Quote:
Originally Posted by stuartbmw3 
I am really enjoying my RC-70s. I have maybe 75 hours on them. I have run them side by side with a pair of Vandersteen 2Ce Signature speakers. It is a 2-channel set up ,with a Sonic Frontiers SFL-1 Signature preamp and a McCormack DNA-1 amp. The McCormack/Vandersteen match is really good, but I am quite surprised with how refined the 70s sound compared to the Vandys. There are some really interesting similarities and differences between the two speakers. Vandys are known to be laid back, relaxed and non-fatiguing, and they are. I really like them. The 70s though, already are very composed and easy to listen to. They seem to have a bit more detail, but it does not come with a harsh edge. The thing that really impressed me was the sense of immediacy that the Energy speakers had.....but again not at the cost of being harsh or edgy. It is way to early to say one is preferable over the other in my set up, but I am extremely impressed with the performance of these RC-70 speakers. A tremendous buy at $598 a pair.,I bought these on a whim, and feel like I really did well.
I am not an AV guy, almost strictly 2-channel audio....but this has me thinking I need to once again build a "modest" home theatre set up. If I did that, I would be limited on space for a center channel (RC-RCL) would not fit.
I have two questions. First would an RC-10 be my best choice to match the voicing of the 70s, and secondly how much of a compromise would it be to run with a phantom center, and run the signal only through the RC-70s?
Thanks in advance for your input.

I am really enjoying my RC-70s. I have maybe 75 hours on them. I have run them side by side with a pair of Vandersteen 2Ce Signature speakers. It is a 2-channel set up ,with a Sonic Frontiers SFL-1 Signature preamp and a McCormack DNA-1 amp. The McCormack/Vandersteen match is really good, but I am quite surprised with how refined the 70s sound compared to the Vandys. There are some really interesting similarities and differences between the two speakers. Vandys are known to be laid back, relaxed and non-fatiguing, and they are. I really like them. The 70s though, already are very composed and easy to listen to. They seem to have a bit more detail, but it does not come with a harsh edge. The thing that really impressed me was the sense of immediacy that the Energy speakers had.....but again not at the cost of being harsh or edgy. It is way to early to say one is preferable over the other in my set up, but I am extremely impressed with the performance of these RC-70 speakers. A tremendous buy at $598 a pair.,I bought these on a whim, and feel like I really did well.
I am not an AV guy, almost strictly 2-channel audio....but this has me thinking I need to once again build a "modest" home theatre set up. If I did that, I would be limited on space for a center channel (RC-RCL) would not fit.
I have two questions. First would an RC-10 be my best choice to match the voicing of the 70s, and secondly how much of a compromise would it be to run with a phantom center, and run the signal only through the RC-70s?
Thanks in advance for your input.
Another alternative if you can find it is the RC mini CC. This is the next step down in size from the RC-LCR, is part of and matches the RC line. I have two set up in my bedroom (rears to an RC-LCR/RC-10's/RC mini CC set) but one did do center duty with the RC-50's in my main area (RC-LCR/RC-50/RC-10/Rc mini) before the RC-LCR replaced it and it held its own very well.
























....trying to decide between Audyssey DSX w/ dolby pl2 music or multi ch stereo. Just wasn't sure if multi ch stereo was effectively running everything as large and bypasing the benefits of xt32.
