Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris Deering 
As I update the benchmark the differences will show. The HQV in the Denon did a bit better with some of the high detail test patterns that Stacey generated with mixed cadences. At some point I would like to generate a competition of sorts between the ABT-103, National Semiconducter, HQV, Reon, and VXP chips since they are all next generation chips. But I don't know when (or if) this could be arranged based on my travel schedule. I would use newer material such as the HQV and VRS test discs, some home brewed stuff and some of our older benchmark tests.

As I update the benchmark the differences will show. The HQV in the Denon did a bit better with some of the high detail test patterns that Stacey generated with mixed cadences. At some point I would like to generate a competition of sorts between the ABT-103, National Semiconducter, HQV, Reon, and VXP chips since they are all next generation chips. But I don't know when (or if) this could be arranged based on my travel schedule. I would use newer material such as the HQV and VRS test discs, some home brewed stuff and some of our older benchmark tests.
That sounds like a very nice plan to me. Nobody did this before for VP deinterlacing capability. I think it would really help.
Btw, what is ABT-103? Is that the name of the HD version of the ABT102? Or is it a newer revision of the SD version?
Also never heard of Reon yet! And also I didn't know that National Semiconducter had a next gen chip available. Seems I learn something new every day...






















