AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › How do you choose the best hdmi cable for the $?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How do you choose the best hdmi cable for the $? - Page 4  

post #91 of 357
Monoprice. And I have a pretty good hunch that if the "other" category was separated into "Monoprice" and "other", Monoprice would be the most popular vote out of all of them (Monster included). Actually, it would beat out all of them combined
post #92 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjones73 View Post

I answered your question here - http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=674608

Many forum members have been very happy with HDMI cables from monoprice.com, don't waste your money on a Monster cable...


Amen and another vote for "Monoprice".
post #93 of 357
I need a 25-foot HDMI 1.3 cable for connecting an AVR with a front projection TV. The cable would lay on top of and extend along a series of bookcases to the projector, which also sits on one of the bookcases.

The cables Monoprice recommends for this length are described as being for "in-wall" installation. - But my installation wouldn't be "in-wall". - Would I have a problem with them, and what are the characteristics of "in-wall" cables? Apparently they would be rather thick (22-24AG?), and not as flexible as lighter cables. - Are they flexible enough to be curved around the projector and connected to an HDMI input jack located on the rear of the projector (about 6 inches from the rear wall)?

Thanks,
Jim Cate
post #94 of 357
I just bought all my cabling from Monoprice thanks to the helpful posters here. Now, I need to get a TV and receiver. Isn't that the cart before the ox?
post #95 of 357
I would have bought from monoprice, but they were out of stock on everything I wanted. They had white versions of the cables I wanted, but I like black better. I settled for bluejeans. It's made in America, so I don't mind spending a little extra money. I hooked my HDTV DVR from TimeWarner in Winston Salem NC to my Sharp LC-46D64U and only had some of the HD channels. When I was on hold with TimeWarner I lost every channel. I removed the HDMI cable and tried different inputs. The pic came back, but it had red lines through it. I switched to component cables and it works fine. It was the cheap cable from TimeWarner and the two of the pins on the end of both connectors look pushed in. I'm hoping it's the cable.
post #96 of 357
I just bought the new sony 60 inch bravia dlp. Like an idiot i bought the monster cables x2 and set myself back 200 bucks. After reading these forums i have since returned the cables and bought 2 hdmi cables from monoprice for 20 bucks including shipping. Thanks all.

Now my question is this....... My sony tv is 120 hz / fps refresh rate. I noticed the monster cables were rated at 60 hz. Do i need the cables rated for 120 hz to get the most from my tv? Any help would be great!

Mike
post #97 of 357
another vote for monoprice...

When I went to order, they had a special on 6 ft cables for $2.94 ea. I ordered 4 just so I wouldn't spend more on shipping. Very nice cables.
post #98 of 357
I am going to need 3 HDMI cables, one from the Denon receiver to TV (should be the best quality one?) One from the ps3 to the receiver, and one from the Satellite receiver to the denon receiver. Should I spend a bit more and get the bluejeans cable for the receiver to TV one, since itll be longer also? And then get short monoprice ones for the other components? I should get a hdmi1.3 cable right? Thanks.
post #99 of 357
You don't need to spend more. Go to monoprice, get a 24 or 26 AWG cable in the length you need and you will be fine. 1.3 cable? If you want, that is a lot of bandwidth that you probably wont use for a long time.
post #100 of 357
Ok what about item 3871, for the ps3 to receiver and sat box to receiver?

http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...seq=1&format=2

It is 28awg, and ferrite cores? Its 3 feet, thats all I should need. I bought a thicker, longer one for receiver to tv from bluejeans. Should i get this or the in wall installation one? its like 24awg, not sure if that will be to thick/not flexible enough.
post #101 of 357
Like probably most of the 71% who chose "other" so far, I use Monoprice.com cables and have been happy with them.
post #102 of 357
28 AWG should be fine at 3 feet.

Are you installing in wall and if so how long?
post #103 of 357
I'm in the Monoprice / other group also. perhaps the OP should start over with only 2 choices; Monoprice and All Others. Bet Monoprice would come out on top.
post #104 of 357
What is the best AWG for 6 foot length?

24, 26 or 28?
post #105 of 357
24 is best, but 26 or 28 if rated 1.3b class 2 should work the same.
post #106 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringfinger View Post

24 is best, but 26 or 28 if rated 1.3b class 2 should work the same.

K, thanks.
post #107 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by j_nolesfan View Post

I've heard horror stories about long runs of HDMI cable not working at all. Has anyone used the Monoprice HDMI and or component cables in lengths of 25-35 feet? If so, which model did you get from Monoprice? I'm leaning towards the 22 AWG for the HDMI because current loss is the biggest enemy of long cable runs for digital signals to the best of my knowledge.
Jeff

I have a 40ft run to a wall jack and then a 6ft to the TV-all monoprice 22 AWG. Pictue is pristene
post #108 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringfinger View Post

24 is best, but 26 or 28 if rated 1.3b class 2 should work the same.

Here's what I found:
HDMI 1.3a Category 2 Certified CL2 Rated (In-Wall Installation) Cable (24AWG) w/ Net Jacket - 6ft (Gold Plated)
http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...seq=1&format=2

$15 is kinda pricey for 6 feet from monoprice isn't it?
post #109 of 357
3 words: Blue Jeans Cable
post #110 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by giaps View Post

Here's what I found:
HDMI 1.3a Category 2 Certified CL2 Rated (In-Wall Installation) Cable (24AWG) w/ Net Jacket - 6ft (Gold Plated)
http://www.monoprice.com/products/pr...seq=1&format=2

$15 is kinda pricey for 6 feet from monoprice isn't it?

In-wall cable has to be built differently to prevent a fire hazard. I would never buy it.
post #111 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by joed32 View Post

In-wall cable has to be built differently to prevent a fire hazard. I would never buy it.

Does that affect performance? All the 24 AWGs are in-wall cables.
post #112 of 357
Look I have 3 different brand name HDMI cables one from monster, one from audioquest, one from some x brand , and two monoprice cables and they are all the same don't waste money on expensive cables a $5.00 cable will work just as fine as a $100.00 cable.
post #113 of 357
Does in-wall connection affect the performance of the cable? Also, I thought 24AWG was best for a 6 foot connection, but only the in-walls are 24 AWG. Please help because I need to purchase an HDMI today from mono while they are in stock.
post #114 of 357
24AWG is best, only because it contains thicker wire. However, for a 6 foot run, any thickness should be fine. There is nothing wrong with cables rated for in wall. In order to be in wall rated, they need to have a slow burning outer jacket. They are approved by Underwriters Laboratores (UL).

Having an in wall rating doesn't affect the performance of the cable. It just makes them a little more expensive.
post #115 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by strader69 View Post

Now my question is this....... My sony tv is 120 hz / fps refresh rate. I noticed the monster cables were rated at 60 hz. Do i need the cables rated for 120 hz to get the most from my tv? Any help would be great!

The 120 Hz refresh rate is internal to your TV. The signal being passed is still 60Hz. The TV just doubles the refresh rate of the signal. You don't need special cables for a TV that has a 120 hz refresh rate.
post #116 of 357
Ok, explain this one. I too hate the ridiculous prices of monster cables. I resent the fact that the sales people who just made a pretty dime off me buying expensive equipment try to make me feel like I won't get my moneys worth unless I spend a lot more money on the best cables. I have read about analog vs digital and that as long as the signal is there thats all that matters. So I have been happy using cheap cables, even the one that came in the box of my directv hr-20. Until, the other day I picked up a blu-ray open box buy, they wouldn't honor my 12% coupon because the player wasnt at full price...so I used the coupon on a hdmi monster cable after arguing with the rep that their full of crap, she said just bring it back if you dont like it and by the way you get a free movie with it also.. Fair enuff. So I was too tired to re-run all the cables that night so instead of hooking up the blu-ray, I just replaced the hdmi cable on the hr-20 with the monster, both only 4'. Next day my wife asked me what I did to the tv (she understands nothing about what is hooked up to the tv) I asked why, whats wrong? She said "nothing, it just looks better, like the stuff in the stores". I said it already did, she said "no, it never looked this crisp and clear and the colors are brighter". I finally took the time to watch some tv, and I agree with her, I even tried another cheap hdmi just in case it was a bad original one. That is the best test possible, my own eyes. Now I am not saying the price is worth the better picture, because it is still great with any hdmi or component cables. The only true test would be having the exact same setup side by side running the same content. Its like wine, the expensive bottle is not necessarily better then a cheaper bottle but you've gotta try both and if you like the cheaper one or can't tell the difference, or just want the buzz, then definitely save the money. Sorry such a long post, but had to post my honest findings.
post #117 of 357
Ok, I'm back. I may have found my own answer. And if I am right then I should delete my original post, but I'll leave it in case my new theory is wrong.

Could it be that the cheaper cables were older and non v1.3a? And thh new monster ultra 600 is v1.3a which = more bandwidth? If so, then a new monoprice v1.3a would be just as good and I can take this monster back and whip the biach with it.

Thanks for your time folks.
post #118 of 357
There is no change to the hardware between various HDMI spec levels, only higher testing to meet certification. I would highly suggest reading the HDMI Information on Blue Jeans Cable's website. Remember to take what they have with a grain of salt since they are trying to sell something, but the basic information is still quite useful in understanding all the nonsense surrounding HDMI.
post #119 of 357
I just recieved my monoprice cable and couldn't be happier. Excellent build quality and weight.
post #120 of 357
I needed to replace some component cables, checked out Monoprice (cheapest was $10 shipped) The came across HDMIKing.com, $7.99 shipped for a 2 meter 1.3 cable. Already got my confirmation email, will repost once the cable arrives.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HDTV Technical
This thread is locked  
AVS › AVS Forum › HDTV › HDTV Technical › How do you choose the best hdmi cable for the $?