AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide - Page 499

post #14941 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by benleeys View Post

Yea, it's an idea to fiddle with. Set up with SMS-1, run ARC, then fine tune with SMS-1. Or run ARC, then fine tune with SMS-1. Thanks for the suggestion.

Basically though, I am more concerned with the shift of the ARC calculated response peak from 50Hz down to 25Hz whereas peak for the other speakers remains at about 80Hz. Means there's a more pronounced dip between them and I don't think it's a good idea to fiddle with that with the SMS-1.

But we're deviating from my original question, and that is, from comparision of the 2 subwoofer graphs, whether it would be advisable for me to discard the SMS-1 and rely solely on the ARC.
-Ben


Ben,

I looked at your graphs again and it looks like you are better off without the SMS 1. SMS1 decreases your 20 to 30 herts output by 10 dB and ARC can manage only around a cut of 6 dB, the resulting curve(with ARC engaged) is better without it.
post #14942 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by abc999 View Post

Ben,

I looked at your graphs again and it looks like you are better off without the SMS 1. SMS1 decreases your 20 to 30 herts output by 10 dB and ARC can manage only around a cut of 6 dB, the resulting curve(with ARC engaged) is better without it.

Wasn't that an SMS-1 bug that was fixed?
post #14943 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by abc999 View Post

.....SMS1 decreases your 20 to 30 herts output by 10 dB and ARC can manage only around a cut of 6 dB, the resulting curve(with ARC engaged) is better without it.

That's because I reduced the peak at 25Hz by 12dB with the SMS-1 to try and cure the horrible room resonance. Maybe if I were to cut the reduction by, say, just 6dB .... yes, worth a try. Be back after remeasurements.
-Ben
post #14944 of 40876
Looking at your charts without the SMS-1 -- have you got your sub in a corner? It looks like it is suffering from a severe case of "boundary gain".

Repositioning it, even just a few inches, may do more to fix that 25Hz problem than anything else.

Also, you can't just look at ARC's subwoofer charts in a vacuum. You need to see what ARC has to do to the main speakers as well near the cross overs. I found with my Velodyne DD-15 that having its internal EQ working hard up near the cross over was causing issues ABOVE the cross over which you couldn't really see in the Velodyne's own charts but which ARC was picking up and having to fix in that transition region.

Finally, make sure you are using the latest D2 and ARC software (D2 V1.33 and ARC V1.2.2) to insure that you are getting good Uploads of ARC results to the D2. I think the ARC-only results don't look to me like they should sound all that bad.
--Bob
post #14945 of 40876
I did a few searches on this thread and I have an elementary question about ARC that was probably answered already - but I could not find the answer.

Can the ARC EQ be turned on or off for any mode except for analog direct (where I assume it is always off).

In other words, if you have the 6-CH input set to AnalogDSP with processing as "None", then the ARC is still engaged?

Thank you,

Mike
post #14946 of 40876
Mike,
Yes. Don't confuse the "surround sound processing" audio modes with ARC. Think of ARC more like the volume trim and cross over setting controls in the Setup menu -- just a whole lot more sophisticated.

In Setup / Source Setup you will find a Room EQ line for each Source you define. Once you have Uploaded results from the ARC application to the D2 the Room EQ = ON setting enables the ARC room correction processing for that Source (and disables other, simpler audio correction tools you would use in a manual setup such as the "Room Resonance Filter").

This will apply to digital audio input and to ANALOG-DSP audio input regardless of the surround sound processing audio mode you are currently using.

ARC will not apply to ANALOG-DIRECT audio input just as all other forms of audio processing are bypassed for that type of audio. ARC does its processing in the digital audio domain, and ANALOG-DIRECT audio inputs are never digitized. They are just passed through to the pre-amp (main volume control) portion of the D2 for output.
--Bob
post #14947 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

In Setup / Source Setup you will find a Room EQ line for each Source you define. Once you have Uploaded results from the ARC application to the D2 the Room EQ = ON setting enables the ARC room correction processing for that Source (and disables other, simpler audio correction tools you would use in a manual setup such as the "Room Resonance Filter").

BTW, my tests were only "by ear" but it seems that the RRF is active (if turned "ON") even with ARC. Did not have the inclination to measure yet.
post #14948 of 40876
Just saw that one can engage/disengage ARC on the fly via an RS-232 command. I'm going to set up a button on my RTI remote to toggle so I can do some A/B listening tests.
post #14949 of 40876
Should be easy enough to test. I can run the Velodyne DD-15's internal test sweep for a source with Room EQ = ON and see if Room Resonance Filter ON/OFF makes any difference in what the Velodyne's mic chart shows. But I won't be able to try this for a while.

[For folks who don't know, the DD-15 sends out its test sweeps as a normal stereo analog audio signal that gets processed in the D2 (set to Stereo audio mode) and sent back out just like any other, normal, stereo audio content to the DD-15 and to the Main Front speakers according to how the cross overs, etc. are currently set in the D2. The DD-15 includes a calibrated mic to pick up the result and displays a chart via an S-video output of whatever that mic hears. The chart runs from subsonic frequencies up to just above the cross over.]

Similarly, we should be able to confirm that it is REALLY the case that the THX Ultra 2 Subwoofer and Boundary Gain Compensation settings have no effect if Room EQ = ON is set for a given source.

-----------------------------------------

If we discover that any of these *ARE* still active with ARC engaged then that raises a couple issues. First, is it a bug? And second, is it important how these are set when you do the ARC Measurements?

As I said, I can't get to this right now. If anyone else with a setup similar to what the DD-15 offers would like to try this and report back we might get the answers faster. The Boundary Gain Compensation will effect the very lowest frequencies (easily picked up in the Velodyne chart), and a deep enough and narrow enough Room Resonance Filter should also be obvious in the chart if it is, in fact, still active. Just toggle those settings ON/OFF in the D2 (while leaving ARC turned on) and see if any changes appear.
--Bob
post #14950 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by barhoram View Post

Just saw that one can engage/disengage ARC on the fly via an RS-232 command. I'm going to set up a button on my RTI remote to toggle so I can do some A/B listening tests.

I posted a long post on this a week or so back, but the short story here is that doing an A/B test this way does *NOT* compare the best that ARC can do with the best that you could do in a manual setup.

Room EQ = ON/OFF only engages the ARC Room Correction stuff (and supposedly also toggles Room Resonance Filter and the like). It does *NOT* re-adjust levels and cross overs to take best advantage of what you might have done with them and the other simpler tools like Room Resonance Filter.

That is, turning Room EQ = OFF will produce audio that is somewhat biased by the portions of ARC's calculated setup that are still active -- in particular, ARC's choice of speaker levels and cross overs. For example, it looks to me like ARC deliberately overlaps cross overs but then compensates for that in the Room Correction parameters. When you turn off the Room EQ, you lose that compensation -- but the cross over overlaps remain in place! This may give a false impression that ARC is better than it really is compared to what you could achieve in a fully manual setup.
--Bob
post #14951 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

Looking at your charts without the SMS-1 -- have you got your sub in a corner? It looks like it is suffering from a severe case of "boundary gain".

Repositioning it, even just a few inches, may do more to fix that 25Hz problem than anything else.

No Bob, the sub is located more than 4' away from the side walls near my front speakers. That horrid 25Hz is my room resonance, I think because my front speakers have that too (which I tamed by adjusting a 25Hz pot to minimum).

Quote:
Also, you can't just look at ARC's subwoofer charts in a vacuum. You need to see what ARC has to do to the main speakers as well near the cross overs. I found with my Velodyne DD-15 that having its internal EQ working hard up near the cross over was causing issues ABOVE the cross over which you couldn't really see in the Velodyne's own charts but which ARC was picking up and having to fix in that transition region.

Please see the rest of the graphs below. Noticed that the sub's ARC peak has changed from 50Hz down to 25Hz without the SMS-1. There's no change in the low frequency slopes of the rest of the speakers.

Quote:
Finally, make sure you are using the latest D2 and ARC software (D2 V1.33 and ARC V1.2.2) to insure that you are getting good Uploads of ARC results to the D2. I think the ARC-only results don't look to me like they should sound all that bad.
--Bob

Am using D2 v1.31c and ARC-1 v1.2.4. The upload went without a hitch on my newer PC this time.
-Ben
LL
post #14952 of 40876
Hmmm. Living in a kettle drum?

Actually it looks to me like ARC is doing a really great job out to 5KHz given what it is hearing. The worst deviation left in your subwoofer is less than 3dB. Velodyne, for example, tells its subwoofer customers not to sweat deviations under 3dB. Even the Left Surround is only hot by 5dB at 25HZ (which is probably seeing very little content due to the cross overs).

You might want to double check that your Center speaker doesn't have Richard Syndrome -- loss of a woofer?

My guess is that since your room modes are so severe, you may be hearing more than usual room response variations at different listening positions even after ARC is turned on. Applying some bass room treatment materials may be your only good recourse. But there are others posting here who have far more expertise in taming tricky rooms than I have.
--Bob
post #14953 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by benleeys View Post

No Bob, the sub is located more than 4' away from the side walls near my front speakers. That horrid 25Hz is my room resonance, I think because my front speakers have that too (which I tamed by adjusting a 25Hz pot to minimum).



Please see the rest of the graphs below. Noticed that the sub's ARC peak has changed from 50Hz down to 25Hz without the SMS-1. There's no change in the low frequency slopes of the rest of the speakers.



Am using D2 v1.31c and ARC-1 v1.2.4. The upload went without a hitch on my newer PC this time.
-Ben

Ben,

Are you're front speakers toed-in? It seems tha t you are loosing too much high freq. beyond 5k. If you have not done so, why not toe-in the fronts directly to your main seat and run ARC again. Just a thought.
post #14954 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

The Flash Eraser is on the password protected download site. So they just have to point you at that.

But as usual, I recommend people do NOT use Flash Eraser until instructed to do so by Anthem tech support because it may wipe out important clues they can use to figure out what happened -- i.e., to keep it from happening again.
--Bob

Just to update Bob and others, I ran the Flash Eraser and re-installed v. 1.33 and my ARC files and the D2 is up and running strong again! I also downloaded a new software update for my PS3 (v. 2.41) before watching Blu-ray again, as the notoriously buggy v. 2.36 PS3 software release seemed to coincide with my Anthem software crash/freeze up. Thanks for the help Bob, and the rest!

Mike
post #14955 of 40876
The other night I turned on the TV and got picture but no sound, on the HD channels. Sound was there on the standard channels. MY system is a bell express view with hdmi to my anthem. I switched to optical cable and got
sound. Any ideas? The system worked before . I also tried a new hdmi cable.
post #14956 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

Hmmm. Living in a kettle drum?

You should have heard the sound before SMS-1 and ARC!. It's actually quite superb now, better than most systems that I've heard without these 2. Currently I'm just nitpicking.

Quote:


You might want to double check that your Center speaker doesn't have Richard Syndrome -- loss of a woofer?

No, it's actually working fine. Matter of tilting it to the correct angle (unlike cones, electrostatics tend to beam). I've been experimenting with various angle.

Quote:


My guess is that since your room modes are so severe, you may be hearing more than usual room response variations at different listening positions even after ARC-1 is turned on. Applying some bass room treatment materials may be your only good recourse. But there are others posting here who have far more expertise in taming tricky rooms than I have.
--Bob

My room is now actually quite extensively treated with bass traps and diffusers ($7k worth). Problem is the 25Hz region is most difficult to suppress, especially in a sizable room like mine which has ceiling height shelves for discs and storage built on both sides. Most traps are not very effective there. That's why SMS-1 and ARC-1 are godsend.
-Ben
post #14957 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by barry burman View Post

The other night I turned on the TV and got picture but no sound, on the HD channels. Sound was there on the standard channels. MY system is a bell express view with hdmi to my anthem. I switched to optical cable and got
sound. Any ideas? The system worked before . I also tried a new hdmi cable.

Barry,

It could be your TV tuner. I had a similar problem, but somewhat in reverse. My TWC SA 8300 DVR is connected to my D1-HD with only the HDMI. My DVR is set to "passthrough" the signal - basically if the source is 480i, it outputs 480i, and so on. When the DVR was outputting 480i or 480p I received no sound. But if it was outputting 720p or 1080i I had sound. If I switched the procesding to output a minimum 720p regardless of the input signal to the DVR, then I received sound.

I checked to make sure that the D1-HD did not have a problem with sound on 480i or 480p signals by setting my PS3 to output 480i (or 480p) via HDMI and the D1-HD had no problems.

I contacted TWC and talked to them about the problem, and they had me reboot and that was no help and then they ran through the settings with me and that was no help, so they recommended I trade my DVR in for a new model.

The long story short - it may be your source equipment not properly coding the sound - or it could be that we both have something set wrong on or D2's!

Mike
post #14958 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by abc999 View Post

Ben,

Are you're front speakers toed-in? It seems tha t you are loosing too much high freq. beyond 5k. If you have not done so, why not toe-in the fronts directly to your main seat and run ARC again. Just a thought.

The gradual loss of hi-freq above 5kHz that you are seeing is most probably the result of the beaming nature of electrostatics, unlike cones. That's why the sweet spot us usually relatively smaller. Within it, the sound is detailed and natural, something that is quite different from box speakers. Placing the measuring mic too far outside the sweet spot means it will fail to capture a substantial amount of the hi-freq. Since the ARC-1 graph is a composite of measurements from 5 different spots, each at least 20" away from its preceding spot, you end up with what you are seeing. I did try to confine my measurements from within spot, and it was very smooth to 20kHz, (but Anthem does not recommend that).

I could increase the toe-in of the speakers to show a better hi-freq response, but I will sacrifice on sound stage at the sweet spot, which at the moment with minimal toe-in is fantastic. By the way, the surrounds are non-electrostatics, hence the highs look quite reasonable.
-Ben
post #14959 of 40876
There's a nice ARC review on ultra audio (part of soundstage), fyi.
post #14960 of 40876
Mike,

I have an AVM 50, and I get the same 'no sound from 480i or 480p' situation from my SA8300HD DVR. I really like using the passthrough, because the Anthem does a better job in upconversion than the cable box does. I get around the sound problem by using a coax cable: not too elegant, but it works.

Ron
post #14961 of 40876
CONFIRMED: As Documented, ARC Disables/Ignores Older Setup Menu EQ Options

I did the tests with my Velodyne DD-15 as described yesterday, and I was able to confirm that ARC does, indeed, disable/ignore the Room Resonance Filter, THX Ultra 2 subwoofer, and subwoofer Boundary Gain Compensation settings in the Setup / Speaker Configuration menu for sources where Room EQ = ON is set after Uploading ARC results.

(Center EQ is supposedly also disabled/ignored, but the Velodyne's test sweep tones don't go high enough for me to confirm that.)

There is no change at all in the Velodyne's charted test curves regardless of how you set those older EQ tools. With Room EQ = OFF (i.e, with ARC's room correction processing disabled), those older EQ tools are functional again.

All of this is in accordance with the ARC documentation: See Section 3.15 of the updated V1.3x Operating Manual.

NOTE: I did *NOT* do re-Measurements as part of this, so I can not confirm that any settings that might be in place for these older EQ tools are ignored by ARC during its Measurement phase. However, the documentation states that you can ignore those Setup menu settings if using ARC, and I'm pretty sure that means not only during normal listening after the fact but also during ARC Measurements, i.e., when setting up ARC to begin with.

I do know from my current ARC Measurement charts that my subwoofer is showing the sharp rise as the Measured curve drops down towards 20Hz that is characteristic of Boundary Gain -- even though I have THX Ultra 2 subwoofer and Boundary Gain Compensation turned on in the Setup menu. Based on prior experiments I've done using the Velodyne test system, I know how much Boundary Gain Compensation would reduce that if the filter was mistakenly being applied during ARC Measurements.

So even though I didn't actually do ARC Measurements both ways to nail this down, I think this is pretty good evidence that ARC is, indeed, *NOT* applying Boundary Gain Compensation during its Measurements -- as of course it should not since ARC's solution to that issue is much more general and sophisticated than the simple, "one size fits all" filter applied by the Boundary Gain Compensation setting. I.e., you want ARC to see the real problem down there, so that ARC can handle all the necessary correction, rather than what's left after Boundary Gain Compensation is applied.

-----------------------------------

I know there were some who were hoping the Room Resonance Filter could be applied on top of the ARC stuff -- possibly during ARC Measurements, or possibly after the fact. I'm not really sure that's a good idea since I don't know how a simple parametric filter (as used in the Room Resonance Filter) would interact with what ARC is actually doing. But in any event, the current documentation is correct: The Room Resonance Filter is NOT applied for sources where Room EQ=ON is set to enable ARC's more general room correction processing.
--Bob
post #14962 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bogg View Post

There's a nice ARC review on ultra audio (part of soundstage), fyi.

thanks, Bogg,
here's the link:


http://www.ultraaudio.com/twbas/twbas_20080715.htm
post #14963 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

CONFIRMED: As Documented, ARC Disables/Ignores Older Setup Menu EQ Options

I did the tests with my Velodyne DD-15 as described yesterday, and I was able to confirm that ARC does, indeed, disable/ignore the Room Resonance Filter, THX Ultra 2 subwoofer, and subwoofer Boundary Gain Compensation settings in the Setup / Speaker Configuration menu for sources where Room EQ = ON is set after Uploading ARC results.

(Center EQ is supposedly also disabled/ignored, but the Velodyne's test sweep tones don't go high enough for me to confirm that.)

There is no change at all in the Velodyne's charted test curves regardless of how you set those older EQ tools. With Room EQ = OFF (i.e, with ARC's room correction processing disabled), those older EQ tools are functional again.

All of this is in accordance with the ARC documentation: See Section 3.15 of the updated V1.3x Operating Manual.

NOTE: I did *NOT* do re-Measurements as part of this, so I can not confirm that any settings that might be in place for these older EQ tools are ignored by ARC during its Measurement phase. However, the documentation states that you can ignore those Setup menu settings if using ARC, and I'm pretty sure that means not only during normal listening after the fact but also during ARC Measurements, i.e., when setting up ARC to begin with.

I do know from my current ARC Measurement charts that my subwoofer is showing the sharp rise as the Measured curve drops down towards 20Hz that is characteristic of Boundary Gain -- even though I have THX Ultra 2 subwoofer and Boundary Gain Compensation turned on in the Setup menu. Based on prior experiments I've done using the Velodyne test system, I know how much Boundary Gain Compensation would reduce that if the filter was mistakenly being applied during ARC Measurements.

So even though I didn't actually do ARC Measurements both ways to nail this down, I think this is pretty good evidence that ARC is, indeed, *NOT* applying Boundary Gain Compensation during its Measurements -- as of course it should not since ARC's solution to that issue is much more general and sophisticated than the simple, "one size fits all" filter applied by the Boundary Gain Compensation setting. I.e., you want ARC to see the real problem down there, so that ARC can handle all the necessary correction, rather than what's left after Boundary Gain Compensation is applied.

-----------------------------------

I know there were some who were hoping the Room Resonance Filter could be applied on top of the ARC stuff -- possibly during ARC Measurements, or possibly after the fact. I'm not really sure that's a good idea since I don't know how a simple parametric filter (as used in the Room Resonance Filter) would interact with what ARC is actually doing. But in any event, the current documentation is correct: The Room Resonance Filter is NOT applied for sources where Room EQ=ON is set to enable ARC's more general room correction processing.
--Bob


This is a good thing, having to deal with two set of settings would be confusing. This makes our life easier. Turn on the EQ and forget about other setting.

Meanwhile, we need to be careful with this when we do with and without EQ comparisons. To do a proper comparison, we should ensure that for the EQ off listening, all settings are to their optimum. If not the comparison become unfair biases toward the EQ On results.
post #14964 of 40876
The install notes for ARC V1.2.4 (on the password protected download site) have just been modified. The "changes" from V1.2 now read as follows:

Quote:
Changes:

v1.2.4:

1. Added ARC to AVM 30-HD, AVM 40 and AVM 50. These models require new DSP hardware to run ARC. If so equipped, "AVM 40/ARC" or "AVM 50/ARC" is displayed at power-on. Software v1.33 or later required.

2. Fixed problem occurring if subwoofer level would be out of range, preventing upload.

This is the first confirmation I've seen that the AVM-30-HD will be upgradeable to add ARC (as makes sense since it is, after all, the equivalent of an AVM-50). But note that there is *STILL* no indication that the unmodified AVM-30 will be upgradeable to add ARC -- short of also doing the more expensive AVM-30 to AVM-30-HD upgrade as well.

Note also that the power on sequence will identify an AVM unit that has had the DSP hardware upgrade added. Presumably this is true even before you do your first Upload of ARC results to it.
--Bob
post #14965 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Pariseau View Post

The install notes for ARC V1.2.4 (on the password protected download site) have just been modified. The "changes" from V1.2 now read as follows:



This is the first confirmation I've seen that the AVM-30-HD will be upgradeable to add ARC (as makes sense since it is, after all, the equivalent of an AVM-50). But note that there is *STILL* no indication that the unmodified AVM-30 will be upgradeable to add ARC -- short of also doing the more expensive AVM-30 to AVM-30-HD upgrade as well.

Note also that the power on sequence will identify an AVM unit that has had the DSP hardware upgrade added. Presumably this is true even before you do your first Upload of ARC results to it.
--Bob

It just make sense that this be also available for AVM-30-HD Owner. I also guess that further conversion of the AVM-30 to AVM-30-HD should include the new DSP boards.
post #14966 of 40876
Bob,

where on the protected site is the 1.2.4 file. downloaded link1 and nothing in there.
John
post #14967 of 40876
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayray View Post

Bob,

where on the protected site is the 1.2.4 file. downloaded link1 and nothing in there.
John


Try Link 7 (Test)
post #14968 of 40876
It's in the "Test" folder -- Link 7. Normally I would suggest people steer clear of stuff in the Test folder since that's where Nick puts special versions specific to problems he is diagnosing for particular owners. But we've had posts here that a few current ARC users were told to use ARC V1.2.4 to fix their problem getting subwoofer levels to Upload properly, so it appears to be in good shape and will probably become the official release shortly after Anthem finally goes public with the AVM ARC Upgrade program.

However, if you are a D1 or D2 ARC user who is NOT having problems getting his ARC application to complete the Upload of ARC results, then there is no reason to go to ARC V1.2.4 at the moment. It doesn't fix anything else as far as I know.
--Bob
post #14969 of 40876
ASW and Bob,
thanks. I have the AVM50 so it is likely I will need this version when the time comes.

John
post #14970 of 40876
Remember that if you install it now, you will need to manually copy the two licensing/calibration files from your ARC Upgrade kit CD to the Programs folder where it gets installed before it will actually work. Alternatively, your Upgrade kit CD will likely contain ARC V1.2.4 and you can just install that one -- it will delete the prior install and transfer the two required files as part of the new install.

==============================

ETA: For folks using the default, AVS posts/page setting, this thread just hit 500 pages. Whew!
--Bob
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Receivers, Amps, and Processors
AVS › AVS Forum › Audio › Receivers, Amps, and Processors › Anthem D2/D2v/AVM50/AVM50v/ARC1 tweaking guide