Quote:
Originally Posted by larkowski1 
When I auditioned the T45s almost a year ago, they were using an NAD integrated and I was worried about how the PSB gear would sound with my receiver (Sony doesn't seem to get a lot of positive attention for their receivers and amps), but I'm pleasantly surprised. I can't wait for my T45s!

When I auditioned the T45s almost a year ago, they were using an NAD integrated and I was worried about how the PSB gear would sound with my receiver (Sony doesn't seem to get a lot of positive attention for their receivers and amps), but I'm pleasantly surprised. I can't wait for my T45s!
You know, I think people should not be surprised that almost any modern amp will perform excepionally well. Almost all manufactures have nailed that part of the reproduction chain for the mid to upper parts of their product lines. Sure, you can screw things up, over driving a low wattage amp, or getting an amp that won't handle a low impedance speaker and then matching it with exactly that, but for most speakers, most amps are going to do exactly what they should do. (And this is coming from a guy who once helped haul the Brystons in and out of the PSB suite at more than one audio show.)
Don't get me wrong, a good amp is still a good amp, but a bad amp is getting to be a pretty rare beast...



















) mean on the calculator?

, I'm going to get the C40 (since it matches everything else). The T45's play low enough (~35 Hz based on my meter, ears, and AVIA disk) for me for music and low enough for now for movies. In the longer term, I'm probably going to get an SVS sub, but I'll do research again when and if that time comes.