AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Energy Owners Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Energy Owners Thread - Page 1293

post #38761 of 47687
I'm going to be wiring my Energy speakers inwall next week. Do I need special wire (fire resistant?) for that or can I use this: http://www.amazon.com/Audiovox-AH141...pr_product_top

I needed to pull permits for my family room renovation, so there will be a building and electrical inspector coming. Not sure if they will be looking at that or not.

also - does anyone have any wall-plate products they can recommend for connecting the wires from my AVR to wall, then to the wall-mounted TV?
post #38762 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotsomuni View Post

I'm going to be wiring my Energy speakers inwall next week. Do I need special wire (fire resistant?) for that or can I use this: http://www.amazon.com/Audiovox-AH141...pr_product_top

I needed to pull permits for my family room renovation, so there will be a building and electrical inspector coming. Not sure if they will be looking at that or not.

also - does anyone have any wall-plate products they can recommend for connecting the wires from my AVR to wall, then to the wall-mounted TV?

I am no expert on permits etc., but I would get CL2 rated wire meant for in-wall applications. Here is what I would get....note that it comes in many different lengths.
http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...seq=1&format=2
post #38763 of 47687
@kgallerie Thanks - I think I will go with that from Monoprice. I might get the 12 AWG instead for a few extra bucks.

I'm also looking for a 7.2 wall-plate that also has HDMI connections...any recommendations? I will be adding V-Minis as front height speakers, and the wall-plates I see online don't have front-height ports.
post #38764 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotsomuni View Post

@kgallerie Thanks - I think I will go with that from Monoprice. I might get the 12 AWG instead for a few extra bucks.

I'm also looking for a 7.2 wall-plate that also has HDMI connections...any recommendations? I will be adding V-Minis as front height speakers, and the wall-plates I see online don't have front-height ports.

Sorry, no experience with wall plates for that type of thing.
post #38765 of 47687
Another somewhat off topic question. I borrowed a friend's Rotel RB-1090 to play with my Veritas. I wanted to see how a higher powered amp would sound. I noticed that when I connected the Rotel to my setup, there is a much more pronounced hiss coming from the tweeters with everything connected but only the amp is on (audible from about one foot away). In contrast, with my Parasound 2205a in the same configuration with just the amp on, the tweeters are almost dead quiet. I believe this is what people refer to as noise floor. From my limited understanding, I thought the Rotel had a lower noise floor. Should I tell my friend that he might need to get his amp serviced or is this nothing to be concerned about? Thanks.
post #38766 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

Just got the Dire Straits album Brothers In Arms 20th Anniversary Edition SACD using DSD and it is hard to stop listening to it. I am really glad that I got it. I actually got two copies so I could compare some different SACD players. This album is going to stay in the player for quite a while. I already have it on vinyl, but the multi channel is really enjoyable on a Denon. Highly recommended.

Yep, this is my favorite SACD/DVD-A in my collection.(I have the DVD-A version) I picked up two Denon DVD-1940CI units at a ridiculous close out price about two years ago ($74 ea or something like that) paired with my Denon 789 + Energy 5.1, it is just amazing. The thing for me is that the 5.1 channel sound for a period of time got fairly expensive as I was buying titles of artists I wouldn't normally buy just for the sonic qualities. (Elvis, Carpenters comes to mind) Also I plopped down about $70 for a sealed DVD-A of the Eagles Hotel California, which I have left sealed.
post #38767 of 47687

del


Edited by Pat Sexton - 3/27/13 at 2:20pm
post #38768 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by caper_1 View Post

wish I had a SACD player. I always recommend that album as 'reference' listening material. Hank, can I talk to you about vinyl? I also have that on vinyl, but my stylus keep sliding across records, so I think i need a new one. I want to start playing records now that I have a new audio rack upstairs.

I got my SACD players used for pretty cheap. The Denon 2910 is my best player, but it is by no means anywhere near the best that is available.

I am no expert, but I have messed around with many old players and have got them to work. What player do you have? Are you getting any sound out of your table? I would first try turning the arm weight at the back of the arm in or clockwise. It sounds like there might be to much counterweight and it needs to be adjusted. Next, I would look at any anti skating controls that you might have.
I can't believe that the guy that I loaned my QSC 1700 amp to blew it up. Those amps are indestructible for 99% of the population. I don't know what he is doing to his amps, but he has killed three robust models in a short time, I think it's his speakers. Anyways, that was the amp I wanted to use for a sub.
post #38769 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

Does this mean that you have heard the 22 Reference Connoisseurs? For $350 or under I would imagine they would be very hard to beat for value.

No I have'nt heard the 22 Reference Connoisseur's myself, and, yes, they would be a good value at $350.00USD providing the pair in question are in good condition considering their age at this point in time. However I would'nt recommend blending a pair of 22 Reference Connoisseurs in a system using more recent RC-Series speakers (which is what I gathered from the OP's original posting?). I think he would be better-off using current matching product line- ie. RC-R, V-S, Rc-10, RC-30, RC-50, etc.,...

From what I've read the 22 Reference Connoisseurs were some of the best sounding speakers at the time when they were first released. The Pro-22's, their studio monitor sibling's, were supposedly slightly better. Part of the reason was due to the Energy Dual Hyperdome tweeter, one of the best dome tweeters ever designed. These tweeters yielded freq. response of 1,500 - 45,000 Hz. +/- 3 db and 1,500 - 20,000 Hz +/- 1.5 db @30 degrees off- axis. Unbelieveable transparency. The Dual Hyperdome tweeter's were installed as a matched pair in mirror imaged cabinets. And each pair came with angled stands to time align the drivers. It would definitely be worth having a complete re-built pair (tweeters and woofers) for use in a dedicated stereo system using good electronics.

This technology reflected some of the early developments led by Energy (API) developer John Tchilinguirian. John Tchilinguirian played an important role in many of Energy's designs. He later followed with Take, Veritas, and RC-Series. At the point of release of the RC-Series line John left API when it was sold to Klipsch Group Inc..
LL
post #38770 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat Sexton View Post

Planning on using RC 70's for l/c/r with 2 subs behind an AT screen and wall. The V 6.2 are cheaper on vans and the smaller verticle footprint would be less likely to be blocked by the screen frame.

Content will be 95% movies and hd tv. Is there a significant sound difference between the RC 70 and the V 6.2? What are the strengths of each speaker?

Never heard the Veritas products. However the V6.2 is equivalent to the RC-50 while the V6.3 is equivalent to the RC-70 in their respective lineup. This means that the V6.2 is a 2.5-way design, lacking the dedicated mid-driver of the 3-way V6.3 and RC-70. The V6.3 is indeed more expensive than the RC-70.

People in this thread describe the Veritas sound as brighter than the RC line, for better or worse. The Veritas line also has higher quality finishes, but that may not be an issue if they are to be behind a screen.
post #38771 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

No I have'nt heard the 22 Reference Connoisseur's myself, and, yes, they would be a good value at $350.00USD providing the pair in question are in good condition considering their age at this point in time. However I would'nt recommend blending a pair of 22 Reference Connoisseurs in a system using more recent RC-Series speakers (which is what I gathered from the OP's original posting?). I think he would be better-off using current matching product line- ie. RC-R, V-S, Rc-10, RC-30, RC-50, etc.,...

From what I've read the 22 Reference Connoisseurs were some of the best sounding speakers at the time when they were first released. The Pro-22's, their studio monitor sibling's, were supposedly slightly better. Part of the reason was due to the Energy Dual Hyperdome tweeter, one of the best dome tweeters ever designed. These tweeters yielded freq. response of 1,500 - 45,000 Hz. +/- 3 db and 1,500 - 20,000 Hz +/- 1.5 db @30 degrees off- axis. Unbelieveable transparency. The Dual Hyperdome tweeter's were installed as a matched pair in mirror imaged cabinets. And each pair came with angled stands to time align the drivers. It would definitely be worth having a complete re-built pair (tweeters and woofers) for use in a dedicated stereo system using good electronics.

This technology reflected some of the early developments led by Energy (API) developer John Tchilinguirian. John Tchilinguirian played an important role in many of Energy's designs. He later followed with Take, Veritas, and RC-Series. At the point of release of the RC-Series line John left API when it was sold to Klipsch Group Inc..

I agree that the best match for baron2 is to get more of the current RC speakers to use for surrounds.
I would be willing to bet large amounts that the 22 Reference Connoisseurs would match the current RCs much better than the current Cs do though. They would be a little low, but they are angled up to help with that.

The 22 Reference Connoisseurs are the top of the line by far, for that era. I have the 22 Pros with the original functioning tweeters and they are very good. The 22 Pros weigh about 35 pounds a piece, while the 22 Reference Connoisseurs weigh in at over 80 pounds a piece.
post #38772 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

I agree that the best match for baron2 is to get more of the current RC speakers to use for surrounds.
I would be willing to bet large amounts that the 22 Reference Connoisseurs would match the current RCs much better than the current Cs do though. They would be a little low, but they are angled up to help with that.

The 22 Reference Connoisseurs are the top of the line by far, for that era. I have the 22 Pros with the original functioning tweeters and they are very good. The 22 Pros weigh about 35 pounds a piece, while the 22 Reference Connoisseurs weigh in at over 80 pounds a piece

yeah the 22 Reference Connoisseurs were the Energy flagship models back then. They were released in like 1982. Had a frequency response of 25Hz to 45Khz (incredible for the time). Used a 1 inch tweeter and 7 inch woofer. I believe the famous Dual Hyperdome tweeter's were "soft-dome" style, this design yielded unique properties. The latter product lines (ie. Veritas, RC-Series, etc.,...) involved aluminum dome designs.

Did you get your 22 Pro's brand new? I believe the weight differences between the two models were mostly related to cabinet dimensions. I'm sure they had hefty magnets as well.

Yeah, the original C-Series, or "Connoisseur" series, (I believe released in late 90's/early 2000's) performed extremely well too for aluminum dome tweeters. I originally owned a pair of C-3's which I loved (and became very highly sought after). These models used a type of "poly" woofer material (homopolymer woofer), an updated, but similiar, material used on the 22 Reference Connoisseur woofer material.
http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/energy_c3.htm

Later the release of the Reference Connoisseur, or "RC-Series", saw the use of kevlar woofer cone material combined with aluminum dome tweeters. I felt these speakers invoked the best sound characteristics following the original C-Series.

However the 1rst/2nd generation Veritas product line were extremely well designed flagship models as well.
LL
LL
post #38773 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

yeah the 22 Reference Connoisseurs were the Energy flagship models back then. They were released in like 1982. Had a frequency response of 25Hz to 45Khz (incredible for the time). Used a 1 inch tweeter and 7 inch woofer. I believe the famous Dual Hyperdome tweeter's were "soft-dome" style, this design yielded unique properties. The latter product lines (ie. Veritas, RC-Series, etc.,...) involved aluminum dome designs.

Did you get your 22 Pro's brand new? I believe the weight differences between the two models were mostly related to cabinet dimensions. I'm sure they had hefty magnets as well.

Yeah, the original C-Series, or "Connoisseur" series, (I believe released in late 90's/early 2000's) performed extremely well too for aluminum dome tweeters. I originally owned a pair of C-3's which I loved (and became very highly sought after). These models used a type of "poly" woofer material (homopolymer woofer), an updated, but similiar, material used on the 22 Reference Connoisseur woofer material.
http://www.soundstage.com/revequip/energy_c3.htm

Later the release of the Reference Connoisseur, or "RC-Series", saw the use of kevlar woofer cone material combined with aluminum dome tweeters. I felt these speakers invoked the best sound characteristics following the original C-Series.

However the 1rst/2nd generation Veritas product line were extremely well designed flagship models as well.

Yes, the 22 series used a soft dome tweeter.
I bought my 22 Pro Monitors used last year. The specs are amazing for this era of speakers, especially the Reference Connoisseurs. Energy built a solid reputation by only producing world leading speakers back in the day.

I also really like the original C models. I have the C-8s and they are excellent in my opinion.

The Veritas 1.8s are by far the very best speakers that I have. That series of Veritas really demonstrates the highest standards that Energy had.
post #38774 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by caper_1 View Post

wish I had a SACD player. I always recommend that album as 'reference' listening material. Hank, can I talk to you about vinyl? I also have that on vinyl, but my stylus keep sliding across records, so I think i need a new one. I want to start playing records now that I have a new audio rack upstairs.


You need to rotate the counter weight until the tone arm free floats about 2 inches above the turntable platter (this means that the tone arm/cartridge doesnt fall onto the platter or fly straight up - it should be floating almost level)

At that point rotate the black numeric ring, which is in front of the chrome counter balance ring to zero at the 12 o' clock position. Do this without rotating the chrome counter balance weight (it should still be free floating at this point)

I have no idea what quality your turntable is but it should track at 1.5 -2 grams. Start by rotating the counter balance weight to 2 grams (not the black numeric ring, the whole chrome counter weight). At this point the tone arm should drop back into the tone arm holder.

Set the anti-skate adjustment to the same value = 2

And here is a Youtube video showing the same, except for the anti-skate adjustment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G35Hluc2ZkM
post #38775 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotsomuni View Post

@kgallerie Thanks - I think I will go with that from Monoprice. I might get the 12 AWG instead for a few extra bucks.

I'm also looking for a 7.2 wall-plate that also has HDMI connections...any recommendations? I will be adding V-Minis as front height speakers, and the wall-plates I see online don't have front-height ports.

No need to pay more for 12 AWG unless you are running your wires a really long ways. The 14 AWG is plenty heavy.....

I don't even mess with wall plates with connectors anymore... more connections = more places for signal loss/degradation. Do a search in Monoprice for "wall plates" and you will find plenty of options. Including something like this.....

http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...t=1#largeimage
post #38776 of 47687
Energy and Denon combo continues to amaze me!

I have a modest Denon AVR-789 and RC 10 / S10.3 set up for my 2.1. but the soundstage continues to amaze me. Now listening to my originally bought / rarely played SRV LP "Couldn't Stand the Weather" Absolutely gloreous the way you would swear there was a center channel in the works. Now onto some Clapton!
post #38777 of 47687
Question for you guys. On speakers I was told to make sure if you have 2 of the same speakers to make sure the last digit of each speaker is different like one ends in an even number and the other speaker of the same ends in an odd number.

Also the closer those consequtive numbers are on the pair of speakers the better
post #38778 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

I agree that the best match for baron2 is to get more of the current RC speakers to use for surrounds.
I would be willing to bet large amounts that the 22 Reference Connoisseurs would match the current RCs much better than the current Cs do though. They would be a little low, but they are angled up to help with that.

The 22 Reference Connoisseurs are the top of the line by far, for that era. I have the 22 Pros with the original functioning tweeters and they are very good. The 22 Pros weigh about 35 pounds a piece, while the 22 Reference Connoisseurs weigh in at over 80 pounds a piece.

The guy never returned 2 emails and the ad is still running so who knows but at the moment Im looking at staying in the RC line.
post #38779 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

I got my SACD players used for pretty cheap. The Denon 2910 is my best player, but it is by no means anywhere near the best that is available.

I am no expert, but I have messed around with many old players and have got them to work. What player do you have? Are you getting any sound out of your table? I would first try turning the arm weight at the back of the arm in or clockwise. It sounds like there might be to much counterweight and it needs to be adjusted. Next, I would look at any anti skating controls that you might have.
I can't believe that the guy that I loaned my QSC 1700 amp to blew it up. Those amps are indestructible for 99% of the population. I don't know what he is doing to his amps, but he has killed three robust models in a short time, I think it's his speakers. Anyways, that was the amp I wanted to use for a sub.



Quote:
Originally Posted by DAC21 View Post

You need to rotate the counter weight until the tone arm free floats about 2 inches above the turntable platter (this means that the tone arm/cartridge doesnt fall onto the platter or fly straight up - it should be floating almost level)

At that point rotate the black numeric ring, which is in front of the chrome counter balance ring to zero at the 12 o' clock position. Do this without rotating the chrome counter balance weight (it should still be free floating at this point)

I have no idea what quality your turntable is but it should track at 1.5 -2 grams. Start by rotating the counter balance weight to 2 grams (not the black numeric ring, the whole chrome counter weight). At this point the tone arm should drop back into the tone arm holder.

Set the anti-skate adjustment to the same value = 2

And here is a Youtube video showing the same, except for the anti-skate adjustment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G35Hluc2ZkM

I think the TK-421 phaser is out of voltage tolerance with the canouter valve!!! j/k, thanks for all that info, I will dig it out tomorrow. It is just a cheapy Kenwood turntable. I will try and figure out what all those parts are, because I know absolutely zero about them!
post #38780 of 47687
[THIS] is the one I have. Here is the [MANUAL].
post #38781 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by knight_40k View Post

+1

RC-R's are incredible speakers. I have them set to Di-pole and it really feels like you are part of the action.

I'm really impressed as well, I have a pretty tough large and open to the kitchen/dining room and these work great and fill up the room with diffuse sound. I have mine set to Bipole because I'm forward of the speakers and it's what their chart recommends and they've done an amazing job back there. Pretty much everything I'd want in a surround.
post #38782 of 47687
Any help on this would be great

Quote:
Originally Posted by baron2 View Post

Question for you guys. On speakers I was told to make sure if you have 2 of the same speakers to make sure the last digit of each speaker is different like one ends in an even number and the other speaker of the same ends in an odd number.

Also the closer those consequtive numbers are on the pair of speakers the better
post #38783 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCoastD View Post

yes, you're exactly right! I love these speakers, great design. They perform very well and look great on the wall.

I agree they do look nice up there! They are big as far as footprint but don't stick out into the room much which is great. I'm also a big fan of the mounting hardware in that it keeps the speaker really close to the wall and it's so eazy to take the speaker down to change the wiring or whatever and put it back up. I've been trying to clean up the wiring of my system and this has been invaluable!
post #38784 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron2 View Post

Any help on this would be great

I'm really not sure where this came from so I can't comment on how accurate it is but I wouldn't stress too much about it. The part about making sure you have an odd number and an even number means that there is an assumption of some kind of left and right speaker. Some companies do have speakers that are designed to be used on the left and right but energy are not designed that way as each speaker is designed to meet the same specs. So maybe this is just a bigger deal for tower speakers that have woofers on a specific side or tweeters angled in to the listening position while the rest of the speaker fires straight into the room. Again energy RC's or the new veritas don't do either of these.

As to having speakers with similar serial numbers that sounds like it's to make sure the speakers are from the same manufacturing batch which I could see some value in expecially if one speaker is from say 5 years ago and the other one was made yesterday as the parts may have changed over time. With the fact that these energys have been almost sold out and discontinued I'd say it's safe to assume all of these are coming from the same batch and were probably all manufactured recently with the same parts. So I personally wouldn't worry too much about this one either but this all comes down to personal preferance really.
post #38785 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karn View Post

I'm really not sure where this came from so I can't comment on how accurate it is but I wouldn't stress too much about it. The part about making sure you have an odd number and an even number means that there is an assumption of some kind of left and right speaker. Some companies do have speakers that are designed to be used on the left and right but energy are not designed that way as each speaker is designed to meet the same specs. So maybe this is just a bigger deal for tower speakers that have woofers on a specific side or tweeters angled in to the listening position while the rest of the speaker fires straight into the room. Again energy RC's or the new veritas don't do either of these.

As to having speakers with similar serial numbers that sounds like it's to make sure the speakers are from the same manufacturing batch which I could see some value in expecially if one speaker is from say 5 years ago and the other one was made yesterday as the parts may have changed over time. With the fact that these energys have been almost sold out and discontinued I'd say it's safe to assume all of these are coming from the same batch and were probably all manufactured recently with the same parts. So I personally wouldn't worry too much about this one either but this all comes down to personal preferance really.

Thanks Karn for that info. I had a damaged rc-70 they sent back a replacement. The one I kept was an even number, damaged one was an odd number and they were only 3 numbers apart. The new one they sent me ended in an even number again so I was worried about that. By the way this new one is only 6 numbers apart from the original one I kept.
post #38786 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron2 View Post

Thanks Karn for that info. I had a damaged rc-70 they sent back a replacement. The one I kept was an even number, damaged one was an odd number and they were only 3 numbers apart. The new one they sent me ended in an even number again so I was worried about that. By the way this new one is only 6 numbers apart from the original one I kept.

You're welcome, you should be fine you could be sure that those came from the same batch and neither speaker was designed to be in a pair so even if you did have a matching pair of serials they wouldn't be any more likely to match than any other speaker in that batch. I believe when you get into the higher end stuff they may be designed as pairs but that adds a lot of cost to the whole process so if they were designed that way energy would be sure to let us know about it. Sorry to hear you had a damaged speaker but glad you were able to get it corrected. Enjoy the speakers these 70's are pretty amazing!
post #38787 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karn View Post

I'm really impressed as well, I have a pretty tough large and open to the kitchen/dining room and these work great and fill up the room with diffuse sound. I have mine set to Bipole because I'm forward of the speakers and it's what their chart recommends and they've done an amazing job back there. Pretty much everything I'd want in a surround.

As as I recently posted, thanks to rscecil007's recommendation, I got the VS Surrounds to go with my RC's. They really helped since one side of my living room has a large opening to the dining room and another to the foyer. Seems like the RC-Rs/VS Surrounds might should be a standard recommendation for this type of room situation. It definitely was worth the money over going with a pair of RC-10s.
post #38788 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by cel4145 View Post

As as I recently posted, thanks to rscecil007's recommendation, I got the VS Surrounds to go with my RC's. They really helped since one side of my living room has a large opening to the dining room and another to the foyer. Seems like the RC-Rs/VS Surrounds might should be a standard recommendation for this type of room situation. It definitely was worth the money over going with a pair of RC-10s.

Yep, I'm glad you ended up picking them up because they really are worth it. They can also shine in a small room because the reflected sound can make the space sound bigger so I'd just flat out rather have them for surrounds if I could afford it. It's not really a knock on the RC 10's either as those would be better as mains it's just the R's/VS are great at what they do. I've also seen people interested in the energy line just because this is one of the better bipole/dipole surrounds out there or using them in higher end setups.
post #38789 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron2 View Post

Any help on this would be great

As Karn mentioned, you have no reason to pair your RC-70s with consecutive or odd to even serial numbers in regards to sonic performance.
Energy do have speakers that are designed to specifically be on the right OR left (like the 22 series), but current Energy speakers don't have this concern.

Users can use the newer towers for a centre channel with fantastic results, left and right placement isn't important at all.
post #38790 of 47687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Mardukous View Post

As Karn mentioned, you have no reason to pair your RC-70s with consecutive or odd to even serial numbers in regards to sonic performance.
Energy do have speakers that are designed to specifically be on the right OR left (like the 22 series), but current Energy speakers don't have this concern.

Users can use the newer towers for a centre channel with fantastic results, left and right placement isn't important at all.

Thanks Hank
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Speakers
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Speakers › Energy Owners Thread