's obviously, but their frequency response is just as flat. I recall hearing something about them discontinuing the E-series simply because they cost too much to make and they weren't selling as well as BA had hoped because the retail price was so high. They couldn't really drop the prices and continue selling them because the cost to make them with the extruded aluminum bodies etc. was so high, which is why the VS series is back to using conventional materials and cabinets. Pity.

I actually managed to acquire a second set brand new unopened of 2 E100's and 3 E70's. Planning on putting them in the bedroom for a killer 5.1 setup in the bedroom when I move into a bigger house. Now I have one set in Black Walnut and the brand new set is in the Cherry.


Max
post #2543 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post

The E100's sound amazing powered by the 500watt XPA-1's. The noise floor is really low with these amps but when the material calls for it, man can they rock the house!

After running the Audyssey XT32 calibration, the crossovers for the E100's were set to 40Hz. I measured the in-room frequency response of the E100's with the Seaton Submersive HP and wow, incredibly flat response. I then ran 10hz to 20kHz sweeps at 75db, 85db, 95db and 105db from the MLP. Compared all the graphs for signs of power compression and driver distortion and all the graphs traced each other.

Yup, the E100's with 500 watts can hit THX Reference cleanly with a flat frequency response at 10 feet without a problem. Something the majority of speakers out there can't do. They sound SO good with music too.

Before getting the XPA-1's, I first tried powering the E100's with the 5008, then with the 5008 bridged. They still sounded great powered just by the avr, but with 145 watts, I could hear power compression on the calibrated system at about -15db. With the 5008 bridged to the E100's, they would sound good to about -10 to -5db. They weren't distorting or clipping, but I could hear a difference in dynamics and... the ease of audio. I don't know how else to explain it. When you have s sound system that can hit the volumes you want easily without being near its power of mechanical limits, the sound is natural and relaxed.

Most people I know personally wouldn't notice it, but on my own system in my own house, I could hear that they needed more power if I wanted to hit THX Reference, so I got the XPA-1's. I probably could have gotten away with running the E100's bridged (at least for the left and right) if I'd changed the crossover point to 80Hz (takes a lot more power to drive the lower octaves), but I did some a/b testing with 40 and 80Hz testing and discovered that I can hear the effects of stereo bass and can localize bass below 80Hz, so I prefer the 40Hz crossover.

BTW, I ran a sweep of the speakers without any EQ to see how they did in my room and the frequency response was very good. In fact, in my treated room, some people might prefer the unEQ'd response because it follows the 'Harman curve'. The Audyssey frequency response produces a flat FR out to 15kHz then has a slight rolloff to 20kHz. It also has the 'BBC dip', a slight dip at 2kHz that BBC discovered reduces harshness in voices when played back in smaller than studio/theater spaces. The Harman blind testing preferred curve is a flat/even frequency response that produces a gentle slope with the lowest frequencies being louder and the SPL gently decreasing as the frequency increases.

The reason folks might prefer the Harman curve is because anyone used to unEQ'd systems is probably used to a sloping response due to room gain on the low end. This curve is what the unEQ'd E100's produces, and in my room, DOES sound very good. After a/b'ing both many, many times though, I find I prefer the slightly better tightness and imaging with Audyssey XT32.

Music sounds so good on these. There's an SACD called Art Lande:While She Sleeps, Piano Lullabies. This SACD on this setup is the first time I've personally heard what sounds like a real Steinway being played in front of me(from a recording). Before this, it always sounded like a recording of a piano played on a sound system. But this SACD on these speakers... Amazing. Oh, and one of my favorite songs on these is Nella Fantasia by Jackie Evancho. Her voice is incredible. Gives me goose bumps.

Don't know why they ever stopped making the E-series. They're amazing speakers. Even the E70 and E60's sound good. They don't dig as deep or go as loud as the E100's obviously, but their frequency response is just as flat. I recall hearing something about them discontinuing the E-series simply because they cost too much to make and they weren't selling as well as BA had hoped because the retail price was so high. They couldn't really drop the prices and continue selling them because the cost to make them with the extruded aluminum bodies etc. was so high, which is why the VS series is back to using conventional materials and cabinets. Pity.

I actually managed to acquire a second set brand new unopened of 2 E100's and 3 E70's. Planning on putting them in the bedroom for a killer 5.1 setup in the bedroom when I move into a bigger house. Now I have one set in Black Walnut and the brand new set is in the Cherry.


Max

Ok quit gushing about your E100. You just want me to jump off a bridge for passing up a pair at @ 600. What was I thinking. I spent about 30 minutes just staring at them. Stunning speakers. I had the E70s mounted on the EFL stands but they looked to "top-heavy". How do you plan to mount yours? I have E50s on the stands now as I sold the E70s. I also have E40s on shelves as surrounds and VRMC for center. I am waiting for a nice price on a single E50 for center duty. Love Boston. Too much. I feel like I am prepping for doomsday sometimes. Some people stash food. I stash Bostons.
post #2544 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by morrischestnut60 View Post

I am waiting for a nice price on a single E50 for center duty. Love Boston. Too much. I feel like I am prepping for doomsday sometimes. Some people stash food. I stash Bostons.

If you are interested in refurbish - there is one here.
http://www.accessories4less.com/make...-Cherry/1.html
post #2545 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by djbluemax1 View Post

The E100's sound amazing powered by the 500watt XPA-1's. The noise floor is really low with these amps but when the material calls for it, man can they rock the house!

After running the Audyssey XT32 calibration, the crossovers for the E100's were set to 40Hz. I measured the in-room frequency response of the E100's with the Seaton Submersive HP and wow, incredibly flat response. I then ran 10hz to 20kHz sweeps at 75db, 85db, 95db and 105db from the MLP. Compared all the graphs for signs of power compression and driver distortion and all the graphs traced each other.

Yup, the E100's with 500 watts can hit THX Reference cleanly with a flat frequency response at 10 feet without a problem. Something the majority of speakers out there can't do. They sound SO good with music too.

Before getting the XPA-1's, I first tried powering the E100's with the 5008, then with the 5008 bridged. They still sounded great powered just by the avr, but with 145 watts, I could hear power compression on the calibrated system at about -15db. With the 5008 bridged to the E100's, they would sound good to about -10 to -5db. They weren't distorting or clipping, but I could hear a difference in dynamics and... the ease of audio. I don't know how else to explain it. When you have s sound system that can hit the volumes you want easily without being near its power of mechanical limits, the sound is natural and relaxed.

Most people I know personally wouldn't notice it, but on my own system in my own house, I could hear that they needed more power if I wanted to hit THX Reference, so I got the XPA-1's. I probably could have gotten away with running the E100's bridged (at least for the left and right) if I'd changed the crossover point to 80Hz (takes a lot more power to drive the lower octaves), but I did some a/b testing with 40 and 80Hz testing and discovered that I can hear the effects of stereo bass and can localize bass below 80Hz, so I prefer the 40Hz crossover.

BTW, I ran a sweep of the speakers without any EQ to see how they did in my room and the frequency response was very good. In fact, in my treated room, some people might prefer the unEQ'd response because it follows the 'Harman curve'. The Audyssey frequency response produces a flat FR out to 15kHz then has a slight rolloff to 20kHz. It also has the 'BBC dip', a slight dip at 2kHz that BBC discovered reduces harshness in voices when played back in smaller than studio/theater spaces. The Harman blind testing preferred curve is a flat/even frequency response that produces a gentle slope with the lowest frequencies being louder and the SPL gently decreasing as the frequency increases.

The reason folks might prefer the Harman curve is because anyone used to unEQ'd systems is probably used to a sloping response due to room gain on the low end. This curve is what the unEQ'd E100's produces, and in my room, DOES sound very good. After a/b'ing both many, many times though, I find I prefer the slightly better tightness and imaging with Audyssey XT32.

Music sounds so good on these. There's an SACD called Art Lande:While She Sleeps, Piano Lullabies. This SACD on this setup is the first time I've personally heard what sounds like a real Steinway being played in front of me(from a recording). Before this, it always sounded like a recording of a piano played on a sound system. But this SACD on these speakers... Amazing. Oh, and one of my favorite songs on these is Nella Fantasia by Jackie Evancho. Her voice is incredible. Gives me goose bumps.

Don't know why they ever stopped making the E-series. They're amazing speakers. Even the E70 and E60's sound good. They don't dig as deep or go as loud as the E100's obviously, but their frequency response is just as flat. I recall hearing something about them discontinuing the E-series simply because they cost too much to make and they weren't selling as well as BA had hoped because the retail price was so high. They couldn't really drop the prices and continue selling them because the cost to make them with the extruded aluminum bodies etc. was so high, which is why the VS series is back to using conventional materials and cabinets. Pity.

I actually managed to acquire a second set brand new unopened of 2 E100's and 3 E70's. Planning on putting them in the bedroom for a killer 5.1 setup in the bedroom when I move into a bigger house. Now I have one set in Black Walnut and the brand new set is in the Cherry.


Max

No processing here for now, I'm a bit of a purist at heart you know I run them full range with a well treated room, The A21 is a THX certified amp and delivers gut wrenching sound from the E100's on movie sound tracks and my gosh on full scale playback of classical passages its breath taking. As you say its really a shame they had to stop making them I for one never in my dreams thought that I could afford them when I heard about them in 2006, but when they slashed the prices to under $2000 a pair, My Vr 40's where up for sale the next day I revamped my entire setup for them and in 25yrs have I never heard sound this good
post #2546 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by morrischestnut60 View Post

Ok quit gushing about your E100. You just want me to jump off a bridge for passing up a pair at @ 600. What was I thinking. I spent about 30 minutes just staring at them. Stunning speakers. I had the E70s mounted on the EFL stands but they looked to "top-heavy". How do you plan to mount yours? I have E50s on the stands now as I sold the E70s. I also have E40s on shelves as surrounds and VRMC for center. I am waiting for a nice price on a single E50 for center duty. Love Boston. Too much. I feel like I am prepping for doomsday sometimes. Some people stash food. I stash Bostons.

600 yep! I would've jumped
post #2547 of 2769
Quote:
Originally Posted by morrischestnut60 View Post

Ok quit gushing about your E100. You just want me to jump off a bridge for passing up a pair at @ 600. What was I thinking. I spent about 30 minutes just staring at them. Stunning speakers. I had the E70s mounted on the EFL stands but they looked to "top-heavy". How do you plan to mount yours?

I have the E70's on the stock stands. Yeah, they do look a little top heavy, but that's OK. It's the sound that matters. Have wall mounts for them too, but I think I'll use those for the E60's to ceiling mount them as Height speakers.


Max
post #2548 of 2769
Getting ready to setup my system - Classic series CS 226 fronts and CS225c center. Bought some other brand bi-pole surrounds for the 5.1. I'm using a Yamaha AVR, and my listening position is only about 2 -3 feet from the back wall, so I'm going to use the Boston CS26 bookshelves as front heights ("presence" as Yamaha calls them).

I originally bought some B-Tech BT77 side clamp mounts. These babies are a beast - rated for up to 55lbs - the CS26's are said to weigh about 12lbs. Bought these because I was finding it hard to get any mounts that would articulate up/down and sideways, and hold the weight of the speakers.

However, I believe the WAF will be VERY low on these, so I have now also purchased some Omnimount 20.0 wall mounts. As these would be completely hidden behind the speakers when looking at them, I expect the WAF will be much better with these.

But, I've also read some things about these that they may not hold the weight very well (sagging), even though rated for 20lbs.

So, just curious if anyone has used either of these mounts - especially in connection with the CS26's - and what your experience is?
post #2549 of 2769
I love my Boston VR3s and VR1s in my main system, and seeing this recent chatter made me decide to upgrade my computer speakers to some Boston bookshelves. After all, I do tend to listen to music on the computer first before deciding whether to send it over to the real system.

I found that all the A series bookshelves in white gloss are 50% off at onecall, so I got a pair of the A25s - the 26s would have been too large for this application - extremely near field monitors on a desk with a 42" LCD. Attached is a comparison of an A25 vs what I was using, some old RCAs, and one A25 in place. Maybe if I clean up my computer desk I'll take a full shot.

Also decided to get a Dayton Sub-1200 to replace an old Sony subwoofer on this computer system, and I'll be moving my Yamaha HTR-5890 from the real system to the computer system, replaced with an Onkyo 3800. One upgrade unfortunately leads to another.

These are obviously a nice step up from the old RCAs, should have done this a long time ago.
LL
LL
post #2550 of 2769
^^^^
And Stereophile likes the A25 series. Have Fun.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Boston Acoustics Owners Thread